HOME    WORLD    U.S.    POLITICS    CRIME    ENTERTAINMENT    HEALTH    TECH    TRAVEL    LIVING
November 19, 2009
$6.4 billion stimulus goes to phantom districts
Posted: 12:04 PM ET
Share this on:
Share | Permalink | 10 Comments
Recovery.gov
Recovery.gov

Bill McMorris
The Franklin Center

Just how big is the stimulus package? Well for one, it has doubled the size of the House of Representatives, according to recovery.gov, which says that funds were distributed to 440 congressional districts that do not exist.

According to data retrieved from recovery.gov, nearly $6.4 billion was used to “create or save” just under 30,000 jobs in these phantom congressional districts–almost $225,000 per job. The web site operates on an $84 million budget and is tasked with monitoring the distribution of the $787 billion stimulus package passed by Congress–which, for the record, counts 435 members–in early 2009.

The site’s monitors, however, are not too savvy about America’s political or geographic landscape. More than $2 million was given to the 99th District of North Dakota, a state which has only one congressional district. In order to qualify for 99 districts, North Dakota would have to have a population of about 60 million people, almost 24 million more people than California.

Read More...

10 Comments
More about: Economy •  Job Market
10 Comments
Tim Gibson   November 19th, 2009 12:14 pm ET

Come on now, we all know this was just a minor error right, after all Biden told us so. We all know jobs were created, see, all you have to do is move this number over here. Magic, compliments of the tooth fairy.

Jim   November 19th, 2009 1:02 pm ET

They can give out that much to phantom districs but can't give a one time grant of $20,000.00 to a real person who could use the money to pay off debts, pay needs ahead & stimulate the real economy.

William of Iowa   November 19th, 2009 1:09 pm ET

The money was distributed to districts that do not exist. Then I should assume someone on the other end received funds, placed them somewhere or allocated money to a project of some sort? Or, the funds vaporized into cyberspace never to be recovered? Maybe the money was allocated but never sent, therefore 6.4 billion remains with the treasury. Data entry is only as good as the persons who do the work and the software utilized. This "glitch" in the system can be corrected, to believe this is an indictment of the stimulus program shallow.

Marlene Louise   November 19th, 2009 2:20 pm ET

The real investigation should be: States that received money and how the states reported it. The Administration sent the money to the states and it was up to the states to report the allocation of the funds. If North Dakota reported 99 districts, find out who did that reporting and what North Dakota did with the money!!! Now that would be a complete unbiased look at the situation.

alex lyrics   November 19th, 2009 2:25 pm ET

we need to go after congress, not the president for this one

Kelly   November 19th, 2009 2:45 pm ET

This makes me feel sick to my stomach.

Mike, formerly from Syracuse, NY   November 19th, 2009 2:49 pm ET

And we want these yahoos to run our health care? When will the obamatrons going to learn that bog government just means more debt and more taxes?

Boomer in Mo   November 19th, 2009 3:15 pm ET

What a mess.
But I come from infamous Tuscumbia, MO, and we are happily getting a new $8.5 million bridge because of the stimulus. The workers building it are sure happy; many had been laid off for a long time. And even though said bridge sits in a village of fewer than 200 people, more than 2,500 vehicles cross it every day, which is a fact CNN missed when they dubbed it the bridge in the middle of nowhere back in March. Maybe after the new ones open I'll quit having the nightmare about falling off the old one in my car and drowning in the Osage River. (I have a lifelong fear of water.)
We need an explaination as to how these phantom districts got created. If it was intentional, heads need to roll.

Linda B., Ga.   November 19th, 2009 3:46 pm ET

Somebody needs to be investigating the people, in the state it happened in, on why they reported the wrong info. Somebody got to fill their pockets and quite heavily.

Jeanette   November 19th, 2009 4:20 pm ET

This is really sickening, and they won't allow senior citizens a badly needed cost of living raise because of the economy. They can steal all this money and get away with it.

Thanks government for putting my kids and grandkids and their kids in debt for their whole lives!!!!!

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About this blog

A behind the scenes look at “Anderson Cooper 360°” and the stories it covers, written by Anderson Cooper, the AC360° staff and a network of contributors. Insight you can’t find anywhere else.

We search the news each day to show you what’s on our radar and what we’re planning for the show each night.

For more details, read our tips on how to win 360° approval for comments.

Send your instant feedback to Anderson Cooper 360°.

Featured Contributors
Candy Crowley
Candy Crowley is CNN's senior political correspondent and an AC360° contributor
David Gergen
David Gergen is CNN's senior political analyst and former presidential advisor
Roland S. Martin
Roland S. Martin is a nationally award-winning journalist and AC360° contributor
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. All comments should be relevant to the topic and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. You are solely responsible for your own comments, the consequences of posting those comments, and the consequences of any reliance by you on the comments of others. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying and other information you provide via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Justice  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Opinion  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences  |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2009 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com VIP