| Dev Brown |
July 16th, 2009 4:17 pm ET Two comments on your article/video. 1. No slaves dealt with fire ants, those pests arrived in the 20th century well after slavery had ended. 2. As far as the census, (white or back) no one other than the head of a household was identified until the census of 1850. |
|
| Ann Moody |
July 16th, 2009 5:02 pm ET In the story about Michelle Obama's roots you mention that the slaves had to battle mosquitos, chiggers, 'fire ants,' etc. There's little doubt that there were ants on the plantation, but fire ants? It's my understanding that fire ants in the US is a relatively recent phenomenon, the ants having moved northward from Mexico in the last 30-40 years. I was very happy to see this story, but I would like for you to check out the business about fire ants. I don't think there were fire ants in SC in the 1800s. If I'm wrong, I would like to be corrected. Ann Moody |
|
| Sarah |
July 16th, 2009 5:14 pm ET The article "Tracking Michelle Obama's slave roots" was very interesting and as a descendant of people who were enslaved, it touched home. While other immigrant group share with pride the stories of their embarkment on the shores of the U.S., and have kept track of their family history, culture and language, people who were enslaved from African roots were not considered human beings but property. There was no sense of pride for people who were sold into bondage by both their own people as well as Europeans around the world. As the emmancipation of slaves took place, descendants of these people tried their best to move away from slavery by not talking about. Slavery was a humiliating and shameful experience and later descendants did not want to talk about it with younger generations. The trail from slavery has turned cold in many families because aunts, uncles, great-great-grandparents did not want to talk about it because of the hurt. In essence, trying to find out more about one's family with African roots is all the more difficult because of the obvious lack of a paper trail but because the shame proved too great to talk about. |
|
| Mike |
July 16th, 2009 5:45 pm ET The written article states: "The shacks probably weren't much refuge from the vicious clouds of mosquitoes, chiggers, fire ants, and other pests that still impinge on a person's every move on the plantation." There were undoubtedly bad things going on, but FIRE ANTS was not one of them. Not in the 1800's in South Carolina. |
|
| Annie Kate |
July 16th, 2009 10:31 pm ET Before the census some slave owners kept records of their slaves with the records of their livestock (horses, cattle, etc). One person I know traced her family back this way – found the ancestor in the livestock records and then found where and when was bought; from there found what ships had come in to supply the market with slaves and then checked the ships log which only listed counts – so many males, so many females – but it also said where they had sailed from. It doesn't get you back to an individual but it does get you back to the general area of Africa where your family may have started. |
|
|
Comments have been closed for this article |
||
A behind the scenes look at “Anderson Cooper 360°” and the stories it covers, written by Anderson Cooper, the AC360° staff and a network of contributors. Insight you can’t find anywhere else.
We search the news each day to show you what’s on our radar and what we’re planning for the show each night.
For more details, read our tips on how to win 360° approval for comments.
Send your instant feedback to Anderson Cooper 360°.
- About our show
- Father Henry, a secret father
- Live Blog from the Anchor Desk 11/12/09
- Evening Buzz: Hasan Warning Signs Missed?
- Beat 360° 11/12/09
- Pelosi plays whack-a-mole on health care
- Raw Data: Religious preference in the military
- Sesame Street – A place where everyone owns a piece of the street
- Preventing an epidemic: An eco-perspective
- Obama can't count on Karzai

