<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sotomayor reversal not a first</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2009/06/29/sotomayor-reversal-not-a-first/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2009/06/29/sotomayor-reversal-not-a-first/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 04:00:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joanne Pacicca, Solvay, NY</title>
		<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2009/06/29/sotomayor-reversal-not-a-first/comment-page-1/#comment-776763</link>
		<dc:creator>Joanne Pacicca, Solvay, NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/?p=44187#comment-776763</guid>
		<description>Perhaps the racial issue is valid; however, I thought &quot;justice is blind&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the racial issue is valid; however, I thought &#034;justice is blind&#034;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brenda Weisz</title>
		<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2009/06/29/sotomayor-reversal-not-a-first/comment-page-1/#comment-776694</link>
		<dc:creator>Brenda Weisz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/?p=44187#comment-776694</guid>
		<description>There are persons that would like to believe that there shouldn&#039;t be any reasons for any additional considerations for employment such as quotas, even though they still see the acute disparity between Blacks and their White counterparts in unemployment, income, almost all health concerns, proverty, etc. Also in many cases, Blacks are locked out of  jobs because of our credit, which is a silent form of discrimmination. Here in California, we have English as a second language in our public schools, giving our Latin brothers an additional consideration, while creating another reason not to hire Blacks. Even state jobs are increasingly spanish speaking only,  as well as the private sector; another shut -out for Blacks. Plagued by inner-city woes of proverty, fatherless latch-key ungoverned, unparented  children,since according to statistics, we are more often unable to afford childcare, another generation will be needing a leg up. So we are forever falling behind, failing in front. We are  not given preference in a lop-sided society. I don&#039;t know what the answer is. Quotas, though not ideal, at least leveled off those drowning in the deep end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are persons that would like to believe that there shouldn&#039;t be any reasons for any additional considerations for employment such as quotas, even though they still see the acute disparity between Blacks and their White counterparts in unemployment, income, almost all health concerns, proverty, etc. Also in many cases, Blacks are locked out of  jobs because of our credit, which is a silent form of discrimmination. Here in California, we have English as a second language in our public schools, giving our Latin brothers an additional consideration, while creating another reason not to hire Blacks. Even state jobs are increasingly spanish speaking only,  as well as the private sector; another shut -out for Blacks. Plagued by inner-city woes of proverty, fatherless latch-key ungoverned, unparented  children,since according to statistics, we are more often unable to afford childcare, another generation will be needing a leg up. So we are forever falling behind, failing in front. We are  not given preference in a lop-sided society. I don&#039;t know what the answer is. Quotas, though not ideal, at least leveled off those drowning in the deep end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Courtney Peratrovich</title>
		<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2009/06/29/sotomayor-reversal-not-a-first/comment-page-1/#comment-774609</link>
		<dc:creator>Courtney Peratrovich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/?p=44187#comment-774609</guid>
		<description>&#039;Now how did Dorothy do that with her heels?&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#039;Now how did Dorothy do that with her heels?&#039;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Courtney Peratrovich</title>
		<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2009/06/29/sotomayor-reversal-not-a-first/comment-page-1/#comment-774603</link>
		<dc:creator>Courtney Peratrovich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/?p=44187#comment-774603</guid>
		<description>President Obama contempates the sales strategy of The Best Pop President with sales of Chia Obama...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama contempates the sales strategy of The Best Pop President with sales of Chia Obama...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.D.One</title>
		<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2009/06/29/sotomayor-reversal-not-a-first/comment-page-1/#comment-774357</link>
		<dc:creator>C.D.One</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 22:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/?p=44187#comment-774357</guid>
		<description>Mr. A/C when is CNN gonna do a special about beiing 
,a native american in america, or poor middle class whites ,etc. ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. A/C when is CNN gonna do a special about beiing<br />
,a native american in america, or poor middle class whites ,etc. ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annie Kate</title>
		<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2009/06/29/sotomayor-reversal-not-a-first/comment-page-1/#comment-774352</link>
		<dc:creator>Annie Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 22:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/?p=44187#comment-774352</guid>
		<description>These judges are fallible human beings - it is unrealistic to think they wouldn&#039;t be reversed on some of their decisions.  The reversal is pretty much &quot;business as usual&quot; for any judge and not just Sotomayer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These judges are fallible human beings &#8211; it is unrealistic to think they wouldn&#039;t be reversed on some of their decisions.  The reversal is pretty much &#034;business as usual&#034; for any judge and not just Sotomayer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
