February 25th, 2009
03:47 PM ET

Duty, honor, country "uh could you pls sign on the dotted line?"

[cnn-photo-caption image=http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2009/POLITICS/02/02/obama.afghanistan/art.gates.gi.jpg]


Defense Secretary Robert Gates is requiring officials working out the details of the next fiscal year's defense budget to keep their discussions "secret" and he's gone the extra step to ensure the secrecy.

Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell told reporters Wednesday that those involved in formulating the budget for fiscal year 2010 have been required to sign a nondisclosure form "to create an environment in which the best possible budget can be built."

"This is highly sensitive stuff involving programs costing tens of billions of dollars, employing hundreds of thousands of people and go to the heart of national security," Morrell said.

The Pentagon classifies material about wars, intelligence and weapons every day, but the move to make everyone sign the form is unusual though not without precedent.

Morrell said Gates wants the budgeting process "to be as disciplined" and "as forthright as possible."

"He thinks that by having people pledge not to speak out of school, if you will, on these matters while they are a work in progress, that you'll create a climate in which you can ultimately produce a better product, because people can speak candidly with the confidence that it will not be leaked," Morrell said at a Pentagon news conference.

Morrell said Gates believes the leaking of portions of the budget would be counterproductive and he said most of the information under discussion is classified.

"Ultimately, this product can't be judged by the sum of its parts; it's got to be judged (as) a whole. So if bits and pieces leak out, you start to tug on these strings and the whole thing could unravel. This budget the secretary wants to be judged in its totality, because that's where you will see the strategic balance he is trying to build."

He said Gates and the Joint Chiefs of Staff are among those who signed the agreement.

Gates wants people participating in the work to do so with "the confidence of knowing that what they are saying is not being leaked, it's not being disseminated, and, therefore, we can work together perhaps in a more collegial and honest way and come up with a better product," Morrell said.

Morrell commented on a questioner's remark that there are "criminal penalties" if the "information is secret and therefore classified."

"Classified information with potential criminal consequences gets leaked all the time. This is to reinforce the message that indeed this is classified material. These are highly secret discussions. And we should remember that, be mindful of it, and honor it."

When asked how this level of secrecy squares with the Obama administration's "stated goal of maximum transparency," Morrell said he doesn't think "the administration has been advocating a transparency in national security matters. I think that, at the end of this, it will be apparent to everyone where the secretary is and ... what the process has yielded."

Filed under: Military • Robert Gates
soundoff (4 Responses)
  1. Art

    Please, no more 9/11's or pearl harbor's.

    February 26, 2009 at 7:06 am |
  2. Joe G. (From Illinois)

    If the US Military had to charge Iraq and Afghanistan for every bullet and shell chasing they run through, then Yes.. I can see why the Pentagon would want to keep the bill secret.. They are our enemies after all.! But If the US Military isn’t charging the cost of war to neither Iraq or Afghanistan then I think it’s time for congress to start some of those famous televised Baseball trivia sessions “So that we learn from our mistakes and that it doesn’t happen again.”

    February 25, 2009 at 10:44 pm |
  3. Fred W for Florida

    It would be very unfortunate to have public opinion shaping the National Defense budget due to leaks. Somethings, like the specifics in the defense budget, just should not be public information. It tells our enemies and potential enemies too much.

    February 25, 2009 at 10:18 pm |
  4. Annie Kate

    Some things need to be kept quiet. Our parents knew this in WW2 and things were kept quiet because we knew that sometimes it meant life or death for our countrymen. With all the leaks of information these days I have often wondered if Americans could keep things quiet without some special interest group yelling about the right to know. We'll know in the end and can judge the whole package and make sense of it then. Until then we just need to be patient. Good for Gates – hope the press will support his position.

    February 25, 2009 at 7:53 pm |