HOME    WORLD    U.S.    POLITICS    CRIME    ENTERTAINMENT    HEALTH    TECH    TRAVEL    LIVING
May 21, 2009
How many detainees go back to terrorism?
Posted: 09:06 PM ET
Share this on:
Share | Permalink | 10 Comments
A guard talks with a detainee at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, earlier this year.
A guard talks with a detainee at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, earlier this year.

Editor's note: The Defense Department reports that up to 14 percent of detainees suspected of terrorism and held by the U.S. at Guantanamo Bay turn to terrorism when they get out of custody. The numbers are alarming. But are they accurate?

Peter Bergen says no. The CNN National Security Analyst believes the recidivism rate for suspected terrorists is far lower than the 14 percent estimate from the Pentagon. Together with his colleagues at The New American Foundation, Bergen concludes that less than 3 percent of released detainees engage in attacks or attempted attacks against the U.S. citizens or interests.

And there is more, as Peter tells us in his dispatch below:

Peter Bergen
CNN National Security Analyst

This is what we have concluded based on analysis of press reports, previous DoD statements and al Qaeda or Taliban statements.

Instead of a 14 percent recidivism rate, we found a TOTAL rate of 8 percent - even if you include people making anit-American statements when they got freed.

When you take out those people and guys who joined insurgencies or terror groups that aren't anti-American-focused, the real number is no more than 3 percent. Here's the raw data:

Of 534 detainees released, 13 have engaged in insurgent groups that attack or attempt to attack the U.S., U.S. citizens or U.S. bases abroad. That's 2.4 percent.

Thirteen more engaged in insurgent groups that attack or attempt to attack non-U.S. targets. That's another 2.4 percent.

And 18 more got involved in anti-American propaganda or criticism of the U.S. government or military - but not in terrorism. That's another 3.4 percent.

If you add them up, you can conclude the recidivism rate is 8 percent. But more realistically, no more than 3 percent have gotten involved in groups that engage in anti-American violence. About 5 percent TOTAL are engaged with violent groups anywhere in the world. AND a not surprising 3-4 percent who get involved in anti American propaganda activities.

By comparison, the recidivism rate for convicts coming out of U.S. prisons is about 60 percent.

10 Comments
More about: 360° Q & A •  Guantanomo Bay •  Peter Bergen
10 Comments
Patton   May 21st, 2009 9:55 pm ET

We are at war with terrorists. Since when is it appropriate to release prisoners of war until the war is over. Obama is wrong on this one. I would hate think of having someone like this in charge during WWII otherwise we would all be speaking German or Japanese. Wonder what Obama view on using the atom bomb would be. How would he call it? A misguided experiment?

suntak   May 21st, 2009 9:58 pm ET

perhaps we should keep them in prision longer till they are too old to
be a terrorrist.

Heidi   May 21st, 2009 10:24 pm ET

Good job hammering Cheney's daughter with questions and facts. She was squirming and resorted to one of the lowest GOP tactics: talking over you. Wish you could put a shock collar on people when they do that.

LYNN INGANAMORT   May 21st, 2009 10:54 pm ET

Isn't one percent too many...
Why don't we just invite a few known terrorist into our country..
and see what happens ... is there any difference..?
Oh ..except that this bunch may hate us even more for holding them..

Tami   May 21st, 2009 11:46 pm ET

What is the recidivism rate for the crimanally insane comming out of U.S. prisons. If someone states their intention to commit terrorism because the bible or god told them to, don't they get incarcerated in an institution for the criminally insane? Can detainees be "rehabilitated" to a point where they are no longer criminally insane?

Jim   May 21st, 2009 11:52 pm ET

If even one returns to their old ways that is too many .

DA   May 22nd, 2009 1:37 am ET

so, Gitmo was excellent at rehabbing these detainees?–12 x better than the US prison system?

Mike   May 22nd, 2009 4:53 am ET

It is a shame VP Cheney continues to speak in a defensive manner. It is not any more about defending the past. It is about moving forward. Obama is the new, Cheney is the old. And Cheney just can't seem to understand the new. Every politician worth his weight has to be able to evolve and change with the public's view. Cheney is not listening to the people. And it is making him look bad. No wonder he waited til "after" Obama spoke. If he went first, who knows what else ignorant statements he would have made. I am a life long Republican, and Cheney is really not doing the party or the American people any favors by keeping in the public eye. It was torture! And how dare he say otherwise. Then, we would not have called it that. Today, yes we would! He just can't understand how the American public has evolved its opinion while he keeps his in the past. It is a shame he can't evolve with most of America. President Obama led this evolution. Thank God for that.

Hartmut Rast   May 22nd, 2009 5:13 am ET

If only I could believe in figures and statistics! The whole discussion about the recidivism rate for suspected terrorism by the Guantanamo detainees sounds to me like a mixture of wishful thinking and to play down the damage for the interpretation of democracy by the former Bush administration. Please do not get me wrong with my ideas about human rights and I disapprove any violence to express ones political views, moreover, suicide bombings or terrorist attacks against whomever. However, being captured and tortured over a longer period of time will make a terrorist even out of a former pacifist and non-violent protester. With the so called War on Terror the US government has brought more difficulties into our world then solutions for a peaceful and tolerant living together. Unfortunately, one can not turn back the time. Hartmut Rast, London

Bob Little   May 22nd, 2009 6:31 am ET

One is way too many!

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About this blog

A behind the scenes look at “Anderson Cooper 360°” and the stories it covers, written by Anderson Cooper, the AC360° staff and a network of contributors. Insight you can’t find anywhere else.

We search the news each day to show you what’s on our radar and what we’re planning for the show each night.

For more details, read our tips on how to win 360° approval for comments.

Send your instant feedback to Anderson Cooper 360°.

Featured Contributors
Candy Crowley
Candy Crowley is CNN's senior political correspondent and an AC360° contributor
David Gergen
David Gergen is CNN's senior political analyst and former presidential advisor
Roland S. Martin
Roland S. Martin is a nationally award-winning journalist and AC360° contributor
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. All comments should be relevant to the topic and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. You are solely responsible for your own comments, the consequences of posting those comments, and the consequences of any reliance by you on the comments of others. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying and other information you provide via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Justice  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Opinion  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences  |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2009 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com VIP