Special to CNN
The latest constitutional amendment being floated by some Senate Republicans - to deny citizenship to children born in the United States to unauthorized immigrants - is not new.
Calls for modification of the 14th Amendment's birthright citizenship guarantee have appeared during other moments of immigration-related hand-wringing. The question is whether the idea is a good one.
And the reform is not unthinkable from a democratic point of view. In fact, the United States and Canada stand apart from other major immigrant-receiving societies in the breadth of birthright rules. The United Kingdom amended its laws in 1981 to provide that only children born to citizens, or permanent residents born in the U.K., are citizens at birth.
If they change the 14th amendment who is to say they wont change the first , second ,etc.I may be Canadian but isn't this a huge part of the United States and what it stands for?I believe it is just plain foolish to even contemplate changing the 14th amendment.
Anderson Cooper goes beyond the headlines to tell stories from many points of view, so you can make up your own mind about the news. Tune in weeknights at 8 and 10 ET on CNN.
Questions or comments? Send an email
Want to know more? Go behind the scenes with AC361°