Barclay Palmer
AC360° Senior Producer
Good morning!!
How about a little reality check on the issue that Americans say concerns them most: the economy. And let's drill down to its core: energy.
Everybody's talking energy - President Bush is pushing Congress to act before it goes on vacation, each presidential candidate talks about it every day...
Why, even Al Gore and T. Boone Pickens are weighing in with urgent calls to develop independent, sustainable forms of energy... like Pickens' proposal to quickly build windmills fields and let the clean wind power us, rather than burn up the rest of the fossile fuel so quickly...
So... what about that?
Why don't we quickly build windmill fields on federal land - since everyone's calling this an urgent national security issue.
And why aren't the candidates and the President and the Congress even talking about that? A quick executive order - citing a national emergency - followed by a quick Congressional appropriation could get construction going before the end of the year.
Opening up offshore drilling, by contrast, wouldn't increase actual oil supply for years, although advocates argue it would have a valuable psychological effect on markets and bring down oil prices.
Maybe.
But why not get some actual results more quickly - and get some cleaner energy and sustainability along with it?
Why not?
If you're a committed offshore drilling advocate because you think it'll drive down prices in the near term, why not add this kind of option to have an even greater psychological effect? It doesn't have to be either/or. And political finger-pointing over offshore drilling ain't gonna get us new energy right away anyhow.
If energy is an urgent matter of national security, we need a call to arms, right?
So why aren't the President, the Congress and the candidates making an urgent call for these kind of measures - in addition to their other proposals?
Maybe this is why none of them are wildly popular among the public, as polls show, with Congress's popularity ratings in the low 20s, President Bush's only a little above that, and neither presidential candidate cracking 50%.
Hello. Warning signs.
| deborah, OH |
July 31st, 2008 9:16 am ET Good morning, Barclay. No truer words were ever spoken! Thank you for writing. Have a good day all. |
|
| deborah, OH |
July 31st, 2008 9:18 am ET p.s. ACTUALLY, the words are written, but, my chemo brain is not functioning yet! lol. Thanks, again, & a good day to all. |
|
| Cindy |
July 31st, 2008 9:33 am ET Morning Barclay, I think that we need to work on all forms of sustainable energy, rather it be offshore drilling, windmills, nuclear, solar power, or whatever. None of them will actually do anything for us right now. They all have to be planned, worked out and then built which will take years. So no one is really any better than the other as far as getting fast results. We need to go down every avenue that we can to become self reliant and not have to deal with these other countries to sustain us. Cindy...Ga. |
|
| Michelle Fonthill Ont,Canada |
July 31st, 2008 9:47 am ET Good Morning Barclay and everyone at 360 Michelle D. |
|
| Jason |
July 31st, 2008 10:31 am ET I totally agree with you about developing alternatives for the future, and I'm a huge fan of offshore drilling. Many people say that offshore drilling will not effect near-term prices because it will take years for the oil to make it to consumers. However, what everyone needs to understand is that the markets (commodities, stocks) are forward looking and prices of commodities and stocks reflect future supply and demand, which is why prices for oil are so high. Currently, there is enough oil to supply the world's needs, but the investors/traders know that at some point in the future there will not be enough, and that is why oil prices are so high. Yes, we definitely need alternatives, but drilling offshore, and in ANWR, will lower today's oil prices without a doubt. If the oil traders see more oil coming to market, they will drive the prices of oil down. No, it's not the answer to all of our energy problems, but it will definitely help the American consumer in the near term. |
|
| Betty Ann, Nacogdoches,TX |
July 31st, 2008 11:35 am ET Hey Barclay! |
|
| Tim McGuire |
July 31st, 2008 11:49 am ET Why won't anyone interviewing those pushing to open up offshore drilling for oil and opening ANWR for oil drilling / exploration... why won't anyone at CNN ask them how that stand gels with the just as urgent problem of global warming / climate change. The continued use of Fossil fuels and global warming are undeniably linked. Do those who are pushing for more drilling and exploration of fossil fuels denying that global warming / climate change is a problem. Come on CNN. Someone go a little deeper. keep on keeping them honest!! |
|
| NateSC |
July 31st, 2008 12:12 pm ET Barclay thank you people need to know that drilling will not solve our problem. We need to stop putting bandaids on the issue and hoping it will resolve itself. |
|
| james r butteri |
July 31st, 2008 12:18 pm ET i would make love to jenna bush-thats how much i love the president-but for him to take away much needed resource from the energy department-and give it-in the form-of legislation and money-to the mortgage crisis convict(s) -it is political suicide- Signed James Butteri |
|
| Larry |
July 31st, 2008 1:24 pm ET The Gov. of Alaska wants ANWR drilling, apparently Alaskans have the highest pump prices. However, this will kill off the polar bear, so no drilling there. |
|
| Jan from Wood Dale IL |
July 31st, 2008 2:45 pm ET According to the Energy Information Administration, in 2008 the US is projected to consume 20.29 million barrels per day of petroleum, but we only produce 5.14 million barrels per day. That means approximately 75 percent of our oil supply comes from OPEC countries. They project about the same for 2009. With global supply uncertainties, combined with significant demand growth in China, the average cost of $127 per barrel in 2008 is projected to average $133 per barrel in 2009. Since both of our presidential candidates have boasted about their abilities to work with those "across the aisle", maybe they should get together now to work out the best plan for the American people. Then it would be up to both of them to convince the Congressional members of their respective parties to move into action now. I realize this is unlikely to happen, but I'm tired of both political parties putting their interests ahead of the taxpayers best interest. |
|
| Greg , San Berdo, Ca |
July 31st, 2008 3:49 pm ET Why is the media not getting more involved? Instead of sound bites why isn't the media pursuing debates asking; Congress seems to have forgotten when Newt shutdown the government under Clinton. Reid, Pelosi and McConnell need to revisit what happened to congress after that mess.. Thanks |
|
| Graham |
July 31st, 2008 4:42 pm ET First off, there a thousand and one ways to save, conserve, and create energy. It's just that people don't don't know about all of them. |
|
| Shelley, Washington the State |
July 31st, 2008 5:17 pm ET Excellent feedback on this issue. I wonder how long it would take to get some of these windmills up and running? Definitely, I think it is worth a try. Economic relief maybe for Americans by this time next year. Hopefully. I am all for that. |
|
| Lisa |
July 31st, 2008 6:26 pm ET Because it's about lobbyists and profits ... and well, think about where members of this administration have gotten most of their money. Even Condi Rice had a Chevron oil tanker named for her. If oil and energy are the issues, why isn't there urgent orders to start building rigs and refineries and start drilling on already leased land? Why not orders to refurbish some shut down nuclear plants and get them up and running? No, what this is about is giving additional rights to a relatively small group of companies. What better way to do than with a "national" emergency? (Hmmm, come to think of it, isn't this also how we got into Iraq - using 9/11 as a means to invade Iraq?) And once given, they are near impossible to revoke. And if even off-shore drilling were given the okay by Congress, what guarantee do we have that whatever oil is found will stay here in the US for our benefit? What guarantee do we have the oil companies will not sell it overseas to the highest bidder? It's certainly not about what is best for we, the people of the US, but about what is best for the shareholders and BODs of the few oil companies. |
|
| Annie Kate |
July 31st, 2008 8:05 pm ET Bush is an oil man – he's never been for the environment and never will; that's one reason nothing is being done right now and the other world powers are exasperated beyond belief because as one of the larger polluters Bush has not agreed as have other countries to a set cutback in emissions. Other types of power will help us now – if we target it for the power plants that already exist; some places in America are already doing it. Wind farms, solar panel farms, even geothermal energy can be used in placed of coal to power the flow of electricity to our homes and cut back on oil and coal usage now. There are cars already on the market that use less gas – NYC is converting its entire taxi fleet to hybrid cars. Instead of saying it can't be done today we need to look at what some of our cities are doing and what European nations are doing to get started and follow suit. Some things will take more time than others but the ones that are doable now should be done now – it helps lessen the problem for later and that should have a good psychological effect. Annie Kate |
|
|
Comments have been closed for this article |
||
A behind the scenes look at “Anderson Cooper 360°” and the stories it covers, written by Anderson Cooper, the AC360° staff and a network of contributors. Insight you can’t find anywhere else.
We search the news each day to show you what’s on our radar and what we’re planning for the show each night.
For more details, read our tips on how to win 360° approval for comments.
Send your instant feedback to Anderson Cooper 360°.
- Real-life effects of reform getting lost in the noise
- Evening Buzz: Buying Health Care Reform Votes
- Live Blog from the Anchor Desk 12/21/09
- U.S. soldiers in Iraq could face courts-martial for getting pregnant
- FAQs about health care reform
- Interactive: Brittany Murphy’s acting career
- Senate health care reform bill
- House health care reform bill
- Interactive: The top 10 Health-Care-Reform Players
- Video: Child custody battle continues
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2005

