HOME    WORLD    U.S.    POLITICS    CRIME    ENTERTAINMENT    HEALTH    TECH    TRAVEL    LIVING
July 16, 2009
Winning the good war: Why Afghanistan is not Obama's Vietnam
Posted: 11:34 AM ET
Share this on:
Share | Permalink | 9 Comments
A U.S. soldier flies over Afghanistan aboard a Chinook helicopter in March.
A U.S. soldier flies over Afghanistan aboard a Chinook helicopter in March.

Peter Bergen | Bio
AC360° Contributor
CNN National Security Analyst
For The Washington Monthly

Throughout his campaign last year, President Barack Obama said repeatedly that the real central front of the war against terrorists was on the Afghanistan-Pakistan border. And now he is living up to his campaign promise to roll back the Taliban and al-Qaeda with significant resources. By the end of the year there will be some 70,000 American soldiers in Afghanistan, and the Obama administration is pushing for billions of dollars in additional aid to both Afghanistan and Pakistan.

This has caused consternation among some in the Democratic Party. In May, fifty-one House Democrats voted against continued funding for the Afghan war. And David Obey, the chairman of the powerful House Appropriations Committee, which controls federal spending, says the White House must show concrete results in Afghanistan within a year—implying that if it doesn’t do so, he will move to turn off the money spigot. If this is the attitude of Obama’s own party, one can imagine what the Republicans will be saying if his "Af-Pak" strategy doesn’t start yielding results as they gear up for the 2010 midterm elections.

Read More...

9 Comments
More about: 360° Radar •  Afghanistan •  Pakistan •  Peter Bergen •  President Barack Obama
9 Comments
meenas17   July 16th, 2009 12:13 pm ET

Af-Pak strategy is business to most Americans, eh!.Is it not the life and blood that counts?Is it only the money you deploy matters?concrete results should be shown according to the Chairman of the House Appropriations committee. Results in the form of currency or in the garb of peaceful exixtence?Be clear in your format.

Mike, Syracuse, NY   July 16th, 2009 12:32 pm ET

Sounds a lot like a 'surge' doesn't it? Say, didn't that stabilize Iraq and let us start withdrawing troops? Say, didn't Obama oppose the surge? Say, doesn't he still refuse to admit it worked? I guess he learned the lesson though because he's using McCain's strategy now in Afghanistan.

Michael C. McHugh   July 16th, 2009 12:35 pm ET

No war is ever good. They are always evil, but sometimes they are a necessary evil, as this one is. Our enemies are Islamic Nazis who hate us rabidly and cannot be negotiated with, so there is nothing else to do but to continue the war to the finish.

Mike in NYC   July 16th, 2009 12:58 pm ET

CNN's voice of Langley speaks.

Deneshia, in AR   July 16th, 2009 2:23 pm ET

I agree, No war is good. Malcolm X did once state, "You're not supposed to be so blind with patriotism that you can't face reality. Wrong is wrong, no matter who says it." I think that Obama is going right along with Bush and McCain to be honest. I really can't pinpoint the good things he have done for this country. Hopefully things will get better.

Najma Naizi, Califonia   July 16th, 2009 2:56 pm ET

Sounds a lot like a ’surge’ doesn’t it? – A constant mantra from the talking points of conservative talk show hows. They fail to mention that
a surge would not be required if the original process of the Iraq war was properly managed. They refuse to admit the wrong reasons to invade Iraq at a huge cost to the nation.
Obama is now cleaning the mess in Afganistan that should have been
addressed before IRAQ!
I guess we have all learned a lesson not to trust the Republicans, after all they base their foreign relations experince on the view of their
back window!

Joanne Pacicca   July 16th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

Soviet Turkistan, bordering Afghanistan is land above a sea of oil. Putin knows that will bring the Soviets back to superpower status...of course there is concern, this issue is critical to the balance of power and world peace.

earle,florida   July 16th, 2009 4:48 pm ET

One simple question regarding history,and the downfall of the "Roman Empire"? Their armies (Rome) were always fighting perrinnial conflicts throughout the world! Eventually,the massive cost to finance these forces of conquest, collapsed by their own weight,and the corruptness of their societal culture! Sound familiar? America,is on the same path of eternal conquest,and good-will to proliferate democracy throughout the known world,unfortunately our democracy is like an ice-creme shop,with many flavors to choose from,as our founding fathers were very aware of? Shame,shame, on America to behave as the righteous lords of the world's dogma's,and soviregn beliefs!

Ruby Coria LA., CA.   July 16th, 2009 5:54 pm ET

The man "Michael Ware" said we have no choice but to talk with the Taliban, alQaeda, Afghanistan, Pakistan,& don't forget ~India. I know one thing, they don't like us in there Land, period. What are we doing there anyways? I forgot, oh wait the 911 deal, didn't that happen in part because they don't want us in there Land, period. Just talk to them, shake hands, take pictures, & so on..

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About this blog

A behind the scenes look at “Anderson Cooper 360°” and the stories it covers, written by Anderson Cooper, the AC360° staff and a network of contributors. Insight you can’t find anywhere else.

We search the news each day to show you what’s on our radar and what we’re planning for the show each night.

For more details, read our tips on how to win 360° approval for comments.

Send your instant feedback to Anderson Cooper 360°.

Featured Contributors
Candy Crowley
Candy Crowley is CNN's senior political correspondent and an AC360° contributor
David Gergen
David Gergen is CNN's senior political analyst and former presidential advisor
Roland S. Martin
Roland S. Martin is a nationally award-winning journalist and AC360° contributor
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. All comments should be relevant to the topic and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. You are solely responsible for your own comments, the consequences of posting those comments, and the consequences of any reliance by you on the comments of others. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying and other information you provide via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Justice  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Opinion  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences  |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2009 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com VIP