Roland

This isn't the first time Obama had changed what he said on an issue. Even though he declares he is a new type of politician but all I have seen so far is the same old politics. This won't be the last time he "changes" his mind on something in this campaign. Someone should keep a scorecard.

Annie Kate
Birmingham AL

Roland martin saying something that someone in the middle, like myself, agrees with. Whats the world coming to.

Honestly, the campaign-finance reform isn't all that it is cracked up to be. If McCain truly believed in campaign reform, it would NOT accept money from special interests and lobbiests like OBAMA!

Well with all due respect to Roland Martin, but no matter what SEN Obama does or say, Roland seems to be the mouth piece for the Obama Campaign on CNN...kind of disturbing. Isn't the Obama campaign and alot of Democrats calling out Hillary Clinton for wanting to change the rules once they had agreed and so called signed a document on not counting MI & FL; then called her out on it and even saying she is trying to get the edge on the campaign by counting MI & FL the way the voted; EVEN though Sen Obama TOOK his name off the ballot...(No One forced HIM too)....

No Obama is Doing the SAMETHING... He is a POLITICIAN...Just another one who will tell you any thing to get elected. I cannot in good conscience vote for him. His campaign will LIE and SPIN anything in a way that is GOOD for his campaign and dog others...

Okay, let me see if I have this straight. Everyone is mad at Obama because he WON'T take public money? Please explain this to me.

Hi Anderson, I am sorry but why not take money from donors and if John McCain and the republican party can not get people to support them tough. McCain flipflops all the time.

You are right Mr Martin. It was a risky move and running for President is about taking risks. I think it was an obvious decision made by the Obama camp. It's all about change! Here is a man willing to take risks because of the views and support shown to him by the people. Doing the right thing when the wrong thing has been done for so long and by so many people isn't easy. Barack Obama doesn't need the so called 'public financing". The public has been financing him just fine. I am sure he wishes that he didn't have to go back on his word to make this decision, but he would have been an idiot and a coward not to.

I have always been against public finance and I think Sen. Obama did the right thing not to spend our tax money. I think the American tax money should be spent wisely such as health care, infrastructure and education. As independent I support Sen. Obama decision.

The system is no more broken today than it was years ago. The only thing that has changed for Barry Obama is that he thinks he can get more money this way. Profit not principle. I suppose thats "change".

McCain is not going to know what hit him. This is a movement unlike anything ever experienced in the political process in this country. Obama will swamp McCain in policy, in money, and in votes. He will win almost every state in November agains McCain. They will not take this away from us this time.

You know what's funny Anderson??? The critics talk like if my boy is "stealing" their money! LOL!!! TRUST ME, if anyone can bring in that much dough, I would assure you they would think twice. And to tell you the truth, I wonder how one person would feel if they had this opportunity at them??? I heard it all!! I heard the usual he broke his promise, I heard the "norm" that he's just a politician, I heard the usual thing over and over again. And to be honest, that's just too much dough!!! LOL!!!!

I'd like to see more thorough coverage of McCain's own weaving in and out of public financing for the primary. He has been using private funding while running in general election mode for some time now, after initially pledging to use public financing in the primary in order to qualify for some loans when he was in financial difficulty.

So it is remarkably expedient for McCain to now say he is going to use public financing after having the benefit of private financing these past few months. Obama qualified his initial pledge to use public financing by saying he would pursue an agreement with his opponent, but his opponent has already had the benefit of being able to skirt the spirit of the law. So Obama is not going back on his pledge in my view, he simply is unable to see any path to a fair agreement.

If Senator McCain had the kind of grass roots financial support from the people Senator Obama has, I'm sure he'd be playing the grand 'independent of government financing' card himself.

The facts are simple here: the everyday person has willingly given Obama enough money that Senator Obama now sees no need or reason to take money collected through taxes. What – should we be wanting him to get direct contributions AND pull money from a government which is running a gigantic deficit? That seems the height of fiscal silliness. This is not a question of morals, it's a question of simple financial management.

I just watched the clip from Obama's new advertisement that you showed this evening. And I couldn't help but remember (along with Carville's comment about "re-assurance") the controversial ad that Mike Huckeby played during Christmas with the cross-shaped window behind him. Maybe because of the recent rumors about Obama's faith have caused some problems he's using the same kind of subliminal advertisement to "re-assure" Americans of his Christian faith?

I strongly support Medicare and Medicaid, but I don't use it. I strongly support a woman's right to choose and I chose life. I strongly support homosexual civil unions, but I am married with children. I strongly support Head Start, but I sent my children to privately owned preschools. I strongly support many rights and government programs that I do not use. This does not make me a hypocrite or flip-flopper. It is because I know some people need the help and I don't. I would not take away their right to these things simply because I do not need them. And if I can get better health insurance through my job or pay to send my kids to a great preschool, who would fault me? Is this not the American Way so proudly touted by the Republicans?

This is very disappointing. I understand Obama's decision, but it is totally politically motivated, he is only thinking about himself and his campaign. The system didn't break in the last months, and the Democrat party and the left-leaning 527s and PACs can do the same things (and are already) that Obama claims is behind his flip-flop on this issue. I voted for Barack Obama in the primary because I thought we maybe finally had a candidate who thought about this country and the people before himself and his party. Many strategists and analysts are saying this is a minor issue. It may be in the scheme of things, but it gives me pause on a few things that Senator Obama has been saying and wondering what he will do. He railed against NAFTA and now is backing off, he said he would take public financing and now he won't, maybe he isn't as principled as I had hoped. I think I'll go make a donation to John McCain and hope to even things out now.

For all Americans to imbed in our minds.
"All things are ready if our minds be so"
Thanks
Cookie Good
Cozad Nebraska

Barack is for change. This is evidently the first change. Should he become the next President, others (with money) will follow (opting out on public financing) using the rationale that if the President can do it why can't we. This will probably occur more at the local level vice national level. Is this change good or bad?

About your interview with Bill Bennett on McCain being told what to do by his campaign advisors; "John McCain will do what the hell he wants to do." Isn't that what President Bush has been doing for the past 7 years? McBush is not what we need leading our country. We need a president that does for the people not for his own interest.

Would McCain change his mind if he raised the amount of money we have donated to Mr. Obama?

So a guy accepts !,000,000 smaller donations from countless individuals who want to see change and out of hope contribute...that sounds like public financing to me and of the best kind...

He had signed a pledge and is now withdrawing – why would anyone want to vote for vote him?

Take the campaign finance $$ and give it to those folk's along the Mississippi.
They need it more.....

I received the email from Obama this afternoon, watched the video, and said "Right on!" This man is nothing short of brilliant. He is engaging his supporters using 21st century technology, making us feel a real part of his campaign. And, you're right, AC. By not accepting public financing, Obama can continue to raise money from the "little people," dwarfing McCain's campaign coffers and spending as much as he needs to to win the election.

Obama's fundraising "campaigns" have also been smart. He sends an email looking for $25 from a million people and bang, he's raise $25M just like that. It's quick, it's easy, and it's painless. This is the way of the future, one more indication that Obama really is about change.

"The end justifies the means". That's what most of the world does, and that is what Senator Obama is all about. A typical politician. He is not different from all the other politicians. "Change" ? That's only an election slogan.

Roland,
Quit trying to spin Obama lying and being a typical politician. I don't even like watching you anymore. You think Obama can do no wrong. Why don't you try being a little more fair. A lie is a lie!

Here we go again with the "flip-flopper" label. It is so 2004...so unoriginal...

One more reason for some of us not to trust Obama. Even his signature on a document means nothing to American's. Is he hiding something? Are these contributions coming from people he has known for 20+ years but he really doesn't know? Just a very short time back, his campaign made excuses why they couldn't help pay off Clinton's debts, as is customary. Let's face it, with an unlimited amount of cash, anyone could get in and win. After all, isn't that partly how he beat Clinton in the primary. I have read earlier articles about his private schools and his grandparents in Hawaii, now this new ad he has out, portraits him as a poor kid on foodstamps, being raised by a single mom. Which is it? Just like the poor muslim women, I'm sure he knew the decision was being made. John McCain gets criticized for his lime green jello backdrop, while Obama is critiquing the race, religion and ethnic apparell of his background. This is not how I want my money spent by those in office. I wish Obama would give most of us enough credit to see through the propaganda. Just give us the facts and tell us the truth and if circumstances change, that influences your original decisions, just say so. Don't patronize those of us, for whom you will be working.

Obama doesn't have a sense of fair play- he has no compunction in doing whatever he wants. His actions are amoral and do not bode well for democrats- or democracy. I am already weary of his disrespect for the voters, and his disregard for American values. If Obama wins, the White House and the Congress (since he took over the DNC) will be bought and paid for by big money. There will be no satisfaction in saying, "I told you so."

Kris K.

Hey.........so Obama doesn't want public financing. Good for him. Shouldn't it be good to not use the public's money for a campaign? McCain should opt out of the public financing option also. Let's take all that money and use it somewhere else. Fortunately, we will gladly give freely to Obama's money machine. I'll go to Obama's website tomorrow and give some more................money well spent.

Obama 08

Why would anyone want to vote for him? Because he's doing the right thing, making Mac. Squirm. He's got my vote.

Anderson
I feel that you are this days unfair towards obama you push him harder than you do McCain I mean be neutral and let the money take care of itself. What about we take all that money he doesn't need anymore and give it to people along the Mississippi

Right On Obama! Thank god one of them is "conservative" with the taxpayers money......he doesn't need it. Obviously the Obama warchest, made up of small donors at $25 to $100 a pop gives support to the notion that there is a HUGE support base out there....giving.....and waiting to cast their vote.....the money talks!

I would like to see both campaigns run off the money just raised by fund raising by the average person. No PAC (cough John Macain), no corporate donations. Just money from the average person.

I'm assuming that public financing = taxpayer's money?

And Mr Obama doesn't want any TAXPAYER'S money?

If so.... where's there problem?

Feel free to send him to Canada if he's not elected... He would be a welcome change up here!!!!

You guys at CNN are pathetic, Roland more so than others. For 6 months I watched you dog one candidate and anoint another the Messiah! Obama started the negativity at one of the debates.
He disavowed Rev. Wright for political gain.
He disavowed Mr. Ayers for political gain.
"Bitter-gate"
"Typical white person"
Now he is reneging on a promise to accept public financing, you guessed it for political gain. This man is the biggest phony since the $3 bill. But no....you see no need to aggressively and fairly address his decisions. As a lifelong Democrat, I find myself rooting for the underdog, McCain.
Oh by the way, I am an African American male.

McCain needs to quit his whining, join the 21st century and use technology to participate in this election. His age is showing.

Anderson, I 've always thought of you as fair until recently. You seem to have fallen in the same trap as most of the rest of the media -Obama can do no wrong, when he flip flops it is only changing his position whereas other candidates are labeled "flip flopers'. Hope you will strive harder to treat both candidates and their campaigns fairly.
Obama's campaign does what it wants(refuse scarf wearers from photographs) and just issue a statement saying it is not our policy to exclude anyone.
If you actually read this "thanks", Keep up the good work, we depend on you,
Ann

There is just too much talk about money , the amounts raised and spent are obscene.
What about the issues that are important and when is Obama going to explain about " CHANGE " , so far we have seen politics as usual.
I don't trust Obama , just too many shady associations in his life that without any doubt would have disqualified any other candidate.

Considering that if Obama were to take this money that would probably be from the hard working tax payers of this country I say Thank You for not taking our money.
The candidates for any office should raise money and if they don't have enough well get in a car or truck and do what should be done anyway go to as many homes as possible and actually talk to people and not at them.
I have voted for President since I was of legal age and have yet to have any candidate come close to where I lived and live now. They just go to the big cities and the other towns and the back forty are not even thought of.
No I am one person that who has not decided who I will vote for this year. I think for the first time I will wait and see who might run and not associated with either party.

talk about flip flopping..first he didn't wear a flag pin or say the pledge of allegance..now he is a true patriot

Great decision!!!
Republicans are upset because now the Democrats have unlimited means of getting the message out and presenting thier ideas for our nation.

Thank you Obama for not allowing John McCain and his opinions stop you from doing what is best for the campaign and the Democratic Party.

THIS IS NO FLIP-FLOP!

Obama NEVER said he's take public financing.

He said he would "PRESERVE" public financing. He never said he'd take it.

What about McCain's flip flop? In the primaries, he secured a loan for his campaign w/public financing. THIS IS ILLEGAL!

This is one of many promises I'm sure Obama will be "Changing" his mind on and God knows he's made far more than he can possibley keep.

Please tell me why is all the outrage. Is there a problem because obama will not take our money. c'mon please explain this to me why is this such a big deal !!!!!!!!!

Anderson, won't you explain why the decision is a BIG DEAL. Originally, wasn't it put into place to keep things fair and equal, so that the wealthiest, or poorest were allowed a maximum to get elected, taking the money element out of politics? Yes, the system is outdated and broken but should be repaired, not scrapped, because there was a reason it was approved. Donna Reynolds on the blog above said that Obama sends out 1 million donation requests for $25 each and presto he has $25 million dollars. If it's that easy Donna, I hope Obama's request to send donations to those flood victims in Iowa and midwest states works that well. I'm sure we will all hear about the millions sent when it happens.

I can not stand people who are closed minded. Obama has made a great move and has kept his promise for change. I am glad that he is avoiding "big money" and going with the people. For me, I believe that makes me as an individual who has supported him more accessible to me. Obama is very strong, cares about the people and is very strategic. For those who believe that this is only about the dough-you do not understand "the Obama campaign strategy". Let's just get to the issues like the fact that a gas tax holiday is a joke and more drilling is not an answer for short term. It is a fact that many oil/energy companies have made record profits over the past several years. Now, all we need to do is make the oil companies reduce the prices for the American people. If their profits are no longer 30% + that will benefit the majority of the American people. Please let's get back to the meat and leave the peas for dinner.

I think that Obama with the not taking Govt. funding is an act of realizing the state of the people and in refreshing, sure patrotic, he should be appreciated for what he is trying to do for this country.
I'm split but I think He would be best for this country.
I think that the wife is detremental to both for both of them.
Keep them out this year and focuse on the issues, who care what either one says.
Macain and Obama should be concernerd with issues not what the hell the wife says. We are not electing the wife just the candate.
i think they are hurting both of them, let's all just focuse on the people needs and wants.
Hello... Gas prices, Cost of living, food prices, health care,come on with the crap.....
I get to point sometime where I get tired of hearing about it as many of use do ,
. Forget the wfe thing.
Please Focus on he issues at hand why do we have to worry about what they are doing on top of the other things>>>>
Sad state of affaires for this country.
Thank you
Timothy Solano

This entire subject concerning public funding has much to do with nothing. So, Obama decided to use the funds raised from supporters nation wide via the internet. He should be commended in fact that should become the requirement hence forth for all candidates running for public office caped at $200.00 per person. Face it McCain would have opted to do the same as Obama had he been to do likewise. McCain is whining because the funds Obama raised is leveling the playing field when the Republicans had banked on being able to out spend the Democratic nominee. Surprise! Believe me the fat cats with be dumping money as in the past in support of McCain, their corrupt funds is the real story. Flip flopping, come on guys lets come up with a original thought of substance.

I commend sen. obama for his decision to work for the people,whereas misuse of public funding has gone too far.Somewhere, lost in the mist of the amendments of the
constitution,so has been lost the building blocks of this great country.We have citizens trying to survive a hardship that is unimaginable,yet we turn there dispair into a political attack against one another.wt are we thinking?
That has changed my outlook on the candidates overall.I feel most politicians are so worried about politicians,they forgot about politics and the American Public,DUH,were still here!Dare to be diff<its time for the the real american issues to be handled.We have our home to think about and it's about time!

@ Annie Kate in Birmingham (first post on this blog):

Sadly, the guy who would be keeping the scorecard you speak of passed away last week. Tim Russert immediately came to mind today when I heard this news. He would be asking Obama why the system that was working fine when he agreed to use it has suddenly turned into one that is "broken"....

I miss Tim.

Well I guess I don't understand. It seems to me that if he can raise the money on his own from people that want to give, why not do it that way instead of taking tax money? What is all the fuss about? He changed is mind? People, who are not so stubborn and headstrong that they can't re-evaluate their decisions, change their mind all the time trying to make better decisions.

This is a ridiculous argument...the agreement he signed was not a legal document...This is a very serious campaign with very serious issues, and if Obama can finance his campaign taking money only from his supporters then more power to him...he is not fool enough to depend on the DNC for additional financing. I think it was imperative he took matters into his own hands!!

Obama took a big step towards buying this election and putting price tags on every further election. No this is very bad; if not for Obama, most definitely for the future of our Democratic Republic. Until now I was going to vote for Obama, but not now. First I thought it was just his supporters, Roland Martin and Jeff Toobin, I didn't like, but every decision he's made after the nomination process has become extremely alarming. Seeing his actions and the words of his followers, this is not the change this country needs, it's change this country should run from. He bought his nomination and now he wants to buy the election. This is far beyond any petty label of flip flop. Of course nobody will see it until it is to late.

And CNN what happened to your journalistic integrity. Fire all of these supporters of candidates, Reverends, and hire some real journalist. I'm sure there's some out there who understand the importance of the role they're suppose to play. Or is the bottom line dollars with no sense?

Obama is right the "public finacing" system is broken and Mccain and the RNC (which buy the way raised twice as much funds as the DNC) will use tricks to spend more money than the allowed 85 million with 527 groups like Karl Roves "Freedom's Watch" that can spend an unlimited amount of millions of dollar to attack and defeat Obama it would of been stupid of him to accept to an offer with so many loop holes that the republicans will gladly exploited.
Also I don't believe its right to use tax payer money on campaigns instead it should be the people who want that candidate to win who finance them thats true public financing

once again i would like to point out that people are avoiding the topic of mccain accepting money from clayton williams you remember the guy with big oil connections raising money for him mccain refusing to return it which to me says he doesnt think that clayton williams comment about rape being something women may as well just lie back and enjoy AND one week later he wants off shore drilling allowed WHY is this not being discussed more I would think that Anderson c ooper the host of Planet in Peril would be discussing the connection between mccains change of position on offshore drilling and the possible consequenses of destroying the coral reefs instead of trying to demonize obama for Not useing TAX dollars to fund his campaign

I would just like to ask why one John McCain would hire high priced political strategist and then not listen to them, to me, that is not fiscally sound. Why pay for advice you ignore, sounds like our current administration. I'll pass.

Barack Obama, has the right to change his mind, just like Hillary Clinton, with Florida and Michigan, when she did not follow the rules and still wanted the votes counted, what do you call that "White Rights", and John McCain, is stuck like Glue with your incompetent President Bush and has Flipped and Flopped many times. I agree with Bill Clinton, if you can't take the heat get out of the Kitchen. Stop Whinning, and play the game, after all Barack Obama, is the New Kid on the Block. He has more intregrity than John McCain or Hillary Clinton. Chill Out!

djg

I can imagine that when Mr. Obama took his first step on this long journey, he may not have dreamed that so many people would contribute so much money to him. Accepting public funding would have seemed to be the best option to choose. However, he asked ordinary people to support him with whatever amount they could contribute and they did big time. He has always been genuinely appreciative of each one of those dollars and the people who gave them to him. He IS being publicly financed. To fault him for not taking public financing funds is stupid. If his bucket of money is bigger than McCain's, good deal. If he's in this to win, then go for the gusto! People are too quick to take away another's right to change their mind, but dare someone take that right from them. Too bad Bush never seemed capable of changing his.

Why not, someone should let the money from hard working people go back to the people. If no ones noticed the decline in the little box on our income tax – maybe they should think of a way to give that monies back to the people. If a canidate can raise enough monies through large or small donations from the people – Oh is not that money from the public? So how many publics do when have anyway? Another thing, Anderson you have a segment called keeping them honest!! Lets start with your people. Play the tape of Mrs O – because you and your reporters and those that wish to mislead us say she said "For the first time I am proud of my county" No No No. She said " I have never been MORE proud of my county ect ect" It makes a difference. So let's keep them honest – I love your show so I was a little disappointed when you edited what she had said and what she meant about more and more people have come out to vote in this election year. So do me proud. By the way my son is on his third tour in Iraq. I was in the first one. My prayers go out to all the Mothers, Fathers, Wivies, Husbands and children. To quote Bush's daughter – why was it "not practical" for them to go to WAR, but practical for everyone else. (Sorry about that, little leftover anger).

Give me a break. I recall when McCain illegally hocked his campaign finance bundle to borrow a pile of money. The legality of that little trick has not been decided yet. But like his wife's comments about Michelle Obama (remember she has stolen drugs in the past by forging prescriptions) McCain has no moral high ground about opting out of the public financing. When he put up public financing money to secure a loan, perhaps some one who is interested in fairness should bring that little fact up about now. Say someone like Candy Crowley. Frankly often these days, I might just as well be watching Fox news the way your news anchors coddle both Senator McCain and his wife, Cindy. What in the world has happened to your fair and balanced claim.

Anne wrote:
"He had signed a pledge and is now withdrawing – why would anyone want to vote for vote him?"

It's sad that people in this country take voting so for granted that they vote based on petty unimportant JUNK like this. How does who takes what money from where make one person or another a better presidential candidate? Research your candidate. Look at the raw issues...then make an educated choice. Campaign funding one way or the other won't help the economy, bring an end to turmoil in the middle east, or improve quality of life for you and me. This isn't a high school prom queen election. Please people, take this year's election to heart. Our futures depend on our making a good choice.

Look at what Obama does now that he doesn't have Clinton to answer to. I cringe at the thought of him in the white house with nobody to answer to. God knows CNN won't ask him any questions he might not like. "Keeping them honest." More like keeping them as honest as they want to be.

Obama flip flopped?

* McCain criticized TV preacher Jerry Falwell as “an agent of intolerance” in 2002, but has since decided to cozy up to the man who said Americans “deserved” the 9/11 attacks.
* McCain used to oppose Bush’s tax cuts for the very wealthy, but he reversed course in February.
* In 2000, McCain accused Texas businessmen Sam and Charles Wyly of being corrupt, spending “dirty money” to help finance Bush’s presidential campaign. In April, McCain reached out to the Wylys for support.
* McCain supported a major campaign-finance reform measure that bore his name. In June, he abandoned his own legislation.
* McCain used to think that Grover Norquist was a crook and a corrupt shill for dictators. Then, McCain got serious about running for president and began to reconcile with Norquist.
* McCain took a firm line in opposition to torture, and then caved to White House demands.
* McCain gave up on his signature policy issue, campaign-finance reform, and won’t back the same provision he sponsored just a couple of years ago.
* McCain was against presidential candidates campaigning at Bob Jones University before he was for it.
* McCain was anti-ethanol. Now he’s pro-ethanol.
* McCain was both for and against state promotion of the Confederate flag.
* And now he’s both for and against overturning Roe v. Wade and is ready to rape the everglades for oil.

This is the least of our peoblems... A year ago he may have thought a year ago he may have needed public funding. Real life: things change and people can change their minds. This is such a minor issue, lets focus on major issues. The war, High gas prices, our economy is falling quickly!

If this is a flip flop by Obama then good for him! I'd rather send him my last $10 than hear that he took public money. Too bad he said he would take it, he changed his mind, why does that always have to be a flip flop.

This is dishonesty with the American people. One of many Senator Obama has displayed during this campaign season. Senator Obama tells us he doesn't take money from special interests but his contributor list is full of lawyers and attorney firms. The cost of health care is high today because of lawyers and attorney firms.

The other concern I have is Senator Obama's attitude towards older Americans. Senator Obama's constant attack on Senator McCain's age is an indicator of how Mr. Obama feels about all older Americans. It scares me to wonder what will happen with seniors, older veterans etc, if Senator Obama becomes president.

I strongly agree with Rita. I support programs I don't use. Obama doesn't need our tax money, McCain does. So let McCain use it. Nobody changes there minds or flip flops or lies more than McCain. McCain the senator who was absent for most of the votes and when he did vote he agreed with Bush 95% of the time. McCain who has changed his mind about things that effect the American people. Not taking public financing doesn't affect us. It affects Obama personally and his campaign. McCain's flip flop and change of mind hurts us.

Finally – a Democratic candidate is going to take on the GOP by beating them at their own money game. Once that happens, real campaign finance reform will be possible. Gotta run – time to make another donation to the Obama campaign. Go O!