HOME    WORLD    U.S.    POLITICS    CRIME    ENTERTAINMENT    HEALTH    TECH    TRAVEL    LIVING
July 11, 2008
Inside the lab that cleared the Ramseys
Posted: 08:00 AM ET
Share this on:
Share | Permalink | 2 Comments
What is touch DNA? Go inside the lab that cleared the Ramseys with CNN's Brian Todd
What is touch DNA? Go inside the lab that cleared the Ramseys with CNN's Brian Todd

Brian Todd
CNN Correspondent

We tracked down the lab that handled the new kind of DNA evidence that exonerated John and Patsy Ramsey in the murder of their daughter 12 years ago, six-year-old beauty queen JonBenet.

We wanted to find out how this lab effectively ruled out the heart-breaking and unresolved accusations that these parents murdered their daughter.

The lab's run by Bode Technology, based in one of those unassuming office parks - this one in Lorton, Virginia.

When we got there, the photojournalists and I were required to have our own DNA swabbed… two mouth samples each. They say it’s policy, to make sure there’s no strange outside DNA they can’t identify in there.

A funny aside: while we were moving around and filming, someone remarked on the multitude of precautions, and a Bode official quipped, "You should know… everyone who works here has OCD" - Obsessive Compulsive Disorder.

The "touch-evidence" DNA technology that Bode used in the Ramsey case for the first time has actually been around for 4 or 5 years, they tell us, but it’s only been in widespread use for about a year.

Bode handles standard (fluid-sample) DNA testing, too. They have contracts with state, local, and federal law enforcement agencies for that. The cases they’ve been involved in are impressive: not only the Ramsey case, but also helping to identify victims of the World Trade Center collapse on 9/11, missing persons cases in the Mexican drug-wars along the border, and people missing after Hurricane Katrina.

One thing they showed us that they didn’t want publicized in detail - how they clean crime scenes of extraneous DNA that could either dilute the DNA they’re looking for, or contaminate what they have. They let us film it, but said they’d prefer we didn’t use that–because they don’t want to give criminals any ideas.

2 Comments
More about: Crime & Punishment
2 Comments
Cindy   July 11th, 2008 8:25 am ET

I'm glad that the Ramsey's were excluded as being the ones that killed their daughter by this new DNA technology but it still seems a little fishy to me.

I mean if your DNA gets on stuff when you touch it wouldn't that mean that everyone who ever touched her night clothes would have their DNA on it? So what if a maid touched them, or maybe some friends or even when the clothes were made , shipped or sold in the store...people touch them. That would leave unknown DNA on them that wouldn't match the family but isn't from the killer either.

Just makes me wonder if they tested it against any housekeepers or friends that could have touched them or what? This new technology leaves a lot of questions for me!

Cindy...Ga.

Teresa, OH   July 11th, 2008 9:59 am ET

I think the title is very misleading: Ramseys cleared. So this one little itty bitty piece of evidence is going to nullify the obvious evidence?

Dont think so. Let's look at this a little different: I'm married, I have two kids and we all live in the same house. One of my kids is found dead and strangled in my basement during my wait for a ransom call.
Four of us in the house, one is dead. No concrete evidence that anyone else was in the house or broke in. My hubby and I would be tossed in jail and our other child taken into child protective services.

Upon autopsy, the deceased child has many old scars of injuries, however small, to her genital area...she has undigested pineapple chunks in her which points at eating two hours before death. But, the family claims she went to sleep HOURS ago.

Four people in the house, one turns up dead. Simple math.

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About this blog

A behind the scenes look at “Anderson Cooper 360°” and the stories it covers, written by Anderson Cooper, the AC360° staff and a network of contributors. Insight you can’t find anywhere else.

We search the news each day to show you what’s on our radar and what we’re planning for the show each night.

For more details, read our tips on how to win 360° approval for comments.

Send your instant feedback to Anderson Cooper 360°.

Featured Contributors
Candy Crowley
Candy Crowley is CNN's senior political correspondent and an AC360° contributor
David Gergen
David Gergen is CNN's senior political analyst and former presidential advisor
Roland S. Martin
Roland S. Martin is a nationally award-winning journalist and AC360° contributor
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. All comments should be relevant to the topic and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. You are solely responsible for your own comments, the consequences of posting those comments, and the consequences of any reliance by you on the comments of others. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying and other information you provide via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Justice  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Opinion  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences  |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2009 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com VIP