September 6th, 2012
09:55 PM ET

Carville: Obama's speech not best at DNC

James Carville, David Gergen, Ari Fleischer, Gloria Borger, and John King assess President Obama's presentation at the DNC. Carville says it was a very good speech and he was struck by the "muscular tone and attitude."

September 6th, 2012
06:24 PM ET

Letters to the President #1326: 'The big speech'

Reporter's Note: Tonight is the president’s big speech in Charlotte, where I will be watching with a focus group…I mean, in addition to writing my daily letter to the White House.

Dear Mr. President,

So tonight your big speech comes up. I’m sure you’re every bit as excited as everyone else in this town, and let me tell you, they’re plenty jazzed. My producer, Eric, and I went for a bit of a walk after lunch (two tables away from Nancy Pelosi…go figure) and the streets are just filled with folks who absolutely adore you.

Well, that is not entirely accurate. We also encountered a fair number who don’t like you. I mean, really don’t like you. Some had bull horns with which to bellow at the crowd, others had signs or flags or costumes, and all had an attitude. Granted, they had to. You don’t wade into a fervently partisan crowd and start badmouthing the big man unless you have a pretty thick hide. I suppose that is no matter to you. You won’t have to see them or talk to them, and you couldn’t win them over even if you did. They, like your true fans, have made up their minds and won’t be shifted by either dynamic speeches or dynamite.

The question is, who can you shift? When you think about it, the entire purpose of your speech tonight can be summed up in a few words: You have to convince some people to support you, who right now don’t plan to. It’s that simple. Your words must compel someone who likes you but not enough to go vote, to get up off the sofa, ride to the polling place in November, and throw a lever next to your name. Or you must convince someone who thinks voting itself is a waste of time, to not think that anymore. Or you must convince someone who mistrusts you, and has no faith in your policies, to reconsider.

It is tempting before any big speech (as I know from my own experience) to obsess about the great lines; the clever or soaring moments that will bring the crowd to its feet. But I also know that, to borrow an old phrase, you have to keep your eyes on the prize.

In terms of pure politics, anything you say tonight that does not move levers in the voting booths this fall, is wasted. I hate to say that, because I wish political leaders could or would focus on just doing their jobs and let re-elections take care of themselves. But since that will never happen, I repeat: You must weigh every word in terms of the people who, at this moment, have no actual plan of voting for you. If you reach them, the speech will be a success. If you don’t, it doesn’t matter a nickel’s worth what the pundits have to say after the confetti flies.

Good luck. Call if you can.


September 6th, 2012
10:10 AM ET

Analysis: Clinton speech hit Obama's marks

Wednesday's convention programming followed Tuesday's standard script: red meat for the base in the early hours, capped off with a slightly sweeter offering in prime time for independent consumption.

But there was nothing routine about Bill Clinton's speech. The 48-minute address - nearly 3,200 words of prepared text and a thousand more of classic Clinton riffs - checked off nearly every item on the Obama campaign's wish list:

• Appeal to the persuadable who cite bipartisanship as a key quality: Clinton praised Eisenhower. He quoted Reagan. He even got an arena-full of loyal Democrats to cheer George W. Bush.

"Through my foundation, in America and around the world, I work with Democrats, Republicans and independents who are focused on solving problems and seizing opportunities, not fighting each other," Clinton said. "When times are tough, constant conflict may be good politics but in the real world, cooperation works better."


Follow Rebecca Sinderbrand on Twitter.

September 6th, 2012
01:10 AM ET

Pelosi: DNC platform debate "so mild"

Rep. Nancy Pelosi discusses the contentious voice vote to amend the Democratic platform and include language relating to God and Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. "It's been corrected, we move on from there. Platforms are usually even much more controversial than that," Pelosi tells Anderson Cooper.

Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, the DNC Chairman, called for a vote three times before announcing the platform had been amended by a two-thirds majority.


September 6th, 2012
01:04 AM ET

Paul Begala: Bill Clinton substantive and riveting

Anderson Cooper asks Paul Begala, David Gergen, Alex Castellanos and Gloria Borger for their reaction to Bill Clinton's speech at the DNC.