Comments on: Watching the Arctic ice melt http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/09/03/watching-the-arctic-ice-melt/ Tue, 22 Dec 2009 04:00:12 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: David W, Florida http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/09/03/watching-the-arctic-ice-melt/comment-page-1/#comment-288494 David W, Florida Wed, 03 Sep 2008 20:21:13 +0000 http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=7871#comment-288494 For the most part, Peter just wasted his time drafting and posting this important message. No one seems to want to hear about this right now. Why? Because it's not convenient at this time. We're focused on drilling more holes and transferring our wealth to the middle east so we can keep driving our 15mpg SUV's to the soccer field. You'll likely hear no mention to reducing CO2 emissions via a serious push for renewable energy sources at the RNC this week. The RNC fundamentals are mostly sound but they have been out of touch with their fundamentals since the Reagan era. So let's not discuss any more of this polar melting nonsense until our costal cities are threatened by slowing rising waters. For the most part, Peter just wasted his time drafting and posting this important message. No one seems to want to hear about this right now. Why? Because it's not convenient at this time. We're focused on drilling more holes and transferring our wealth to the middle east so we can keep driving our 15mpg SUV's to the soccer field.

You'll likely hear no mention to reducing CO2 emissions via a serious push for renewable energy sources at the RNC this week. The RNC fundamentals are mostly sound but they have been out of touch with their fundamentals since the Reagan era.

So let's not discuss any more of this polar melting nonsense until our costal cities are threatened by slowing rising waters.

]]> By: s smith http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/09/03/watching-the-arctic-ice-melt/comment-page-1/#comment-288483 s smith Wed, 03 Sep 2008 20:13:06 +0000 http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=7871#comment-288483 What I think is that 1979 is a drop in the bucket in terms of "ages". For example "global warming" believers can't explain why the previous Ice Ages ended --- that is, before man inhabited the earth/ or before man had undustry to ruin the climate ! "Ages" last more years than we live; we can't say that man affects the climate and it's arrogant to think so What I think is that 1979 is a drop in the bucket in terms of "ages". For example "global warming" believers can't explain why the previous Ice Ages ended - that is, before man inhabited the earth/ or before man had undustry to ruin the climate ! "Ages" last more years than we live; we can't say that man affects the climate and it's arrogant to think so

]]>