.
September 9th, 2013
07:36 PM ET

Before AC360 Later: Anderson Cooper & Christiane Amanpour

Tonight we are launching AC360 Later.

Before Anderson and Christiane join the rest of the panel at 10p, they are answering your questions.

Join them for the first of our nightly discussions on Spreecast tonight at 9:15p E.T.

soundoff (18 Responses)
  1. kurt robertson

    Tonight....day 2. Amanpour is arrogant and obnoxius in her arguments and delivery (and facial expressions). She even made a comment about the conserative Crystal Wright from the previous night as, "now that we have a concensious". The show, love its freewheelingness, best find someone else for her spot.....give up, she's been and not tested well on any television venue.

    September 11, 2013 at 2:34 am |
  2. Beverly P. Jahnke

    One of Russia's big challenges in the past has been dealing with Muslin attacks in Russia. Russia has to take into consideration the idea that Syria is for the most Muslin, so what would prevent the Muslins who are attacking Russia in the past decide to use poisons that Syria is using????? Russia needs to protect their people from the gases!

    September 11, 2013 at 12:44 am |
  3. Matt J

    The people in the middle east HATE Americans. Why should we get involved?

    September 10, 2013 at 10:56 pm |
  4. M Fraser

    Excellent experts, real! Kay was exceptional and delightful. Note: Poll shows many do not understand what is actually on the ground in Syria but they do have positive hope. Thank you for a news program with real experts and not political practiced rhetoric.

    September 10, 2013 at 10:54 pm |
  5. Ralph Schwartz

    Welcome back Anderson. You bring a sobriety and relevancy to current events. Hopefully the members of the panel will adhere to the same sobriety in expressing their viewpoints with meekness and accuracy.

    September 10, 2013 at 10:44 pm |
  6. Diane

    Thank goodness for Andrew Sullivan actually being in touch with what the American people are thinking. And thank goodness for Fareed Zakaria's global insight. And David Kay's information is crucial. Christianne, whom I normally really like to listen to, has become too full of herself and needs to talk less.

    September 10, 2013 at 10:43 pm |
  7. David J. Davin MD

    Now we know what Neville Chamberlain looked like when he was played by Hitler et al in Munich, 1938. Putin and Assad have taken a page out of Hitler's playbook. Alas....

    September 10, 2013 at 10:26 pm |
  8. Rida Khodr

    Hi Anderson, since now that the problem might be solved by Assad surrendering his chemical weapons.
    I have a hypothetical question: what if Assad's chemical victims were 70,000 and then he decided to surrender his chemical weapons. Would it be the end of the story as well? Are 1400 persons that cheap??

    September 9, 2013 at 11:15 pm |
  9. michael adams

    just possible, that the rebel forces staged the chemical attack to place the government forces of Syria behind the 8-ball and force the hand of the president of the US....

    September 9, 2013 at 11:00 pm |
  10. Khaldoon Alaswad

    No one said that Bashar Al Assad said that he will continue to kill his people with conventional weapons!

    September 9, 2013 at 11:00 pm |
  11. Carlos

    There is another explanation, Assad bomb ed an unknown rebels chemical site which exploded without control of any side, kind like a match in a powlder can. Both sides needs to end this irrational butchery.

    September 9, 2013 at 11:00 pm |
  12. kippwatson

    The Obama Administration claims that Bashar al-Assad's regime is responsible for the use of chemical weapons on August 21, 2013. Bashar al-Assad denies this. Why doesn't the United States ask the General Assembly to refer this factual dispute for a judicial determination by the International Court of Justice before engaging in illegal military action? Russia has veto power in the UN Security Council, but not over the General Assembly.

    September 9, 2013 at 10:47 pm |
  13. Richard

    If we attack there chemical facility's isn't that gonna kill much more people from the chemicals GOING AIRBOURN, why isn't anybody talking about this

    September 9, 2013 at 10:37 pm |
  14. Lu

    The media has made us believe the US is in Afghanistan to fight terrorism. But in reality we're ensuring the interest of the super rich and powerful by protecting the trans Afghanistan pipeline. You know, kind of like Iraq.

    I just can't help to think that there's something about Syria that financially beneficial the same people.

    Just a theory.

    September 9, 2013 at 10:24 pm |
  15. George Hayston

    I would like to put this Syrian issue in the simplest and clearest terms. Either we are With Assad, or Against Assad. There's a Killing Machine out there that has killed 100,000 innocent kids, their moms and their families. It has completely crushed the genuine democratic aspirations that started peacefully in Syria. And it is going to kill 100's of thousands more if we listen to Russia and all the folks who feel that is OK. We need to get rid of that Killing Machine NOW.

    September 9, 2013 at 9:59 pm |
  16. Mark Zinan

    What are we trying to accomplish? Stability? Regime Change?
    What if this leads to a larger conflict with Russia, Iran, and Hezbollah?
    Why do we attack Syria and not other murderous dictatorships?

    September 9, 2013 at 9:52 pm |
  17. Linford

    The President has missed a great opportunity to send a strong message to rogue nations like Iran and north korea. His u-turn on Syria is a great disappointment. How do you trust Russia who has prevented any action on Syria for over 2years? You have disappointed the world, mr president. You have the power to go solo but you have just belittle the power of the presidency of the most powerful nation on earth.

    September 9, 2013 at 9:48 pm |
  18. Robin Wright

    How will we keep sleeper cells, in USA now, from retaliating immediately after a US strike on Syria?

    September 9, 2013 at 9:22 pm |

Post a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.