<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Genetic testing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/12/04/genetic-testing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/12/04/genetic-testing/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 04:00:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pearl Pfiester</title>
		<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/12/04/genetic-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-482967</link>
		<dc:creator>Pearl Pfiester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 08:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=18284#comment-482967</guid>
		<description>I believe the author from her media perspective skewed the reality and usefulness of genetics testing to &quot;make a story.&quot;  Many genes make a protein and the process is rather complex so the &quot;one-gene association&quot; dream to a disease is not valid.  The fact someone may have mutation(s) or chromosomal instability (microsatellites e.g.) present (person can be mosaic too) does give one a higher probability to disease.  As for PD, they are still trying to find the exact candidate gene ex. p.R1141C (I just read a paper from the European Human Genetics Journal published 2008).  

Cancer is something that worries people; CANCER IS GENETIC and can be PREVENTED by positive lifestyles.

Genetics testing informs people&#039;s disease susceptibility.  This can play a role for people that choose to procreate; they can avoid passing the sex-linked genes to offspring for example.  People can make future choices based on their screening or family history to decrease the probability.  Time and time again, it&#039;s unfortunate that the media does not report science accurately; only a partial story comes out usually.  

I don&#039;t pretend to know everything about genetics but I feel I have a better understanding than most people.  I would love to talk about genetics to the author sometime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the author from her media perspective skewed the reality and usefulness of genetics testing to &#034;make a story.&#034;  Many genes make a protein and the process is rather complex so the &#034;one-gene association&#034; dream to a disease is not valid.  The fact someone may have mutation(s) or chromosomal instability (microsatellites e.g.) present (person can be mosaic too) does give one a higher probability to disease.  As for PD, they are still trying to find the exact candidate gene ex. p.R1141C (I just read a paper from the European Human Genetics Journal published 2008).  </p>
<p>Cancer is something that worries people; CANCER IS GENETIC and can be PREVENTED by positive lifestyles.</p>
<p>Genetics testing informs people&#039;s disease susceptibility.  This can play a role for people that choose to procreate; they can avoid passing the sex-linked genes to offspring for example.  People can make future choices based on their screening or family history to decrease the probability.  Time and time again, it&#039;s unfortunate that the media does not report science accurately; only a partial story comes out usually.  </p>
<p>I don&#039;t pretend to know everything about genetics but I feel I have a better understanding than most people.  I would love to talk about genetics to the author sometime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. M. from NY</title>
		<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/12/04/genetic-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-482940</link>
		<dc:creator>A. M. from NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 05:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=18284#comment-482940</guid>
		<description>I think that we should use genetic testing in more constructive ways. Instead of trying to determine the future, we can prevent many genetic diseases by testing the compatability of a couple before they have children. A private Brooklyn, NY based non-profit began testing for many diseases years ago, after the founders lost a few children to the disease. They ahve almost obliterated tay-sacks and other devestating genetic diseases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that we should use genetic testing in more constructive ways. Instead of trying to determine the future, we can prevent many genetic diseases by testing the compatability of a couple before they have children. A private Brooklyn, NY based non-profit began testing for many diseases years ago, after the founders lost a few children to the disease. They ahve almost obliterated tay-sacks and other devestating genetic diseases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tammy, Berwick. LA</title>
		<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/12/04/genetic-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-482915</link>
		<dc:creator>Tammy, Berwick. LA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 04:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=18284#comment-482915</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had several health professionals tell me over the years that I am a genetic medical nightmare.  Having sad that, they have also said over and over again that I could control what happened to me regardless of the history.  I used to want to be tested for juvenile diabetes genetics because the disease killed my mom at 53. Well, without genetic testing I came up in a routine check as a pre-diabetic over a year ago and knew I didn&#039;t want to die like my mom did.  I have worked harder than I ever have in my life, and I beat it.  I will for the rest of my life have to continue to beat it.  Obviously, the genetics are there, but the rest matters more I discovered.  My doctor and I are overly vigilant.  And I am proof that the worst genetics in the world don&#039;t mean an automatic death sentence.  I wouldn&#039;t waste the money on testing.    I would, however, spend the money on a good medical history, work up, and doctor who is just as aggressive and proactive in wanting to prevent this disease as I am.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve had several health professionals tell me over the years that I am a genetic medical nightmare.  Having sad that, they have also said over and over again that I could control what happened to me regardless of the history.  I used to want to be tested for juvenile diabetes genetics because the disease killed my mom at 53. Well, without genetic testing I came up in a routine check as a pre-diabetic over a year ago and knew I didn&#039;t want to die like my mom did.  I have worked harder than I ever have in my life, and I beat it.  I will for the rest of my life have to continue to beat it.  Obviously, the genetics are there, but the rest matters more I discovered.  My doctor and I are overly vigilant.  And I am proof that the worst genetics in the world don&#039;t mean an automatic death sentence.  I wouldn&#039;t waste the money on testing.    I would, however, spend the money on a good medical history, work up, and doctor who is just as aggressive and proactive in wanting to prevent this disease as I am.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
