[cnn-photo-caption image=http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2010/POLITICS/06/18/prop.8.implications/t1larg.prop8.jpg caption="Protesters make their case at an anti-Proposition 8 rally in east Los Angeles, California, on May 26, 2009." width=300 height=169]
Washington - While closing arguments have ended in California's Proposition 8 trial - a case that will determine the constitutionality of California's same-sex marriage ban - the outcome may not have an impact on states considering similar legislation.
The reason: State budget crises and the upcoming elections have shifted the focus from social issues to fiscal stability, which will sidetrack same-sex marriage legislation in other states, a policy expert said.
"I have also seen this issue pushed aside since the recession started. States are just so focused on budgets and the shortfalls," said Christine Nelson, a program director at the National Council of State Legislatures. "I had a legislator tell me 'Are you kidding? Our state needs money and job creation. So why in the world would we be tackling that?' "
Nelson, who follows the issue of same-sex marriage, said there's been very little legislative activity this year, which she attributes to a year where most legislators are up for re-election.
Questions or comments? Send an email
Want to know more? Go behind the scenes with