HOME    WORLD    U.S.    POLITICS    CRIME    ENTERTAINMENT    HEALTH    TECH    TRAVEL    LIVING
February 24, 2009
Same ol' pork barrel Congress
Posted: 02:40 PM ET
Share this on:
Share | Permalink | 74 Comments

Drew Griffin
CNN Special Investigations Unit

On the same day the President called on the government to undergo fiscal restraint, Congress unveiled a bill revealing where all those earmarks have been hiding.

The pork-laden omnibus catch-all, held over from last year, contains no less than 8,570 earmarks. The pork projects are still being deciphered by various watchdog groups, and republicans are railing at the fact that the congressional leadership seems to have violated its transparency rules by jamming these all in a last minute bill, but a quick view has me scratching my head in disbelief at both parties.

After two years of criticism aimed at pork barrel spending, the defiant members of Congress are unabashedly asking for more. Republicans and democrats alike are looking for taxpayer dollars for projects no one could call necessary.

Like what?

David Obey, the house appropriations chair, wants to rebuild a Carnegie library building in Medford, Wisconsin, and he wants to reconstruct "Historic Lighthouses" in the Apostle Island National Lakeshore. (Historic lighthouse means no one uses them anymore, they are simply nice looking relics)

Nancy Pelosi wants money for Angels Island State Park for a center to research genealogy.

A Republican, Robert Aderholt of Alabama, wants $47,500 federal taxpayer dollars to build a perimeter fence around the Rountree Airport to keep the animals away. Rountree airport listed a whopping 14 aircraft based there in 2008. There is not a single air taxi or air carrier that uses this dinky little one runway airstrip.

But the request pales in comparison with an old favorite up in Alaska that simply won't go away. Akutan is a tiny island off Alaska that has a seasonal fish processing factory. The owners of the factory gave money to now disgraced and ousted Senator Ted Stevens. We reported on Stevens' earmark request last year. This year, Stevens is gone but Akutan airport is back. Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski wants you and I to spend $1-point-2 million dollars on the Akutan airport.

Airports are a favorite of money. Another favorite of mine is Democratic Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia, a true pro at earmarking bills. If Senator Byrd wants money for airports in West Virginia, he doesn't waste time explaining why. His earmark request in the transportation portion of the bill: $4,275,000 dollars. The explainer: "Airport improvement statewide." Effectively, just give me the money and West Virginia will determine where to spend it.

Last year I interviewed a somber, somewhat dejected republican senate veteran Orrin Hatch. When I asked him about earmarks and federal spending, he simply shook his head saying the arrogance of both sides of the aisle is quite frankly outrageous and depressing. I'd like to know if somewhere in the White House our new President who promised change and hope, isn't shaking his head too.

So how can you do your own investigative reporting to find your own Senate or Congressional pork? First, open up this House Appropriations committee link.

This site will display the Omnibus bill. Each individual portion of the bill contains a segment labeled "statement". This is the center of all pork. Scroll down to read them all. Or, if you would like to search for a specific Representative or Senate request, hit control-f, then type in the name of the Senator or Member of Congress you are looking for.

If you opened the "statement" for the "transportation" section of the bill and searched "Murkowski", you would find the money being requested for Akutan airport by Sen. Lisa Murkowski.

I know...it is not easy...but remember, just a few years ago all we got was a big stack of papers with no names attached. Happy hunting!

74 Comments
74 Comments
Travis   February 24th, 2009 2:02 pm ET

It will be very interesting to see if Obama signs this into law or if he lives up to his promises and vetoes this bill due to "earmarks". Something tells me he will sign this bill as a thank you to congress for getting the $780 billion spending bill done.

Alyzabeth   February 24th, 2009 2:11 pm ET

It sounds like our old system of checks and balances needs some new and improved checks and balances.

Clark   February 24th, 2009 2:34 pm ET

and yet the polls indicate that Americans trust these same politicians that hide all of these earmarks within omnibus bills .... costing taxpayers hugh amounts of money .... more than they trust Wall Street ....

I don't trust any of them ... but Capitol Hill is definitely on the bottom of the list.

Michael "C" Lorton, Virginia   February 24th, 2009 2:35 pm ET

you know the old saying, "there is more than one way to skin a cat,"-–believe me nothing compares on how many ways you can create pork. Why do we keep electing these officials? Why? It almost a thought for all Americans not to go to work or vote for a year--that would definitively resolve all our problems-–we need to start over--I wish I knew how to do that.

Jennifer   February 24th, 2009 2:50 pm ET

In 2010 and 2012...it will be out with the old...I'm voting for people who have not served in the House or Senate ever before. It is time for "real change" and that isn't going to happen until we sweep both houses clean of the current people in them and leading them. And throw out the names Democrats and Republicans...it is time for Independents.

Maurice   February 24th, 2009 2:56 pm ET

If military spending in the billions, plus the hundredths of millions for the eco hybrid cars of the government were eliminated from the stimulus.Now I advocate for green but that's just benefiting the government not the country as a whole.There be even more money to go towards the people of this country whose unemployed, and homes that have been foreclosed on.
If we can get the wrong people in charge of the finances in large cities like Shirley Franklin and Purdue we'd really make progress.

As it stands their debacles are especially purdues will cause a "civil-uprising".We were surprised he passed the to bare arms gun law.He's now talking about not passing the request for stimulus-aid the state needs!.How he thinks by not accepting the money in this economy won't affect his pocket too? "baffles me".And can you in the media address the president as such!,"bush got us in this" put you adressed him still as president bush unlike your anchors of late.

Shaman   February 24th, 2009 3:06 pm ET

I am still confused as to why we are not going after those thief’s that have stolen most of the tax payers money like George W Bush and his cabinet members.
Also isn’t it true that U.S is actually loosing the war that Osama Bin Laden raged against U.S.
His objective was simple; it was to financially bleed United States slowly to harm the most people in the U.S. I personally think the guy is actually winning the war.
I think that before U.S sinks any further, we should elect Osama as our president. I don't think he will continue to harm U.S if he becomes part of the U.S. We have enough laws in place to restrict what he does so I really don't see a problem with it.

I know some Americans would rather die and let the innocent kids die along them before getting Obama into office but for the most of us, we all want to live and live happily along everyone else. If we can work together with those that are determined to bring U.S down, we might be able to change their mind and hopefully get their assistance in building U.S back up.

Jim W   February 24th, 2009 3:07 pm ET

there is a solution to this form of corruption. As with the President who is term limited, we should limit the terms of members of Congress. The House should have no more than 2 4 year terms, Sentors limited to 2 6 year terms. Then no one elected to federal office could lobby for 10 years following their term. No post term benefits so these people have to go back to real work like everyone else We would quickly move to citizen represetatives, instead of professional politicians who jockey for power 24/7. .

Janine from PA.   February 24th, 2009 3:18 pm ET

I believe Clinton temporarily had the line item veto right which was taken away by the sepreme court if I remember correctly. Too bad as the president could just go through all the pork that is not supposed to be part of the government budget and just cross them all out. If there ever going to be change (which I personnally highly doubt will ever happen which in no way takes away from President Obama's at least trying to change things) all congresspeople need to stop wasting our tax dollars! And taxpayers need to be involved and complain when their congress people do this kind of thing. They are so used to the status quo how can they stop themselves?

ARTBUFF   February 24th, 2009 3:19 pm ET

IS THERE EVER A BILL, THAT COMES, UP, THAT ISN'T FILLED WITH EARMARKS?

Sharon S   February 24th, 2009 3:28 pm ET

Earmarks? What you really mean is BS! Yes the same old selfish idiots like Pelosi are still pouring pork into the bill!

My thoughts are this if these stupid politicians want these stupid things done they put their own money into if it is so important put your MONEY where YOUR mouth is!

And keep mine out of it!

xtina, chicago IL   February 24th, 2009 3:29 pm ET

Doesn't sound as if anything will "change" under Obama

Terry   February 24th, 2009 3:31 pm ET

I agree Jennifer, in the next election I will be voting the same way. We need to clean house and it is past time for "CHANGE" I do not care what the party..you are out. Instead of them coming together and fixing the problems they are the problems. The country can not heal until we, as a country stand together. All they do is say it will not work, if they all showed unity and really put this countries needs ahead of petty politics maybe they could find a solution to the issues and get our country on the right track. I say we fire them all and start over. I do not trust any of them. No pork, just put the needs of this country first. It is my hope that President Obama will not sign anything with special earmarks. Itis time to take a stand and i hope it starts with him.

JIM FALLBROOK CA   February 24th, 2009 3:45 pm ET

I agree with Drew. Business as usual in Washington. If I remember correctly our socialist president Barack Hussein Obama promised us change. So far the change was corrupt cabinet members of his administration like Timothy Geithner Tax cheat aand of course Eric Holder. I think that was the change Obama was talking about. The Bank and Insurance bailout didn't work and neither is Obama's stimulus package. He just want to scare the American people so he can tax and spend like all Democrats do. I believe that the members of congress never did read the 1200 pages of of the Stimulus bill. That is why Harry REid snuck in $8 billion for the bullet traing from LA to Vegas and Obama geve $4 billion to ACORN.

detroit _fed   February 24th, 2009 3:55 pm ET

One way to get the pork off the hill is to reject any bill the doesn't serve the interests of the country as a whole. Eventhough they (Congressmen) are elected by their states , it was only to ensure the state has a voice in what is done for the whole.... if you have issues or worthy projects in your city or state take them up at city and state level. let the federal government deal with with federal issues.

Dee, New York   February 24th, 2009 4:17 pm ET

I think that we should vote out all of the greedy career politicians in their next election. All they do is curry favor in order to get themselves elected again... and again....... They are supposedly public servants, but they only serve themselves.

john d   February 24th, 2009 4:22 pm ET

....If our law makers dont what to see our president make head way then i agree with jennifer time for real change give us the name i dont care what party ,,im looking to make and better nation ,our collage students put a good man in office and and i think if we start now giving names we can get ride the bad apples.

John W. Falardeau   February 24th, 2009 5:01 pm ET

All the goverment spending does not surprize me at all, it is just goverment as usual.
Here is one I not sure of, wasn't with the 1st Bush we had all the S&L problems and now with the 2nd Bush it is the banks. Humm, I wonder how much money they made on both of these?
It's nice that they are going to help the people with forclosures keep thier homes, but I went and ask the back about getting a new morgage with a lower interest rate and was told that I had to owe less than 75% of the value of my home to get one. Now I have never made a late payment in 30 years, I have credit rating of 805 (as of last year), even have a Citi Bank credit card that I have not had a late payment on and I got it in 83. They tell me I am a valued costumer, but every month or so I have to call them to lower my rate. If I just ignored it, I would be paying over 12.5% on it.
I guess if all you do is pay your bills, you can't ask for much.

Arachnae   February 24th, 2009 5:20 pm ET

One way to get the pork off the hill is to reject any bill the doesn’t serve the interests of the country as a whole.

That would entirely preclude any infrastructure spending, some of the most economically stimulating spending in the whole thing. Kind of defeats the purpose, don't you think?

Annie Kate   February 24th, 2009 5:59 pm ET

Drew,

Stay after them. This is outrageous especially given the current economy. West Virginia's senator shouldn't be asking for money for airports while he lets the big coal companies blow the appalachian mountain tops off and destroy some of the oldest mountains in the country – he should be asking for money to enable a force to go in and force the coal companies to reclaim what they have destroyed. Or even better he could ask for money to help the poor families that below poverty in West Virginia.

As for Alabama – I live in Alabama and I have never heard of that rinky dink airport and there is no need for it – good grief Birmingham has an international airport and Montgomery has an airport. Good grief!!

Annie Kate
Birmingham AL

detroit _fed   February 24th, 2009 6:06 pm ET

Are we discussing the pork in the budget?.... or something else.... that bridge to nowhere is considered infarstructure.... but how would that benifit the country as a whole... now on the other hand the us interstate system acheives that objective.... so to your response No it would not preclude spending on infrastructure therefore it would not defeat the purpose

Mike, Syracuse NY   February 24th, 2009 6:49 pm ET

the problem with Obama's 'change' is that even if he's serious there are 535 members of Congress who are saying 'not so fast bro'.

ray   February 24th, 2009 6:51 pm ET

One more reason we are loosing the war – not Iraq or Afghanistan, the one for sane and honest government and one to remove the evils of the past administration. This is just more business as usual. Those incompetent and dishonest so-called congressmen/women should be thrown out. Let them try earning a living like the rest of us and stop them feeding from the public troth. And, if Obama, signs the bill, he should join them. It's about time we started taking offense and punishing those who cause the problems like Bush and his cronies, CEOs and incompetent congressmen/woman. We need to make some examples for the rest.

Ellepatricia   February 24th, 2009 7:17 pm ET

Is you add up the cost of these 8570+ earmarks, what is it? how close to the bailout #s or the [yikes!] stimulus package? just curious...

Alex   February 24th, 2009 7:40 pm ET

It is this very issue – earmarks and wasteful spending – that leaves questions as to the credibility of any fiscal proposals coming from President Obama and this Congress. If this is "change you can believe it," then that slogan is a myth and nothing more. Sure we all want to see Obama succeed for the good of our nation. But in reality they say one thing and then do business as usual when they think they can get away with it. Waste is waste and spending away our children's and grandchildren's future is plainly wrong no matter if you are a Democrat or a Republican.

JAN   February 24th, 2009 7:59 pm ET

GOP's/republicans offer no solutions to the economic mess.
They just need to stay quite and deal with Obama's bill.

Renee, NC   February 24th, 2009 8:13 pm ET

Horrified of how corrupt the govenment really is, they keep coming out of the woodworks. I am for cleaning the house. Elect outside the Washington bunch of crooks we now have. Bush didn't do all this by his self, its decades of crooks that we elect contributing to the current situation. Why do we keep electing these same people to get us out? We pay the price while they play the political game. Hard working, law abiding, tax paying people should not have to support lazy, whinning, looking for handouts people. God Bless America

Salas   February 24th, 2009 8:31 pm ET

Its amazing politicians in the US also exhibit such sleaze many associate with people of developing countries of africa and the rest.It shows they are all the same,americans should be asking questions,call them to town hall meetings to clarify why they had to vote money for airport with a whooping 14planes when an average family is facing foreclosures.I think there should be term limits for this guys,i read the other day a guy has spent 50years+ in the congress,simple law of nature even attest to the principle of diminshing returns.Obsolete ideas in a digital age isnt doing any better.Every pork item in the stimulus&budget should be removed.Enough of this cowboy politics,thousands of people are unemployed,how about going to the congress,,,, .

jake from nc   February 24th, 2009 8:44 pm ET

really, these days, whats another tril?

Michael, SoCal   February 24th, 2009 8:49 pm ET

Look folks, the average American just doesnt care. A little over 50% of the eligible voters went to the polls last November. So much for the greatest democracy in the world. And why dont we care? Because we have been told for decades that its all a waste of time to vote and that politics is bad bad bad (note the above comments!). With that type of spin, far fewer people will care about what happens. To effect Change, we Americans must stand up, be counted, react to political news stories, write our representatives, go to our local city public meetings every now and then. If we get involved, we can change things for the better. If we dont, wealthy politicians will do it for us.

Ann   February 24th, 2009 8:50 pm ET

Living in the SF Bay Area I am unfortunately used to these greedy lying political PIGS. Throw them out!

sam   February 24th, 2009 8:52 pm ET

President Obama has done more in a month than any president especially Bush’s. Being pig headed and bouncing your heads against the wall is not going to make changes in the bill or help anyone. IT IS JUST NOT GOING TO HAPPEN. This time you’ve got a smart, educated president. The last fool is out. This president cannot be pushed around by whites or blacks. He is studied in his thoughts, dealings and vision.
So GOP’s/Republicans get with it or shut up, because you are no help to the citizens of these United States. Steele is a dumb token and a useful republican pawn. JINDAL cares none for the pain he will cause his people, his eyes are on the presidency and he will never become President of these United States “That’s Guaranteed”. Remember this JINDAL your on that bridge with Palin

sam   February 24th, 2009 8:53 pm ET

We have never been in these economic crises before. So GOP’s should shut the hell up or put up, because you have not said or done anything that will help the American people. Government has never been involved in this type of economic disaster that your organization has caused.
At this point surveys taken have shown that government is the only entity left that can get us out of this mess and Obama is working on the solution. Republicans have offered only divisiveness. Like it or not Obama will succeed.

Sharon   February 24th, 2009 9:04 pm ET

How in the heck does this keep happening over and over to us the taxpayers? I don't recall "pork" ever creating jobs unless you are a pig farmer or a slaughterhouse worker. Hopefully something will come out of this mess called the stimulus bill. When Congress adds all this extra bacon into a bill it feels like we are all being taken for a ride in a pork – sorry... pink – cadillac!

felicity   February 24th, 2009 9:14 pm ET

I think the US citizens should be more vocal. Our blood pressures skyrocket everytime we read all this wasteful spending of our tax dollars. Can't we march on Washington and let them know how we feel. Our taxpayer dollars are being squandered on a daily basis and we sit on these chat groups and can't do anything but complain. Surely we can think of a more productive way to let these crooks know what we think. Would signing petitions and delivering it to the rogue senators help any???? Please let's do something that will get the right peoples attention and shame those stealing from us. Signing petitions, emailing these senators directly, soliciting the media's help, marching on Washington..... what can we do????

Bill Carson   February 24th, 2009 9:22 pm ET

Obama lied about vetoing "earmarks." Indeed, almost every word out of his mouth is a careful lie. When he was running, he was against earmarks. Now that he has power and wants to make liberals happy, he is still for earmarks but has simply renamed them or said that the 97,456 earmarks really aren't "earmarks" at all. What a liar!!!!!!!

Ret   February 24th, 2009 9:26 pm ET

There is only ONE way. To make these evil lying jerks go through the same hell we live everyday. That is the only way they will change and take action- if it effects them directly. Take away their healthcare – all of it.!
Have them make 25K a year with no raise, no paid vacations, no dental and no bonuses. Take away their fancy cars and their vacations.
Make them suffer like we do.

Jeff   February 24th, 2009 9:29 pm ET

This should not come as a surprise to anyone who pays even the slightest amount of attention to what goes on in Washington D.C. Next election, maybe the "mainstream media" will help outline these issues for the mostly ignorant electorate. That would be "serving the public interest."

Tom   February 24th, 2009 9:38 pm ET

Dear readers. Stop complaining,and start writing to your congressman and senator. Let them know your vote, and everyone that will listen to you, will vote for the other side unless they prove they are working to cut this crap out!

sharon   February 24th, 2009 9:40 pm ET

I agree on term limits, but let's go one better. Limit all members to 10 years, one term only. Then the politicizing that is done trying to get re-elected will be done away with. Maybe then they will do the right thing while in Washington, not just what will get them money to be re-elected!

Arachnae   February 24th, 2009 9:40 pm ET

I don’t recall “pork” ever creating jobs unless you are a pig farmer or a slaughterhouse worker.

See, now this is just ignorant. Oh, I know you're trying to be funny, but how does pork NOT create jobs? Are you going to restore wetlands by just flinging the money on the ground? Build airports by rolling in wheelbarrows full of money? SOMEONE's going to get the job of doing the work.

Drew's beef is that Congressmen get to decide where some tiny fraction of the money goes. Apparently it's better left to faceless bureaucrats in DC.

Jason   February 24th, 2009 9:41 pm ET

Earmarks!!!!
And you wanted change!!! GOOD LUCK!

Ed   February 24th, 2009 9:43 pm ET

Same old crap, different shiny, new label....depressing but true. I serious doubt any real change is coming. Oh and by the way......
SHAMAN....it is 2009, Obama was elected president! Are you seriously that lame or do you cut and paste your posts from ones you feel you did good on?

David Douglas   February 24th, 2009 9:44 pm ET

How can anyone expect change, when the very people who were on "watch" allow these inappropriate expenditures to take place. Obama is just one man, it's the Congress and the Senate that should be brought to task. Our government was never supposed to run by committee, the heads of these committee's are too powerful and table good ideas that go against their personal likes. We need to vote them out. Giving the same people tax money when they're part of the problem is insane, because they won't change unless personally held accountable. I haven't read that in any of the material out there! With computers, we should be more than able to trace where "our" money goes and who profits from abusing our trust.

sh   February 24th, 2009 9:45 pm ET

Vote Libertarian and solve the whole problem!

Medhanie Petros   February 24th, 2009 9:49 pm ET

We are moving out from old way, system of living, to the new generation, Digital world living.... it will pritty much hard for the next couple years untill we able get to use to it.

BOB WETMORE   February 24th, 2009 9:55 pm ET

I think I understand why all this pork is added to a bill. People like Nacy Pelosi one of the most incompentent of this congress needs to get re-elected and in order to do that she takes my money and gives it to her constintuents under the guise of stimulus. How else will this arrogant piece of work get re-elected, certainly not by her merits. These supporters of pork should actually be arrested and charged with larceny. How is this even legal?

Patrick   February 24th, 2009 10:06 pm ET

You Americans have freedom of speech so you all speak before you think.

Every pork does create jobs for someone who carry out the contract. Not because you are not the one who is doing the job the ear mark was created means that someone else is not doing it. People need jobs even if the job is for two, six or 12 months.

Some people have been out of jobs for so long so any contract will do until the next one comes around. Every ear mark is not a waste; yes a few may be wasteful but most are short term contracts that will help a family pay some mortgages, health bills and student loans. Even the the earmark was for a baseball field, someone has to build it.

Lance   February 24th, 2009 10:07 pm ET

Why should we wait for the next election?
Let's revolt by having a recall on all of those politicians that are wasting our money. If y'all wait, they will just have more time to waste and pocket our money. Do something now! Tomorrow may be too late.
A bloodless revolution is the best way to get their attention. It is time for us to stop bending over to pick up the soap. Start a grassroots, "Kick out the greedy, now!" campaign. I am sure there are enough smart people out there that can start this.
To only complain and do nothing is worse than what these people are doing to us. We elected them to do our bidding. If they only think of themselves, then we can unelect them.
Also "Detroit_fed" made a good comment. Read it!
PS: Have a nice day!!

Matt   February 24th, 2009 10:08 pm ET

Aderholt want's tax payer money to build a fence around a small landing strip maybe 45 minutes away from Huntsville Int'l just another example of pointless spending and a representative be elected to one too many terms in the house

Marie Schmitz   February 24th, 2009 10:12 pm ET

We all know that each and every congress person has their own welfare as top priority, they have made promises to those money raisers who helped get them where they are and they need to make good on these promises.

Sylvia   February 24th, 2009 11:10 pm ET

This pork barrel spending is not new but this is by far the worst. Congress doesn't get it. They are out of touch with the American people. They need to get out of the chambers of Congress and meet the people who elected them to represent us. I am from Pennsylvania and the last governor's election, the people of PA voted out 17 elected people and replaced them with "new blood." Unfortunately, it didn't take many of these new elected people to fall into the same habits that made the people of PA throw those 17 out of office. The actions of Barney Frank and Chris Dodd are criminal. They had the opportunity to stop the theft, greed, and deception on Wall St. They took the "campaign money" from Wall St and continued to turn a blind eye to what was happening on Wall St.

bob   February 24th, 2009 11:22 pm ET

We need to expose those on Capital Hill who continue to waste taxpayers money like this. More then just exposing them we should make them accountable for "why" they feel that this particular project is feasible and would add jobs or play into the President's overall plan. Anderson, you can do this over several shows. Bring them on and let them account for their wasteful spending.

Grace   February 24th, 2009 11:23 pm ET

Republicans, Democrats, I really don't see a differnce, it seems they're just taking turns throwing away our money.

Don Maxey   February 24th, 2009 11:41 pm ET

Removing Bush’s tax cut on incomes over $250,000 will not add to the cost of doing business (large or small). All legitimate business expenses are 100% deductible!

The hiring of new employees, or sharing in the cost of health coverage, are expenses that are totally deducted from business receipts before taxes are levied.

Please explain these facts to the current Repugnant Party leadership!

William of Iowa   February 24th, 2009 11:54 pm ET

Ours is a government of the people, by the people and for the people. We elect local citizens to represent our interests at the local, state and federal levels. They are lobbyists for the local interest and needs as well as a voice for the nations collective good. We might laugh at a project in some far corner of the country, but think for a minute that it might have legitimate value to those folks who called upon their representative to solicite help. Many local, county and state projects over the years would never have been accomplished without the help of the nation through the federal government. The Omnibus bill must pass muster of the entire legislative branch, given our economic situation, I would imagine many of the requests will be removed.

Gilby-HI   February 24th, 2009 11:54 pm ET

If you want to see the result of what this type of spending with out details and planing just look at the South Chiago school Anninberg program. Millons into a neighborhood which resulted in boarded up slums and total blight. Ask Pres, Obama what happend to the money.
Tony Rescco to jail and Barac to the Whitehouse//

Steve, Michigan   February 24th, 2009 11:59 pm ET

Unfortunately pork does provide someone jobs, it just ends up being an in-law or donor of the politician.

dave   February 25th, 2009 12:08 am ET

Worth repeating – In 2010 and 2012…it will be out with the old…I’m voting for people who have not served in the House or Senate ever before – TERM LIMITS. It is time for “real change” and that isn’t going to happen until we sweep both houses clean of the current people in them and leading them. And throw out the names Democrats and Republicans…it is time for Independents.
Read Oklahoma Senator Tom Coburn's book "Breach of Trust".

Eileen   February 25th, 2009 12:11 am ET

What should be done as a show taxpayers mean business is throw out everyone of the politicians that "porked" that bill NOW!! We can impeach a president why not others who are ripping off the people. It would be a lesson well learned in Washington. There must be some out there that truly want to help this country gain its pride,independence and fiscal solidness back.

Stein Taylor   February 25th, 2009 12:15 am ET

Wouldn't some of these earmarks be comparable to an average Joe who is behind on ALL his bills, but still goes out and charges for a new 40" plasma?

Sorry, but we are spending money that we don't have, again (sigh).

MarkG   February 25th, 2009 12:16 am ET

Hey Ray I got a news flash for you, it isn't just Bush, and it isn't just the Republicans, or Democrats either for that matter. I agree with the one that says we throw them all out and tell them to do something productive for a living, if they ever knew how in the first place. I didn't vote for McCain or Obama, and all my relatives tell me I wasted my vote....I voted for Ron Paul.

What happened to government "by the people and for the people"? It's turned into "government for the insiders". It is far, far beyond Democrat or Republican at this point, and I am surprised that we as Americans do not take firmer, more pro-active measures.

Writing to your congress-person is totally ineffectual. Senator Feinstein wrote back to me that even though 87,000 out of 91,000 respondents were against the first bailout, she voted for it because she knew it was needed.

Unreadable   February 25th, 2009 12:16 am ET

Well, yeah, hit Control-F, type in the name of Sen. Hatch, and see just how much the somewhat dejected senator requested. Not a small amount! Come on.

Now some projects are necessary, but very local, and no one would spend any money on them if it weren't for those earmarks. On the other hand, some other projects are completely unnecessary and wasteful, and it is between those two kinds that the line should be drawn.

Life isn't simple, and simplistic approaches never work.

Jerry   February 25th, 2009 12:20 am ET

Shaman: Just for clarification could you please tell me what money President Bush stole? And how do you know that, factually? Thank you.

Corwin7   February 25th, 2009 12:21 am ET

True Alex,

Spending away our childrens future IS a national disgrace...and the republicans have been doing it now for 8 years...where ya been pal? Welcome to the democratic party!

randysluder   February 25th, 2009 12:23 am ET

folks, in the 1930s the mob paid politacal figures off to do things that were good for them but bad for hundreds and thousands of others. 80 years later nothing has changed. Few benefit(along with politicians) while thousands suffer.

oldtimer   February 25th, 2009 12:23 am ET

Pork earmarks is a way for the politicians to pay back for being elected. Pork money goes to individuals that helped elect these crooks. Term limits for all, and also force them to belong to Social Security. Our money would then be a little safer. Remember one thing that only 5% of the people in this country controls the other 95%. They make the policies and we sheep just follow along. They send out their well spoken candidate and we think he belongs to the people with those fancy words, but at the end he does their bidding. It will never change.

Ann Humphries   February 25th, 2009 12:30 am ET

Please keep telling it like it is! But remember, we do have to back our country and it's not the current president or, even necessarily the previous president that created the problems the USA suffers from now. (By the way – I did not vote for Obama. However, in backing our country, we have to back our President.) I say fire most everyone in DC and start all over. PS was Polaski drunk tonight or is that just an over-exuberant personality on display?

shawn   February 25th, 2009 12:40 am ET

We the people need to make ourselves heard! Why should we stand idiolly by and watch a hoard of money mongering fools threaten our finacial livelihood and that of our children and perhaps generations to come. We supposedly are the ones who voted these seemingly blind and incompetent fools into office. Why? Because they lied to us, made false promises and most likely never had any intentions of standing behind their words. Everyone needs to make themselves heard. Write to your congressman, senator, govenor and even city officials. Express our distaste with the job they are doing and if nothing else demand their removal from office. last time i checked, if i don't do what is expected of me in my job, I get fired!

Roland - St George, UT   February 25th, 2009 12:42 am ET

Tell those people who want that earmark money to start having bake sales. Want your airport fixed? Bake cakes, pies, and cupcakes and we'll sell them next Saturday at 8am, all proceeds go to the airport fund. Want a bridge to nowhere? Have a salmon cook-off and a sled race next Saturday and all proceeds go toward the bridge to nowhere.

victor   February 25th, 2009 2:17 am ET

One question – why do we have to GIVE 800 million dollars of our money to rebuild GAZA? 800 million could be better spent here at home, education, disaster aid, etc.

Mr. Britt   February 25th, 2009 6:02 am ET

Roland – St George, UT- best comment iv read all night...ever

Adriane Carr   February 25th, 2009 8:06 am ET

What Nancy Pelosi lacked in decorum, during the State of the Union address, she certainly made up by her enthusiasum. She must be planning a very big shopping spree.

Joe - Pensacola FL   February 25th, 2009 12:55 pm ET

The only solution for getting rid of these clowns is to elect representatives that have never served in Congress; and to amend the Constitution with term limits for Congress. Do you all hear me? TERM LIMITS!!! 2 Terms and your history.

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About this blog

A behind the scenes look at “Anderson Cooper 360°” and the stories it covers, written by Anderson Cooper, the AC360° staff and a network of contributors. Insight you can’t find anywhere else.

We search the news each day to show you what’s on our radar and what we’re planning for the show each night.

For more details, read our tips on how to win 360° approval for comments.

Send your instant feedback to Anderson Cooper 360°.

Featured Contributors
Candy Crowley
Candy Crowley is CNN's senior political correspondent and an AC360° contributor
David Gergen
David Gergen is CNN's senior political analyst and former presidential advisor
Roland S. Martin
Roland S. Martin is a nationally award-winning journalist and AC360° contributor
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. All comments should be relevant to the topic and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. You are solely responsible for your own comments, the consequences of posting those comments, and the consequences of any reliance by you on the comments of others. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying and other information you provide via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Justice  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Opinion  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences  |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2009 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com VIP