Editor's Note: While health care reform proposals are still being reconciled on the Senate floor, House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi unveiled the House plan Thursday at a rally on Capitol Hill in Washington D.C. Read the full contents of the proposed bill.
AC360°
The battle over health care reform reached another milestone Thursday as top House Democrats unveiled sweeping legislation that includes a highly controversial public health insurance option.
The nearly 2,000 page bill - a combination of three different versions passed by House committees - would cost $894 billion over 10 years and extend insurance coverage to 36 million uncovered Americans, according to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
It guarantees that 96 percent of Americans have coverage, Pelosi said. The figure is based on an analysis by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.
Among other things, the bill would subsidize insurance for poorer Americans and create health insurance exchanges to make it easier for small groups and individuals to purchase coverage. It would also cap annual out-of-pocket expenses and prevent insurance companies from denying coverage for pre-existing conditions.
| Laura Newman Tarzana, CA |
October 29th, 2009 3:52 pm ET Is anyone considering making insurance companies Non-Profit and regulating charges for provided healthcare services across the board with consideration to regional cost-of-living indexes? |
|
| Steve |
October 29th, 2009 4:37 pm ET Will someone please as the Republican members of congress one simple question. Why didnt they design healthcare the way the wanted when the had control of congress starting in 1995 till 2007? I hear every member of the republican party doing this crying that we know there is a problem with healthcare but this isnt the way to do it, then why didnt they do it their way when the had the chance. I think the answer is that they are really and it's not just a saying the party of "no ". |
|
| David L. Warshauer |
October 30th, 2009 2:05 pm ET This is a question related to the health insurance government option issue. |
|
| Annie Kate |
October 30th, 2009 8:44 pm ET Instead of a 2000 page bill for the ordinary citizen Congress should just expand their coverage to include all the citizens – why should we have to pay for lesser insurance for us while we are paying for better insurance for them? For really good insurance like that I think we would all sign up. |
|
| Cecil |
October 30th, 2009 10:19 pm ET The majority of Americans do not want the government to control more of their life and this includes their medical care. If you like the idea of socialized medicine then you should support the Obama heathcare plan. |
|
| Joanne P. |
October 30th, 2009 11:50 pm ET The true healthcare solution is to allow workers to retire with benefits at age 62. The cost would be less than kick starting the economy for younger workers entering the workforce and allowing mandates to private industry to provide health insurance. |
|
| Margot, Northern California |
October 31st, 2009 2:07 am ET I agree that one solution would be opening up the Federal employees' insurance program to anyone. One of the better policies in CA costs the Federal government $585 per month. That same policy costs a private employer as much as $890 per month, and over $1,200 to an individual depending on age. |
|
| Garry from TN |
October 31st, 2009 8:43 am ET I made a honest attempt at reading and understanding what was written in the almost 2,000 page health care bill on your site. I must say, I could not make any sense of it, or understand what it is going to do for anyone. How do our elected officials know what they are voting on? This is all smoking mirrors, we are in big trouble if this passes. |
|
| Terry Horn |
October 31st, 2009 8:50 am ET My question is , who is going to pay for this 1 trillion dollars, or the last 1 trillion dollars, or the trillion dollars that the Bush administration stuck us with. Or the next silver bullet that congress needs a trillion ,for. |
|
| Kyle |
November 1st, 2009 11:47 pm ET Regardless of which party you favor just ask yourself this one question and try to come up with an answer. Why would Congress exempt themselves from the bill they are going to vote on. It seems pretty obvious. |
|
|
Comments have been closed for this article |
||
A behind the scenes look at “Anderson Cooper 360°” and the stories it covers, written by Anderson Cooper, the AC360° staff and a network of contributors. Insight you can’t find anywhere else.
We search the news each day to show you what’s on our radar and what we’re planning for the show each night.
For more details, read our tips on how to win 360° approval for comments.
Send your instant feedback to Anderson Cooper 360°.
- Live Blog from the Anchor Desk 02/09/10
- Evening Buzz: Digging Out.... Again
- Returning to Haiti. Tipping the scales of faith.
- Toyota Recalls: What you need to know
- Severe Weather Update
- Treating addicts: What we may (or may not) learn from the Conrad Murray case
- The view from above
- Interactive Haiti Map: Aid, supplies and stories
- Video: Doctors: Haitian may have survived 4 weeks in rubble
- One year in, Obama must define himself
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2005


