June 30th, 2014
11:46 PM ET

Supreme Court birth control ruling sparks debate

The Supreme Court struck down the requirement that family-owned companies pay for specific types of contraceptives for their employees. It was a 5-4 decision that divided the court along ideological lines. Senior Legal Analyst Jeffrey Toobin and Chief Political Analyst Gloria Borger joins CNN's John Berman to discuss what the decision means for Obamacare and the administration.

Filed under: Obamacare • Supreme Court • True Politics
soundoff (2 Responses)
  1. warthog6

    Let religion ban birth control!

    After all, just look what it did for Mexico!

    The consequences of your stupidity are crossing our borders without their parents in the 10s of thousands. Guess who's going to pay for it?

    That's right!


    July 3, 2014 at 12:51 pm |
  2. poppajohn818

    As a husband of 57 yrs, a father of 5 girls & a Grandfather of 7 girls I am disgusted by the vile attacks on the Supreme Ct decision in the HL case and calling it the GOP's War on Women. First of all it was not contraception it was Abortion/pill the killing of babies. Medical insurance is for medical reasons. 93% of Abortions are for convenience and medical reasons are a small %. Medical reasons are carried by most Insurance Co. anyway. They did not say you can not abort your child they said the business did not have to pay for coverage of it. If anyone is waging a war on women it is BO & the Socialist Democrat not the Supreme Ct or GOP. The leftist media would not ever admit it but the truth shall prevail. The right of the baby to live supersedes the
    Mother's right to take a life.

    July 1, 2014 at 8:46 am |

Post a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.