May 27th, 2010
11:20 AM ET

Nicholson: 'Don't ask don't tell' deal is good for the country

Alexander Nicholson
Special to CNN

Editor's note: Alexander Nicholson, a former U.S. Army human intelligence collector, is the founder and executive director of Servicemembers United, a national organization of gay and lesbian troops and veterans and their allies.

Washington (CNN) - The word compromise is never music to the ears of passionate advocates for a cause. This is especially true for advocates of overturning the military's "don't ask, don't tell" law, a law that was supposed to be a suitable compromise itself in 1993.

But when idealism collides with political reality, risk avoidance and workable solutions become the goal. The deal that was reached on DADT this week between the White House, the Pentagon, gay rights groups (including my own), and pro-repeal champions on Capitol Hill is that workable solution and will get us where we need to go.

More than 14,000 proudly serving men and women have been abruptly fired from the military pursuant to the DADT law, and many more have voluntarily left the military because of the burden of serving under this unnecessary restriction. The DADT law prevents our armed forces from being able to recruit and retain troops from the largest possible pool of talent, and it is a stain on the integrity of our nation. We cannot afford to wait until next year to lock in full legislative repeal. Our country needs this now.

The risks of waiting until after the midterm elections to address DADT legislatively were simply too great. It is possible that the pro-repeal majority could lose seats in November, and could even lose control of one chamber of Congress. If it passes, this deal will get the looming legislative battle over with.

Read More

Filed under: 360° Radar • Gay & Lesbian Issues
May 27th, 2010
10:43 AM ET

Part 1: ATF under fire

Full Story

Follow Abbie Boudreau on Twitter: @Abbiecnn

Filed under: 360° Radar
May 27th, 2010
10:26 AM ET

Obama clamps down on offshore drilling

Washington (CNN) - President Obama is applying the brakes, at least temporarily, to expansion of offshore oil drilling.

Obama is delaying oil exploration off the coast of Alaska, canceling the sale of a lease to drill off Virginia and extending the moratorium on permits to drill any new deepwater wells for six months, a White House official said Thursday.

Obama's announcements Thursday come in response to a deadly explosion on a Gulf of Mexico oil rig - an accident that has triggered a devastating oil spill.

Obama has launched a presidential commission's safety review of offshore drilling in response to the incident.

The official said the moratorium will continue as the commission works to "determine how to prevent this from ever happening again.

Read More

May 27th, 2010
10:23 AM ET

Gingrich drops presidential hints

[cnn-photo-caption image=http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2010/images/05/27/art.gingrich.getty.jpg]

Alexander Mooney
CNN Ticker Producer

(CNN) – Swinging through Iowa Wednesday to promote his new book, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich suggested he and his wife may be spending a lot of time in the key campaign state next year.

Though declining to discuss the specifics of his political future, Gingrich said his wife – who attended college in Iowa – may be preparing to make an extended return to the Hawkeye State.

"She likes being in Iowa and its very possible she'll be spending a lot of time in Iowa," he joked with reporters in Des Moines, according to CNN affiliate KCCI.

Gingrich has repeatedly left to the door open to a presidential run, saying last January that he considers his name to be on "a list of seven or eight possible candidates at this stage."

The former House Speaker has also remained significantly involved in the Republican Party, having been a constant fixture on the campaign trail for a string of GOP candidates this cycle. He's also appeared at several high profile party conferences and become a forceful critic of President Obama.

Read More

Filed under: 360° Radar • Raw Politics
May 27th, 2010
09:52 AM ET
May 27th, 2010
09:30 AM ET

Coast Guard admiral: 'Top kill' working as planned

[cnn-photo-caption image=http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2010/images/05/27/art.oilrig.getty.jpg caption="A drilling platform is seen near the site where the Deepwater Horizon oil platform sank in the Gulf of Mexico"]

Update: "The 'top kill' procedure is going as planned, and it is moving along as everyone had hoped," said Coast Guard Adm. Thad Allen, who has been leading the government's effort to end the leak.

Earlier, BP officials said they may know by Thursday afternoon whether the oil company's latest attempt to cap the runaway leak in the Gulf of Mexico is yielding results.

"I think we just need to take the next 24 hours and actually see what the results are," said BP Chief Operating Officer Doug Suttles from Robert, Louisiana.

The operation, known as a "top kill," that began Wednesday afternoon was going according to plan, he said, with drilling mud being applied to the well at a rate of up to 65 barrels per minute.

Coast Guard Rear Admiral Mary Landry, the federal on-scene coordinator, was equally reluctant to draw conclusions.

"While we're very encouraged by some aspects of this procedure, I don't want to express optimism until I know for sure that we've secured the well and the leak has stopped," she told reporters.

President Obama is certain to be peppered with more questions Thursday about the administration's response to the spill. He plans to announce "strengthened inspections" and an effort to tighten safety regulations for offshore drilling, during an afternoon session with reporters, an administration official said.

Read More

Filed under: 360° Radar • Gulf Oil Spill • T1
May 27th, 2010
09:00 AM ET

Letters to the President #493: “Three Critical Steps to Get Out of the Goo”

[cnn-photo-caption image= http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2010/images/05/27/art.oilglove.getty.jpg width=300 height=169]Tom Foreman | BIO
AC360° Correspondent

Reporter's Note: President Obama is taking a lot of flack over the Gulf oil spill. My advice? Take this letter and call me this morning.

Dear Mr. President,

I hope the effort to close the well is working, and if it is working, I pray that it will keep doing so. Still, I had trouble sleeping last night. I live just beyond the DC limits, but even there I could hear the fiddling coming from your place. You know that I always try to be encouraging, but your team has made it look for days as if the spill is merely an inconvenient truth to borrow a phrase from a previous denizen of DC land.

So here are three things I think you might consider if it wants to reverse that impression.

1) TAKE CHARGE – Establish an immediate, well-publicized, and actual command center on the Gulf; a “White House South” where Vice President Biden would be dispatched to preside over all operations in a highly visible show of commitment. (Honestly, it’s not like he’s too busy.) Once a day, have him hop a helicopter to a trouble spot, look it over, talk to the experts and locals, and make sure they are getting the tools they need. Nothing drives regular citizens crazier in a time of crisis than a distant power in DC saying, “Oh yes, we’ve heard the latest idea/proposal/question, and we’re just routing it through the proper channels. I’m sure we’ll have an answer in a couple of days.” There is only one channel now. It shows oil spewing 24/7. An honest command center which has the power to call the shots, immediately implement your executive orders, and a single responsible federal representative giving twice a day updates on all that is happening would help ease the growing fear that you’re simply not yet really getting your hands dirty. And make no mistake, that impression is political poison. You went around for months talking about the gradual and relatively distant impact of rising health care costs but you have yet to publically express a similar sense of urgency about what is happening in the Gulf. Or at least you’re not doing it nearly as much. With a strong enough presence, you won’t have to officially take over the entire operation (which you seem reticent to do) but you can at least show a much more robust engagement. You think it’s just symbolism? Yeah, well, President Bush flying over Katrina damage and not even touching down was pretty symbolic too.

2) FIX WHAT CAN BE FIXED- Your team says you do not have the expertise to address the leak itself, and must leave that up to BP. Even if that is the case, then at least grow much more aggressive about dealing with the results of the spill. Despite suggestions just a couple of weeks ago that the oil would be corralled on the surface and contained, now we are seeing precious little activity beyond the press conferences. We are hearing by the hour from local officials, fishermen, tourists, and residents about the shortage of resources deployed across the wetlands and beaches. This is a no brainer. You need to make it overwhelmingly clear to every agency that this is a full-on national emergency that is threatening one of the world’s greatest fisheries, the economic recovery, and…oh by the way…your party’s chances in the election this fall. You had no hesitation about spending billions of dollars in hopes of stimulating the economy. It would not be beyond the pale at this point to redirect some of that spending to families on the Gulf; imagine the impact and effectiveness of replacing the lost wages of fishing families by paying them to spread oil boom, build sand barriers, and clean up the oil on an on-going basis until this crisis is past. The shore gets protected. Desperate families get help. The economy gets stimulated. And a precious natural and economic resource might be saved from years of collapse which, trust me, could affect the entire country.

3) FOCUS ON RIGHT NOW- You political types have a terrible habit: When you misjudge a situation at first blush (even quite honestly,) it seems like you will often fiercely defend that misjudgment for weeks rather than admit a mistake, or that conditions changed and you did not take sufficient notice. I’ll grant that at first, the spill looked like a small, untimely blow to your plans for more offshore drilling at worst; and at best, like a convenient back door mistake which might allow you to criticize big business again when necessary. Turns out it was neither. The spill, hour by hour, is threatening to make an all out mockery of your offshore oil ambitions by suggesting your team never seriously considered the potential downside. Practically and politically this situation demands focus on the immediate: If the oil is not stopped; if it is not contained and collected on the surface; if the beaches and marshes are not protected, every single person in this country is going to pay a price. Or rather, I should say, every person who likes going to the beach, driving a car, eating seafood, seeing songbirds, or believing that we are a great nation capable of handling problems. You need to forget about the mistakes so far, ignore the consequences of failure in the future, and work in the present as if it is all that matters…because right now it is.

On a personal level, there is no reason for anyone to doubt your concern for the Gulf. But then, on those same terms, there was no reason to doubt that President Bush was concerned after Katrina either. But since voters don’t know you personally, they have to judge you by your actions.

All I’m saying is, if your heart and head are in the right place, look up: See that oil spreading across the Rose Garden, soaking into the Oval Office rug, and staining the Presidential Seal? If you don’t take some big steps fast you may find your own White House harder to clean up than the marshes and beaches all along our battered Gulf coast.

I’m not trying to be too tough, or unfair. I’m just saying…well, give me a call and let’s talk it over.


newer posts »