.
December 1st, 2011
11:34 PM ET

Video: Ungodly Discipline

An AC360 exclusive: A former leader at a Christian school accused of paddling students in the name of God. Now as adults, those former students are speaking out.

December 1st, 2011
10:17 PM ET

Video: The RidicuList: Texas Vette Racers

Two guys in Corvettes achieve internet fame for all the wrong reasons.

Post by:
Filed under: The RidicuList
December 1st, 2011
08:11 PM ET

Letters to the President #1046: 'Ahem, are you going to get the bill?'

Reporter's Note: Mother Jones reports that President Obama has spent an amazing number of days on fundraising trips this year. But his White House, like every administration, defends the practice of having taxpayers foot the bulk of the bill. That’s what I’m writing about in today’s letter.

Dear Mr. President,

I’ve been following some of this noise about you using Air Force One to scoot all over the country on campaign junkets and fundraising trips, and two thoughts come to mind.

First, I think everyone has to fully understand that you are President of the United States, and this is how you get around. You can’t rent a moped, you can’t get a coach seat on Amtrak, or ask a college pal for a lift to Indiana. A president is, as your staff has said, always on the clock and the security, connectivity, and mobility of the person holding that office must always be assured.

But second, I wonder if your critics have a point. Don’t get nervous. I’m not saying that you are doing something uniquely wrong, but maybe all presidents…Democratic and Republican…ought to be paying a heck of a lot more when and if they want to spend time campaigning and raising funds.

I don’t want to be unfair. I understand that being re-elected is important to anyone who wins any political office. But the whole nation is struggling right now to hold onto jobs, to pay bills, to pick up the check for all sorts of expenses. Why should taxpayers foot the bill for you, or any other incumbent, to go raise money for re-election? Wouldn’t it be simple enough to do some basic accounting and divide the expenses accordingly?

For example, if you fly to some battleground state to visit a factory and make a public speech about jobs, that’s just your responsibility; taxpayers should pay for it all, even if your opponents think the trip is suspect. But if you attend a fundraising dinner while you are there, and that takes up half of your time on the ground, why shouldn’t you or the Democratic Party reimburse taxpayers for half the cost of the whole trip? After all, those fundraisers are private events that the rest of us can’t even attend unless we pay the entry price. You are, during that time, acting as a private individual out to improve his own private standing and that of his organization.

I suppose the better solution would be for all presidents, Democratic or Republican, to simply not be involved in fundraising at all. After all, you’ve got a pretty important job. Arguably, you should have no time for anything except doing what we elected you to do. But since that is not the case, maybe substantially increasing the amount  sitting presidents and their parties pay for trips that smack of campaigning would be a good start. You keep saying the rich should pay more; in terms of campaign funds– admit it, you’re loaded!

Hey, you said you were coming to D.C. to change things. This is something you can change right now, and the symbolism won’t be lost on a nation where so many are having a hard time. It is, after all, kind of hard to see you or any other politician raising millions and millions of dollars at fancy dinners, then sliding the check across the table at the rest of us.

Hope all is well. Call when you can.

Regards,

Tom

Post by:
Filed under: Letters to the President • Opinion • President Barack Obama • T1 • Tom Foreman
December 1st, 2011
07:26 PM ET

Poll: Lawmakers insider trading?

Tonight, AC360 reports on legal ambiguities that could make it difficult to convict Congressional lawmakers of insider trading.


Filed under: 360° Radar
Beat 360° 12/01/2011
Presenter Robert Downey Jr. speaks onstage at BAFTA Los Angeles 2011 Britannia Awards at The Beverly Hilton hotel on November 30, 2011 in Beverly Hills, California. (Photo by Frazer Harrison/Getty Images For BAFTA Los Angeles)
December 1st, 2011
05:41 PM ET

Beat 360° 12/01/2011

Ready for today's Beat 360°? Everyday we post a picture, and you provide the caption. Our staff will join in, too. Tune in tonight at 8 p.m. to see if yours is our favorite!

CONGRATULATIONS to our winners!

STAFF

Speaking about the not so good times, Robert thanks the only one who would stick out his neck for him.

– Eli Lazar

VIEWERS

Will everyone in the audience please confirm that they as well see the girafffe at my side!

– John Shelton

Beat 360° Challenge


Filed under: Beat 360°
December 1st, 2011
11:12 AM ET

Video: Heroes: J.R. Martinez on supporting injured veterans

J.R. Martinez describes his connection with Operation Finally Home, a nonprofit that gives free homes to injured vets. Watch CNN Heroes: An All-Star Tribute, hosted by Anderson Cooper, live on Sunday, December 11 at 8 p.m. ET. This year, J.R. will co-host the pre-show with A.J. hammer at 7 p.m. ET!


Filed under: CNN Heroes
December 1st, 2011
01:12 AM ET

Video: The RidicuList: Anderson Cooper

After admitting he doesn't know what kale is, Anderson Cooper places himself on the RidicuList.

Post by:
Filed under: The RidicuList
December 1st, 2011
12:00 AM ET

Letters to the President #1045: 'The law of unintended consequences'

Reporter's Note: Every single day I write a letter to the White House. Not once has the president responded. But maybe today is the day.

Dear Mr. President,

Some distant relative of mine (I can’t recall his name) made a terrible mistake when he was a young teen according to family lore. He was standing near a barn and noticed a piece of straw sticking out between the boards from inside. Rather absentmindedly he thought he would strike a match and burn the straw back even with the wall. That was the intended consequence. But the unintended consequence was what followed: The straw burned to the wall, through the crack, ignited piles of straw inside the building, and “Bob’s your uncle” the whole joint went up in flames.

The story comes to mind as I consider the latest news from Iran. In a nutshell, protestors stormed the British embassy and trashed the place. Their intended consequence would appear to have been to send a message: We’re mad at the Brits for imposing further economic sanctions on our country, and we figure burning a few flags and smashing some windows will make the point clear.

The unintended consequences? Well, those seem to be shaping up by the hour and they are none too pretty for Iran. Britain, France, Germany, and the Netherlands have all recalled their ambassadors. Iran has grown more diplomatically isolated. Europe is growing more united in its opposition to Iran’s nuclear ambitions. In short, what a couple of hundred angry Iranians (and likely the political operatives who ok’d or perhaps even organized their coup de’ Brits) thought would dramatize their outrage, instead may be making their situation considerably worse than it was.

In effect, they are like a kid who issues a mock challenge to another to “meet after school and duke it out,” only to be shocked when the “challengee” says “Sure! Let’s go!”

Is the world now poised for war with Iran? Probably not. But the planet has clearly moved a step further away from peaceful, production relations with Iran. And Iran will pay the price.

Just a few thoughts on a busy Wednesday. Call if you have a moment.

Regards,
Tom

Post by:
Filed under: Letters to the President • Opinion • President Barack Obama • T1 • Tom Foreman