[cnn-photo-caption image=http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2009/images/07/16/art.moon..jpg caption="A view of the Earth appears over the Lunar horizon as the Apollo 11 Command Module comes into view of the Moon before Astronauts Neil Armstrong and Edwin Aldrin Jr. leave in the Lunar Module, Eagle, to become the first men to walk on the Moon's surface."]
Tom Foreman | Bio
On the day that Neil Armstrong became the first man on the moon, 40 years ago, I sat on the living room floor of our Illinois home, holding my breath. The fluttering, grainy images of the “small step” brought relief, exultation, and disbelief from my family. For weeks afterward I played “moon landing” in the backyard, and thought that with a really powerful pair of binoculars I might look at the moon and see the flag. (Subsequent experiments, btw, proved that hypothesis a tad weak. Kind of like the one I had about how we could breathe underwater if we started with a really deep gulp.)
The moon landing crowned a decade of some of the most ambitious, excellent, and successful technological development our species has ever known. That was the giant leap. The ‘60’s had been as turbulent as a Maury taping. Vietnam. Civil rights. Battle lines between old and young, hawks and doves, and Apollo was a bright star amid often dark days.
Today, however, the U.S. space program sits in another half-light, and it is not clear if it is dawn or dusk. President Obama supports it. Congress seems generally willing to maintain funding. But too many members of the public are not entirely sure what the goal is these days, and even when they are, it can feel a little “been there/done that.” Right now we have unmanned probes looking more closely at the moon, and we’re hoping to send humans back to stake out some turf in the not terribly distant future. Then from a sort of moon base we might launch deeper space explorations, like to Mars, for example.
But all of that takes time, patience, and political leaders willing to stick with it through elections, recessions, crises, and wars. In the ‘60’s we had the Russians and the promise of an assassinated young president, John F. Kennedy, to push us. We had a national will to explore space.
What space proponents must do is reignite the public’s imagination with the modern reasons to press on. Space is the birthplace for oceans of science and technology. China, with its very active space program, is graduating close to a quarter million new engineers each year. We are far below even half that number. The explosively hostile environment of space demands technological excellence, and likely somewhere within your arm’s reach is a product forged in that furnace; something you would not have without that surge of invention, and advancement that grew out of the space program.
The emptiness of space is where imagination lives.
I met Neil Armstrong last year. And it was like meeting a man from the past, and future all at once.
Anderson Cooper goes beyond the headlines to tell stories from many points of view, so you can make up your own mind about the news. Tune in weeknights at 8 and 10 ET on CNN.
Questions or comments? Send an email
Want to know more? Go behind the scenes with