HOME    WORLD    U.S.    POLITICS    CRIME    ENTERTAINMENT    HEALTH    TECH    TRAVEL    LIVING
January 7, 2009
New ties between Burris and Blagojovich revealed
Posted: 11:45 PM ET
Share this on:
Share | Permalink | 32 Comments | Add a comment
Roland Burris, left, meets with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid in the Capitol on Wednesday.
Roland Burris, left, meets with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid in the Capitol on Wednesday.

Program note: See the full report from Drew and Scott tonight on AC360° at 10pm.

Drew Griffin and Scott Bronstein
CNN Special Investigations Unit

Did Roland Burris secure his appointment to Barack Obama's vacant Senate seat through some kind of pay-to-play politics of the very sort that have tainted the man who appointed him, Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich?

Republicans in the Illinois state legislature are asking that question, and they want Burris, the former Illinois attorney general, to answer in person at a hearing scheduled for Thursday on Blagojevich's impeachment.

And the question is reverberating back to Washington, where Democratic leaders have been blocking Burris from taking the Senate seat, saying the appointment is tainted by Blagojevich, who was arrested last month and accused of trying to sell the seat for money and influence.

Blagojevich, however, has not been indicted and remains governor. He and Burris say the appointment is legal. In a written affidavit given to the impeachment panel, Burris said he had one limited conversation with the governor about the Senate seat before he was appointed. And that conversation, he said, was initiated by a Blagojevich attorney.

But records show the two men have long ties to each other - includinglucrative state contracts, political contributions and even a job for the governor's wife. Those records are raising thorny questions from state officials, particularly Republicans.

"I want Mr. Burris to, under oath, talk about that, about exactly when his interest in his seat, when he became interested in the seat," said Republican State Rep. Jim Durkin, "how far back it went, who did he talk to, and exactly the communication that went back and forth between him and the governor and any type of documentation which he may have given to the governor."

On Wednesday, Burris told reporters in Washington that his selection had nothing to do with money or any pay-to-play scheme.

"There is certainly no pay-to-play involved, because I don't have no money," said Burris, who returned later in the day to Illinois, where he planned to appear Thursday before the impeachment panel.

"I'm going to tell them exactly what transpired between the governor and I," he told reporters when he arrived in Chicago.

Illinois state records show Burris, who once ran against Blagojevich for the Democratic nomination for governor, and his lobbying firm have contributed more than $20,000 to the governor's political campaigns. Two years ago, Burris hosted a $1,000-per-plate fund-raiser for Blagojevich.

What's more, Burris's consulting firm - Burris & Lebed Consulting - has won nearly $300,000 in state contracts over the last four years.

Finally, the governor's wife, Patti, was hired in September to an $80,000 a year job with the Chicago Christian Industrial League, where Burris's lobbying partner is a board member.

Although Democrats in the U.S. Senate initially strongly opposed seating Burris, the hard-line position appears to be eroding. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-California, said she supports seating Burris. And Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid - who initially led the move to block him - then softened his position, saying that an Illinois Supreme Court ruling in favor of Burris could settle the issue.

Democrats in the Illinois legislature have been largely supportive of Burris, the first African-American elected to state office in Illinois. But they - and their Washington counterparts - will be watching Thursday's hearing closely.

32 Comments
More about: Drew Griffin •  Raw Politics •  Rod Blagojevich •  Roland Burris •  Scott Bronstein
32 Comments
Annie Kate   January 7th, 2009 9:12 pm ET

I wonder if there is anyone in Illinois state politics who is clean – I thought surely Blagojevich would have picked someone above the fray just so it would not indict him further. Maybe he isn't as smart as I gave him credit for. But maybe Burris is not implicated – we'll have to see what he tells the impeachment committee. I loved the line – "I don't have no money" – if nothing else we have him on bad grammar.

Pati Mc   January 7th, 2009 9:30 pm ET

Surprised?

JC-Los Angeles   January 7th, 2009 9:30 pm ET

How about throwing out all politicians, executives and leaders and starting fresh? it would be hard to argue that new replacements would need more than $700 billion to offset incompetence.

Joe Blaloch   January 7th, 2009 9:36 pm ET

I wonder if there is anyone in ANY state politics who is clean!

How do you tell if a politician is lying?
His mouth is moving!

Leonard   January 7th, 2009 9:45 pm ET

"Stupid is as stupid does."

Lorie Ann, Buellton, California   January 7th, 2009 9:48 pm ET

Hi Drew, Wake me when it over! There's just about zip that surprises me about all of this. I guess time will reveal who paid or pays to play. It's so sad to hear, but you can bet we'll be hearing an ear full of it from every nook and cranny. Whether we want to or not! Happy New Year. I always appreciate your reporting.

Lorie Ann, Buellton, Calif.

PA   January 7th, 2009 9:51 pm ET

Well if he "don't have no money," his wife might. Just when you think things have taken a turn for the better they change course! Stay Tuned.

Hannah Marner   January 7th, 2009 10:06 pm ET

Technically, "I don't have no money" translates to "I have money," so....

bubba   January 7th, 2009 10:08 pm ET

it all smells fishy dont it

Mike in NYC   January 7th, 2009 10:14 pm ET

What's the deal with two, count 'em, two 180 degree turns in the past day? Reid now supports Burris, and Feinstein's now behind Panetta. Actually, it's three, if you count BO's about-face on Burris - but that doesn't count, of course.

I think Roland's loose grammar was an implied shout-out to the long underserved demographic of people who don't give a rat's a-s about speaking English properly.

Larry   January 7th, 2009 10:44 pm ET

Annie got him:)

robyn caffrey   January 7th, 2009 10:48 pm ET

to whom it may concern ?

if roland burris gave any intention's""on blagovich's side""" you can bet it was only to get closer to barack. "' just remember "' rome wasnt built in a day.. now that barack is in,) and now everybody is getting along on the streets, " ( because of barack ) hello" look pepole" roland burris is not"' an american" ( the united-states ) was so blessed at this time with the obama's

John   January 7th, 2009 10:59 pm ET

Joe 97 % are they only get caught when they tic off the wrong people or need to be disgraced and ruined the tlp the shift of power around The comment about replacing everyone and start over bears some consderation but will never happen uless the people do it

DanD   January 7th, 2009 11:09 pm ET

It sounds to me like Burris has "paid to play" as recently as September by getting Blaggo's wife a cushy(?) job paying
her a fat salary! $80K a year – even over 6 years and
Sir Slimy has boosted the family income by almost a
half a million bucks....thanks the Burris connection!!
If this is true, I don't need an impeachment committee!
Let the gavel fall! Guilty, as charged!! (He should have
asked for a favor in the form a salon visit so he could
lose that mop top!)

Rudy   January 7th, 2009 11:16 pm ET

Of course he "don't have no money", it has all gone to his shrine...

Kenny A. Joyner   January 7th, 2009 11:16 pm ET

I feel that like anyone who is an American, Blagojevich is innocent until proven guilty and Roland Burris should be not be used as a pawn in what is going on.

Dan   January 7th, 2009 11:21 pm ET

But records show the two men have long ties to each other — includinglucrative state contracts, political contributions and even a job for the governor’s wife.
I dont know if Burress has any ties to Gov. Blagojovich or not, but if he does, the article states a good point because at the time of the governors arrest, they also accused him of trying to get a higher paying job for his wife

Kenny A. Joyner   January 7th, 2009 11:25 pm ET

I've been involed in Illinois politics since I was 21 years old, anyone can see that the situation with Burris is not about who he is but about trying to control Blagojevich's actions.

LaVonia Brown   January 7th, 2009 11:37 pm ET

The Senate is out of order, legally. If Jesse White signed the Affidavit to guarantee a special election for Rahm Emanuel's seat, why can't he sign for Burris!!! It should also be illegal for a tainted Governor to name a special election day...same Governor, same situation. I am sure everything will work out for Mr. Burris A special message to all the Senators: MAN exposes...GOD disposes. All of these Senators might want to run for re-election again!!!

Speaking of morals, Jesse White hired Jim Burns in his office. When Sidley & Austin got rid of Jim Burns, on his last day of work there, he was DRUNK, fell on the 47th floor, broke his nose and had to be taken to the hospital. Jesse White hired him. I have never heard of Mr. Burris carrying on like that.

Did the Prosecutor have all of his ducks lined up before accusing the Governor of any wrong doing?

Djibri,NY   January 7th, 2009 11:37 pm ET

i'm glad that America's kept his irony

Kerry   January 8th, 2009 12:03 am ET

Hi Anderson,

Glad you're back from Israel. I'm much happier when I know your safe at home here in NYC
See you tomorrow at 10!

Brian Langley   January 8th, 2009 12:11 am ET

My thought would be that if your reffering that Roland Burris got his postion by being dishonest?People should take a long look at society when it comes to drug dealers.Take the time to set up a private investagation on someone skimming the till at a local tavern.My own wrongness in life at a younger age because I didn't know any better got involved on stealing from a well knwon store.Point I'm making is that whether or not the truth comes out whether or not he cheated his way into office,more then likely he will learn from his mistake.Please understand that individual like myself has defently learned from my mistake in the past,others will follow.

Karen Bradshaw   January 8th, 2009 12:28 am ET

I think Reid will give in, and Barack's kind comments might help, too. I still don't Blago though, and hope he gets impeached. I'm looking to a new era w/the Obama administration!
Karen in Kansas

George Smith   January 8th, 2009 4:18 am ET

Change you can believe in

Randy B   January 8th, 2009 5:51 am ET

I should be suprised that a former Attorney General would accept a position where there is the slightest hint of a conflict of interest. But as an ex-Chicagoan, I'm not. If the man is truely the best qualified, he would have recused himself and waited for the state legislature to resolve the issue with first. But he so actively jumped at this, it only raises more questions. And for what? What does he need to prove? He already has made a name for him self. Now he stands to tarnish it.

PA   January 8th, 2009 9:14 am ET

Given all the connections reported on Burris, State contracts, donations to Blago's Campaign and his wife's position with a Chicago Christian Ind. League salary $80,000, I think Mr. Burris has alot of explaining to do before he goes to Washington! Does it ever end :-)

Connie Daggs   January 8th, 2009 9:46 am ET

Everyone seems to be looking at how wrong the governor of illinois is for wanting to sell Obamas senate seat to the highest bidder and then turn around and select Burris to fill the position. The governor has not formally been charged or furthermore convicted of any crime. Legally, he is still the governor of Illinois with all the rights and priviledges of that position. He has every right to select whom he chooses. I don't think this has anything to do with the fact that Burris happens to be a Black American. This candidate is more than qualified for this position and he has conducted himself in a very positive manner. Let Mr. Burris have his senate seat, because it's the right thing to do. The governor will be dealt with later on whatever he tried to do to taint this appointment, but let's not punish the one qualified for the job.

Joanne, Solvay, NY   January 8th, 2009 9:53 am ET

We really do need a good political cleaning agent. Let the press expose everything, no one excluded.

Rick Darrough   January 8th, 2009 10:34 am ET

Its easy to tell Burris is a crook by the way he talks.And his past dealings with Blagojevich just proves it even more.

M. Levy   January 8th, 2009 11:56 am ET

Talk about flip flopping. I am really surprised that Harry Reid would go back on his word. There is nothing honest about Roland Burris because of his ties with this Gov. Blago.

Marlene   January 8th, 2009 4:28 pm ET

It is my humble opinion that this was a mess from the beginning. It seems that the U.S. Attorney, Fitzgerald, "made his move too soon." Could that have been done so as not to ensnare the next culprit, who may have been a Big Fish? Arrest the governor, handcuff him, all of these press releases and charges and then to have to return to the Courts for an extension of time to indict seems to indicate "screw-up." The Illinois Legislature made sure that the politics was intact so that they did not request a special election. And, Blago continues to say that he has done nothing wrong. Well, if one looks at his training ground, perhaps he doesn't think he did anything wrong. According to reports, he was a "low-level attorney," in the States Attorney office (under Richard M. Daley); he worked with former alderman Ed Vdrolyak (now under indictment); also worked under his father-in-law, Richard Mell (he of the toe-tapping excitement on the city council desk when the late Mayor Harold Washington died. In other words, he was trained in Chicago politics. Didn't Daley tear up Meigs Field during the middle of the night? Criminal offense, no charges. As for Secretary of State, Jesse White, when did that office attain veto power over the governor? As an elected official, how could he decide not to perform the duties of the office? If the late George Dunne was around, White would have signed that document twice, with apologies for delays. Illinois citizens need to vote to clean house and rescue our state from the corruption/business as usual list. Democrats need to stop playing games, eat crow, and clear Burris for the U.S. Senate so that America can be rescued from the brink of economic disaster as put forth by George W. Bush.

Alex   January 8th, 2009 6:28 pm ET

Hey folks, lets the chips fall as they may. People are already condeming a man before the evidence has been put on the table. Just because someone contributes to somebody's campaign doesn't mean they are a bunch of crooks. Using that rational, how would you characterize people who paid money to the election campaigns of Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton or John McCain? Burris should have nothing to hide if he's clean and deserves the benefit of the doubt at this point. What appears to have happened, according to what has been revealed thus far, goes on in every state in the union (except for the Blago pay to play garbage).

Leave Your Comment


 

Comments are moderated by CNN, in accordance with the CNN Comment Policy, and may not appear on this blog until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting. Also, due to the volume of comments we receive, not all comments will be posted.


subscribe RSS Icon
About this blog

A behind the scenes look at “Anderson Cooper 360°” and the stories it covers, written by Anderson Cooper, the AC360° staff and a network of contributors. Insight you can’t find anywhere else.

We search the news each day to show you what’s on our radar and what we’re planning for the show each night.

For more details, read our tips on how to win 360° approval for comments.

Send your instant feedback to Anderson Cooper 360°.

Featured Contributors
Candy Crowley
Candy Crowley is CNN's senior political correspondent and an AC360° contributor
David Gergen
David Gergen is CNN's senior political analyst and former presidential advisor
Roland S. Martin
Roland S. Martin is a nationally award-winning journalist and AC360° contributor
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. All comments should be relevant to the topic and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. You are solely responsible for your own comments, the consequences of posting those comments, and the consequences of any reliance by you on the comments of others. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying and other information you provide via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Justice  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Opinion  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences  |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2009 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com VIP