Dr. Ronald Walters
NNPA Columnist
Originally posted 7/9/2008
Just back from the Rainbow Push convention in Chicago sponsored by Rev. Jesse Jackson, Sr., I was struck by the fact that neither Barack nor Michelle Obama showed up and they live virtually right down the street.
The symbol of Obama's absence was made even more vivid to me because he was out making nice with Hillary Clinton to knit together a unified campaign in the fall.
I understand that, but I also understand that he could have showed up, when Governor Bill Richardson, who lives in New Mexico not only showed up, but gave a rousing speech crediting the civil rights movement for much of the political success of the Hispanic community and his own.
I know, I know, it is common knowledge now that Barack Obama has to distance himself from Black radicals, from his church, and much of his community in order to make White voters comfortable enough with him to trust him and then give him their votes. And he will probably show at the NAACP Convention. But the troubling trend which finds him absent from other venues that are the substance of Black life looks like he is taking the Black community for granted because of their thirst for his victory.
I was not too put out when Obama did not show up at the State of Black America, because Michelle Obama was offered to Tavis Smiley and Obama was campaigning to win a touch primary in Indiana.
Jackson, however, not only was material in Barack Obama's rise to the State Senate and the U. S. senate, he represents to most people the living legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
That is important because the Civil Rights movement is implicated in Obama's victories, since he won 99 pledged Delegates in nine Southern states during the primary elections. This performance was in states where Blacks constituted one-third or more of the Democratic party base, states where the Voting Rights Act worked to empower Black voters to make a difference.
Without those 99 delegates, Hillary Clinton would have won the pledged delegate race and the popular vote and most surely would have won the nomination.
The question this raises is whether the sophistication of Black voters in this case will eventually cost them. Blacks have a long history of voting for Whites when the potential returns were based on hope.
If we support a Black candidate for president of the United States, I think that it is fair to ask whether we will have more or less access – at least as much access as we did to Bill Clinton – and whether he will deliver the goods for our community.
My concern here is that theory of Black politics should be to move our community from just hoping their political participation will lead to resources, to exercising tough leverage over politicians to negotiate potential returns to our community in exchange for our vote.
In fact, one of the lessons of Rev. Jackson's two previous presidential campaigns is that "Hope and Trust politics" is not as effective as the ability to trade votes for future support. The irony is however, that when a Black person runs for high profile office our leverage often disappears because we are asked to trust that the person will deliver based on their ties to the Black community.
The Black community didn't have to play the politics of leverage with Rev. Jackson because he had proved his fidelity to their needs through his history and in his presidential campaigns he spoke forcefully to their issues. I know, I know, he didn't win.
But I am driven to ask what the traditional notion of "winning" is worth under circumstances where the level of trust is not as high, because the message is absent and the candidate is absent. In other words, how much can the Black community count on the delivery of goods and services by a Black president who presence and message does not privilege his own community.
What concerns me is that we are involved in a great celebration without checking the guidepost that determine whether or not there will be sufficient returns to our community from a Black president in the White House. The irony is that Obama is likely to win, we will have to accept him, but under circumstances where he is essentially a White candidate, so we should "bottom line" our public policy requirements now as every other community is doing.
Dr. Ron Walters is the Distinguished Leadership Scholar, Director of the African American Leadership Center and Professor of Government and Politics at the University of Maryland College Park.
| TB |
July 10th, 2008 10:16 am ET "My concern here is that theory of Black politics should be to move our community from just hoping their political participation will lead to resources, to exercising tough leverage over politicians to negotiate potential returns to our community in exchange for our vote." I am sorry to see that some feel this is a black/white issue. Isn't this the basis for all politicking? We all hope for a better tomorrow. We vote for people we HOPE we will have access to. We all want leverage over politicians in exchange for our vote. Bottom line – hope is for all. |
|
| A Girl from SC |
July 10th, 2008 10:17 am ET Obama knows that African Americans will never leave him because he's black. |
|
| Cindy |
July 10th, 2008 10:35 am ET I think that Obama is taking the black vote for granted. It seems to me that he thinks that they will automatically vote for him because he is black. He is making a big mistake by thinking that. But on the other hand the president is the president off ALL people not just blacks. So to cater to one race is ludicrous and shows bias. Which isn't great either. He has to balance his time between all races and give each equal time. He can't be only at every black function held. That wouldn't sit right to all other races. He and McCain both have a fine line to walk on that. Cindy...Ga. |
|
| k.t |
July 10th, 2008 10:39 am ET What people don't understand is that a biracial president will have to walk a fine line if he is to suceed in any type of elected position . People must sacrifice in order to make that an reality . But since the wounds are so deeply ingrounded in the black com. the question is can it be pulled off with out hurt or finger pointing. We shouldnt hate on the best to be apart of the rest!!!!!! |
|
| American Patriot |
July 10th, 2008 10:42 am ET This is one of the most divisive tactics I"ve seen from this campaign in effort to dilute Senator Obama's impact ( on the order of"throwing his white grandmother under the bus"). The Senator has said nothing out of order to or about either side of his ethnic make-up (Black/White) tho many who fear his very possible election & have very low opinions of Blacks are attempting to place a wedge between Obama's powerful campaign & the Afican-Americans the pundits feel can't or won't think for themselves. They Are Wrong !!!! |
|
| Kristen- Philadelphia, PA |
July 10th, 2008 10:44 am ET I hate the fact that if a black person in this country is not screaming black power from the top of their lungs then they are acting white and trying to appease white people. It’s absolutely ridiculous. Barack Obama is running for President of the United States of America not the Black United States of America. His candidacy should inspire the black community to pull themselves up by their own boot straps, not sit back and say now Barack will be president everything is going to miraculously change. The only way problems in the black community will change is when people decide for themselves to do differently. Stop making excuses…Obama has said change doesn’t happen from the top down but from the bottom up and its true. Unless people who want things to be different actually do something about it instead of waiting on the next MLK nothing will change I don’t care how many black presidents we have. |
|
| Mike, Syracuse, NY |
July 10th, 2008 10:49 am ET Seriously, who else are blacks going to vote for. Jackson's same tired message hasn't changed since the 1960's. Then it was reasonable to say that much of the inequities between white and black were due to racism, prejudice and government inaction. Today that's largely not the case. 90% of what a person accomplishes is through his or her own efforts, 10 % by the circumstances of birth. With 70% of black children born out of wedlock, black dropout rates much higher than whites, black crime rates higher than whites, how is that the government's fault? Obama is telling blacks to accept responsibility for what a defective subculture has done to their community. Bill Cosby had the same message a few years ago and got much flack for it. This article talks like if there's a black President, it's payback time- a super affirmative action season. Obama's success has been due to the fact that he has largely been race neutral. Whites are sick of hearing that all the black community problems are their fault and the result of slavery. It's time to step up. |
|
| Anthony, Dallas, Tx |
July 10th, 2008 11:20 am ET Why would yall put something like this on here to start controversy. |
|
| Tootie |
July 10th, 2008 11:48 am ET Perhaps Jesse is a little sensitive to the fatherhood question, since the birth of his illegitimate love child. |
|
| TESAP. SAVANNAH, GA |
July 10th, 2008 12:12 pm ET Ok here I go again...................... This blog makes no sense.................. In what sense is he distancing himself from black people.............. I am hoping the person who authored this blog if black. So here we go...................... Many blacks fully understand that Obama is running for president in a very different form than the way Jessie tried and failed........... Do not belive for one second that we (black people) do not face the same issues as everyone else. the problem is many so-called black leaders (contrary to popular demand thereare NONE), think he should address issues that only we (the black community) can address and correct. This is just speculation and non-sense. Black issues are: High gas prices; unemployment; education and heathcare.....are we the only ones facing these problems??????????? |
|
| GAIL Centre,Al; |
July 10th, 2008 12:29 pm ET Obama is an elitest, he is talking down to blacks, just like Jackson said, I don't think he's for black people, he'll raise taxes and do away with all the free programs he can.that so many people depend on, he will be a diaster for poor people, with his smooth talk. WAKE UP PEOPLE BEFORE IT'S TO LATE. |
|
| Matthew |
July 10th, 2008 12:30 pm ET I think that he knows black people will vote for him period on the basis of color and the assumption that this will be a good look on the black community. It is deeper than that, for years the black vote has been critical and Obama has been playing it safe on the level of inspiration. Inspiration has always been a big seller, especially in media. The idea is that you never judge a book by its cover. In a leader there has always been something that they were tirelessly passionate about, but it was that issue that wrapped every other problem up in one. They had a stance that was more than political, but progressive in way that communicates pass barriers from the top to the bottom of society. I hope to see a black man have an opportunity to be able to have a sit in this "white" house of America. |
|
| JC- Los Angeles |
July 10th, 2008 1:14 pm ET Barack Obama is a classic example of someone who utilizes every angle to try to reach the top despite minimal accomplishments and experience. Today, there are countless failed executives, politicians and leaders to reference who took a similar path with harrowing results for our once proud nation. As a multi-racial candidate, I couldn't understand why Obama wasn't running as the candidate who truly represented the diversity of today's America. Once we were introduced to a racist Rev. Wright, it became clear that Obama identified with his black roots over his white. Now, he's trying to distance himself from black leadership and the likes of Jackson. Using race for convenience is unacceptable. Colin Powell, Condoleeza Rice and Clarence Thomas have all reached the tops of their professions, however, many in the black community fail to acknowledge their achievements. Los Angeles is home to over 140 different nationalities which is reflective of why our country is so great; the American people need a leader that can represent all people equally and not placate to one over another. |
|
| Cynthia |
July 10th, 2008 1:19 pm ET I don't see it as Senator Obama distancing himself from the Black community. This is one event among many that he will be able to or not be able to attend. Let's not try to make something out of nothing. |
|
| Phil - Denver |
July 10th, 2008 1:22 pm ET I completely agree with Kristen in PA. She makes a very good point. |
|
| james |
July 10th, 2008 3:56 pm ET Jesse is telling the truth, Obama really does not have the Black Americans on his mind. He being handle by the White's and in the end he will be used to do their will as usual. And I think that more Black's should speak-out about the way they really feel about his ideals and politics, they are far from the need of Black Americans. |
|
| David |
July 10th, 2008 4:19 pm ET I don't think Obama is taking the black vote or any other races vote for granted. Obama went to a black church on father's day and talked about fatherhood and personal responsibility. Some whites might have said thats giving too much attention to blacks but he did it. I think Obama has the right balance not to show favoritism to one race and be the President for all not just one race. |
|
|
Comments have been closed for this article |
||
A behind the scenes look at “Anderson Cooper 360°” and the stories it covers, written by Anderson Cooper, the AC360° staff and a network of contributors. Insight you can’t find anywhere else.
We search the news each day to show you what’s on our radar and what we’re planning for the show each night.
For more details, read our tips on how to win 360° approval for comments.
Send your instant feedback to Anderson Cooper 360°.
- Real-life effects of reform getting lost in the noise
- Evening Buzz: Buying Health Care Reform Votes
- Live Blog from the Anchor Desk 12/21/09
- U.S. soldiers in Iraq could face courts-martial for getting pregnant
- FAQs about health care reform
- Interactive: Brittany Murphy’s acting career
- Senate health care reform bill
- House health care reform bill
- Interactive: The top 10 Health-Care-Reform Players
- Video: Child custody battle continues
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2005

