David Gewirtz | BIO
Editor-in-Chief, ZATZ Publishing
I know I should be celebrating. The Dow hit 10,000 yesterday after more than a year in the doldrums. So why do I have this really bad feeling in the pit of my stomach?
It's not like the fundamentals of our economy are that much more sound now than they were six or nine months ago. Health care reform still seems like a $2.4 trillion boondoggle intended to benefit those who thrive off our pain. We're still about 20 million jobs below where we need to be for most Americans to be adequately employed. And millions of Americans are still underwater in their homes, if they have anywhere to live at all.
And, oh, sure, the bankers are reporting epic profits, but those profits aren't really real. Those profits are there because taxpayers got suckered into giving away the store to the banks, and the banks kept most of the money, called it profits, used it to boost their stock price, and then gave themselves all millions of dollars in bonuses.
Heck of a scheme, if you can get away with it.
The Dow itself is also something of a farce. You may think the Dow is an average of stock prices, but that's not really the case. It's actually an artificially-generated number gerrymandered by a bunch of guys in suits. Seriously. The Dow is actually managed by the editors of the Wall Street Journal.
These editors of the Wall Street Journal choose the stocks to be included in the Dow. Choose different stocks and the Dow goes up or down. But to smooth things out and make it meet some sort of editorial standard, they don't just average the price of all the stocks. Instead, they multiply that average by a mystical multiplier - and it's that multiplier that gives them editorial control over the final Dow number you see in all the news.
So the mere fact that the Dow broke 10,000 isn't necessarily something to celebrate. It's a cooked number that could have broken last week or next month, depending on the multiplier and set of stocks the editors chose.
But still, it's nice to see the Dow is now a shiny, happy number again. Except.
Except most investors are, well, to put it gently, morons. That's how we got the dot-bomb bust. Investors follow the herd, they're lemmings, and if someone they trust says things are good, they invest. The reason we had the housing collapse, the financial collapse, and the dot-com collapse all relate to this herd mentality of investors.
And if you really want to lead investors around by the nose, there's no lure better than the Dow. It's an easy number. If it's up, they're happy. If it's down, they're sad. Unfortunately, since the fundamentals of our economy are still anything but strong, having a highly positive Dow now means many lemming investors are going to be stupid again.
They're going to follow the lure of greed. Regulations still haven't been put in place to fix the last round of idiocy. And someone's going to get hurt. Any guess who? It's not going to be the bankers. They're celebrating their hundreds of millions in bonuses.
Nope, it's going to be you and me that get hurt. Because the Dow isn't really real, greedy bankers are going to be greedy bankers, and, at 10,000 in this economy, it's all a house of cards.
Unfortunately, you can't live in a house of cards. When it collapses, and it will, let's hope you and I live inside something more substantial - and that we'll still be able to pay for where we live after the bankers and the insurance companies finish sucking us dry - just so they can have another Happy Dow Day.
I know. Cheerful thoughts.
Follow David on Twitter at http://www.Twitter.com/DavidGewirtz.
Editor’s note: David Gewirtz is Editor-in-Chief, ZATZ Magazines, including OutlookPower Magazine. He is a leading Presidential scholar specializing in White House email. He is a member of FBI InfraGard, the Cyberterrorism Advisor for the International Association for Counterterrorism & Security Professionals, a columnist for The Journal of Counterterrorism and Homeland Security, and has been a guest commentator for the Nieman Watchdog of the Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard University. He is a faculty member at the University of California, Berkeley extension, a recipient of the Sigma Xi Research Award in Engineering and was a candidate for the 2008 Pulitzer Prize in Letters.