Sen. John Edwards’ affair with Reille Hunter, the former director of operations for his presidential campaign, raised questions on the impact it would have had, had Edwards made it to the conventions as the Democratic nominee. Last night on AC360° we sat down with CNN Senior Political Analyst David Gergen to explore the larger implications regarding the Edwards affair along with the upcoming Democratic National Convention and the potential VP’s for presumptive nominee, Sen. Barack Obama. Here are his observations and insight:
David Gergen
CNN Senior Political Analyst
On how John Edwards and Reille Hunter met:
“There may be people out there who believe his story, but so far I haven’t met any. Everyone has questions about when this actually started up and whether she did on the payroll as after, and there have been various reports showing a timeline suggesting she went on the payroll after the relationship started; about the paternity of the child, about the money payments since then.
And now there are questions, of course, about whether John Edwards himself was a victim to some degree, whether he was set up at the Beverly Hilton. Perhaps even by her friend.”
On Reille Hunter’s employment:
“I do think it’s one of the central questions here. There had been people who have traced out the timelines that suggested that their relationship did indeed start before he put her on the payroll. That he paid her out of his pack money. That this was money he had taken from others for various political purposes and for his campaign against poverty. And therefore, he betrayed the donors.
But I must say that there is a much larger sense of betrayal here that hangs over this and that is having run, had he won the nomination of the party, all sorts of people are now asking the question we talked about Friday and that is what if this had blown up at any time along the way. Would somebody else have been nominated and if it had blown up very late, would he have cost his party? If he had been the nominee of the party, would he have cost his party a chance to take this one?”
On Hilary Clinton at the Democratic National Convention:
“Well, other than the question of [Barack Obama's] vice-presidential candidate, it’s about the only story the press has to deal with over the next two weeks. So I think it’s interesting how the press is coming back to the Hillary Clinton story.
As you know, I continue to believe that Hillary Clinton ought to be on the short list and be very seriously considered for the vice- presidential spot.”
On Hillary Clinton and the VP shortlist:
“Personally, I’m in Chicago and my impression on the Obama campaign is that she is not. And I think they’re scrambling to make sure that she is honored at the Convention. I do think Chelsea is likely to introduce her now and there will be a magic moment and that will be a chance to have quote, ‘a catharsis’ that she thinks is necessary at the convention. It will be a big, big rally for her at that moment, and then her husband will have a chance to speak. So they’re going to get plenty of major, major airtime.
But the reports from the field are, and I run into this all the time now, there are an awful lot of people out there, who are Hillary supporters, especially older women who are not yet reconciled to the Obama candidacy, who are resisting it in a variety of ways. And I think they still have a job to do on both sides, the Clinton side as well as the Obama side, to bring this together and the convention is going to be critical.”
On the Democratic National convention:
“Just very briefly. I think [Obama] is controlling the convention. He’s being gracious and I’ll bet dollars to doughnuts that both Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton will come out as unifiers out of this convention. I do not think their speeches will be divisive. I do think they’re going to be very supportive.”
| Cindy |
August 12th, 2008 12:51 pm ET UMM..isn’t this what you all showed last night? I mean why post it today? Is there no other news? I don’t think Edwards affair will effect the Dems. convention at all. I doubt he was even going to be asked to be there or talk. As far as Hillary goes…this affair may have helped her some if it came out during the primaries but I don’t think it would have helped her win. That is wishful thinking on her part. Cindy…Ga. |
|
| Milena, Toronto |
August 12th, 2008 1:08 pm ET Hillary should be Barack’s VP. Aint nobody that does it better than Hillary. Big deal Barack won, its obvious that America would still rather have a man tell them what to do than a women. How pathetic is that? The irony is that Hillary is a much better politician than the two candidates left standing, and from the most recent polls John McCain has a chance at beating Obama if he can get enough of the undecided and of course if he plays his cards right and chooses the right VP. Unbelievable! Only in the United States of America. |
|
| SARA.ro |
August 12th, 2008 1:11 pm ET She’s blessed because she hadn’t JE endorse.So in the dems club for the nominalisation it’s a need to trade with “the other woman”?? |
|
| Pat |
August 12th, 2008 1:13 pm ET This party that has organized on behalf of Hillary Clinton needs to accept reality and stop the inane game playing! If they proceed as planned to the Convention in my opinion they will be belittling Hillary Clinton. Hillary has accepted her hand as it was dealt to her and has done what every true Democrat would do - reached out to support the Nominee. If the Hillary Supporters in this group are truly supporters than they would support her lead and get behind Obama. To have her name added to the list has no purpose or outcome. They need to get rational. Hillary knows if Obama does not win America and the World will suffer another four years of the same Bush Devastation. This group should realize the same and get on board with Hillary or take the McSame Bus that will zap them back in time to 2001 and they can relive the horrors all over again! Frankly I have no respect or patience for people who engage in such inane poltical antics for their own entertainment! |
|
| Larry |
August 12th, 2008 1:28 pm ET We’ll never know if it would have helped Hillary to win. Why was Edwards in such a rush to endorse obama? Is it realistic to think that the powerful obama camp didn’t know about the edwards affair? What if any other obama endorsers are exposed, no pun intended; does HRC have any right of appeal? |
|
| Jolene |
August 12th, 2008 1:29 pm ET I’m sure most are already sick of hearing about Edwards and this sex scandal but it was so obvious that Edwards had planned out how he was going to do this. To announce on the same evening as the Opening Ceremonies. In a way, I’m glad it backfired and is getting so much media attention. Until questions get answered, especially the money trail, I’m sure it will stay in the limelight for awhile. I don’t believe Edwards was set-up either because if he was, he would have said so. Always appreciate getting David Gergen’s take on things. Thanks for posting and for trying to keep Edwards honest. Jolene, St. Joseph, MI |
|
| Sandy, Arkansas |
August 12th, 2008 1:46 pm ET David, I agree that not only should Hillary be on the short list…I think she should be the short list! If the Democrats want to win the White House I think it is the logical choice. Will it happen…I don’t think so. Will that diminish Obama’s chance of winning…I do think so. It is time for everyone in the Democratic Party to exercise some intelligent thinking and acting. Personalities and power struggles need to be shelved. This election should be about values not selfishness - which brings us to John Edwards! It was selfish and self-serving to think that he could run for president without disclosing his infidelity. It could have harmed the Democratic Party irreversibly if he had been chosen the nominee when this came out. If he had not run, or this had been disclosed earlier, I do believe that Hillary Clinton would have had a better chance of securing the nomination. That is not how it played out - and I believe there is a lot of things to still be played out about this situation. On to the Democratic Convention and hopefully some selfless thinking and a win in November. |
|
| Presley from Michigan |
August 12th, 2008 1:51 pm ET OMG I LOVE YOU GUYS! Personally, a good old fashioned scandal has been long over due. What if’s, could’ve’s, might have beens, meh, Hillary didn’t win and nothing will change that now. XXO BEAT 360!!!! |
|
| Michelle Fonthill Ont,Canada |
August 12th, 2008 3:08 pm ET The convention should be interesting and thechoice Obama makes regarding his VP choice should be Hillary but she is not likely . The idea of John Edwards being a victim please the real victim is Elizabeth Edwards . |
|
| Nicole |
August 12th, 2008 3:09 pm ET I have nothing against Hillary but I can understand if she isn’t selected as Obama VP. I don’t quite know how to say this nicely but the Clintons (we all know Bill comes along w/ her) haven’t completely seemed trustworthy and even down right shady at times. And I know they have something up their sleeves for the convention. I will never forget how she disrespected him on the night he won the nomination. There is alot of work that needs to get done in Washington and Obama needs someone that he can work with from day one and she doesn’t seem to be that person. Beating John McCain isn’t going to be easy but I think Obama will still win the election without her as his VP choice. |
|
| carmen |
August 12th, 2008 3:20 pm ET Same old behaviour |
|
| Lorraine333 |
August 12th, 2008 3:20 pm ET If you will recall, it was when Edwards and Obama joined together and targeted Hillary during the debates, that Obama started moving up as a serious contenter. Who knows what might have happened if Edwards had had the sense to stay out of the race, under the circumstances, would Hillary have stayed in the lead? Anyway, I was a Hillary supporter and I now am an Obama supporter. Although, I certainly did not like the press (yes, that certainly includes you, Anderson) displaying an obvious support for Obama and their anti-woman, anti-Hillary antics! |
|
| lampe |
August 12th, 2008 3:30 pm ET If Obama, had lost, you better believe AA’s would want his name put in nomination at The DNC Convention. If for no other reason than to have it in the History Books, that Obama was that close to winning the nomination. so therfore why is it not okay, for Clinton supporters to want the same thing? This is about nothing more than that. What are all of you Obama Supporters so afraid of? |
|
| Larry |
August 12th, 2008 3:35 pm ET Any polls on how we, the public, are going to be happy with Michelle Obama as 1st lady? |
|
| karen-phoenix |
August 12th, 2008 3:43 pm ET What McCain did to his first wife makes Edwards look like a prince. At least Edwards is staying with Elizabeth and says he loves her. McCain thru his first wife, Carol, “under the buss”. Had a two year affair with Cindy. married Cindy 1 month after divorce final and Cindy’s father had to pay for all of Carol’s medical bills. Who is the man with poor judgement? Edwards admits and stays with Elizabeth. Next, Edwards is still working for the people in this country who are deep in poverty. McCain got mixed up in the Keating 5 and should have gone to jail. Lets put all this in perspective!!! Edwards is soooo much better than McCain will ever hope to be! |
|
| Pete |
August 12th, 2008 3:50 pm ET Now Ms. Hunter’s friends are speaking out about her and claiming the woman had integrity or that, according to her sister, she is the nicest woman you could hope to meet and an honest and good person. If Edwards is telling the truth (NOW) then she has slept with two different married men on his campaign. If the Enquirer is telling the truth she slept with one and had a child with him while allowing another to take the fall and actually living with that patsy and his poor wife!!! If anyone believes that Ms. Hunter is either a good person or that she has a scrap of integrity they need to look up the meaning of the terms. She is a low life as only a low life would do and say such things as she has done and said. I am sure she loves Edwards but that hardly makes her look any better. |
|
| Tammie D |
August 12th, 2008 4:13 pm ET Well is it possible that we have any pols that have been completely honest with the public? After Bill Clinton don’t you think sex scandals are getting old? Yes Edwards had an affair, after that I don’t really care to here the details. CNN get a new story….PLEASE!!! |
|
| JC- Los Angeles |
August 12th, 2008 4:14 pm ET I feel that John Edwards has the right to destroy his career and family in any way he chooses; judging from his actions, he seems like one of the few politicians who can actually accomplish something. Your comment “there are questions, of course, about whether John Edwards was a victim” is the height of incompetance and is completely unacceptable. The American people have been let down by endless leaders, politicians, executives and select members of the cloth with their sex lives playing no part whatsoever. John Edwards, Eliot Spitzer and the like should be prosecutred to the fullest extent of the law if found to be in violation of campaign finance laws, wire fraud, illegal inter-state commerce and tax evasion. I would suggest that at each upcoming convention when any politician speaks, the loud speakers blast out endless streams of laughter. |
|
| Diane N. |
August 12th, 2008 4:17 pm ET It’s disgusting that this woman and Edwards are getting all this attention for doing something so rotten and the person really suffering from all this is Edwards wife. Disgusting. |
|
| Mike, Syracuse, NY |
August 12th, 2008 4:26 pm ET Karen-Pheonix. Your facts are highly in error. McCain’s divorce settlement included him giving her 2 houses, child support, and lifetime medical care for the accident she had. Cindy McCain is on good terms with John McCain and has supported his run for president, saying publically he is the best man for the job. He has good relationships with his kids from that marriage. As for the Keating 5, four of the five were Democrats, including the 3 that were found guilty of wrong doing. Two, McCain and John Glen (the former astronaut) were cleared of all wrong doing. Why do you Obama supporters insist on spreading lies, when documentation on all of these things is just a google search away? |
|
| Roman |
August 12th, 2008 4:29 pm ET McCain - Clinton ticket!!! |
|
| Larry |
August 12th, 2008 4:32 pm ET Think of all the book and movie deals that will be generated; along with the fringe psychology experts on tv. |
|
| Larry |
August 12th, 2008 4:45 pm ET Defeating John McCain is a given. A new ad has McCain as ‘Rocky’ the poor white guy underdog going up the wealthy black champion Apollo Creed, which I’m sure is not lost on the Obama Racism Advisor. |
|
| Pamina |
August 12th, 2008 4:50 pm ET I thought for a long time that John Edwards would be on Obama’s VP short list. I guess with this scandal, that possibility is gone. I don’t think what he did was right, but so many politicians have been involved in scandals, we seems almost immune to it. I will be interested to see who Obama picks as his running mate now. |
|
| lampe |
August 12th, 2008 4:58 pm ET McCain-Clinton 08 The ticket of party unity. |
|
| Megan Dresslar |
August 12th, 2008 5:37 pm ET I agree with you and bloggers, |
|
| a.m. deist |
August 12th, 2008 5:42 pm ET If having an affair or lying about it is something worth making illegal, then we should have the Supreme Court make it into law. Unfortunately, we have people on the Supreme Court that aren’t exactly hollier than thou. Matter of fact, we have many male newscasters that aren’t that way either. Maybe we should let personal things stay that way, and stop disrespecting the families of those in politics. We have enough politicians that commit crimes that go without punishment. Lets start dwelling on that problem. |
|
| Marguerite |
August 12th, 2008 5:52 pm ET David: I appreciate your comments, whether from last night or not. I also have some suspicions about the Edward’s timeline, but only because of the implications regarding use of political contributions. For a political family, it is disturbing that both Elizabeth and John Edwards would go forward into a Presidential campaign with the onus of an extramarital affair in the background. As far as John Edwards being ’set up’–it makes no difference. He was aware of the tabloid speculation and went to meet with Ms. Hunter anyway. Was he not aware that the media might be present? And if he was not aware of that possibility, I question his judgment on many fronts. |
|
| Saad, Ramsey, NJ |
August 12th, 2008 6:18 pm ET What Edwards did is extremely low and disgraceful but it is not disgusting. What the NJ Governor did (I don’t remember his name) while his wife was in the labor and he was making out with another guy on his living room couch was disgusting. But to honest, they both crossed the line in an extremely shameful manner but the stuff that has been happening lately, am I surprised - the answer is a BIG FAT “NO”!!!! |
|
| Tammy, Berwick, LA |
August 12th, 2008 6:33 pm ET I don’t see the big deal being made out of John Edwards having an affair. It’s nothing new. JFK was screwing around on Jackie while he was in the White House, Bill followed suit, and Edwards won’t be the last to get caught doing what he shouldn’t have done. The Dems are turning this into such a three-ringed circus between Edwards, Hillary, Bill, the VP ticket, and the Convention no one is paying attention to Obama’s ineptness to run the Oval Office much less nation or the screw ups of the Dems in Congress. Interesting detractor if you ask me. And timed so well. The sad thing is it just makes the Democratic party look moronic once more in their attempts to gain control. Here’s to another eight years of Republicans in the White House thanks to the Dems imploding themselves. |
|
| Cynthia |
August 12th, 2008 6:49 pm ET David, I feel that they should honor Senator Clinton in some kind of way and I’m sure that they will. I don’t think that she is the best VP pick for Senator Obama. Senator Obama’s VP choice should be someone that he likes, someone that enhances what he has to offer and more importantly someone that he can trust. If I were Senator Obama I would just take my chances on winning. As far as John Edwards goes - we all know that it is morally wrong and his wife has my sympathy. But, for my part, with all that is going on in the world and in our own personal lives it’s not a major thing for me and the only way something like that would be major was if he were my husband or a love ones husband. |
|
| lampe |
August 12th, 2008 8:06 pm ET Obama; wants this to be a three-ringed circus. He wants all the attention to be everywhere, but on him. The reason being is that the polls, are suggesting that people are really starting to take a good look at him. And what their seeing is not what he promised. I think he has gotten in way over his head, and he has gotten larger than life. And now he and his wife aren’t really sure exactly what it is their supposed to do. Wait till it’s time for The Debates there will be no denying how bad this man really is then. It will be right out in front for everyone to see. |
|
| Larry |
August 12th, 2008 8:35 pm ET Obama should show how much he appreciated edwards’ endoresement, at a time when HRC was on a roll, by selecting him as his running mate. Infidelity is no crime, infact its a badge of honor in politics. obama/edwards 08 & 12. |
|
| Kathy, Chicago |
August 12th, 2008 8:46 pm ET The DNC had me rate the Dem candidates a while ago. I had Edwards and Obama tied for third place. I still havn’t changed my mind on either man. I would have chuckled if it had been Obama instead of Edwards who had strayed. I feel for Elizabeth Edwards. I have respected her on the campaign trail. I think that she is intelligent and passionate about the country and her family. How difficult for her to stand by him, knowing what had happened. I don’t think that Edwards has a place in the convention this year. |
|
| CaseyJ - Palm Springs, CA |
August 12th, 2008 8:57 pm ET Geez. All this because two people had (UNPROTECTED) sex. Sheesh! I love it when people comment about what’s MORALLY wrong–funny how expert they are at judging others whom they’ve never met. |
|
| lampe |
August 12th, 2008 9:15 pm ET Obama, played the race-card first,so therefore, anything said now is fair-game. The Republicans, are not going to put up with the same crap, that Sen. Clinton had to deal with from Obama and His Cult-Followers. |
|
| Annie Kate |
August 12th, 2008 9:32 pm ET While I admire David Gergen and his analysis tremendously I don’t think the focus of the Edwards’ affair should be the impact it could have had on the Democratic Party - Edwards never did well in the primaries and he was never really a contender so speculating what it might have done to the party is just a way to fill air time - the real issue here is what the affair has done to his family and his future and really both of those at this point are not our business. Annie Kate |
|
| Julie San Diego, CA |
August 12th, 2008 10:33 pm ET “PAC” money, guys. (Political Action Committee) It should be a four-letter word, but it’s not Annie Kate, your comments about John Edward’s affair are thought-provoking, but I do differ with you on one pont: this IS our business. John Edwards formerly ran for Vice President on a platform that was centered on the premise that “you can’t trust the other guys, you can trust us”. I bought it hook, line, and sinker and I’m still angry about that. Interestingly enough, if he would have been honest and said “I had an affair and was absolutely awful to my family” it would have been a signal that he was a person who took ownership for his actions - maybe stupid, but still “employable” as a VP. I don’t buy the “set up” theory either. No one holds a gun to your head in these kinds of situations. Hugh Grant had it right. When caught doing something stupid, the only thing you can say is: “I did a very bad thing.” No excuses, no weaseling. Humans make mistakes. Extraordinary humans own their mistakes and learn from them, and some even have the humility to offer up their mistakes as an example for others to learn. This man asked for our vote and our trust. It IS our business. |
|
| Pat |
August 12th, 2008 11:32 pm ET Julie, I’ m of the same mind. If he hadn’t been a contender for President I might see it differently. A man vying for the highest position in the land, centering his whole Campaign around his wife’s illness, his family life, his values as a Christian, his compassion for the less fortunate and last but not least, his earlier condemnation of Bill Clinton for commiting the same offence warrants his accountability to those he serves as a Politician. And should also demand his honesty not blatant lies. My thoughts are with his wife and family who through no fault of their own will have to also bare the consequences. |
|
| Suzanne, Burlignton Ontario |
August 12th, 2008 11:36 pm ET All I can say is we Canadians get a kick out of your scandals and can’t wait to read and hear more! I was a little surprised to hear about John Edwards but then I wasn’t. He is a man after all. Once more a woman is disgraced and standing by her man. Why do they do it? Elizabeth, you are a smart woman…send him packing! Your husband went for hot dogs when he has steak at home. Shame on him! |
|
| Rena, Cologne Germany |
August 13th, 2008 9:41 am ET Yup, I was kinda shocked when I heard that. Edwards was, such as Clinton and Obama one of THE candidates for presidency in my opinion. The American people chose different though (what I honestly didn’t exspect - but what in this election is actually predictable^^). I really thought he wasn’t that kind of person. It’s amazing how people can deceive the public? Doesn’t his wife suffer from breast cancer? I feel so sorry for her. I think that this affair would have totally broken his neck if he was still in. That would have definetly pushed McCain. |
|
|
Comments have been closed for this article |
||
A behind the scenes look at “Anderson Cooper 360°” and the stories it covers, written by Anderson Cooper and the show’s correspondents and producers. Insight you can’t find anywhere else.
For more details, read our tips on how to win 360° approval for comments.
Send your instant feedback to Anderson Cooper 360°.
- Tales from the backline: Waiting for the third shoe to drop
- An Unnecessary War
- Create a tech-friendly U.S. government
- Obama’s dire economic warnings…
- Rockets not from Hezbollah
- Q&A with Candy Crowley: President-Elect Obama, making it official
- The inauguration map
- Polygamists feeling under siege
- Keeping Them Honest: Blagojevich and Burris ties?
- Obama’s peace offensive

