<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fear on TV, and in the voting booth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/06/06/fear-on-tv-and-in-the-voting-booth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/06/06/fear-on-tv-and-in-the-voting-booth/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 04:00:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/06/06/fear-on-tv-and-in-the-voting-booth/comment-page-1/#comment-184604</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 23:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=1162#comment-184604</guid>
		<description>Objectively speaking, if the attack ads are consistent with any documentaries I can find on the delegate, or are consistent with any unease I may feel from listening to him/her, the ads will only serve to legitimatize the suspicions, feelings or beliefs I already have. 

I for one, pay more heed to the body language, eyes, and what my gut says, than the rhetoric politicians typically spew to win votes. The only exception being, if the politician says things that are so contrary to mainstream,  that what&#039;s said could be injurious to their wellbeing; such as with things Ron Paul proposed while running. Bring down the Federal Reserve &amp; I.R.S.? Bankers and the elite behind the government naturally wouldn&#039;t favor a man who desired to bring down the Federal Reserve, and very few Americans questioned the medias censoring of him. So much for commonsense. 

People were quick however, to buy into charisma and views on policy even when presented with evidence that should&#039;ve outweighed both; e.g., Obama&#039;s claims to have an uncle that aided in the liberation of Auschwitz prisoners; A claim found to be both a lie, and inconsistent with documented history. 

Many of similar mindsets, would vote for Hillary; dismissing entirely, her denied presence at the Bilderberg meetings, the bilking of senior citizens by both her and Bill, in their real-estate dealings, and the more than controversial body count between the pair; all of which were dismissed as suicides, by a coroner with a vested interest. 

So it would seem that attack ads would have little bearing; for if they had as much impact as studies indicate, there&#039;d of been no need to censor one congressman; rather, invalidate him with &quot;attack ads;&quot; but the media apparently didn&#039;t want to chance this type of campaign&#039;s failing.

As for the fear factor, I we&#039;re mixing Apples and Oranges. The &quot;Fear Mongering,&quot;  seems to be used more-so, in an attempt to distract the public from both, equally important issues, and from seeking the truth; rather than accept what the media and politicians repeat daily, as gospel. Hence the term &quot;sheep.&quot;

Show me studies on the ability to detect honesty. Studies to indicate whether people are more apt to follow the pack; e.g. voting for who&#039;s popular, or more likely to win. Show me studies to discern how much the trait of charisma plays in their vote even when the politician is lying. Show me studies that&#039;ll reveal how many Americans are actually capable of completely dismissing what the mainstream media and friends say, to make an INFORMED choice; then, we&#039;ll be getting somewhere.

Seems to me, that the public has been given 2 sides of the same coin to choose from; a choice that will mistakenly leave many Americans with the feeling that, &quot;the people have spoken;&quot; when in reality, the choices were already made for us. This is indicated by the deliberate censoring, and in some instances, the intentional exclusion of, one Texas congressman. Is it coincidental that it&#039;s the one who&#039;s views were inconsistent with the mainstream media and wealthy, was also the one censored? I don&#039;t think so</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Objectively speaking, if the attack ads are consistent with any documentaries I can find on the delegate, or are consistent with any unease I may feel from listening to him/her, the ads will only serve to legitimatize the suspicions, feelings or beliefs I already have. </p>
<p>I for one, pay more heed to the body language, eyes, and what my gut says, than the rhetoric politicians typically spew to win votes. The only exception being, if the politician says things that are so contrary to mainstream,  that what&#039;s said could be injurious to their wellbeing; such as with things Ron Paul proposed while running. Bring down the Federal Reserve &amp; I.R.S.? Bankers and the elite behind the government naturally wouldn&#039;t favor a man who desired to bring down the Federal Reserve, and very few Americans questioned the medias censoring of him. So much for commonsense. </p>
<p>People were quick however, to buy into charisma and views on policy even when presented with evidence that should&#039;ve outweighed both; e.g., Obama&#039;s claims to have an uncle that aided in the liberation of Auschwitz prisoners; A claim found to be both a lie, and inconsistent with documented history. </p>
<p>Many of similar mindsets, would vote for Hillary; dismissing entirely, her denied presence at the Bilderberg meetings, the bilking of senior citizens by both her and Bill, in their real-estate dealings, and the more than controversial body count between the pair; all of which were dismissed as suicides, by a coroner with a vested interest. </p>
<p>So it would seem that attack ads would have little bearing; for if they had as much impact as studies indicate, there&#039;d of been no need to censor one congressman; rather, invalidate him with &#034;attack ads;&#034; but the media apparently didn&#039;t want to chance this type of campaign&#039;s failing.</p>
<p>As for the fear factor, I we&#039;re mixing Apples and Oranges. The &#034;Fear Mongering,&#034;  seems to be used more-so, in an attempt to distract the public from both, equally important issues, and from seeking the truth; rather than accept what the media and politicians repeat daily, as gospel. Hence the term &#034;sheep.&#034;</p>
<p>Show me studies on the ability to detect honesty. Studies to indicate whether people are more apt to follow the pack; e.g. voting for who&#039;s popular, or more likely to win. Show me studies to discern how much the trait of charisma plays in their vote even when the politician is lying. Show me studies that&#039;ll reveal how many Americans are actually capable of completely dismissing what the mainstream media and friends say, to make an INFORMED choice; then, we&#039;ll be getting somewhere.</p>
<p>Seems to me, that the public has been given 2 sides of the same coin to choose from; a choice that will mistakenly leave many Americans with the feeling that, &#034;the people have spoken;&#034; when in reality, the choices were already made for us. This is indicated by the deliberate censoring, and in some instances, the intentional exclusion of, one Texas congressman. Is it coincidental that it&#039;s the one who&#039;s views were inconsistent with the mainstream media and wealthy, was also the one censored? I don&#039;t think so</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susie</title>
		<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/06/06/fear-on-tv-and-in-the-voting-booth/comment-page-1/#comment-184529</link>
		<dc:creator>Susie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 22:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=1162#comment-184529</guid>
		<description>This exactly how the war in Iraq started. Bush created this fear in America so they will support his decision to go to war. There might be some truth about the ads but if you are open minded person and smart you know that this kind of advertisement  are very foolish and misleading.
Canada for Obama</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This exactly how the war in Iraq started. Bush created this fear in America so they will support his decision to go to war. There might be some truth about the ads but if you are open minded person and smart you know that this kind of advertisement  are very foolish and misleading.<br />
Canada for Obama</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trudy in Peoria</title>
		<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/06/06/fear-on-tv-and-in-the-voting-booth/comment-page-1/#comment-184392</link>
		<dc:creator>Trudy in Peoria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 20:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=1162#comment-184392</guid>
		<description>Okay, then explain why Hillary won Pennsylvania, after Obama outspent her 3 to 1 on political advertising.  Not buyin&#039; it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, then explain why Hillary won Pennsylvania, after Obama outspent her 3 to 1 on political advertising.  Not buyin&#039; it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janet, 60+White Female American via Canada</title>
		<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/06/06/fear-on-tv-and-in-the-voting-booth/comment-page-1/#comment-184324</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet, 60+White Female American via Canada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 19:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=1162#comment-184324</guid>
		<description>Fear mongering ads, only prove to me that those putting them out, are the ones with the Greatest Fear of All!

Even as a child, and I taught my children, strip down everything you see, hear and read.  Make your own judgement, even with me.

We must have constructive discussion, as a group of individuals, and our family had what we called &quot;The Round Table Meetings&quot;!   Therefore, all opinions were heard!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fear mongering ads, only prove to me that those putting them out, are the ones with the Greatest Fear of All!</p>
<p>Even as a child, and I taught my children, strip down everything you see, hear and read.  Make your own judgement, even with me.</p>
<p>We must have constructive discussion, as a group of individuals, and our family had what we called &#034;The Round Table Meetings&#034;!   Therefore, all opinions were heard!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TESAP. SAVANNAH, GA</title>
		<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/06/06/fear-on-tv-and-in-the-voting-booth/comment-page-1/#comment-184292</link>
		<dc:creator>TESAP. SAVANNAH, GA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 18:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=1162#comment-184292</guid>
		<description>Very true Nadene, I think we should also ask &quot;why&quot; about the negative ads, especially the ones who run negative ads first.... I think the saying goes... Ye who casts the first stone..........................</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very true Nadene, I think we should also ask &#034;why&#034; about the negative ads, especially the ones who run negative ads first.... I think the saying goes... Ye who casts the first stone..........................</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nadene</title>
		<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/06/06/fear-on-tv-and-in-the-voting-booth/comment-page-1/#comment-184255</link>
		<dc:creator>Nadene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 17:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=1162#comment-184255</guid>
		<description>Your conclusion that it is our subconscious, rather than our views on policy, that determines the way we vote, is rather dubious.  A rational person can overcome his/her subconscious feelings through knowledge and rumination of facts and ideas.  If some Americans vote based only on what they hear in ads, that&#039;s pretty sad.  There is so much information available out there to form your own opinion.  

I have a couple of other thoughts...Has anyone ever compared how negative political ads affect our brains vs. positive ads? I would be interested to see the difference.  One more thing, are negative ads, for the most part, a non-issue? How many people are really affected by negative ads?  What about people who turn off negative ads by changing the channel or shutting off the tv when an ad like that comes on tv?  I think we should always question the relevance of any study.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your conclusion that it is our subconscious, rather than our views on policy, that determines the way we vote, is rather dubious.  A rational person can overcome his/her subconscious feelings through knowledge and rumination of facts and ideas.  If some Americans vote based only on what they hear in ads, that&#039;s pretty sad.  There is so much information available out there to form your own opinion.  </p>
<p>I have a couple of other thoughts...Has anyone ever compared how negative political ads affect our brains vs. positive ads? I would be interested to see the difference.  One more thing, are negative ads, for the most part, a non-issue? How many people are really affected by negative ads?  What about people who turn off negative ads by changing the channel or shutting off the tv when an ad like that comes on tv?  I think we should always question the relevance of any study.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loretta from California</title>
		<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/06/06/fear-on-tv-and-in-the-voting-booth/comment-page-1/#comment-184245</link>
		<dc:creator>Loretta from California</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 16:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=1162#comment-184245</guid>
		<description>Attack ads only affect the weak minded, easily led, or easily influenced.  They have no effect what-so-ever, and are not persuasive for the INDEPENDANT THINKERS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Attack ads only affect the weak minded, easily led, or easily influenced.  They have no effect what-so-ever, and are not persuasive for the INDEPENDANT THINKERS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lilibeth</title>
		<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/06/06/fear-on-tv-and-in-the-voting-booth/comment-page-1/#comment-184242</link>
		<dc:creator>Lilibeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 16:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=1162#comment-184242</guid>
		<description>The main thing is to look at attack ads, or any ads for that matter, with a grain of salt.  These ads prey on gullible voters and that’s what got us in trouble…that’s why we’re in this mess now.  To all voters, please don’t let the politics of fear and hate get to you.  We’re smarter than that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main thing is to look at attack ads, or any ads for that matter, with a grain of salt.  These ads prey on gullible voters and that’s what got us in trouble…that’s why we’re in this mess now.  To all voters, please don’t let the politics of fear and hate get to you.  We’re smarter than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CaseyJPS - California</title>
		<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/06/06/fear-on-tv-and-in-the-voting-booth/comment-page-1/#comment-184225</link>
		<dc:creator>CaseyJPS - California</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 15:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=1162#comment-184225</guid>
		<description>Randi-
I&#039;ve been looking forward to this report.  I think it would have a more meaningful impact if you shared your own experience.  I understand the need to separate reporting from your life, especially considering the challenge of remaining un-biased.  However, I can&#039;t help but think that passion would drive a correspondent/reporter/journalist to put &quot;both feet in&quot; at times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Randi-<br />
I&#039;ve been looking forward to this report.  I think it would have a more meaningful impact if you shared your own experience.  I understand the need to separate reporting from your life, especially considering the challenge of remaining un-biased.  However, I can&#039;t help but think that passion would drive a correspondent/reporter/journalist to put &#034;both feet in&#034; at times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seah</title>
		<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/06/06/fear-on-tv-and-in-the-voting-booth/comment-page-1/#comment-184196</link>
		<dc:creator>seah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 14:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=1162#comment-184196</guid>
		<description>Any one with common sense. No mental problems. It will not effect.

It has less effect than Obama mind manipulation and mind controlling tactics that have been proven to work on people, as did with Hitler and the people of Germany, Jim Jones followers and other cults.  Should that come under scrutinies also?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any one with common sense. No mental problems. It will not effect.</p>
<p>It has less effect than Obama mind manipulation and mind controlling tactics that have been proven to work on people, as did with Hitler and the people of Germany, Jim Jones followers and other cults.  Should that come under scrutinies also?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annie Kate</title>
		<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/06/06/fear-on-tv-and-in-the-voting-booth/comment-page-1/#comment-184185</link>
		<dc:creator>Annie Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 13:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=1162#comment-184185</guid>
		<description>So attack ads work - that&#039;s not the greatest news as we may see a lot more of them now.  Attack ads are my least favorite part of politics.  That they are effective doesn&#039;t surprise me though - the two political ads that pop into my head for this political season so far is that unknown person who was running and stressing fear of terrorism with the capitol blowing up behind him - I&#039;m not sure I remember it because it scared me or because I laughed so hard at it, but hey I do remember it.  The other ad I remember right off is a McCain ad with his mother - I guess thats the aw! factor there.  

Wish there was a way to take that test online.  It would be really interesting to see what results I would have.  

Thanks for this story - this is really interesting.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://anniekatec.blogspot.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Annie Kate&lt;/a&gt;
Birmingham AL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So attack ads work &#8211; that&#039;s not the greatest news as we may see a lot more of them now.  Attack ads are my least favorite part of politics.  That they are effective doesn&#039;t surprise me though &#8211; the two political ads that pop into my head for this political season so far is that unknown person who was running and stressing fear of terrorism with the capitol blowing up behind him &#8211; I&#039;m not sure I remember it because it scared me or because I laughed so hard at it, but hey I do remember it.  The other ad I remember right off is a McCain ad with his mother &#8211; I guess thats the aw! factor there.  </p>
<p>Wish there was a way to take that test online.  It would be really interesting to see what results I would have.  </p>
<p>Thanks for this story &#8211; this is really interesting.</p>
<p><a href="http://anniekatec.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">Annie Kate</a><br />
Birmingham AL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy</title>
		<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/06/06/fear-on-tv-and-in-the-voting-booth/comment-page-1/#comment-184178</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 12:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=1162#comment-184178</guid>
		<description>I will listen to everything that each candidate says and  judge them on their stance on the issues and which one that I think will do a better job at getting this nation turned back around in the right direction.  

Any fear mongering doesn&#039;t work at all on me. Because the reality is that they by themselves can&#039;t do or change anything . They rely on congress to pass things and to get things done. So why let a little thing like fear get in the way of making the right decision for the president. Congress always keeps them in check.

Cindy....Ga.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will listen to everything that each candidate says and  judge them on their stance on the issues and which one that I think will do a better job at getting this nation turned back around in the right direction.  </p>
<p>Any fear mongering doesn&#039;t work at all on me. Because the reality is that they by themselves can&#039;t do or change anything . They rely on congress to pass things and to get things done. So why let a little thing like fear get in the way of making the right decision for the president. Congress always keeps them in check.</p>
<p>Cindy....Ga.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
