Elise Labott
CNN State Department Producer
If anyone needed a better visual that the State Department is back under Hillary Clinton, today's AFPAK meetings provided one. In the State Department's ornate Ben Franklin diplomatic reception room, Clinton presided over the opening session of the two-days of talks with Afghan President Hamid Karzai and Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari. Flanked by the two leaders, Clinton spoke at length to the foreign, defense, intel and agriculture ministers from both countries and a team of heavyweights from the Obama administration, including US envoy Richard Holbrooke, CENTCOM Chief General Petraeus, CIA Director Leon Panetta, FBI Director Robert Mueller and Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsak.
The diverse group, Clinton said, reflects the fact that "promoting peace must be an all-government effort." But it was clearly Clinton who was running the show, on her own turf. The Secretary of State, who came respectably close to being president herself, addressed the leaders with authority about the Obama administration's strategy for stabilizing both countries.
Since taking office Clinton has been adept at featuring the State Department as once again being the center of US diplomacy, a traditional role that was often in doubt during the Bush administration. Just two days on the job, President Obama traveled to the State Department to announce his appointment of Ambassador Richard Holbrooke as his point man for Afghanistan and Pakistan and former Senator George Mitchell as Mideast envoy. She also has fought for the State Department and the US Agency for International Development to take back duties and resources for development that have fallen to the Pentagon over the past eight years.
Obama's foreign policy team is not one of shrinking violets, with Vice President Joe Biden, National Security Advisor Jim Jones and Ambassador to the UN Susan Rice. Not to mention Mitchell and Holbrooke, who is a diplomatic tour de force of his own. During the first 100 days of the administration, we've all wondered whether Clinton would be able to stand out among these players. Today she demonstrated, once again, that she is large, and in charge.
| Melissa |
May 6th, 2009 2:09 pm ET What a truly great idea giving Clinton this position. Obama couldn't have chosen anyone more perfect. She's a very good diplomat. |
|
| Wendell |
May 6th, 2009 2:25 pm ET Why can,t we hit the Taliban with more air power and just blow up thier strong holds and hide outs. It seems to be more practical this way and then perhaps send in ground troops to mop up . We would lose less troops this way . All this hand to hand combat is getting us nowhere. If you saw the vidieo from Nick today, well ,lets say they mean bizness. You no the American public can,t stand to see all the coffins coming back. Why keep losing troops when we don,t have to fight in such a way . We need to be smarter and hit them harder and stop useing old fashion tactics. |
|
| daveindesmoines |
May 6th, 2009 2:30 pm ET The extremists are almost like a virus or cancer that tries to infect “healthy cells.” Hate is that disease. In order to prevent that disease from spreading is to keep good cells (or people) healthy. |
|
| twylamalikah |
May 6th, 2009 2:43 pm ET Thank you for the stroies you cover. I enjoy watching your program. I dvr it every night. May God Bless you. CNN my news to watch! |
|
| Shekar |
May 6th, 2009 2:44 pm ET Please be advised that Taliban is Pakistan's army without uniform. How can the US be so naive to think that the uniformed Military of Pakistan will ever fight with the non-uniformed military? They are one and the same. They are in the pretext of fighting Taliban taking the money from US and funding/strengthening Taliban. |
|
| supergirllondon@twitter |
May 6th, 2009 2:56 pm ET People need to realise that diplomacy and standing 'shoulder to shoulder' with the international community will be the only way that the US can engage in a viable debate on how to contain the Taliban, but also how to make the people in the region resist the agression and somewhat inevitablilty of a mullah like Taliban strong-hold on the masses. This can be addressed in a number of ways: 1) The US gives the international community, – those being the EU,UN and NATO – a strong speaking to and tells them straight to stop with the indecisions, and to get together and agree a UN resolution that recognises the Taliban as a legitimate political party or movement who shall participate in diplomacy so long as they call a ceasefire. It's been done with the IRA, Hamas, and the Mehdi army, so why not the Taliban? 2) You need to get the Arab Alliance (Syria, Iran, SA, Egypt, and Turkey) to engage in transparent diplomacy with the Taliban as well, whilst also laising with the US and UK. 3) People need to stop looking at Talibani recruits as poor uneducated slumdogs, and instead recognise that the wealthy, educated and smart are part of it's band of brothers. 4) You need to make the people in countries like Pakistan to see what their Armageddon scenario could be..No womens rights, ex pat families banned from going to the region, child soldiers, existence within a bubble of fear and control. You then need to show them what the positives could be of resisitng the Taliban...scholarships, internet freedom of choice etc. 5) You need to quite basically shut down all the borders – but with the agreement of those countries. You need to control the various borders. Surely if the international community could find it both practical and logistical to controlling the borders between Pakistan, Afghanistan, Syria and Turkey. 6) And finally, just listen to them all. Find out, understand and recognise why the people in those regions are anti US, Anti government and why they believe it is their way or the highway. |
|
| Ahmed Malik |
May 6th, 2009 3:57 pm ET Billions have been and billions more will supposedly be sent to Pakistan and Afghanistan in the name of development in these countries. For goodness sake, why is everybody afraid or reluctant to demand guarantees if whole or part of this money will not end shoring up family fortunes stashed all over the world by Zardaris and Karzais of these countries? After all these are hard earned dollars paid as taxes by you and me; is it not? |
|
|
Comments have been closed for this article |
||
A behind the scenes look at “Anderson Cooper 360°” and the stories it covers, written by Anderson Cooper, the AC360° staff and a network of contributors. Insight you can’t find anywhere else.
We search the news each day to show you what’s on our radar and what we’re planning for the show each night.
For more details, read our tips on how to win 360° approval for comments.
Send your instant feedback to Anderson Cooper 360°.
- The global sea-level rise: How melting glaciers and ice sheets matter
- Beat 360° 12/8/09
- Can the Federal Government really create jobs?
- Video: Self-help gone wrong
- The future of journalism in the world's most dangerous place for journalists
- Dear President Obama #323: The growing heat over climategate
- Millions in U.S. drink dirty water, records show
- CNN Poll: Optimism on economy fading
- A place haunted by Lennon's murder
- Rape and murder, funded by cell phones
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2005

