March 25th, 2009
12:55 PM ET

Behind the scenes: Ed Henry's take on exchange with Obama

[cnn-photo-caption image=http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2008/images/YOUR_IMAGE.jpg]

Ed Henry
Senior White House Correspondent

The most amazing part of the exchange to me is that I didn't go into the East Room intending to ask President Obama about AIG.

After frantic preparation for the prime-time newser with several colleagues, especially lead CNN White House producer Tim McCaughan, I had several provocative questions in my pocket. But none of them had much to do with the financial crisis because I assumed several of my colleagues would exhaust the topic of AIG before my turn came up.

At the first presser in February, I was about the 10th reporter the president called on. The economy had been chewed over so I went with a "sidebar" question about whether Obama, given his push for transparency, would overturn the policy at Dover Air Force Base preventing media coverage of coffins returning from Iraq and Afghanistan.

It was a surprise line of inquiry. The president made news by saying the policy was under review - and a few weeks later he overturned it. I was heading into this event with the same strategy: make news on something unexpected (I won't tell you which topics I was working on cause it would ruin the surprise for a future presser or interview with the president).

But on Tuesday night, as I sat in the front row nervously reviewing my hypothetical questions written out in longhand (decidedly old school), I kept thinking back to a conversation I had with Wolf Blitzer Saturday night at the Gridiron dinner.

He said that when he was CNN's Senior White House correspondent, he liked following up on a question the president had ducked earlier in the newser. When you press a second time, you may be surprised with the second answer. And then rather than call on me 10th, the president called on me at about sixth. Still early, so nobody had asked AIG yet. Plus my "sidebar" question now seemed off-point so early in a newser focused on the economic pain in the nation.

The pressure was on now because the president had called on me. Someone handed me a microphone, millions were watching, and it's scary to think about changing topic in a split second because you might get flustered and screw up. But it's fun to gamble and like any good quarterback (though I was never athletic enough to actually play the position), I decided to call an audible.

So I went hard on the AIG question, and took Wolf's advice and followed on a couple of colleagues who got pushback from the president when they asked about how his budget numbers do not seem to add up. The president, like any good politician, decided to pick and choose what to answer. So he swatted away the budget question and ignored the AIG stuff.

So I waited patiently and then decided to pounce with a sharp follow-up. From just a few feet away, I could see in his body language that the normally calm and cool president was perturbed.

But it's in moments like that we sometimes find out what's really on a president's mind. In this case, he's not happy about the scrutiny on AIG. So he did slap me down a bit. Anderson Cooper said later half-jokingly that yours truly was "nursing his wounds."

Even more comical to the reaction to me was the flood of e-mail I got from Democratic and Republican sources. Invariably, my Democratic friends tweaked along the lines of "how'd you like the smackdown" because they were pleased the president pushed back.

But my Republican friends hailed me by saying essentially, "Thanks for doing your job - he never answered the question." So the exchange was a great political Rorschach: Each party saw their own talking points in the reflection of the back-and-forth.

What do I think? I've got no hard feelings toward the president and I assume he feels the same, but I can't worry about that. I was doing my job - and he was doing his.

Filed under: Ed Henry • President Barack Obama • Raw Politics
soundoff (3 Responses)
  1. Mario

    I think you did a great job, and i feel disappointed about President Obama's reaction, i expected a straight answer.
    keep up the good work!

    March 26, 2009 at 11:26 pm |
  2. Eric

    While I understand in part that news coverage is about ratings, being popular and in the case of the president even being called upon to ask a question I am much more interested in coverage that investigates hard evidence for signs of truth without unnecessarily being concerned about the consequences. More investigative reporting in the past might have balanced the Madoffs, the dishonest, and the poor businees decisions that have put the country where it is today. I believe the president is big enough and certainly aware enough of the issues to rise above any pettiness that might come of such a dialogue. In the end this issue is neither about you or the president but is about the American people. The question for the press is whether in the midst of other pressing daily priorities such as ratings, including those of the executive at CNN or the simple need for a story the objective facts are being revealed. You have the bully pulpit after all and the people count on you every day for more than sensationalism.

    March 26, 2009 at 6:28 pm |
  3. marie

    Tell you what Ed ,
    I loved it ,because no one else seems to have the guts to question the president. You did what others should be doing, but Obama is clearly not used to this and does not like it! Well its his job to answer us ,but only if someone asks the questions ,right? I know you are taking a beating from the Obats ,which by the way I am a liberal and am for a person for the regular peopleand I am not sure about OB because he talks one game but then you have to look who his team players are and wonder but he is really about...........SO ED ,good job, keep up the way real journalists should be,I was starting to lose hope for real ones

    March 26, 2009 at 5:53 pm |