AC360°
All eyes are on the Senate right now, after the House passed its version of the health care reform bill late on Saturday night.
But what kind of movement can we expect on the Senate Floor? Some say we won’t see voting anytime soon. Sen. Joe Lieberman is repeating his vow to never let a bill with a public option come to a vote. So how will the health care debate play out in the Senate?
Do you have questions about the next step for health care reform? Let us know!
Send us a text message with your question. Text AC360 (or 22360), and you might hear it on air!
| Allison |
November 9th, 2009 4:21 pm ET What is the real timeline? |
|
| Hobbes Durden |
November 9th, 2009 4:30 pm ET It seems that the Democratic caucus pandered to Lieberman in order to keep him with them on important issues like this so if he is going to behave this way, why don't they kick him to the curb? |
|
| SAM |
November 9th, 2009 4:34 pm ET I do not care about the abortion part that was included. I do believe in a woman's right to chose. I do not think government money should pay for abortion ever. I am really concern about the privacy issues in the stupak amendment for women health care. It sound outrageous and scary. Can you please explain the privacy issues with the stupak amendment fully? |
|
| Vivien D Wolsk, PhD. NYC |
November 9th, 2009 4:56 pm ET If abortion isn't covered in the public option then it is the poor who will suffer. People with private insurance or more income can get abortions since IT IS LEGAL. Since that is discrimination against poor, minorities, etc. and hopefully unconstitutional and wouldn't it have to be removed? |
|
| sfcsamfl |
November 9th, 2009 5:04 pm ET I do not care about the abortion part that was included. I do believe in a woman's right to chose. I do not think government money should pay for abortion ever. I am really concern about the privacy issues in the stupak amendment for women health care. It sound outrageous and scary. Can you please explain the privacy issues with the stupak amendment fully? |
|
| DARRELL HICKS -S.C. |
November 9th, 2009 5:46 pm ET If a bill is passed with a public option why on earth will it take years to get it going when we started medicare months after the bill passed. We need LBJ back on duty. |
|
| Injaypee Thompson |
November 9th, 2009 7:13 pm ET What are we supposed to do for THREE YEARS!! before any bills go into effect? To the Senate: Please address the healthcare crisis NOW! Many small business owners are no longer able to pay these high premiums.We may be forced to apply for Medicaid if we get sick! I am calling for an immediate solutions!!!!!! PS Let everyone know that Senator Lieberman is representing Hartford Insurance corporations from Connecticut and Not the average American. |
|
|
Comments have been closed for this article |
||
A behind the scenes look at “Anderson Cooper 360°” and the stories it covers, written by Anderson Cooper, the AC360° staff and a network of contributors. Insight you can’t find anywhere else.
We search the news each day to show you what’s on our radar and what we’re planning for the show each night.
For more details, read our tips on how to win 360° approval for comments.
Send your instant feedback to Anderson Cooper 360°.
- About our show
- Live Blog from the Anchor Desk 12/03/09
- Video: Congress questions the Secret Service
- Video: Huckabee in the hot seat
- Photo Gallery: The Amanda Knox case
- Evening Buzz: W.H. Security Breach Investigation
- GOP congressman accuses White House of 'stonewalling' House committee
- Raw Data: Offenders on compact supervision
- Documents: Maurice Clemmons bail receipt
- Beat 360° 12/03/09
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2005
