April 8th, 2010
12:12 PM ET

Now to explain the party favors

[cnn-photo-caption image=http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2010/images/04/08/citibank.logo.jpg caption="Citibank executives are testifying in front of Congress today." width=300 height=169]

Andrew Ross Sorkin
New York Times

On Thursday, two of the biggest — and among the most tarnished — names on Wall Street will testify in front of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission in Washington: Charles O. Prince III, the former chairman and chief executive of Citigroup, and Robert E. Rubin, a former top adviser and director of the bank. On the watch of these men, Citigroup lost more money than almost any company in history, requiring an extraordinary government bailout.

There are, of course, many important questions for the commissioners to ask these men about how and why the bank filled its balance sheet with so many bad subprime loans, taking on enough risk to nearly topple the system.

But there is one small question, not so obvious, that has been crying out for an answer for years, and it has nothing to do with exoticisms like C.D.O.’s or C.D.S.’s. Instead, this question is about incentives and compensation on Wall Street and a mind-set — a group-think really — that pervaded not just Citigroup but the entire industry.


Filed under: Citigroup • Finance • Wall St.
soundoff (No Responses)

Post a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.