David,
They all lie!! So Obama is no different than the rest. You are right...he finally showed his true colors. He will lie, say what he thinks we want to hear, or what ever he has to do to win and get the job like the rest of the politicians. They are all the same...Dem or Rep!!

Man of change...yeah right!! How about man of the same ole same ole!?

Cindy...Ga.

I understand that he's gone back on what he previously said, but haven't we all done that at some point or another? To my mind, Obama made the best decision he could make a year ago with the information he had then. Now, the info is different, and so he made a different decision. Wouldn't it be better to have a president who makes a better decision with more information than staying the course even if he (or she) knows it's not the best way to go?

Yes, the heat will come but he's to Kool to sweat...Cindy McCain is using the disabled children? I hope you're joking!!!

What I like about you, Mr Gergen, is that you have perspective - by which I mean, you've been around awhile (even longer than I have) & you seem to have paid attention to what went on. So refreshing, & I hope the youngsters listen when you talk, at least sometimes. Many thanks for your valuable contributions.

David, as a registered, undecided, independent and someone trying to determine the true characteristics and abilities of our two remaining candidates, I'm perplexed by your thoughts on Obama's shunning of public campaign financing. You claim he has the "inner will to prevail-even if he has to go back on what he has promised." Say what? He admits he was wrong the first time and you praise him for that? Come again? You then claim we need leaders that can reverse themselves. Huh? Don't we deserve someone who is right the first time? It's as if our leaders practice on the American people. What about a leader that actually has intuition? You also mention his "prodigious capacity to raise money." It's as if our leaders are one big hedge fund; they all raise a ton of money, have flawed logic, admit their mistakes and then stick it to the man. The American people deserve someone that can get it right the first time, period. Right is right and wrong is wrong. I'm hopeful both parties can agree on that.

Gergen's just making excuses for BO.

Sticking to a promise is a true test of character.

So he'll need extra funds to overcome the "racial" factor? That 's pretty imaginative.

Mr Gergen – I am surprised by your position on Obama's decision.
I would not characterize his move of his as "brave" or "tough" - its more typical to his true character: unethical, "do whatever slimy thing you need to do to win".
He is arrogant and that alone will keep him out of the White House.

Frankly, I am surprised you have been so duped on this one.
Maybe its time for you to step back, take a deep breath and really look at this guy.

David,

I always value your opinion. Thank You. But, you forgot one thing. Sen Obamas GE campaign is being funded by "public financing". We, all the 1.5 million small $ donors, are the PUBLIC. Sen Obama is indebted to us, not lobbyists,PAC or special interests. But then again, I guess we do have a "special interest" in Sen Obama.
I also agree with you on his being able to make the tough decisions based on what is happening now. Staying the course ( Bush/Cheney/McCain politics) is not always a means to an end.
Sen. Obama has already proven himself to be a level headed and seriously insiteful leader on what matters most to the American people.
Thank You again David

Almost Senior Woman from PA.......first time voter too...gives 50$ a month to Sen Obamas campaign.

ps. JC- Los Angeles............I never knew anyone as "perfect" as you. hmmmmmmmm why arent you running for POTUS??? You are always right the first time...amazing.

Last fall during a TV appearance he did say he was going to take public funds and did not change his mind until it put Senator McCain in a bind. Senator Obama went back on his word to the American voters–his reasons are not credible. It is just another reason not to vote for a flip-flopper–someone I can not trust.. He has no credibility or judgment.

Come on people grow up!! This is still politics and Obama needs to WIN!! Why would he not take the money!!! He had no idea how big his grassroots campaining would be!! Peolpe do want change and I think you are silly to think that everyone get's it right the first time!! That's why we have little things called mistakes!! Live and Learn!! No one has all the right answers all the time. ;o)

Obama 08!!!

David, I like your perspective. I have watched you many times on CNN Election Center. To me, this type of promise/broken promise/lie, really weighs absolutely nothing in the grand scheme of things. I can't believe people are actually up in arms about this. That tax money that was raised probably could be used to pay for something else the American people need. People are in such a hurry to find something negative about Senator Obama. So he broke this promise not to use public financing. AND? It's like saying, your Grandma has told you the truth all of her life while you were a kid, and when you needed $10, she said, I don't have it, but she actually did have it. You found out she really did have it, and now you think Granda is just the worst person in the world. Jesus, GIVE IT A BREAK... It's not that serious in the big picture. When he changes his policy stance to suit, lets say, lobbyist, then people can start to make a serious argument about him being a liar or whatever they want to say about him in a negative way.

David, I think it is a bit more complicated then that. Obama needs to be able to run a sucessful campaign and if a primary cost over $230 million, what exactly will $84 million do??? Hard decision, but definitely the right one.

As for Cindy McCain, if you want to talk about the charity work she done, then let's also talk about the drugs she stoled from that same charity. Let's also talk about the federal charges that she faced, but served no time for. I understand that she has done good deeds, but she has also done some pretty unfortunate things.

I don't think Obama is proud of this decision. I think he was told that this is necessary to win. The republicans are a fierce bunch. He could lose this election for no other reason than the uninformed believing he's Muslim or the prejudice using a convenient excuse. That's unfair, that's not right – and this shows he's willing to do whatever it takes to accomplish his sincere goal to help the American people.

To quote another poster:

"Is he a Muslim, a Christian with a crazy pastor or a Communist atheist with a hippie mom?
Is he ruthless and overly ambitious or naive and weak?
Is an outsider who is "foreign" to our values or the country club goer?
Is he too South Side, too "black" or too Hyde Park and elitist ? Does he resent white people or is he part of the elite that sneers at blue-collars?
Does he not care about "little people" or is a socialist who will redistribute hard-earned money to everyone?"

David Letterman is right: The Republican party still look like "guys waiting to tee off at a restricted country club" and they are the party of the dirty tactics but it's very amusing to see them call Obama an elitist and a bare knuckle politician. He's caught them unprepared and they're tongue-tighted and are accusing him of opposite things.

Obama-Sebilius '08!

When McCain changes his mind you brand him a flip flopper.
When Obama goes back on his word over and over again
he is flexible .
What a joke .

Now let me see if I have this right. A year ago I was on welfare. During the year I was able to pull myself up by the bootstraps and was able to earn enough money to support myself as my future became clearer to me. So I told the government that I would not need their money any more and will make it on my own and not on the back of taxpayers. Am I wrong?

so he changed his mind have we all not done that one time or another but look at mccain and the flip flopping that man does he has me so confused i dont know what he stands for and what he dont he flip flops just about every day mccain makes my head spin go to the barrack obama web site sign up listen to his message and he will explain why he changed on this

Wow!!!!!! Obama fans and Mc Cain fans are saying "my crook is better than your crook".

Mr. Gergen I thought journalist were to appear unbias. If this is the only issue were Mr. Obama changed his mind–so what? Mr. McCain has flip-flopped all over the place. If he can raise more money thru donations vs 85 mil, why can't he change his mind? He's already proven himself presidential by running his campaign, fundraising. I don't think that it's so far fetched that he may win th WH either. You obviously do and always have. As a woman of faith, I still believe that God has the final say in his fate. I pray that he continues on the path that lays before him all the way to the WH. Those that say they won't vote for him, weren't going to in the first place. Playing up this is another way to have the American people in an uproar. Doesn't he have enough to deal with facing the tactics that McCain has in his arsenal? Give the guy a chance. He definately can't do any worse than what we've had for the last 8 yrs.

GO OBAMA '08

David, I think it was a brilliant move by Senator Obama to not take the public funding. As I see it all he is doing is leveling the playing field between he and Senator McCain. You and I both know that if Senator McCain had the capacity to raise money like Senator Obama he probably would have done the same thing. Having more money available to him and showing his tough side (Which I always knew he had – didn't show it with Senator Clinton becase se was one of his own.) he will hopefully ensure that he puts all states in play or at least make Senator McCain have to really work for what ever states he gets.

Cindy McCain should have not commented about Michelle Obama – since she said family members should be left out of the election.

David, You make it sound like breaking his word was the courageous decision. I submit keeping your word, even when it goes against your own personal benefit, is the more courageous and yes presidential decision. In a country so cynical about politicians looking out for themselves first, how refressing it would have been to see something different. Obama had a chance to walk the walk with respect to change by breaking the self-interest mold. He blew it. I see it that when he had a chance to stand on principle, he caved. Seems pretty Bambi-esque to me.

McCain made the hard decision early on to support the war in Iraq saying that he would rather lose votes than the war. Even though I'm against the war I respected him for that.

Obama though on breaking this campaign promise brings up the question – just how many more campaign promises will he break? Its starting to look more and more like Chicago politics of old, saying whatever it takes to get elected backed by huge amounts of money so you can literally "buy" people's votes. That was why the federal funding was put in place – to even the playing field; candidates should not be able to opt out of it. If Obama wins because he raised more money and got more exposure then the Presidency is just one more thing that favors the have's over the have nots.

Annie Kate
Birmingham AL

Sheesh David....talk about an Obama puff piece on CNN.com. You do yourself and your profession a great disservice.

There isn't anything inherent in Obama making this decision that means he is tough. In fact it is probably tougher to stick with a promise even when not doing so is to your benefit. I'm betting you would make the same argument had made the opposite decision. I can see you writing this.....

"All along, there have been questions about whether he is tough enough to be President. He showed here that in the crunch he is no Bambi, that on a hard call, he has the inner will to prevail – even if he has to stick with a promise when not doing so would more greatly benefit his campaign."

Talk about mailing it in..... nice work David.

Perhaps Mrs. McCain needs to vanquish ALL her proceeds from the beer industry and donate to the DISABLED children. Each and ever penny from this year's profits. See who's calling whom a liar.

Give it up, Cindy, you can afford it, the DISABLED kids cannot.

Sue, if you review my comments, you will find that they are directed at David's comments about Senator Obama. I make no assertion that I am perfect and never will. I truly believe that all Americans, even you, deserve an apology from our politicians, executives and select members of the cloth. The American people have been let down time after time by leaders who seem to be practicing on the general public. Leadership has become one big hedge fund. Raise a ton of cash, tell people what they want to hear, pay themselves a ton of money, operate with flawed logic, clean out the common man and then claim ignorance. I am merely suggesting that we need someone to be right. Not wrong. Right. Period. Even you deserve that much respect Sue. As for running for POTUS, I have been asked by tons of associates who know me and feel I would do quite a good job. Since I don't come from old money or marry into it like McCain or since I don't make my living off book advances for stories about accomplishments yet to be achieved, I guess I'll have to settle for this forum for now. When I do run Sue, you'll be on my shortlist.

Referring to Barack Obama as "the man who beat her" probably isn't helping his election campaign...

Thank you for your excellent analysis. A president must be able to purvey a situation and decide what is the best course of action to accomplish a mission. There i no way that he could have known when he made the pledge the economic position that this decision would effect now.

Also, it is important to know that John McCain has been gaming the system for months now and is in court over his actions. He is not one to be casting stones.

Obama gave up on public financing because he knows he can get more money from his internet supporters, and therefore buy this election. He says it is partially because of the Republican 527's BUT if he is spending so much money, and McCain is limited because of public funding, then Obama is encouraging the 527's to spend on their ads. Obama is campaigning as a reformer but in reality he is really a typical politician. No reformer would ever consider spending the amount he is considering and no reformer would ever spend as much as Obama did in the primaries. And, David, I dont htink this shows strength in Obama, I think it shows him for what he is-a fraud. Why is the news media so lenient with Obama? It seems he will never be criticized for anything-everything is sweetened. I am disgusted and willdo a write in for HIllary.

Why did Senator Obama's change regarding public financing bothered me?
It isn't so much that he reneged on his promise (and it was indeed a literal PROMISE). For me, it's the fact that he wouldn't be honest when he explained his reasoning for change. On top of that, he seemed quite comfortable and not bothered at all with what he was saying to us. He might as well have called me "Stupid". It was insulting and an untruth. I wouldn't want a friend who did that. Why would want a President who would?

David,

Having a grassroots organization in every state opens up great opportunities, not just for votes, but for change in every sense. Even if Sen. Obama does not become the next President, imagine the possibilities of having that many more individuals actually concerned about what is happening in our country, in our government, and in the world. Wow.

If we'd had this kind of mass community organization in the 1960's – or at least, in the early 1970's! – perhaps we wouldn't be sitting here with an energy crisis, a financial crisis, a health care crisis, an environmental crisis, a lack of tolerance and peace crisis.... The non-issues would be non-issues, and we'd have more cohesiveness in addressing the true issues.

We'd be more whole.

ASked if you are a racist, most would say no. My answer to that would to read what you write concerning Obama. Because he's black, he has to do just what you want, how you want it, and when you want it. Most of you need therapy. This is the way war begin with thinking like you do.

Interesting perspective on the "flip-flop," I don't think it will resonate though. And I don't think the American people will ultimately care about him rejecting public financing or his excuse for doing it. Obama will have a difficult summer trying to sell his message but the people will forget about this by August.

On Cindy McCain, you are right about her. She is a very interesting woman with amazing conviction. People need to give her time and learn her story.

If Obama went with Public Financing he would have been criticized by people like you, David and other pundits for being foolish and green. So, either way he would have been criticized by you guys.
The way I see it is that either he uses tax payer money – money people donate but, don't have a say in who gets it. So, they would be funding a candidate they dont' support as well as the candidate they do.
Obama's way he is getting funding by the people but, they know their hard earned money is going to the candidate they support only.
And that is why the average person cannot see why you guys in the media are making such a big deal over it.
As for his going back on his word, at the time who would have known his supporters would have sustained him to such an extent.
And this money will go to help those downticket as well.
I say it's a win for him. And for us, the people.

The average joe doesn't care that Obama decided not to accept public financing. We just don't care about that stuff. Does that bring down the price of gasoline or food? Does it ease the payment on my mortgage? No, on all counts. But, it matters to the Republican Party because they will have to deal with a Democrat running for President that has a boatload of money to fight off the GOP attack. That makes THEM angry. Not everyone else.

I agree David. We already learned what happens when we have a president who is stubborn and not flexible.

Most of the people leaving comments here had never cared about public financing and all of a sudden we care that a man changed his mind..Obama made a decision..washington is upset about it because alot of people there have invested heavily in public financing and they are upset that Obama is going the other way..that's all it is...what he has done is not illegal so lets move on and focus on building America.

The last person I heard about getting every decision right was Jesus. Keep up the insightful commentary David. True leaders have the fortitude as well as intelligence to change their minds when situations so dictate.

People let's put this into perspective. The fact that a LARGE protion of this mony will come from small donors, should silence all the flip-flop yap. I'd rather him change his position on something as meaningless as this, than the far larger issues like McCain has recently. Those blogging here condemming Sen. Obama are not voting for him anyway, so keep it zipped, bring on the real issues and media, please do a better job of finding real stories. Lots of people out tthere who don't bother to get involved on their own with real issues. They rely on the spin that the internet and TV people throw out 24/7.

Obama 08

I agree with you Tish! Some people will try to find any reason they can not to vote for Obama. That's Okay..let them vote for John McCain and get exactly what they deserve.

Thank you for your comments Mr. Gergen. I anxiously await your perspective and find you to be especially insightful and fair in your commentary. Regardless on who else has a comment, I want to hear your insights; I agree that making a change on a position takes courage and demonstrates strength. In regard to public financing, Obama's grass roots effort gives the public a real opportunity for active public engagement. He would be depriving citizens of this opportunity if he did not accept their support... I have made several modest contributions and believe that I am making a difference; its a privilege to have the chance to do so in a tangible way.

Either way he would have taken a hit. If anyone watches fixed news or listens to right wing radio host–he has a very big network he's going up against. He learned something from John Kerry hit back and hit back hard something dems don't do. Maybe if Al Gore wouldn't have tried to be a statesmen and been willing to do what it took to win we wouldn't be so bad off.

He think he's to good to accept the Public financing. Can't stand him.

Dear Mr. David Gergen,

I have been listening to your commentary about the campaign on CNN for several months now. You have an amazing ability to have very sound judgement and perspective – one that is genuinely objective. The Obama campaign would do well to hire you as their consultant. I always look forward to hearing your thoughts and assessment of the various events that have occurred during this campaing so far – and I will continue to do so.

Take care.

I.S. from Milwaukee, Wisconsin

I agree with your assessment that it took courage to reverse on public funding. However, public funding was put there to help those who ran but couldn't draw funds necessary for a national campaign. Obama has tapped non-standard sources of funds, at an average of $88/donation, while leaving PACs and lobbyists out of his financial mix. As far as toughness, he took on the largest most well organized political machine in our history and persevered to win the nomination. While McCain and the Republicans will be no picnic, I would rather face them than the Clinton machine in the general election!

David, I truly respect your opinion. I believe that the money he is taking are public funds, provided by public donations, not corporate donations. As far as I know, the public financing fund came into existance to control the corporate donations, not private citizen donations. I also agree that a promise was broken, however, maybe a look back in history at words from Illinois' most famous citizen would smooth some ruffled feathers. It was Abraham Lincoln who changed his positions and admitted that he changed his mind. As the information around a situation changes, so to must our assessment of the situation. The individual who has never changed their mind based upon new information is the person I would not trust to lead this nation. Sounds like George Bush to me!

I do believe Obama is stronger than he is getting credit for, but as for Cindy McCain. I think you have the idea of the Stepford Wife incorrect. Stepford Wives look, act, and always behave in an appropriate way. I believe a womans true character is revealed when she becomes involved with a married man. As well as the character of the man. I understand having the privilege of disposable millions couldn't have hurt her chances to become his perfect little woman.

An excellent article, but it doesn't touch on my concern that an individual has the ability to buy an election; which is what I thought the purpose of federal funding was for, to do away with special interest groups and level the playing field. Obama has gone back on much more than his promise he has gone back on equality with in elections. It appears he cares for equality only if his opponent has an advantage and if he has the advantage, well he would be silly not to take it. So much for principles. As for the 527 republican groups, what is the difference with the ads Move on.org puts out?

I'm political junkie...I have to get a life
Anyway, I've noticed Gergen leaning Obama for many months.
Hillary was held accountable for her vote on Iraq and now Obama
has to.Clinton's vote on Irag was years ago... His campaign finance statement was said months ago. I still have difficulty with 20 years in his infamous church.Believe it or not, I'm a registered Democratic [since Jerry Brown} and will not vote for Obama.Does anyone know who Obama is?If it makes you happy,I hope your candidate wins.

Mr. Gergen;

What exactly is the pressure being exerted on CNN people to find everything Obama does, even the ethically reprehensible moves, ACTUALLY evidence of "strength and honor" (in the words of another farcical treatment of history, Ridley Scott's "Gladiator")?
You're right, all great presidents have gone back on campaign promises - AFTER THEY GET ELECTED. The great "didn't stay bought" candidates - Lincoln, the two Roosevelts, Wilson - didn't start smashing their seductive promises until they'd secured the White House, and then only to find the best solutions to national crises possible - not the biggest pile of cash. Your historical analogy is therefore nonsense (as even your Boston colleague Mark Shields acknowledged), which is why you quote no examples. In fact, the only precedent for what Obama's done is well known: Richard Nixon.
This is right up there with Ms. Power's admission that Obama, as president, won't feel obliged to live up to his promises on Iraq; again, a statement that they should have bothered to get the White House before making. What great noble commitment that so inspired the Obama messianic movement has the candidate actually STUCK to, can you tell us that?
Truman Capote said that people lose one point of IQ for every year they live in Hollywood; looks like the damage is even worse for the Kennedy School, where former geniuses like yourself seem to go to find friends and lose principles and perspective. A real shame.

- Caleb Carr

I agree completely! I don't feel he broke his word to me. I feel he looked at the situation as it stands today and what will probably happen by November (what has happened in the last two elections with Republican-based 527s) and changed his mind. I, too, would prefer to have someone in the White House that is able to reanalyze the facts and come to a different conclusion if that will ensure success. He also has to help Clinton raise money AND do extra work because of the angry Clinton voters. John McCain doesn't have those challenges.

Susan

People listen – Senator Obama not accepting funds is no big deal, but in essence he is. Every dollar donation is receives is from who? the public, so use your head, why should he double dip? At least he's being honest and not accepting and also keep in mind; these funds restrict him to a certain dollar amount, which means he cannot go after the big republican ads. How and why do you think Kerry lost? he accepted these funds, which limited and the big money republicans went after him because all the 527's or what ever you call them put up the money for Bush and his dogs to go after him.

This allows Obama – to have more money from donations, which are public citizens like you and me. Use your heads!!!!!!

I think everyone needs to keep this in perspective: While Obama is not accepting public financing as defined by lawmakers, he is funding his campaign through the people with small donations. The reason for campaign financing is to keep the big donors and lobbyists away from influencing the people they give money to (politicians) in ways to support their causes and to ignore the will of the people. Obama will remain loyal to the people. This decision demonstrates that he was able to change his mind while remaining loyal to the people he serves. In addition he called for 527s against McCain to close shop–nobody talks about that. Can we see more than "all or nothing", "all or none" dynamics in communication. Life is full of gray!!! There is more than one way to end up with the same result of "not accepting money from PACS, lobbyists, big donors, and so forth.

At least David Gergen is consistent. His comments in the primaries invariably were positive on Obama as they were negative on Hillary.
Now he is trying the same strategy – excuse Obama when he is wrong, praise and advise him most of the times and damage McCain as much as one could.
Obama is the change man....He changed on public financing., He changed his position on NAFTA. He changed his position on sitting down unconditionally with the Iranian president. Change you can believe in Gergen!
Obama's claim of judgement is speaking out against the Iraq war. Jeremie Wright also spoke out against the war...even before Obama. Does that make Jeremie Wright fit to be president. If you ask most of the people from Jeremie Wright's church (including the Obamas) they would all have been against the Iraq war taking their cue from the Rev. Wright. Would that make them all having great judgement and be fit to be president? You are a Harvard man, Gergen...do some more profound analysis.

I think that while it is his choice to make and the American people may not care so much about his funding, we do mind if he is not honest and not a man of his word. Going back on this makes him both a liar and a flip-flopper. Now I am aware that McCain flip-flopped on oil drilling this week, but Obama also flip-flopped on NAFTA and these two flip-flops are far from the only ones so far that Obama has flip-flopped on. Also, drilling for oil off state coasts is an issue that most American's agree on, so McCain is siding with the overall agreement of the Country. I will still give Obama my vote if Hillary is his VP, if not I will probably vote McCain, but this shows a flaw in the image and character that Obama has tried to portray himself as. Much more flip-flopping on Obama's part and I will not vote for him at all. Also, shame on Obama for trying to make McCain look bad for not doing anything about the floods. Last I checked the Democrats have been in Charge of congress for about 2 years, how come none of them have done anything about the poor state of our levees in these states? I think it is funny that Obama would blame McCain for not doing anything when McCain in a senator from AZ (a state that is not even in this flood region) and Obama just happens to be from Chicago, and his home state is one of the states in this flood region. So, how come Obama did not do anything about this in his state about the floods???

Well David. I read all the comments above. I agree that you normally have extreme perspective. However this time your analysis is wrong your perspective is accurate and would be great if your analysis of the situation was right. The problem with Obama's decision is that its devoid of any principle and is purely oppurtunistic. What you are thinking about when you are saying a president needs to be able to reverse himself – i believe you are thinking about when circumstances change and what was once right changes a president would require courage and character to go to the people and explain – totally true. However there is no fit with Obama's situation – system didn't become broke since 2007. Actually very disturbing from a man whose presidency is based on words only. Here's perspective. Match obama words to his actions over his very limited political existence. maybe you get a 10 to 90 match. Then look at the reversals . Then consider what his record might be if he were around for as long as mccain has been around. Media if its to do the job properly should report on how obama's word match with his actions.

Good piece. My view is that he is putting his candidacy and the party in the best position to win in the fall. Agree, it was a bold move he will likely take some heat for....I do see David's point. Hmmm, I wonder if McCain would have done the same if he were to have found himself on the same level as Obama in fundraising!!

I agree with you David and always appreciate your thoughtful commentary. Even the nay sayers have to admit that Obama is running a very smart campaign. In my opinion, not only will this country benefit with Obama sitting in the Oval Office, so will the world at large. I have all my bets on the integrity and the leadership qualities of this man. He can do whatever it takes to win as far as I'm concerned because I trust, deep in my soul, that whatever he does will be above board.

Signed,
A White Middle Class/Middle Aged Woman

Lou Dobbs and David Gergen seem to be the only ones on cnn who seem to be objective about Sen. O'Bama. Thanks Mr. Gergen for saying that he went back on his promise. I think it was probably a prudent thing to do , but he could have explained a good reason why instead of the lame excuse he used. CNN seems to have a problem telling the whole truth about Mr. O'Bama. They won't go near anything that appears to be remotely negative. I am sure he is not nearly as perfect as they portray him. Thanks Mr. Gergen for being able to talk about OB without having stars in your eyes. By the way, I am African- American and that is not going to make me vote for him. I think he is the least qualified of the field and doesn't seem to be very honest.

This is the game of politics. The candidates who make the best
moves will win. This is an impresive move. He would be stupid if he lets that oportunity go. This is a turning point in our history. Be part of history.

No many people has his IQ.

I have to go and donate.....later

I also think it is funny that now when it works for Obama he is playing the race card. Also, David, as we seen with Obama's vetting team, his judgments of people is not the best. He picked two people with a tainted past whose opinion on our VP we cannot even trust, and while he let Clinton be branded as more of the same in Washington in order to make himself look better and something new, or "Change" if you will, then he goes and picks a Kennedy as the third person for his vetting team. All three suck, A Kennedy is way more of the same then a Clinton was, is or could be, they have been around forever and she is the last person I want to help choose my VP. I am not sure I want a president who is wrong from the start and admits it, who lies and flip-flops and says just what he thinks the people need to hear and not what he really intends, as well as one with poor judgments when it comes to important choices in office, like the choice of our VP.

I believe it is important for a President to keep his word and Obama went back on his word. I know you punditts believe it doesn't really matter to the voter. But it matters to me. I know very little about Obama. Now I know that he'll go back on his word when it might benefit him. He can't run enough ads to change that.

I wish the media would scrutinize JM murky dealing on campaign finance like they have spent examining BO. BO is running for POTUS not the second coming of Christ. He is not perfect, doesn't always get it right time ,and suffers from a human condition known as humanity. We all have it. This doesn't make hime unfit to be Pres.

I am happy he did it. On the whole it's more important to defeat JM right now. All BO other policies are on target...can't say the same for JM. BO needs all the money he can get to introduce himself to the public who thinks he's "exotic", "foreign", "muslim", "too black" or whatever other precluding small minded stereotype there is. He needs it to fight the RNC, media talking heads and 527s.

When it comes down to it, BO showed some savvy. I like him even more for it. Also remember, "Change" doesn't mean God like perfection. Alot of people will be dissapointed with that kind of expectation. Keep it real and listen to the policies. He must fight to make through this hard process. He can't win acting like an angel all the time.

I liked your editorial and am in full agreement. My Dad always said," a wise man changes his mind, a fool never does." Things change, you gotta revisit situations and rethink, and adjust accodingly. I am an over 65 white female who is supporting Obama with regular contributions. Thanks.

I've not viewed Cindy McCain as a Stepford wife. I guess my sense is that they lead somewhat separate lives, he in Washington and her at home tending to her family business and causes near to her heart.

I'm getting off track here....I recently read something about John McCain's nasty temper, which gave me some pause. I think the job requires someone who operates on an even keel.

Mr. Gergen,
I am a 31 year old African-American voter and I love you! No seriously! I love your perspective. I love your fairness. I love your honesty. It is a breath of fresh air to watch and listen to someone with your knowledge and experience and not just someone who has worked on one campaign that is all of a sudden a "political analyst.". I especially appreciate the fact that you don't have any hidden agendas as do some other "political analysts."
Keep up the good work!

As far as I am concerned a man who can't keep his word doesn't need to win. He needs to lose. BIG

"Brave .... tough" ??? Respectfully disagree. More like... typical politician ! Reversing his pledge is all about what's good for HIM, which is considerably different than reversing a decision that would help others. I don't understand why the media is giving Obama a "free pass" on this. As an independent I've liked a lot of things about his candiacy, but this decision has eroded my confidence in his trustworthiness.

I give Obama credit for doing what's best for his campaign. I hope a President could also look at all aspects & choose the best course.
Seriously people, the Republicans are the ones who REFUSE to stop taking money from Lobbyists so the fact that Obama will raise money without them is far more important. I seem to remember MANY occasions when McCain " changed his mind" about things far more
important than this. Good for Obama for making a smart decision & turning his back on the old style politics. Proves that he is the only candidate interested & capable of implementing true change.
Go Obama!!

Sticking to something that would probably cost him the election would be absurd. Only those who want him to loose would say so. McCain and the right wing attack machine would off a family member if it would win them the election. So to play into grandpa McCain's hand would be self destructive to say the least. I agree with Gergen, if we had a president that would admit his failures our country wouldn't be in the position it is in right now. King George will be remembered for the tyrant that he is. And Grandpa McCain is just an extension of him. After being his whipping boy McCain know what they want him to do.

David, I am surprised at you writing this article. Bush and McCain have changed their minds so many times and we are suffering from it right now. It might not affect you, but it is affecting a lot of Americans. What if Bush decided not to go in Iraq. I am sure many parents and wives would be very happy. So you have never changed your mind-well-you are the first. What wrong David, why can't America have a sensible election. You supposed to know the in's and out's. There are so much to talk about except someone changing their minds. Let's talk about high gas prices, which probably doesn't affect you, health care, broken prisons systems, tornadoes, firers, hurricanes, flooding, Katrina still broke, child abuse in America, hunger in America, veterans sleeping under bridges and homeless.etc. just to name a few.
Let's also talk about the hate in America that the whole world sees and we wonder why they should love us. Why should America celebrate MLK when we have not lived up to his ways of love and peace. Some of the America people are showing their true colors. David, don't let me down, I have always given you the credit for the better. Oh, well. Let me go and donate to Sen. Obama. It's all in God's hands anyway and His will, will be done. God Bless you David.

Mr. Gergen: Your comments are thoughtful and insightful. Obama would have been making a terrible mistake to accept federal government financing of his campaign. One of your readers was correct: Senator Obama's financing has been "public financing" in small amounts from 1.5 million of his supporters. I am one of them. The American people have learned just how disastrous it can be to always "stay the course".

Lewis/Ala

David, i never doubt your opinion on any subject. Yourself and Rawlings are the only two analyst that speaks from their heart and both of you always make sense when i listen to what you have to say on any subj...Thank you for your insight..The rest of the world is watching AMERICA!

I don't understand the people that say Sen. Obama broke a promise. Barack has dedicated himself to campaign reform and has proven such over and over with his strikingly unusual approach to campaigning and campaign funding. The spirit of reform means, of course, he cannot become beholding to corporations by taking their money. It means The People must remain the principle beneficiaries of his execution of power, once he acquires it. So far, I see no major contradiction with his stance on public finance. But unlike the supporters of Junior George, I will be watching Sen. Obama with great interest in congruence between word and deed. Barack Obama's integrity is why I became an Obamacrat in the first place. Obamacrat.us!

He doesn't seem so "reckless & naieve" now, eh John McCain?"

JC – Los Angeles...

I humbly disagree with your assertion.

I understand that you think that Obama should have been able to "get it right the first time", but his decision, in my opinion, was one made after he gathered evidence, weighed what it was telling him, and made the best decision based upon that even if it contradicted what he said 1 year ago when he could not have foreseen that he would be able to raise as much money as he did and has the potential to do. I think it was the right call for him to forgo the public financing and capitalize on being able to raise substantial funds in his bid to be the next president. I think it was an astute judgment call.

Mr. Obama is a realist. He has seen Senator Kerry's aspiration for the White House destroyed by a spurious & relentless war waged by Republican backed 527s'.
Mr. McCain knows far too well that the surrogate 527 money makes the Public Funding Proposal a Farce.
Why should Mr. Obama not count on the support of the millions that have contributed, and, want to continue to do so. Are we not a democracy after all. Should the peoples' will to contribute not be respected.
Mr. Gergen has served several Presidents during trying times. His observations are backed by wisdom. CNN should be complemented for having Mr. Gergen as an expert commentator.

I think it's high time, white america give Barack a chance and stop scrutinising everything he says in an effort to find loop holes. It is quite obvious, you are using this to hide the fact y'all are some bigots.

so .... he changed his mand .... Big deal!!!!

crazyasacalabrez
looks like Obama has changed public financing forever. He has
already delivered on his promise to his supporters by not taking
pac money, big oil, etc. He's talkin the talk, and walkin the walk,
one taxpayer at a time. What a breath of fresh air.
I also read the piece on Cindy MCain. I hope they just leave her alone. She is very brave.

Obamaniacs in this country need to wake up and stop excusing this man's actions. He lied – plain and simple – and it's time for someone to hold him accountable. He's getting accustomed to being let off the hook.......... it's not a good thing.

So Obama cant change his mind when he feels he is making a better decision based on current circumstances, every person
with a brain does this, Republicans have made seriously bad decisions and stuck too them at the disadvantage of about
4000 or more very young soldiers and probably many more
to come. We are not electing JESUS for president, we are
electing a man, so to all you self righteous hypocrites out there
so eager to throw the first stone, stop masking what is really
behind your inhumane judgement of Obama, stop masking
your hatred and fear of true change.

What WE THE PEOPLE want is campaign finance where the total amount of money spent is about even.

With "public funding" [from the government] only comprising a portion of the total spending on Presidential elections, I look at Obama's move as a means for him to ensure that this year, unlike in years past, the Republicans and their PACs & 527s can not outspent the Democrats.

I'm sorry but I see this in keeping with the true spirit of campaign fianance reform. In law we talk about the letter and the SPIRIT. Senator Obama seems to be keeping the SPIRIT.

When circumstances change, choices change. Plain and simple! The problem becomes when the change is done in the darkness of night; Obama spoke about the choice change in broad daylight. Only the simple minded will remain stuck with a previously made choice when circumstances change-Obama recognizes his campaign has many challenges to overcome so why should he limit his financial options? Considering the low road nature of the competition, I applaud the choice!

Maybe Obama could just "stay the course," even when he is wrong–oh wait, that's what the clown we have now does. Of course, Bush is just parroting what his advisors (and Cheney) tell him to say. The whole Bush presidency is a criminal nightmare of bad decisions and ignorance. Why in God's name have we not impeached both Cheney and Bush?
This is is a non-issue for Obama. Grow up, people. Perhaps, he should have stated that he would wait to decide on what to do regarding funding. If he had, this would not be a discussion.
If Obama wins, it will be nice to have one of the smarter guys around running the show. A person who can make good decisions with the data available. Right now, even if we gathered some of the dimwits on this site and around the Internet, Bush would NOT be the smartest guy in the ROOM. Sad, but frightening!

To be honest, I never thought this was the reform Obama has been talking about. I see, due to journalist digging up the story, he had mentioned it in the past. For me, this change of heart makes sense and is the right thing to do. What change means to me is a change in government, a more mature foreign policy that includes diplomacy, and a willingness to negotiate with people who disagree with you- even if they are the minority political party or heads of states who are dictators and pursue policies not in US interests.

Further, in terms of money, the real problem has always been big money. If a candidate can raise large sums of small donations, from any party, on some level he or she must be popular. It is democracy in action. People should be able to express who they are for though a financial donation.

Politicians, including Obama are going to have to change their position from time to time. The important thing is to be honest about it. I think he was. He thought it was best thing, and did it. Whoever you vote for, I guarantee their position will change once in the White House. Sometimes that is for good reason.

Obama did the right thing. The objective is to win the Presidency. To not use the financial resources at his disposal, many small contributions which are essentially vote proxies and strongly suggest how well he will do in the election, would be foolish. To change one's mind when the facts demand it is good sense, not a flip flop.

Smart move. He would have been a fool to give up this big advantage. He's going to need a lot of money to answer all the "swift boaters" that are going to come out against him. The Republicans are just grousing because their little trap didn't work. There is a good reason John McCain can't match the donations going to Obama. I just hope all the voters that came out in the primaries show up in the general election. Every vote counts!

Mr. Gergen, you are one of the few analyst on television whose analysis I trust and respect. That said, I agree with you on most of what you said.

I'm am concerned that everyone says Obama made a PROMISE. Correct me if I'm wrong but I thought he filled out a survey of some sort. Everyone acts as if he solicited the funds from the FEC, signed a pledge to use the funds and then changed his mind.

By completing a form, did he break a promise to the American people?

I just read the Newsweek article about Cindy McCain. What really struck me is that wife and family took a back seat to career and country with Sen. McCain. Life is about balance, spouses have a responsibility to their partners and to their family. It is truly unfortunate that Cindy McCain was in her words a "single parent" and it is even more unfortunate that she settled for that.

The truth is, this is great wisdom from the part of Senator Obama in particular and his campaign in general. Yes he said he was going to take public finance but after examining the Republican party's relations with the 527s he had to change his mind. Let us be mindful of the fact that without successfully getting to the oval office he can not bring the most needed change in America where people pray for terrorist attacks for political gains.Infact, that was the right decision.

You right i would of optout on public financing to.whos that stupid to take 83million when you can make tripple that amount,and all the flip-flopping john mccain does please the world aint that crazy i dont thank a religous person that crazy i dont call that optout i call that being smart thats why i want Obama as my president good thinking.

Bobby, I greatly appreciate your comments and understand how you feel a leader may be inclined to change his mind once additional information is gathered, however, the stakes today are so high that we need leadership that is inclined to be right the first time. We didn't get a second chance to prevent 911, period. With your logic it would be very easy to say, "gee, if we had to do it all again, we'd throw out Alan Greenspan, we'd crack down on Wall Street, we'd stop the mortgage banking fraud, we'd crack down on crooked politicians and their sweetheart loans, we'd stop corporate malfeasance, we'd correct the healthcare system and we'd fix the public schools." I believe the American people deserve someone who addresses these issues upfront, the first time around fixes them once and for all.

I didn't read all of the blogs–about 20 perhaps–but Mike from Syracuse may have put it best ; to wit, it would have been refreshing if Obama had stood by his earlier expressions of intent to accept federal campaign financing. He blew an opportunity to stand out as a politician of principle (if you will pardon the oxymoron.) It's a matter of respect: it is more difficult now to respect the man once he has revealed himself to be like the others. One gets a little tired of folks who continually prostitute themselves for money. Obama apparently is no different. Would like to cut him some slack but with the Rev. Wright association, the "bitter" comments, a few other missteps, and now this, what to do? Heaven knows McCain is no paragon and Hillary was just awful. What a mess this country is in that we can't pick better leaders. It's a flawed system (the primaries) I think. But one does have to admire them all for putting up with such a lengthy and excruciatingly demanding process. 'Nuff said except: we think you are one of the better comentators, Gergen. Hang tough.

Obama's promise to me is HOPE for a better future for my children and grandchildren with HIM in the Oval Office.

That is why I support him with my dollars.

I expect him to use his judgment as to how he is going to fund his run for this office.

Clinton has proven she would run it in the red, and McCain has proven he does not personally have control over RNC and 527 negative ads that may require Obama's strong response.

Obama is again using good judgment... that of course is a thorn in the side of a McCain supporter.

I sure hope you post this one. It is amazing to me the amount of support Obama gets from his followers. Just what, I wonder, do these Americans think he is going to change? What I have learned so far about this man is that he is not honest and his supporters make excuse after excuse for his actions. His pastor, the bomber, his wife never being proud of her country until her husband is a candidate, the slum lord he worked for, etc., etc., now this! Hmmmm... take everything and what do you get? McCain may be old but he still would make a much better president and I would feel safe! By the way, McCain is a republican just like many other great presidents we had but he is not George Bush!

Mr. Gergen,
You are my favorite analyst in all mainstream network. I love your objectiveness not partisanship, which shows from having served in both republican and democratic adminstrations. This is what we need in this country that is been so divided by partisan politics. As an independent I have watched people say HILLARY is divisive. Is she more divisive than George Bush? NO. But she is got some negatives just like Obama as well as McCain. We all have our negatives.
There is nothing wrong with a man changing his mind at some point. Just like you said Mr. Gergen, the best leaders are the flexible ones.I just hope whoever becomes the president should add you to their team. I will vote for OBAMA because he is going to take this country on a different but positive course. Thank you Mr. Gergen for your excellent work. You a great asset to CNN. You are one of the few reasons I watch CNN. My friends agree you are the best.

It is simple. Obama took the money and set aside principles.
Not good for a guy who is running as Mr. Clean or New Wave Politician. As for the 527 swift boaters he needs the money to defend against- It appears Move- on.org (for Obama)is already out there
ahead of the pack .

I have loved Cindy Mcain's activism for years now...quietly and without any media attention she has been doing a great job for disabled children and for operation smile.

Classy Lady

I loved the fact that she has adopted a child from India..I love that her son has served in Iran. For once we have a candidate that he has his own son in the battle ground.

I think McCain is the "change" candidate.

Obama's stand and his comments have an "expiration date"...he has changed too many positions and that shows an indecisiveness not flexibility!

There are times when winning is everything.......; the only acceptable 'outcome'! "This Presidential Election is one of those times"!

At this time in Global and Domestic History and Circumstances.........; Senator Barrack Obama, 'must do what's legally possible/acceptable to win'!

"Strategic and Ruthless; results oriented Action and Flexibility"!

We are 'all' affected by this Presidential Election!

"Go Barrack..........GO"

Let's recognize Obama as a realist who changed his mind to get the advantage of his tremendous fundraising ability. Let's not claim it was a character strength, a sign of necessary toughness, and let's not demonize the Republicans as full of dirty tricks, thus implying Obama had to do this. As an Obama supporter, I believe he was correct to refuse public funds to help him win the presidency. Joe Biden was very eloquent on how Obama is much less beholden to special interests than other candidates who take "big money", so he doesn't need to be as reigned in by the public financing requirement. Many individuals want to fund him; he doesn't need special interests to do it. So the character problem of going back on his word is somewhat diminished by the fact that he isn't really beholden to big money. In my opinion, this is the lesser evil.

David, maybe you or someone with CNN need to explain to the public as to what is "public spending" and the caps on this money. If I was the nominee and had to select the $85 mils or fund my own campaign, guess what? I would keep my own funding machine which Obama has done quite well. Don't you think so?

Obama is doing what he needs to do to win. He denounced his avuncular Reverend when he had to win, not before. He stated that he was caught up in the moment in his reversal of the anti-NAFTA zealotry which he displayed during the primaries. He openly dismisses millions of American Muslims in the name of political favor with the public. As long as he keeps claiming to be the candidate of change who will reverse typical Washington politics, he will dig his grave deeper and deeper. All politicians lie and flip-flop. None has done so with such duplicity as this hypocrite.

Obama is a very savvy and shrewd dude. I am sure when he made the pledge not to accept public financing, he in no way thought he would be his party's nominee. He knows that he does not stand a chance in November if he were to play the game the way the opposition has come to expect the democratic nominee to play the game. He fully understands that he already has two strikes against him, his skin tone and his time in the political jungle. Now if he could just pick the right running mate, he would still be alive at the plate.

Mr. Gergen:

I'm a 76 year old retired sociologist in Berkeley, CA.

We've had seven years of an administration unwilling to change positions, based on new information! It changes false information for the same positions!

Thank you for your many years of astute political analysis.

You're "spot on" on this issue!

A previous poster cited the issue of "Promise". Did filling out a questionnaire constitute a promise?"

GoBama, Go, Go, Go!
Write on, David Gergen! Write on, and on, and on!

Do any of you people even do your research? The entire 'vow' to only use public funds comes from an answer to a question from the original questionnaire from the Midwest Democracy Project.

The quote from Obama is, "My plan requires both major party candidates to agree on a fundraising truce, return excess money from donors, and stay within the public financing system for the general election."

Exactly WHEN did McCain agree to a fundraising truce and return excess money from donors? He didn't. He ran his entire primary campaign WITHOUT using the public financing system and STILL hadn't publically decided to use public financing for his general election campaign until AFTER Obama made his announcement to forgo public financing.

I wish you people would do your homework before you shoot off your mouths about lies from Obama. The only person who's truly LIED about accepting public campaign funding is McCain when he said he'd take it during the primary campaigning so he could use that as leverage to acquire a loan and THEN he opted out of the public funding after securing the loan.

Do your homework people!!! Please put your brain in gear before blogging....

While Obama has incredible numbers of supporters, the Republicans have the kind that can write out a 5 figure check in a minute to any 527 looking to spead dirt. It will happen the closer we get to November.

Obama has to take the hit for not taking public financing but he would be doomed if he did take it. It will take a ton of money to combat the filth that the right wing 527's have learned how to throw. Ask Kerry.

Campaign reform isn't really reform if 527"s can toss momney around at will.

I don't think he had a choice. You can bet McCain would grab at it if he had that many willing contributors.

If anyone seriously thinks McCain has not flip-flopped then go back and read what he said about taxes during war time. That is a complete flip-flop and a more substantive issue for the american people than Barack forgoing public funding. McCain has changed his stance on so many issues that he believed in during the 2000 campaign, including drilling in ANWR, that he's a shell ofhis former self. McCain has pandered so hard to the right in order to get support from the G. Bush conservatives he will beholden to them if he is President.

Americans – be aware of what the Bush neocons are planning for Iran and McCain in securing their support if going to go along with their desires.

I think it was smart for him to refuse public funding. He would probably be outshined by the republicans due to their superior coffers if he had accepted the public financing. If his current fund raising trend stands Obama will most likely have more funds to spend in the fall campaign than the republicans – this is the real cause of the pain and concern to them.

The current fuse by the republicans is an indication that their shallow trap did not work. They have been outsmart and soon they will be outspend by the Obama wheel of change.

Let us be objective. Who among us have never changed a our postition on critical issues? None. So let this hypocricy stop. If it suites us to change our mind, why then do we withdraw the same priveledges to Obama.

I always love your commentary, Mr. Gergen. Relevant and well thought out.

I'm not sure if records are kept for flip flopping in the general election, but this race certainly looks to shatter any previous ones. Senator Obama made a political decision to disavow public financing and to go with with his individual donors. John McCain in the primaries said he would go with public financing-took out a loan in anticipation of that revenue, then changed his mind. Let's face it, both candidates have changed their minds on issues and will keep doing so. John McCain said read my lips, no new taxes earlier this campaign season. Will he keep that promise?

Presidents can’t stick to every campaign promise in a world that changes everyday. Everyday new events call for new strategies and Obama is already showing to be such a man. The USA needs a President in the White House who can reach Americans and the rest of the world and not a white or a colored person. Hopefully Mrs. Clinton’s supporters will not abstain from voting.

This is a strategic maneuver to clinch the white house, nothing more. Honestly, there have been so many "independent" conservative organizations shilling for the republicans this doesn't bother me at all. I want Obama to win the election, and given the cost in lives and damage to the united states (and it's reputation) under the republican banner in the last 7 years, I really don't care if he flip flops on an issue of campaign funding.

It's not like McCain hasn't pulled a 180 yet in his campaign yet. Hell, McCain practically has his own news station shilling for him in the form of Fox News and the tons of other associated faux conservative promises. Obama in '08.

Regardless of what anybody says if they were in the position as Obama they would have done the same thing. There's an extreme amount of "perfect " people saying they would have never changed their mind and stayed the course. Basically you're asking Obama to bring a knife to a gun fight, but instead he chose to bring a bigger gun thats pretty American to me. lol

Have you not figured it out yet? Thisn is the Obama station and it doesnt matter what he does or says. CNN will always find a way to make what ever Osama says to be, the new light of the world.

He is the new press baby, and they will contiue to play to his hand, for fear that they will be considered racisit. Think what you want, But we all know it to be true.

Hello to al. Well, Obama decided not to accept public funding. I think this is not an important matter. THe reason why at first he said candidates should go along with public fundings is to be less dependant on the big corporate and lobbying interests. They re the ones who gives the money and they are the ones who will get favors back while the rest of us are left with leftovers. Well, in this case, Obama got the money from the people, through his internet fundings and so on. He s not as dependant on the corporate interests as McCain is depsites the fact he might accept public fundings. He still relies on fat donners (meaning at least three 0's on every donation)while Obama is getting a few dollars from a lot of people. He's right when taking the decision to refuse public fundings. If he was relying on lobbyists and corporates donnors, it d be another matter and I d be the first to throw him a big fat stone. But in this case, Go Obama and teach those republicans some good politics (they ve played unfair for years now, it s not appropriate for them to complain now anyway....)

David,

My problem with Obama changing his position on this is that he was a major proponent for campaign finance reform. Now that he is in a position to follow his "reform" message, he backs away from it. That is the true material point. (And, the comparison made of McCain changing his mind on oil drilling is not the same. We are in need of a break and these politicians need to institute change now.)

He wants to be an "agent" for change, yet his decision to break his commitment to this makes him the same as all the others.

Frankly, I'm not happy with either candidate.

In politics there's always a reason why a sudden shift of position is made. Obama clearly seems a genuine person. Time will show why he made the decision. Politics is also a game of strategy!

Money is important in U.S politics.I am sure John would have done the same, if he had the abilitty or potential to raise money like Barack. Haven't we seen so far John reverse his stance on off-shore oil drilling ?

Who knew Cindy McCain was a convicted drug addict who stole drugs from her own charity that had to be shut down because she was using it to feed her addiction!

Could you imagine how they would hype that in the media if that was Michelle Obama's story?!

What a good article David, just a small bone to pick. "If he makes it to the white house(and that remain a big if)." I know this country has never elected a black President and knew about it, "A Big If" come on, the American people are smart and most of us aren't as bone headed as others. It is time for "Change".
People that think that Obama is inexperienced voted for GW Bush not once but twice, and they have the nerve to complain about Obama. McCain will fail this nation miserably. I hope people think hard and Long before giving so much power to an old , senile angry man. "No, He won't Ever Surrender". And Cindy will always be proud of her country as long as they keep buying her beer. He'll make it.

shouldn't we, just for the novelty, try electing the smartest person in the room instead of the most doggedly obvious? Things do happen in politics and in the presidency. The ability to look for the best solution to the problem at hand, within the U.S. Constitution and U.S. law, may be a good thing. The coherence of Obama's policy views is still open to close examination, and ought to be. But the decision to save taxpayers an involuntary contribution of $84 million to his campaign is a decision more respectable on principle than McCain's willingness to take $84 million and use it to pay his small army of lobbyists to think about more corporate giveaways and paths to Charlie Black's wars.

Soul,

A bigot is someone who attends an all black racist church for 20 years, I would get your facts straight!

Did the Newsweek article mention that she is a felon who stole money from her own humanitarian organization? She IS a Stepford wife. Mr. Gergen, I am disappointed that you are flaunting her.

I just read someone say "Sticking to a promise is a true test of character" ... are you serious? Do people honestly say to themselves this is true? Does nobody see that Obama is right? There are to many loopholes in the public financing as it stands now? Loopholes that the Republican party has perfected. It needs to be repaired before it should be used and of course it is not going to be fixed before November. Nothing will be fixed before then. Besides hasn't sticking to a "promise" gotten us into a big enough hole? A hole with 4,106 dead.. thousands without homes/jobs.. a failing dollar.. bush tax cuts and now the idea that drilling offshore might solve our oil dependency... sigh.. The thought that this is happening and might continue scares me.. read the facts people. And on the subject of changing ones mind... maybe you should read what McCain has said himself...

Correct me if I am worng, but Obama never said we would accept public financing. He said he would accept public financing if a deal could be reached with his republican counterpart. Since a deal was obviously not reached, did he go back on his word?

It would be nice if the media actually looked at what he said rather than regurgitating what they believe to be common knowledge. Afterall, because of the media, it was "common knowledge" that Iraq was behind 9/11, and look where that got us!

Look folks...BREAKING NEWS...OBAMA IS NO DUMMY. We can sit and whine about how 'HE LIED' or how 'HE BROKE HIS WORD', we can also commend him in January for keeping his word when HE'S BACK IN THE SENATE. The fact is (is) that Obama's campaign is more publicly funded than the gov version (only like 10% participate in the Income Tax checkoff system) Leave it to the Republicans (or highjackers of the Party) to whine so disingenuously (as Lindsay Graham did on Meet the Press, last Sunday) about how Obama's being dishonest for breaking his (nuanced promised) You think someone kicked his dog. So in the end, this is about S-T-R-A-T-E-G-Y for the win in November.

...Oh, and way back on '01, Bush promises us that he would catch the 'terrorists'...and he hasn't caught a single ONE.

I agree with Gergen: Obama needed to do this "flip-flop," given the situation. When Obama agreed to take public funds, he did not yet know that he would have this amazing money-making machine that his campaign has produced. It's been clear the last couple of months that he has been leaning toward foregoing public funds, and he's been trying to find a way to justify this switch.

What bothers me–as an Obama supporter–is that his explanation has been so dishonest. He should have just plain admitted that he changed his mind given the situation, instead of trying to make a pragmatic decision sound grand and noble. And he should have (as he said he would do) "come out" to the McCain campaign before announcing this on his website. I was drawn to Obama the idealist; I don't much like Obama the Machiavellian. (When I believed in Obama the idealist, though, I was pretty sure that he would lose, and I was sad about that. Now I think he will win–and I'm a little sad about that too.)

That Obama chose not to take public financing is great news for the American taxpayers – that McCain *says* he cares so much about.

There are economy flip flops and social flip flops and environmental flip flops and then there is the trading-$84-million-for-$300-million flip flop. Most flip flops are designed to sway votes but this one is designed to buy votes. It is evil and nasty and republican.

I like it.

McBush and the Republicans are at it again...trying to fool the American People....If it is the American People who are financing Barack Obama's Campaign, how can it be that Barack is breaking a promise to the American People by foregoing public financing? It is clear that McBush is not so much concerned about Obama's infidelity towards the public, as he is about his own pathetic inability to convince the public that he is worthy to be president.....I am still waiting for McBush to explain what his "experience" is that qualifies him to be president.