.
Raw Politics: Mitt Romney's no-good, very bad night
February 8th, 2012
12:27 PM ET

Raw Politics: Mitt Romney's no-good, very bad night

E ven if you just tuned in long enough Tuesday night to see his victory speech in a half-empty Denver ballroom, you could tell Mitt Romney had a bad night. If you started watching just a bit earlier, you saw him lose Minnesota, a state he won in 2008. You saw him trailing in every county in Missouri on his way to a bruising loss there. And a few minutes later, you saw him lose in Colorado - a state he dominated in 2008, when his 60% of the vote was more than three times the share of runner-up John McCain.

Based on his 2008 results, Republicans were feeling good about taking back the state this fall, with Romney at the top of the ticket. And heading into Tuesday, Romney could afford to think about pivoting to more of a general election-orientation. No more.

Romney’s loss in Missouri wasn’t unexpected; it’s a state he didn’t win four years ago, with a major evangelical bloc - the ideal audience for Rick Santorum’s pitch – and its accidental “beauty contest” primary this year made it an easy write-off. (Gingrich didn’t even bother getting on the ballot.) Minnesota’s a quirky contest; Romney won it four years ago, but it was seen as anyone’s game.

Colorado was different – which is why the Romney campaign had downplayed the other votes, telling reporters to focus on the state. And that’s what made a Romney loss there all the more damaging. The big question now: how much of Romney’s win four years ago was due to his status as the top alternative to the frontrunner – the role played last night by Santorum. This morning, Romney’s campaign, which had come out swinging against Santorum over the past day or two, focused its fire on Newt Gingrich instead. Maintaining Gingrich’s status as a top conservative contender – keeping the anti-Romney vote as divided as possible – just got a whole lot more important for the former Massachusetts governor.

But Romney wasn’t last night’s biggest loser; that title is actually still up for grabs. Ron Paul’s caucus strategy is in shambles; he’s yet to win a state, and the odds are growing slimmer by the contest. But Gingrich had more to lose heading into Tuesday night; he had to score a win somewhere, or at least a close second with Romney in the top spot, to hold on to his title as the designated anti-Romney candidate – and to keep the money flowing to his cash-starved campaign. Santorum blew a hole in both Romney’s aura of inevitability as the nominee, and Gingrich’s as the logical conservative alternative.

We’re now heading into a weeks-long stretch with no big, delegate-rich contests or debates – several weeks where Santorum’s big night will play an outsized role on the narrative. Last night, as his Super PAC’s top funder, Foster Friess, beamed behind him on stage, money started flowing into his campaign coffers – as much as a quarter of a million dollars by morning, according to Santorum aides. Today, he heads to Texas, to make his pitch to deep-pocketed donors – an argument that just grew a whole lot stronger. It may not be enough to nab him the nomination. But it’s enough to make February a whole lot tougher for the rest of the field.

Follow Rebecca Sinderbrand on Twitter.

Post by:
Filed under: 2012 Election • Mitt Romney • Newt Gingrich • Raw Politics • Rick Santorum • Ron Paul
soundoff (7 Responses)
  1. Riley

    Roland Martin is loud, overbearing and really over the top, please CNN cease the opportunity... let him go.

    February 8, 2012 at 10:05 pm |
  2. Robert Dubin

    Anderson,
    Why don't you challenge Ari Fleischer when he refers to the "Democrat Party" in his diatribes? I doubt he failed 8th grade English, so it must be because of his disdain for the Democratic Party. Certainly Ari is not the only Republican guilty of this abuse, but he's someone you interview regularly. I see the slur as no different than referring to him as a "Jew pundit" or Alan Dershowitz as a "Jew attorney." BTW, I'm Jewish.. .so have some chutzpah and ask Ari to explain.

    February 8, 2012 at 8:53 pm |
  3. rita venable

    I am appalled that Anderson Cooper would bring up the idea that President Obama has flipped flopped is position on Super Pacs. Even if the President does not agree and thinks there should be different rules regarding Super Pacs . Should he loose the election because all others are playing by a different set of rules. The average American is looking to the president and other like minded people in power for help. I am so tired of a faction of individuals making up the rules of the game. When someone outside their circle beats them using the rules that they have created, then they cry foul. CNN should stop trying to sensationalize everything and do more hard core news and reporting.

    February 8, 2012 at 8:41 pm |
  4. Sharon mitchell

    Why in god's name do you let ari fleicher speak his dishonest venom uninterrupted? Such a partisan person has no value on a news show. It is absurd.
    Thank you for your coverage of syria. Why the rest of CNN is silent is why I don't watch CNN except for your show.

    February 8, 2012 at 8:17 pm |
  5. michael searles

    how much money do you think china paid obama administration to not accept canadian pipeline.who on this planet would have said no to this?thanks mike

    February 8, 2012 at 8:16 pm |
  6. Shari Ashton

    Dear Anderson,
    I am extraordinarily socially liberal but the CNN suspension of Roland Martin for his Superbowl tweets is just simply overkill. The network's response is out of proportion to the offensive nature of the comments he made during a rowdy football game. I am a proponent of exercising sensitivity but this is a bit ridiculous. Maybe you can tell your producers to add this to the Ridiculist! Respectfully yours, Shari

    February 8, 2012 at 7:33 pm |
  7. Al

    Looks like the infighting in the GOP is exceeding that reserved for a general elections. The lies and greed perpetrated by big industry has finally come back to haunt them through public recognition of GOP shills.

    February 8, 2012 at 3:23 pm |