Abigail Thernstrom
Special to CNN
Judge Sonia Sotomayor is all but certain to be confirmed as an associate justice on the Supreme Court. It is close to unimaginable that the Republicans will peel off enough Democratic votes to stop Senate confirmation.
She's a first: a Latina. And she has an impressive life history: Raised in a housing project by a single mother, she went to Princeton and then to Yale Law School. It's a classic American overcoming-the-odds story, but, while admirable, it is not a qualification for the highest court in the land.
Democrats themselves have often implicitly made the same point - about other minority appointees, in fact. They never saw the much humbler origins of Justice Clarence Thomas as an argument for his elevation to the Court.
And they used a filibuster to stop Bush appointee Miguel Estrada from getting a seat on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, which they feared would be a springboard to the Supreme Court.
| Teresa, OH |
July 14th, 2009 11:36 am ET A while back I thought Sotomayer seemed like a good choice. Of course, none of us really had all the info about her and her decision making skills. After watching her for a good length of time during the hearings, I am so disappointed in her behavior under fire. I am very concerned about her nomination. Those fluttering eyelids are such red flags to me I cant seem to get beyond it. Her whole manner of body language and facial expressions are making me very very nervous. And whats with all her note taking and big circling of what she has written? But then again, I'm not the one who decides who gets chosen : ) Something I would ask anyone who got nominated for this position is: why do you think you are CAPABLE of taking on this job and doing a good job? |
|
| RLWellman |
July 14th, 2009 12:40 pm ET It would be fine to dominate this woman if she made her decisions by the law. However, she said herself she makes her decisions by her feelings. 80% of her decisions have been overturned by the supreme court. I do not believe she is supreme court material. I for one would not like to have her make these kind of decisions based on her feelings which have shown to be discriminatory. When has reverse- discrimination been the answer to discrimination? |
|
| carmen carrasquillo |
July 14th, 2009 1:34 pm ET The only thing they should worry about Sotomayor is that she will bring in a Blast of Culture, that embraces, good food, a Big Heart, a musical step, the ability to create and have a party at a moments notice, she will become a true friend to every colleague, maintain a relationship with everyone, including the janitor, she will demonstrate the aspects of a true Latina nurturing women who lives life, taking nothing for granted, who is very intellegent, and industrious. All the while doing it with the highest integrity. The justices will no doubt, learn the value of a warm heart, and the spirit of pride of what it is to be a daughter of Puerto Rico, and the kid who grew up AMERICANA loving the Yankees, and growing up BRONX, Catholic, with a steaming plate of RICE and BEANS on a cold day, in the projects! |
|
| Arachnae |
July 14th, 2009 2:16 pm ET "When I get a case about discrimination, I have to think about people in my own family who suffered discrimination because of their ethnic background or because of religion or because of gender. And I do take that into account. When I have a case involving someone who's been subjected to discrimination because of disability, I have to think of people who I've known and admire very greatly who've had disabilities, and I've watched them struggle to overcome the barriers that society puts up often just because it doesn't think of what it's doing - the barriers that it puts up to them." Sotomayor? No, Samuel Alito during his confirmation hearings. Apparently 'empathy' is only okay if you're male. or Republican. |
|
| Crystal Curry |
July 14th, 2009 2:41 pm ET Well the hearings were eye opening ,I did nor realize she was against abortion and so pro gun.Also she did not hold up well under pressure put on her by the Republicans.I don't think she will work for the Blacks. |
|
| Jim,Calif |
July 14th, 2009 2:50 pm ET If You listened to the Senators & The Judges responces on the 2nd Amendment – useing the same questions & answers the Gay & Lesbian community can kiss their battle for "Rights" goodbye. |
|
| Jack L. Ford |
July 14th, 2009 4:02 pm ET Why has the media and the Senate ignored the "elephant in the room". |
|
|
Comments have been closed for this article |
||
A behind the scenes look at “Anderson Cooper 360°” and the stories it covers, written by Anderson Cooper, the AC360° staff and a network of contributors. Insight you can’t find anywhere else.
We search the news each day to show you what’s on our radar and what we’re planning for the show each night.
For more details, read our tips on how to win 360° approval for comments.
Send your instant feedback to Anderson Cooper 360°.
- Real-life effects of reform getting lost in the noise
- Evening Buzz: Buying Health Care Reform Votes
- Live Blog from the Anchor Desk 12/21/09
- U.S. soldiers in Iraq could face courts-martial for getting pregnant
- FAQs about health care reform
- Interactive: Brittany Murphy’s acting career
- Senate health care reform bill
- House health care reform bill
- Interactive: The top 10 Health-Care-Reform Players
- Video: Child custody battle continues
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2005

