HOME    WORLD    U.S.    POLITICS    CRIME    ENTERTAINMENT    HEALTH    TECH    TRAVEL    LIVING
July 13, 2009
Sotomayor a cautious, careful liberal
Posted: 05:00 PM ET
Share this on:
Share | Permalink | 23 Comments
Sonia Sotomayor appears to view the Constitution much like retired Justice David Souter did.
Sonia Sotomayor appears to view the Constitution much like retired Justice David Souter did.

Jeffrey Toobin
CNN Senior Analyst

One of the enduring myths about Supreme Court justices is that they often turn out to "surprise" the presidents who appoint them. Sure-thing conservatives, it is said, turn out to be liberals, ­and vice versa. In fact, the evidence is almost entirely the opposite: that with justices, as in life, what you see is what you get.

The question, then, is this: What do you see when you look at Sonia Sotomayor, who begins her confirmation hearings as a strong favorite for confirmation?

She is, above all, a veteran judge ­who has 18 years on the federal bench: six as a trial judge (appointed by President George H.W. Bush) and the rest on the court of appeals (appointed by President Clinton). The question of competence is closed. Sotomayor can do the job. It's no surprise that she received a unanimous rating of well-qualified from the American Bar Association screening committee.

But what would she stand for as a Supreme Court justice? She is, it seems, a liberal,­ but a liberal in the cautious and careful mode of her likely future colleagues Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer.

Keep reading...

23 Comments
More about: 360° Radar •  Jeffrey Toobin •  Sonia Sotomayor •  Supreme Court
23 Comments
Cindy   July 13th, 2009 10:51 am ET

Thanks for the run down Toobin. I don't see what she thinks really matters. The court will still be evenly split. She is not going to be able to sway all of them to her kind of thinking all of the time. They all think on their own and are great at coming to their own decisions. If they were easily swayed then they would not be where they are today. So the fuss over her being appointed is a waste of time.

Cindy..Ga.

Curtis Colons   July 13th, 2009 12:58 pm ET

Sotomayor is the woman at the poker table playing meek and mild with a soft smile who also has the gun pointed under the table straight at you, which you'll never know good or bad until you make the deadly move or the game ends in well-being! God Bless you Sonja Sotomayor. Dios Bendiga mi gente.

Michael C. McHugh   July 13th, 2009 1:15 pm ET

For most of our history, the Supreme Court has been made up of rich white guys who had considerable empathy for the upper classes and big business interests. We've had more than enough of that during teh Second Gilded Age of the last 30 years.

BARRY IBRAHIMA MALADHO   July 13th, 2009 1:35 pm ET

I heared that G. .H. W Bush was very surprise about his choice to the Supreme Court but rest assured that this one will not be for Mr OBAMA

John   July 13th, 2009 2:23 pm ET

For those "5 percent" of cases that come before the supreme court, those that have no specific law or precident, personal experiences must come into play. Anyone that refuses to admit that personal life experiences don't or shouldn't play a part in these type of decisions simply is not being honest and cannot be trusted. So many politicians are simply not smart or at least not honest.

Joanne Pacicca   July 13th, 2009 2:34 pm ET

Let's not look to the past. Let's look to the future without bias. Is she the best candidate for the position? That is the only litmus test that should prevail.

Lampe   July 13th, 2009 4:53 pm ET

Why is she acting so meek and mild now? We have read her decsions, and her remarks, those are things said numerous times, so she can't say "It wasn't exactly what I meant to say." If she is the right one for the job, so be it, if not get onto something else. That is now that Obamas back home.

RLWellman   July 13th, 2009 6:08 pm ET

This is the problem of voting for a person just because he or she is a Democrat, Republican, or Independent. You need to look at what they have stood for over the years. When Sonia Sotomayer has 80% of her judgements overturned by a higher court, it looks like she is judging on her beliefs, instead of the law.

sara hunter   July 13th, 2009 6:41 pm ET

Why does no one mention the fact that Sen. Sessions did not make it thru the process for the Supreme Court because he is a racist and still is. Why does no one read her whole statement that enclosed the words "wise latina female"?

Milton Smith   July 13th, 2009 6:52 pm ET

Sperm in a lab is pretty clever, hybids men women with bigger eys nueral grafting ports secret teched out ship and stuff is cool and to some degree real, cloned sheep is neat, but the man rex is the most fricken vicous thing i have ever encounterd. As they all massed in into the field lining up to the commander the air planes in the sky dropping bombs numbed the sense all night and day hybrids didn't look like a problem the man rex is the most meanest thing i ever saw. the bombs dropping on you is bad but watching hybrids destroy everything with their bare hands towering over you is fkc real too. Make shift genetic labs in the gehtos is pretty fkc bad dude.

Katja   July 13th, 2009 7:38 pm ET

What a shame that the Senators in the Judical committee take so much time and effort to decide if one person can do a job. Too bad those same Senators can't read a 1000 page bill that puts my yet un-realized grandchildren in debt. Vote all the bums and bumettes out! We need people who have more brains then ego.
I hope this lovely Judge Sotomayor quietly chews them up.

Annie Kate   July 13th, 2009 8:23 pm ET

I think Sotomayer would make a good Supreme. Her similarity to Souter in certain ways encourages me and the fact that she is a woman is also important to me. I think Obama made a very good choice when he nominated her for Souter's seat on the bench. Hope she gets it.

Joanne Osinkowski Ontario Canada   July 13th, 2009 8:48 pm ET

This woman is very competent for the Job. The Republicans just want to make themselves look like they are earning their pay. Nothing but a bunch of cry babies republicans are!

Lampe   July 13th, 2009 9:27 pm ET

AnnieKate: I am surprised to hear that Sotomayer is a women is important to you. I guess it is only important to you that a Democratic women, is allowed to advance? Because from your remarks about Gov. Palin, I just assume you don't like her because she is a Republican?

Joe G. (Illinois)   July 13th, 2009 9:52 pm ET

Obama has an agenda.. He wants “Equality for all..” With the lowest common denominator as the baseline.. People voted for him.. People were notified and well informed.. Now people act surprised of his choices.. “Equality for all.” Do you know who else want equality for all? The devil.. The devil want "hell on earth" equally for everybody.. No matter what your efforts or lack there off.. “Equality for all” that’s what he wants..

Kathy, Chicago   July 13th, 2009 9:52 pm ET

I'm glad that at least she is a woman. I don't think that she would have been my choice. I am starting to see the world in a much more conservative way.

David of Boston   July 13th, 2009 10:22 pm ET

Is anyone at CNN aware that there has already been a Hispanic on the Supreme Court?

His name was Benjamin Cardozo.

TheDankFrankSays   July 13th, 2009 10:39 pm ET

Her "personal experiences" help guide her decision making....

Oh the irony of a Latino woman tricking all the senators and news politicians with simple logic in English.

I sure hope she uses her personal experiences to make decisions. Like.... in 1st grade where she learned to count and read.

Seriously, I hope she uses those experiences.

lisa   July 14th, 2009 1:49 am ET

While I look forward to watching the questions and answers, I can't help but wonder if any of this matters. I'm sure the senators will ask some really pointed questions, and Sotomayor will say as little as possible. I'm not referring to the syllable count either. Her mouth will move and nothing substantial will really come out. After all, there's no doubt about one thing, she does know the law. It will feel like The Puppet Show -only less entertaining – and at the end everyone will smile and clap and she'll be the next justice.
I would truly like to hear legitimate explanations for her switch on the "we don't make laws, we apply them" thing as well as her thinking on the case of the Conneticut firefighters.
I'm willing to give her a chance if she gives me a reason, but I have the sneaking suspicion this is going to look like an awards show.... A lot of back patting and some speeches that don't make sense to the majority of the audience.

Peter   July 14th, 2009 1:55 am ET

Racism ain't racism when it's reverse racism – flavor of the year.

Peter   July 14th, 2009 1:57 am ET

Lampe,

Of course. Hypocrisy's name ids "Liberal".

Peter   July 14th, 2009 1:58 am ET

Kathy,

There is hope. Hang in there.

1 trillion and counting.

Peter   July 14th, 2009 2:00 am ET

Michael C. McHugh,

Right!

Civil rights, affirmative action, etc., etc. Do you know how hollow that remark is?

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About this blog

A behind the scenes look at “Anderson Cooper 360°” and the stories it covers, written by Anderson Cooper, the AC360° staff and a network of contributors. Insight you can’t find anywhere else.

We search the news each day to show you what’s on our radar and what we’re planning for the show each night.

For more details, read our tips on how to win 360° approval for comments.

Send your instant feedback to Anderson Cooper 360°.

Featured Contributors
Candy Crowley
Candy Crowley is CNN's senior political correspondent and an AC360° contributor
David Gergen
David Gergen is CNN's senior political analyst and former presidential advisor
Roland S. Martin
Roland S. Martin is a nationally award-winning journalist and AC360° contributor
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. All comments should be relevant to the topic and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. You are solely responsible for your own comments, the consequences of posting those comments, and the consequences of any reliance by you on the comments of others. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying and other information you provide via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Justice  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Opinion  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences  |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2009 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com VIP