HOME    WORLD    U.S.    POLITICS    CRIME    ENTERTAINMENT    HEALTH    TECH    TRAVEL    LIVING
November 5, 2009
Dear President Obama #290: Some clunking during the spin cycle
Posted: 10:20 AM ET
Share this on:
Share | Permalink | 7 Comments | Add a comment

Reporter's Note: President Obama gets lots of advice. He also gets letters. Like one from me every single day.

White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs called Tuesday's races in New Jersey and Virginia 'local elections.'
White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs called Tuesday's races in New Jersey and Virginia 'local elections.'

Tom Foreman | BIO
AC360° Correspondent

Dear Mr. President,

I understand the whole spin game. I know that Press Secretaries are paid to make weakness look strong, strength look stronger, and to keep cold beers waiting in the Rose Garden. But the spin cycle your team is running on the elections this week is sounding like a load of wet sneakers. I mean seriously, what was Gibbs babbling about when he said it was all about local issues?

If the governors’ races in Virginia and New Jersey were all going to be decided on local issues, then why did you spend any time campaigning for the Democratic candidates? Certainly we have more than enough work for you to do here in the Capitol, without you flying off to debate pothole repair schedules if that’s all that it was. And if you don’t have enough on your desk, just open the White House doors to the public for about an hour and I assure you, folks will load up your calendar like Rachel Ray’s grocery list before a tailgate party.

This is one of those rules of politics. When you campaign for someone and he or she wins, you get some credit; but if he or she loses, you have to embrace some of the loss.

And what was this business of you not even following the returns, but watching basketball instead? Like a two pound burrito, I have trouble swallowing that. Again, if the races are so unimportant that they don’t even deserve your attention (which the basketball comment implied) then why would they merit your campaigning, or the public’s participation, or a comment the next day?

See what I’m saying? You have every right to focus on, or ignore any political race you choose. But once you’ve decided to get involved in a contest (and you did) it doesn’t look so good to just walk away when the race is run and your team loses.

You’re correct: Republicans had their own troubles on Tuesday night. Undeniably. But they’re not sitting in the Oval Office. They’re not running Congress. And I’m just saying, if Democrats keep trying to spin away the tiny warning shots fired in this election, they may not be either.

You should call me. Seriously. Time for a good, head clearing run.

Regards,

Tom

Follow Tom on Twitter @tomforemancnn.

Find more of the Foreman Letters here.

7 Comments
7 Comments
Conserve' for USA   November 5th, 2009 8:26 am ET

Do you think the democrats are smoking something? Maybe that's why they are in denial. They just don't get it do they? The majority of the country does not like what they have been doing. It just took this long for the majority to say something. Dems beware, either start being representatives of your constituants, or you will end up on the outside looking in!

SLM   November 5th, 2009 8:46 am ET

Obama, Biden, Bill Clinton were all campaigning for the Democrats that lost. Obama made numerous trips that cost the tax payers plenty all on his tax payer provided private jet to campaign for Democrats.........so much for the promise to work for ALL Americans. For them to dismiss it as no big deal is a flat out lie. If it wasn't a big deal they wouldn't have put so much into campaigning for them. The Obama administration is turning out to be the most deceptive and divisive in history. So much for change in Washington. Business as usual.

Jim Allen, III   November 5th, 2009 8:52 am ET

Obama to Gibbs: "I will be on the b'ball court outback, just wing it today." Unfortunately it appears this is happening more and more.

Mike, formerly from Syracuse, NY   November 5th, 2009 9:01 am ET

The 'local' excuse doesn't wash. Sure 55-60% of the voters in NJ and VA said in exit inteviews that Obama didn't influence their votes. That gets the spin that it was a 'local' election. Perhaps the correct spin is that the voters are just tired of campaigner Obama and want to see results, not more promises. It's significant that in both NJ and VA of the 40-45% who WERE influenced by Obama, more reported that they were NEGATIVELY influenced in their votes than positively influenced. Why isn't that the headline? Obama actually cost his candidates votes. How can that not be a referendum on Obama? Said another way, Obama's campaigning either negatively influenced or had no influence on 80-85% of the voters, and only positively inluenced 15-20%. Sounds pretty bad huh?

Sharlene   November 5th, 2009 9:05 am ET

This is beautifully written, and I wholeheartedly agree with you. I voted for Obama, and i still support him, but he is spinning this situation out of control.

Lori   November 5th, 2009 10:41 am ET

Tom, you are right.

meenas17   November 5th, 2009 11:40 am ET

Democrats have to work seriously, lest they have to pack their bags.

Leave Your Comment


 

Comments are moderated by CNN, in accordance with the CNN Comment Policy, and may not appear on this blog until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting. Also, due to the volume of comments we receive, not all comments will be posted.


subscribe RSS Icon
About this blog

A behind the scenes look at “Anderson Cooper 360°” and the stories it covers, written by Anderson Cooper, the AC360° staff and a network of contributors. Insight you can’t find anywhere else.

We search the news each day to show you what’s on our radar and what we’re planning for the show each night.

For more details, read our tips on how to win 360° approval for comments.

Send your instant feedback to Anderson Cooper 360°.

Featured Contributors
Candy Crowley
Candy Crowley is CNN's senior political correspondent and an AC360° contributor
David Gergen
David Gergen is CNN's senior political analyst and former presidential advisor
Roland S. Martin
Roland S. Martin is a nationally award-winning journalist and AC360° contributor
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. All comments should be relevant to the topic and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. You are solely responsible for your own comments, the consequences of posting those comments, and the consequences of any reliance by you on the comments of others. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying and other information you provide via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Justice  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Opinion  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences  |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2009 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com VIP