HOME    WORLD    U.S.    POLITICS    CRIME    ENTERTAINMENT    HEALTH    TECH    TRAVEL    LIVING
July 16, 2009
Clinton again rips into vetting process
Posted: 07:16 PM ET
Share this on:
Share | Permalink | 9 Comments
Sec. Clinton believes  'frustrating' and lengthy vetting is hurting diplomatic relations.
Sec. Clinton believes 'frustrating' and lengthy vetting is hurting diplomatic relations.

Jill Dougherty
CNN Foreign Affairs Correspondent

Behind the scenes they’re tearing out their hair.

Nominees for top positions in the Obama administration say they are put on seemingly endless hold for months during the “vetting” process, forced to provide minute details of their financial, personal and professional lives going back years. Many have to hire lawyers and accountants – paid for with their own money – to compile the information. Some nominees have simply given up in frustration.

Now, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton says it’s affecting U.S. diplomatic relations.

“It’s hard to explain in my position to our foreign counterparts that we don’t have positions filled that would be the natural interlocutors or their counterparts in other countries.”

It’s the third time this week the Secretary has lambasted the process. Monday, she called it “frustrating beyond words,” telling staff at the U.S. Agency for International Development who still don’t have a new administrator, the process is a “nightmare.”

Wednesday, in a major foreign policy speech at the Council on Foreign Relations, Clinton was at it again: “I mean, we are trying to get our political leaders in place to work with our very dedicated Foreign Service and Civil Service employees, but we’re still not there yet. And I had no idea when I was in the Senate asking a million questions of every nominee – (laughter) – how really shortsighted that was.” (Laughter.)

Thursday, at a press availability, the Secretary told this reporter “Most (foreign) governments, after they are elected, are up and going in a relatively short period of time. We are now six months into our new administration and it's not only here but across the government where they don't have critical positions filled. I think it's pretty obvious that the process has gotten much more complicated, cumbersome and lengthy and that is something that I hear from everyone. And it is a matter that we're going to have to address.”

Clinton added that it’s not just the Obama administration and it’s not happening just at the State Department or USAID. The situation has been getting worse with every administration. But some political observers say President Obama’s new ethics rules make it even more challenging to get through the process.

In spite of the frustration, at the USAID town hall Clinton managed to find some ironic humor in the predicament. “… here’s one of the questions you get asked: first of all, you have to remember everywhere you’ve lived since you were 18. And, beyond a certain age you can’t even remember when you were 18!”

9 Comments
9 Comments
Lampe   July 16th, 2009 7:23 pm ET

To Bad Obama didn't vet his friends a little better, he might have known that most of them were TAX CHEATS!

JC- Los Angeles   July 16th, 2009 7:23 pm ET

Hillary Clinton needs to put in her four years, pull a Colin Powell by recusing herself from a second term and then run for President under the mantra of someone here to fix eight years of failed policies.

Annie Kate   July 16th, 2009 8:13 pm ET

With a process this cumbersome there are bound to be some good candidates that get tired of waiting and having their life on hold and just give up and go on with their lives and work elsewhere. Talented people are always in demand and the government will have to move faster to be able to snag any of them. The government streamlined the tax return to require less paperwork – why not streamline this process? Its ridiculous that these jobs are not filled so our government can work at full capacity; it looks bad to other countries as well; and the worst fact is that we will use the best and the brightest if this vetting process continues to be as slow as it is now.

Mike, Syracuse, NY   July 16th, 2009 8:44 pm ET

Given the string of tax cheats and subjects of investigations who were 'successfully' vetted, maybe random selection from the population would be better.

Sam   July 16th, 2009 8:53 pm ET

Go Hillary Clinton 2012!!

Jacqueline G. Logan   July 16th, 2009 9:17 pm ET

Look, if the Government didn’t process in this manner then we would all complain about how it wasn’t efficient enough. Talented individuals understand the process and are patient; nothing that is done right is rushed along without process. President Obama has only been in office for 7 months now and has a large undertaking, and I appreciate his high level of thinking and hard work for the people, for America.

Lori   July 16th, 2009 10:47 pm ET

Hillary!

Sabrina In Las Vegas   July 16th, 2009 11:53 pm ET

If you want to hold an office at any time in your life, get your ducks in a row now for the vetting process.

If the administration needs these things, they need to count it as part of the background check and pay it...it is a write-off for them.

We can't have red tape getting in the way of getting work done.

RLWellman   July 17th, 2009 9:03 am ET

The "vetting process" hasn't worked good enough. Look at how many crooks made it through.

The amount of money spent by the Government in the first 6-months is the largest amount ever spent. I would hate to see how much more money would have been blown if the Government was running at full capacity.

I don't think there are a lot of people standing around looking at snapping up these Government jobs. I don't believe the talented people are that stupid to take these jobs!

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About this blog

A behind the scenes look at “Anderson Cooper 360°” and the stories it covers, written by Anderson Cooper, the AC360° staff and a network of contributors. Insight you can’t find anywhere else.

We search the news each day to show you what’s on our radar and what we’re planning for the show each night.

For more details, read our tips on how to win 360° approval for comments.

Send your instant feedback to Anderson Cooper 360°.

Featured Contributors
Candy Crowley
Candy Crowley is CNN's senior political correspondent and an AC360° contributor
David Gergen
David Gergen is CNN's senior political analyst and former presidential advisor
Roland S. Martin
Roland S. Martin is a nationally award-winning journalist and AC360° contributor
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. All comments should be relevant to the topic and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. You are solely responsible for your own comments, the consequences of posting those comments, and the consequences of any reliance by you on the comments of others. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying and other information you provide via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Justice  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Opinion  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences  |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2009 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com VIP