Reporter's Note: President Obama gets lots of advice. He also gets letters. Like one from me every single day.
Tom Foreman | BIO
AC360° Correspondent
Dear Mr. President,
I understand the whole spin game. I know that Press Secretaries are paid to make weakness look strong, strength look stronger, and to keep cold beers waiting in the Rose Garden. But the spin cycle your team is running on the elections this week is sounding like a load of wet sneakers. I mean seriously, what was Gibbs babbling about when he said it was all about local issues?
If the governors’ races in Virginia and New Jersey were all going to be decided on local issues, then why did you spend any time campaigning for the Democratic candidates? Certainly we have more than enough work for you to do here in the Capitol, without you flying off to debate pothole repair schedules if that’s all that it was. And if you don’t have enough on your desk, just open the White House doors to the public for about an hour and I assure you, folks will load up your calendar like Rachel Ray’s grocery list before a tailgate party.
This is one of those rules of politics. When you campaign for someone and he or she wins, you get some credit; but if he or she loses, you have to embrace some of the loss.
And what was this business of you not even following the returns, but watching basketball instead? Like a two pound burrito, I have trouble swallowing that. Again, if the races are so unimportant that they don’t even deserve your attention (which the basketball comment implied) then why would they merit your campaigning, or the public’s participation, or a comment the next day?
See what I’m saying? You have every right to focus on, or ignore any political race you choose. But once you’ve decided to get involved in a contest (and you did) it doesn’t look so good to just walk away when the race is run and your team loses.
You’re correct: Republicans had their own troubles on Tuesday night. Undeniably. But they’re not sitting in the Oval Office. They’re not running Congress. And I’m just saying, if Democrats keep trying to spin away the tiny warning shots fired in this election, they may not be either.
You should call me. Seriously. Time for a good, head clearing run.
Regards,
Tom
| Conserve' for USA |
November 5th, 2009 8:26 am ET Do you think the democrats are smoking something? Maybe that's why they are in denial. They just don't get it do they? The majority of the country does not like what they have been doing. It just took this long for the majority to say something. Dems beware, either start being representatives of your constituants, or you will end up on the outside looking in! |
|
| SLM |
November 5th, 2009 8:46 am ET Obama, Biden, Bill Clinton were all campaigning for the Democrats that lost. Obama made numerous trips that cost the tax payers plenty all on his tax payer provided private jet to campaign for Democrats.........so much for the promise to work for ALL Americans. For them to dismiss it as no big deal is a flat out lie. If it wasn't a big deal they wouldn't have put so much into campaigning for them. The Obama administration is turning out to be the most deceptive and divisive in history. So much for change in Washington. Business as usual. |
|
| Jim Allen, III |
November 5th, 2009 8:52 am ET Obama to Gibbs: "I will be on the b'ball court outback, just wing it today." Unfortunately it appears this is happening more and more. |
|
| Mike, formerly from Syracuse, NY |
November 5th, 2009 9:01 am ET The 'local' excuse doesn't wash. Sure 55-60% of the voters in NJ and VA said in exit inteviews that Obama didn't influence their votes. That gets the spin that it was a 'local' election. Perhaps the correct spin is that the voters are just tired of campaigner Obama and want to see results, not more promises. It's significant that in both NJ and VA of the 40-45% who WERE influenced by Obama, more reported that they were NEGATIVELY influenced in their votes than positively influenced. Why isn't that the headline? Obama actually cost his candidates votes. How can that not be a referendum on Obama? Said another way, Obama's campaigning either negatively influenced or had no influence on 80-85% of the voters, and only positively inluenced 15-20%. Sounds pretty bad huh? |
|
| Sharlene |
November 5th, 2009 9:05 am ET This is beautifully written, and I wholeheartedly agree with you. I voted for Obama, and i still support him, but he is spinning this situation out of control. |
|
| Lori |
November 5th, 2009 10:41 am ET Tom, you are right. |
|
| meenas17 |
November 5th, 2009 11:40 am ET Democrats have to work seriously, lest they have to pack their bags. |
|
|
Leave Your Comment
|
||
A behind the scenes look at “Anderson Cooper 360°” and the stories it covers, written by Anderson Cooper, the AC360° staff and a network of contributors. Insight you can’t find anywhere else.
We search the news each day to show you what’s on our radar and what we’re planning for the show each night.
For more details, read our tips on how to win 360° approval for comments.
Send your instant feedback to Anderson Cooper 360°.
- Real-life effects of reform getting lost in the noise
- Live Blog from the Anchor Desk 12/21/09
- U.S. soldiers in Iraq could face courts-martial for getting pregnant
- FAQs about health care reform
- Interactive: Brittany Murphy’s acting career
- Evening Buzz: Buying Health Care Reform Votes
- Senate health care reform bill
- House health care reform bill
- Interactive: The top 10 Health-Care-Reform Players
- Video: Child custody battle continues
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2005

