Drowsiness (29%); irritability (25%); anorexia (10%); fussiness (6%); autism, convulsion, encephalopathy, grand mal convulsion, hypotonia, neuropathy, somnolence (postmarketing) .

And about the NVICP case, the government "has not conceded that vaccines cause autism,"

also about the mitochondrial condition being more common, that was the conclusion of 1 study... let that sink in... 1 study.

Yes, vaccines may be an important part of a public health strategy, if they are safe and developed and tested in an ethically and scientifically sound manner. AND yes, they can be extremely dangerous to some people...given a vaccination program that is coercive and without genuine informed consent, those individuals ( infants and adults) who are vulnerable will continue to be harmed and their numbers will continue to grow. The ultimate problem will be the public's well-justified loss of trust .

My background and carreer has been in a scientific field. I have a PhD in Engineering and 99% of the time require scientific evidence to support observed phenomenon. But when it comes to being a paretn those rules go out the window. The scientific evidence linking vaccines and autism might not yet be conclusive nevertheless think how limited is our understading related to human mind????

We are not taking any chances.

One size is not ftting all- look at Hannah Polings. The conflict of interests within the CDC is horrific. They are paid to promote these vaccines and hold many lucrative patents. If there is nothing to hide why not make the VAERS public record, why not put equal money into vaccine safety testing as vaccine promotion. Now as it stands that ratio is about 100 to 1. Why is the CDC still trying to save a few cents rather than use single use vials instead of the multiple use fileld with ammonia, formaledhyde and anti-freeze? Why does the CDC push for gag orders in their settlements to vaccine injured families? The whole situation disgusts me.

Our children's health comes last in their list of priorties.

It is also illogical to assume taht all problems following vaccines have nothing to do with them.
Yes, vaccines have done a lot of good. It looks like we are dealing with genetic predisposition. If mitochondrial dysfunction is a possible trigger, and studies are showing up to 30% of children with autism have mitochondrial dysfunction, then the ratio of benefit outweighing the risk has shifted substantially.
There has never been a study on the current vaccine schedule that says it is safe. We, all of us having our children vaccinated, deserve to have that safety study done. We deserve a safer schedule, if need be. Hepatitis B could easily have post-poned without any real tangible difference. No catching that on the playground.
The parents fighting this fight are not unreasonable. They are educated, and they witnessed what happened to their children.
This can not ALWAYS be passed off as coincidence.

THANK YOU ANDERSON!!!!!!!!!

Can we at least start by admitting chicken pox vaccine was a stupid idea? All of a sudden all these talking heads are saying “until you’ve seen a child die from chicken pox”… Are you kidding me!?!? How about until you see a child that was happy and healthy become a detached mess, stop eating, and pee out their but for months on end following that “coincidental” timing of the vaccine administration.

5th’s disease is a common mild childhood disease. You don’t hear much about it because there is no vaccine. The day that one is submitted for approval, it will be “until you’ve seen a child die from 5th’s disease”.

STOP THE MADNESS. Asthma, allergies, type-2 diabetes, autism, chron’s, rheumatoid arthritis, and more ALL on the rise. We are frying our immune systems. Is like putting too much fertilizer on the lawn.

The obvious question is: were children dying by the hundreds of thousands in the U.S. in 1974? No, they were not.

It isn't an debate between zero vaccines or all possible vaccines. It is an argument as to whether a huge increase in the number of vaccines given is causing problems. There is some solid evidence that indeed the increase is causing problems.

Anderson, thanks for picking up this piece. I enjoy your work.

KIM

Combining vaccines has never been proven safe. Because we don't test combinations of vaccines. When we do, we find that the combo shots cause more damage than single vaccine shots.

The new shot that has MMR and chicken pox in one, for example, DOUBLED the number of seizures that kids had when they were getting the MMR and Chicken pox shots separately. Yet we still give the four in one, and the CDC won't even state a preference that kids get them separated. That is just stupid. There is no reason for it.

For Travis and people like him, there is a middle ground between going back to the days of Polio and giving children 66 shots in childhood.

We seem to have struck a balance in the 1970' and early 1980's when kids got about 10 shots. No deadly epidemics – no epidemics of neurological and autoimmune disorders like autism/add/asthema/diabetes.

90% of children gain immunity the FIRST time the get a vaccine, but we give them two more doses because it is cheaper than just testing them to see if they are covered.

Which means that by definition, almost ALL children are over vaccinated and get double and triple the shots that they actually need. That is not just stupid, that is malpractice.

We have gone WAY past the point of balance on vaccinating and it is time for vaccine reform.

There are many "Hannah Polings" out here–and more coming until we can stop this process of vaccinating.

Thanks David Kirby and Anderson Cooper for posting on this very significant issue!!

Bottom line is that childhood vaccines are over 99.9% safe, and there is no data that indicates any correlation or causation between childhood vaccines and autism.