Maureen Miller
AC360° Writer
Get ready for the possibility of more confusion over mammograms.
The Wall Street Journal is reporting the federally-funded task force that loosened breast-cancer screening guidelines is clarifying its position.
Dr. Sanjay Gupta will join us live with the details.
Plus, could the accused Fort Hood gunman Maj. Nidal Hasan have been stopped. Tonight, we'll introduce you to a woman who says she contributed to a report that could have alerted military officials. We're Keeping them Honest.
And, don't miss our special investigation: Killings at the Canal: The Army Tapes. Three Army sergeants have been convicted of killing four Iraqi detainees. Tonight you'll hear from the soldier who turned them in. Is he a snitch or a hero? We'll let you decide.
Join us for these stories and much more starting at 10 p.m. ET. See you then!
| Annie Kate |
November 19th, 2009 9:54 pm ET So the task force is clarifying its position on mammography – they didn't realize just how much fuss the change would cause or the implications for health insurance for those women under 50? If they didn't then I'm not sure I trust their conclusions on the issue anyway – last night it sounded like it was a numbers game that an accountant would come up with – they figured out where there break-even point was and set their recommendation there – break-even analysis is good for some things but not for saving people's lives. |
|
| Christie |
November 19th, 2009 10:45 pm ET I don't think they're clarifying....I think they're back pedaling like crazy. LOLOL That woman from the task force who was on CNN last night with Dr. Copans couldn't even complete a sentence, much less offer any credible input. Where the hell did this "task force" come from, and why are there no experts / specialists on the task force? RIDICULOUS, IMO. I, and I think most women do, have friends and relatives who have died from breast cancer, have survived breast cancer, are living with breast cancer. I have had two surgeries to remove benign cysts (thank God).......and that was in my thirties. There ARE exceptions....don't send some half-ass task force to change policy which in depth research has proved so very beneficial. |
|
| Craig Ledbetter |
November 19th, 2009 10:58 pm ET The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force made a political/economic recommendation, not a health care practice recommendation. Not a single member of that panel of bureaucratic obamatrons would recommend to their own mothers and sisters to live by their amended guidelines. This is how government practices health care. This is health care rationing by the numbers. This is "Change you can die for". This is the future of all clinical practice standards if the current health care reform bills become law. This is a shadow of Obamacare. But you can see how wrong Sarah Palin was to refer to the US Preventive Services Task Force as a "Death Panel". They didn't say you couldn't get a mammogram at age 40. They just said it was not cost effective to pay for it. She should have called it a "Denial Panel". That is much more accurate. If you die because you can't afford to pay for a mammogram at age 40, that is your own responsibility. |
|
|
Comments have been closed for this article |
||
A behind the scenes look at “Anderson Cooper 360°” and the stories it covers, written by Anderson Cooper, the AC360° staff and a network of contributors. Insight you can’t find anywhere else.
We search the news each day to show you what’s on our radar and what we’re planning for the show each night.
For more details, read our tips on how to win 360° approval for comments.
Send your instant feedback to Anderson Cooper 360°.
- Live Blog from the Anchor Desk 02/09/10
- Evening Buzz: Digging Out.... Again
- Returning to Haiti. Tipping the scales of faith.
- Toyota Recalls: What you need to know
- Severe Weather Update
- Treating addicts: What we may (or may not) learn from the Conrad Murray case
- The view from above
- Interactive Haiti Map: Aid, supplies and stories
- Video: Doctors: Haitian may have survived 4 weeks in rubble
- One year in, Obama must define himself
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2005

