HOME    WORLD    U.S.    POLITICS    CRIME    ENTERTAINMENT    HEALTH    TECH    TRAVEL    LIVING
July 21, 2008
The great boomer non-retirement
Posted: 03:21 PM ET
Share this on:
Share | Permalink | 13 Comments

Jeff Goldsmith
Author, THE LONG BABY BOOM: An Optimistic Vision for a Graying Generation

The chorus of doomsayers wailing about the impending “retirement” of the aging baby boom is almost deafening- legions of boomers quitting work, moving to Florida, playing MahJongg, and listening to their old Jimmy Buffet records, swamping our fraying safety net with Social Security and Medicare costs.

What’s the problem with this scenario? Simply, no-one seems actually to have spoken to a boomer about it. The vast majority of us have no intention of retiring as our parents did. Our parents were bored silly in retirement; according to gerontologist Ken Dychtwald, today’s retirees watch 43 hrs of television a week, and half wish they were still working. Their health and mood both deteriorated sharply when they stopped working.

Learning from our parents’ experiences, more than 80% of baby boomers plan on working past age 65. While some boomers who haven’t saved enough to retire would suffer a massive drop in their living standards if they didn’t work, for most of us, it is simply that we don’t know how to not work. As pathetic as it may sound to our children, our work is who we are, it’s where our friends are, it’s where the meaning is in our lives.

Working longer is a big win both for boomers themselves and for our overcommitted federal government. According to a recent Urban Institute study, five more years of work raises the average boomer’s lifetime earnings by 56%! And if we all worked another five years, we’d generate enough tax dollars, between Social Security and income taxes, to pay off the Social Security funding deficit we face.

And when employers, particularly public and non-profit employers, look around for replacement workers, what they discover is a huge hole in their mid-career workforce. School districts, local governments, hospitals, public utilities, manufacturing firms all face a ruinous mismatch between the age of their present workforce and their future people needs.

Yet many employers remain uncertain they want to keep us: they fear our higher health costs and seem reluctant to invest in our training and development. They also have been slow to create flexible work schedules that accommodate part-time or seasonal work. The default setting in many human resource departments seems to be: up or out.

Seniority-based compensation, an industrial-era relic, automatically links seniority to pay level. Yet many of boomers would gladly trade lower salary for benefits, or work part-time or seasonal full time if they are permitted. Bon Secours Health System, a large hospital system in Richmond, Virginia has discovered that a combination of flexible hours and flexible benefits has enabled them to retain experienced nurses and technical personnel well into their seventies. Bon Secours permits its workers to retain health and pension benefits for as little as fifteen hours a week. They also provide financial planning, adult daycare for aging relatives, and a host of other benefits. Over one-third of Bon Secours workforce is over 50, and the percentage is rising every year.

Health benefits remain a major concern. Employer reluctance to continue employing older workers is often traced to the predictably higher health expenses they incur. Public policymakers have largely ignored the more than ten million people over age 45 who lack health insurance, many of whom are self-employed. Boomers represent more than a fifth of the country’s medically uninsured.

There is an obvious solution: permit older workers or their employers to “buy in” to Medicare, at the program’s estimated actuarial cost, as early as age 50. For lower income workers, this coverage could be subsidized by the federal government. For workers over age 65, rather than subordinating Medicare to the employer’s group plan, make it primary coverage, with the employer’s plan providing supplementary coverage.

These two steps would markedly increase the employment potential of older workers. While it would require some increased federal outlays, those costs would be offset by increased income taxes generated from older workers’ earnings and the increased consumption of an employed older population.

There is by no means a perfect match between our economy’s skill needs and those of an experienced baby boom workforce. However, if we boomers want to continue working, employers and the government need to figure out how to make it easier for us. Let us actually retire and collect public benefits when we’re old.

Jeff Goldsmith is Associate Professor of Public Health Sciences at the University of Virginia and author of The Long Baby Boom:An Optimistic Vision for a Graying Generation, published by Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.

13 Comments
More about: 360° Radar •  Jeff Goldsmith
13 Comments
Cindy   July 21st, 2008 3:52 pm ET

Most baby boomers won’t retire and can’t retire because the cost of living is so high. You can’t save money when you can barely live as it is. Plus social security doesn’t pay you barely anything to live on. So why retire and have to struggle when you can continue to work and not struggle?

Plus now a days people live WAY longer and take better care of themselves so at that age they really aren’t feeling “old” like their parents or grandparents did. They still think that they are spring chickens! LOL

Cindy…Ga.

Larry   July 21st, 2008 4:04 pm ET

heheheh What a bunch of whiners we are:)

deborah, OH   July 21st, 2008 4:13 pm ET

Thank you, Mr. Goldsmith for a very interesting & realistic article about the Boomers.
Retirement is happening to my husband right now. However, it’s not a very pretty picture. We have a 55 yr.-old ‘family business’. Because of the influx of ‘big box’ chain stores, we are having to ‘retire’ early. And, because of the raised costs of just about everything, it’s not going to be easy–health care has become a joke, & a worry.
I am disabled because of severe chemotherapy damage to my body 2 years ago. Trying to find anyone in the govt. or in the depressed job market to aid me, is a ridiculous search–but I keep trying.
BUT, so far, we have it better than a lot of people–we are both trying to continue to work, because, as you said, retirement just isn’t for us. lol.
Your article expresses our situation almost perfectly!
Thank you for bringing a LOT of unsaid things to light.

Thank you AC360! You all do a GREAT JOB! Your effort is much appreciated!

Lesli   July 21st, 2008 4:27 pm ET

In December of 2007 my retirement accounts were on track for my husband and I to retire in 10 to 12 years. Now with the turn in the market, we’re a long way off from that.

I can’t wait to retire… and I don’t understand anyone who wants to stay in the stressful working world I live in.

To be sure I am developing a retirement plan for my time. I don’t plan on watching 43 hours of TV a week (maybe just 5 hours a week, say from 10:00 pm to 11:00 pm EST). I want to concentrate on my writing, and some of the activities I love to do. Spend time with friends and travel.

I may look for a part time job in a womens shop or volunteering if time weighs too heavy on my hands, but I certainly don’t intend on missing the working world. I’ve been at it too long, and I have been ravaged by it for too long. Retirement will be a time to take care of me, not the kids and not the cranky demanding bosses and customers.

Will I move to Floriday and listen to Jimmy Buffet… no way, I’m taking my retirement to Ski and golf and any other activity I’m still capable of doing.

Just sign me 15 years and counting.

PS Its never too late to start saving, but the earlier the better.

deborah, OH   July 21st, 2008 4:28 pm ET

P.S. Cindy, I totally agree with your comment, BUT,…I know we are not ’spring chickens”—just need & want to make our own way for as long as possible! (BTW, Cindy, I always enjoy your comments.)

THANK YOU for letting me vent—lol.

Larry   July 21st, 2008 4:40 pm ET

The area where people need to retire is the profession of education. Professors are staying on until they practically die, making it difficult for younger academics to advance in their careers.

Monika   July 21st, 2008 5:16 pm ET

Well, I think it’s sad when your definition of who you are is equal to your job description. And I have a question for those old-timers who feel they need to work until they drop dead: How about making room for the next generation, so that the young people can get a chance to work, too? Nobody ever seems to talk about that.

Sydney   July 21st, 2008 5:28 pm ET

While I totally understand the idea that people need to work to earn money to live, I do not understand those for whom money is not the issue–they actually think they will be bored in retirement! I just retired 4 months ago and just cannot fathom how anyone could be bored. I can’t even get to all the activities I want to (there are still only 24 hours in a day, working or retired, sorry to say.)

As for watching TV, I watch far less TV now than when I was working–when I was working, I was to TIRED every night to do anything BUT watch TV. Now I’ve got far more interesting things to be doing than sitting in front of the boob tube! (sorry CNN).

With the market’s tumble since my retirement–I do worry a bit about money, but NEVER about getting bored! I’m busier now than I ever was working (but doing whatever I want, not what my employer wants.) I could talk about this all day long (and do at my blog Retirement: A Full-Time Job — http://retiredsyd.typepad.com).

But that’s good that some people just can’t find anything else to do but work–I need them to keep paying into Social Security so it will be around when I go to collect . . .

Kim in NY   July 21st, 2008 5:36 pm ET

From the “Boomers” I know – they can’t retire. They may use “work is my life” so they don’t have to admit they can’t make it in retirement. After being raised by parents who weathered the depression, they feel they have no justification to complain. (At least they have a job to go to..) They are too proud to say they need to work. Pensions are gone or dwindling. Health care is outrageous. Food and gas are through the roof. That “golden watch’ just no longer exists. I know plenty of “Boomers” who would love to retire, but they simply can’t. There are many who are on second marriages, younger spouses, second set of kids, or helping to raise grand kids because the “X er’s” can’t make it either.

Let’s be fair – It is not just the “Boomers”that are having problems.

Ann   July 21st, 2008 5:43 pm ET

Retirement can be a wonderful, exhilirating experience. It’s a time not to have to accept unfair and unrealistic management policies, personnel issues, and governmental restraints.

It’s a time to have the freedom to do what you want to do when you want to do it, and not to have to try to figure it into the work day. It’s a time to focus on real priorities, discover new interests, and pursue actitivites you never had time to do before.

It’s a time to not have to put your main priorities behind work. Money isn’t everything. Time and health are the most important factors to consider. So many people who retire, actually become healthier because of leaving the stress of frustration often found with work, and finding time for improved physical and mental fitness.

This culture is so driven by work. Many European countries have shortened work weeks, very flexible work schedules, paid maternity and paternity leave, and much time for vacation. We seem to identify ourselves by our work and not realizine who we really are, and never have time to discover our mind, body, soul connection.

Retirement doesn’t mean retirement from living, but a beginning to focus on the really important things.

Annie Kate   July 21st, 2008 8:14 pm ET

Retire? Sounds nice but probably not possible because of financial requirements. Pension plans that people were counting on are being dropped and 401Ks are not growing as much as we need them to. Children come home after college and stay because they can’t make it on their own. Whether you would be bored in retirement or not isn’t’ the question for most of us – the question is can you afford to keep your home and eat too in retirement. For a lot of us the answer is no.

Annie Kate
Birmingham AL

Victor in Saanich, B.C. Canada   July 21st, 2008 9:10 pm ET

Here in Canada, my Freedom 55 was two years ago. Am I bored?? Heck no!! I now have the time to get involved in volunteer causes, a possible run at the local council, just joined a gym as I found I was getting a little overweight etc. etc. The problem is that in the US your health insurance industry is a fraud!! Your company pensions, 401 K and other retirement concepts are ripe for malfeasance!! Most people don’t save enough and don’t think of themselves when they do ‘everything’ for their kids!! Kids have to learn early that parents are not the support group once adulthood [18!!] kicks in!!
The final sad truth, as has been previously stated, is that way too many people have nothing but their job as a source of recognition in their sad lives!! Once , if there is a pension available, employees should step aside so that junior employees and the newly hired can get a leg up in life!! That includes senior citizen TV personalities!!

Jo Anne Cummings   July 21st, 2008 9:58 pm ET

I retired from the “Telephone Company” at age 47, after working there for 30 years. Now caught in the “dead zone” of not having social security, or being able to get any of your 401k money without huge penalties from the IRS, I don’t think people stay at work because they are bored, but because they cannot afford to retire until they die!!!!!

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About this blog

A behind the scenes look at “Anderson Cooper 360°” and the stories it covers, written by Anderson Cooper, the AC360° staff and a network of contributors. Insight you can’t find anywhere else.

We search the news each day to show you what’s on our radar and what we’re planning for the show each night.

For more details, read our tips on how to win 360° approval for comments.

Send your instant feedback to Anderson Cooper 360°.

Featured Contributors
Candy Crowley
Candy Crowley is CNN's senior political correspondent and an AC360° contributor
David Gergen
David Gergen is CNN's senior political analyst and former presidential advisor
Roland S. Martin
Roland S. Martin is a nationally award-winning journalist and AC360° contributor
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. All comments should be relevant to the topic and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. You are solely responsible for your own comments, the consequences of posting those comments, and the consequences of any reliance by you on the comments of others. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying and other information you provide via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Crime  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences  |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2009 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com VIP