HOME    WORLD    U.S.    POLITICS    CRIME    ENTERTAINMENT    HEALTH    TECH    TRAVEL    LIVING
September 23, 2009
Administration scrambling to come up with alternatives to McChrystal Afghanistan recommendations
Posted: 08:20 AM ET
Share this on:
Share | Permalink | 6 Comments | Add a comment
Gen. Stanley McChrystal, right, arrives at a U.S. base in Logar Province, Afghanistan, last month.
Gen. Stanley McChrystal, right, arrives at a U.S. base in Logar Province, Afghanistan, last month.

Barbara Starr
CNN Pentagon Correspondent

President Obama’s national security team is now intensively looking at alternative strategies for the war in Afghanistan they hope to present to the President within the next three weeks, a senior U.S. official familiar with the highly confidential discussions told CNN Wednesday.

The alternatives would not require the tens of thousands of additional troops General Stanley McChrystal says would be needed to carry out the counterinsurgency called for by the President back in March. Several sources tell CNN McChrystal’s assessment—which only offered the single option of a full counterinsurgency effort—essentially put the President in the position of all or nothing acceptance. Officials privately describe the situation as the president being ‘in a box,” and the situation as messy.

According to this official, one alternative being discussed inside the Administration is to continue current military operations for the next year, but also accelerate reconciliation with Taliban leaders and warlords. In addition, the alternative calls for getting an agreement to base a significant U.S military intelligence gathering operations inside Afghanistan to keep watch for any re-emergence of Al Qaeda.  The official describes this as a “hybrid” strategy somewhat short of pure counterinsurgency but with more capability than a counter terrorism strategy which would involve a limited number of troops only targeting Al Qaeda.

Despite public statements that the internal discussions are simply an effort to make sure the current strategy is the correct one, this official and others describe to CNN a view that the current debate reflects an urgent scramble to give the President new options in the wake of the McChrystal report which suggested the mission in Afghanistan would fail without more troops, resources, and a major new U.S. commitment after eight years of war.

This official also described a growing sense of urgency with each day that the Afghan presidential election remains undecided. The question of reconciling with Taliban leaders may depend in large part on there being a functioning government with even perceived legitimate power to undertake such an effort he said.

The official also said that its now expected General McChrystal will come back to Washington sometime in the weeks ahead to speak directly to the President and other NSC members about the situation in Afghanistan.

Even as this debate goes on, General McChyrstals request for more resources to combat the insurgency there will be sent to Washington in the next several days, according to Geoff Morrrell Pentagon press spokesman. McChrystal had previously been told by the Obama administration to delay presenting that force recommendation until he was asked for it, but Gates will now take the request and keep it confidential until decisions on strategy are made.

Morrell confirmed the requst is "analytical," rather than a detailed list of military units and pieces of equipment required. It will be a recommendation about what "resources" are needed to carry out the counterinsurgency strategy the general laid out in an assessment he
submitted to the Obama administration several weeks ago. In that report, McChrystal said more troops were required, as well as a significant and lengthy commitment to fighting the growing insurgency.

But the delay ordered by the administration for a specific troop request
has sparked controversy. "What I really don't understand ... is why you would tell your general in the field not to send his recommendations for the troop levels that are needed in order to implement a strategy which, according to the chairman of the Joint

Chiefs of Staff, was formulated last March," said Sen. John McCain, R-Arizona, on Tuesday. "Any leader, I think, would want to get the maximum amount of information from your people you have given positions of responsibility," he added.

A senior U.S. military official confirmed that the White House is now
reviewing the whole idea of that counterinsurgency strategy that President Barack Obama approved in March. The official said that review is due to the rising violence in Afghanistan, the unresolved Afghan presidential election and the dire outlook presented by McChrystal.

In his assessment of the situation there, McChrystal warned that more
troops are needed within the next year or the war "will likely result in
failure," according to a copy of the 66-page document obtained by The
Washington Post.

"Failure to gain the initiative and reverse insurgent momentum in the
near term (next 12 months) - while Afghan security capacity matures - risks an outcome where defeating the insurgency is no longer possible," U.S. and NATO commander McChrystal said in the document

6 Comments
More about: Afghanistan •  Barbara Starr
6 Comments
Ramzy   September 24th, 2009 1:13 pm ET

The mission will incomplete & worst.

Julie   September 24th, 2009 1:25 pm ET

"McChrystal warned that more
troops are needed within the next year or the war “will likely result in
failure,”

Will likely result in failure? They HAVE failed. Giving McChrystal more troops is like giving a financial advisor more of your hard earned cash after he's lost your entire 401K.

Afghanistan is a poor country that is not capable of waging a war against us. We have no reason to be there. If our CIA is too incompetent to catch a handful of terrorists it doesn't mean we should invade the entire country to make up for their inability to do their job.

I certainly hope Anderson's talk with John McCain isn't one of those "sounds like it's rehearsed" propaganda conversations to use McCain's clout with the senior set to sway public opinion. There's a special place in hell for those who put others in harms way for their own personal or political gain.

Mike Armstrong TX.   September 24th, 2009 3:21 pm ET

You can post this comment or not but this is my true feelings on this coflict of words and actions WAR STINKS!

Darrel   September 24th, 2009 5:47 pm ET

Someone has to think it over. That man is the commander in chief. We got into this mess with Bush thinking, which is no thinking at all. The President is right, lets think about it then act. What has all those years with the old strategy gained us?

Darrel
Marietta, GA

Claudia, Houston, Tx   September 24th, 2009 6:42 pm ET

John McCain was a war prisoner, he wasn't fighting in the war and I have never been able to understand how the American people thinks he's an authority on war. The best thing McCain could say, it's time to get out because he and Bush failed and the war should have been in Afghan 8 years ago instead of Iraq. Thank God McCain isn't our president because he's always ready to bomb.

Kim   September 24th, 2009 6:59 pm ET

Can't believe there isn't at least 500 comments in concern of this very serious and hard decision. Right or wrong in war and agree or not our men are there ! Obama said head for Afghan and we did ! I't's not an easy decision and it hurts to make it. Why ? Because lives are lost. Poppy fields in Afghan gotta go and we need to work with renewable energy and global peace ! Say No To Drugs ! To stoned on that poppy ? Plant "Sugar Cane" seeds for renewable energy $$$$$ ! New generation wants peace and solutions ! 60's calm down ! Van Morrison to you ! No easy decision and it sucks but going with McChrystal ! We need men and go win ! Obama says this decision will have nothing to do with politics ! He answers to lives lost but as Americans so do we and feel it ! What's your blood type ? That's what our US troops are asking ! When you see McChrystal"s foot prints in the sand State Secretary Hillary Clinton,make sure your feet are too ! They have land minds !" What's your blood type ?" Why are we there ? Terrorism? Oil ? Resourses ? We'll jitterbug like the 40's and tap dance like Sammy Davis Jr. ! Don't say again we won't win ! Support our troops for International Security and Energy Independence ! Super Powers in the nation don't pick on the resources of the little pups on the porch or they'll fight back and get crazy mad . Big dogs chewing up small countries and taking their resources for gain ? That's what their complaining for one hour an 30 min about and then some ! It don't mean a thing. if it ain't got that swing ! Straight Up !

Leave Your Comment


 

Comments are moderated by CNN, in accordance with the CNN Comment Policy, and may not appear on this blog until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting. Also, due to the volume of comments we receive, not all comments will be posted.


subscribe RSS Icon
About this blog

A behind the scenes look at “Anderson Cooper 360°” and the stories it covers, written by Anderson Cooper, the AC360° staff and a network of contributors. Insight you can’t find anywhere else.

We search the news each day to show you what’s on our radar and what we’re planning for the show each night.

For more details, read our tips on how to win 360° approval for comments.

Send your instant feedback to Anderson Cooper 360°.

Featured Contributors
Candy Crowley
Candy Crowley is CNN's senior political correspondent and an AC360° contributor
David Gergen
David Gergen is CNN's senior political analyst and former presidential advisor
Roland S. Martin
Roland S. Martin is a nationally award-winning journalist and AC360° contributor
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. All comments should be relevant to the topic and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. You are solely responsible for your own comments, the consequences of posting those comments, and the consequences of any reliance by you on the comments of others. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying and other information you provide via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Justice  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Opinion  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences  |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2009 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com VIP