Octavia Nasr | BIO
AC360° Contributor
CNN Senior Editor, Mideast Affairs
The news out of Lebanon today was loud but not clear. Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri “declined” to form another cabinet after his proposed one was rejected by the country’s opposition. He “quit,” according to news wires; others wrote that he “stepped down” and he “resigned.” Still, others described the Lebanese billionaire’s decision not to submit another cabinet line-up as “giving up.”
With very few exceptions, the summary of a critical moment in Lebanon’s complex political landscape was reduced to an underlying message that Hariri is a “loser” who “failed” to form a national unity government. A natural expectation follows that now someone else will “succeed” where Hariri “failed.” But, anyone with good knowledge of Lebanon – its regional role and its stature in the world – should know better.
The same groups who wanted us to believe that the Hezbollah-backed opposition was heading toward a clear win in Lebanon’s parliamentary elections in June, want us to believe today that Saad Hariri is “quitting” and “stepping down” or “resigning” from forming a government.
The fact is that Saad Hariri is only the Prime Minister-designate. That means he becomes Prime Minister only when his cabinet gets approval from President Michel Sleiman and then the vote of Lebanon’s parliament. According to the constitution, the Premier-designate can present as many cabinet combinations as necessary to secure all approvals.
In Lebanon the formula differs from any other parliamentary system because of the division of power among the country’s religions and sects. With a major win in the parliamentary elections, Hariri’s bloc, known as ‘March 14,’ gets to nominate its candidate to form the government and lead it. This will not change. Lebanon’s next PM will be a Muslim Sunni who belongs to the ‘March 14’ bloc or will be its designee.
The opposition, which is made up mainly of Muslim Shiite groups and supporters of Christian Maronite former General Michel Aoun, has been demanding key cabinet portfolios and imposing names for these cabinets. One main name that is “not negotiable” says Aoun, is his own son-in-law, Gibran Bassil, for Ministry of Interior. Bassil ran for the parliamentary elections and lost in his district.
When Hariri presented his cabinet selection to President Sleiman earlier this week after negotiations that lasted more than two months, he made it clear that if this cabinet was not approved, he would “decline” from forming a government. What this meant then and means now, is that he believes the opposition is playing hardball and he intends to do the same.
His announcement today that he told the President he would “decline from forming a government,” confirms those plans.
This is a political position, some might call it maneuvering. After all, it is Hariri’s bloc that will designate the next Prime Minister and the same cabinet is likely to be proposed. Hariri himself might end up as Premier-designate and it shouldn’t be a surprise if he re-submits the same cabinet.
The bottom line is that with his “declining to form a government” Hariri added his group’s deadlock to an already existing opposition deadlock. The only guarantee at this point is that no government will be formed under these conditions.
While on the surface, this might seem a normal process in any other parliamentary system, in Lebanon, this means the circus continues, and personal politics plays a role in the nation’s future and its people.
Who’s the biggest loser, you ask? None other than the great nation of Lebanon, home of the majestic Cedars and birthplace of Kahlil Gibran. Today, like many other important milestones in history, Lebanon stands to pay the price of personal preferences and political games. While Lebanese politicians play hardball, the people of Lebanon are divided – some cheer on the politicians, while many others watch from the sidelines wanting only to live, prosper and keep pace with world.
Follow Octavia on Twitter @OctaviaNasrCNN
| susan |
September 10th, 2009 4:21 pm ET And we thought partisanship was bad in Washington! |
|
| Annie Kate |
September 10th, 2009 4:38 pm ET And I thought politics was a mess here! Sounds like Lebanon has it worse than we do. Seems like compromise is a word that has gone out of fashion. I hope for the people of Lebanon and other countries with this problem that someone reintroduces the concept of negotiation and compromise. To just quit because he didn't get his cabinet he proposed says to me that he is in it for himself and not to help his country. |
|
|
Leave Your Comment
|
||
A behind the scenes look at “Anderson Cooper 360°” and the stories it covers, written by Anderson Cooper, the AC360° staff and a network of contributors. Insight you can’t find anywhere else.
We search the news each day to show you what’s on our radar and what we’re planning for the show each night.
For more details, read our tips on how to win 360° approval for comments.
Send your instant feedback to Anderson Cooper 360°.
- Real-life effects of reform getting lost in the noise
- Evening Buzz: Buying Health Care Reform Votes
- Live Blog from the Anchor Desk 12/21/09
- U.S. soldiers in Iraq could face courts-martial for getting pregnant
- FAQs about health care reform
- Interactive: Brittany Murphy’s acting career
- Senate health care reform bill
- House health care reform bill
- Interactive: The top 10 Health-Care-Reform Players
- Video: Child custody battle continues
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2005

