Comments on: Anderson's View: the 360° Scott McClellan interview http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/05/30/andersons-view-the-360%c2%b0-scott-mcclellan-interview/ Tue, 22 Dec 2009 04:00:12 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Amanda http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/05/30/andersons-view-the-360%c2%b0-scott-mcclellan-interview/comment-page-4/#comment-174398 Amanda Mon, 02 Jun 2008 11:53:06 +0000 http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=1076#comment-174398 Anderson, watched your interview Friday night somewhat cynically. Seems to have become standard practice now for people to blame the circumstances, the environment, the bubble (?)... But on the other hand if we all know that the emperor is naked why the surprise when someone mentions it. However, I think that McClellan maybe exhibiting something that all of us are suffering from now - the world is becoming so complex and when we don't have deep expertise on something you tend to trust that those who do. I know it was his job to have peripheral vision, but he was surrounded by credible people (?). Heard a comment recently that deep analytical thinking is becoming the most required survival skill modern man - can't agree more. Mr McClennan could perhaps have had use for it. He did make me think of the old 80s song, You’re the voice when John Farnam sings We can write what we want to write, we’ve got to make ends meet before we get much older. Anderson, watched your interview Friday night somewhat cynically. Seems to have become standard practice now for people to blame the circumstances, the environment, the bubble (?)... But on the other hand if we all know that the emperor is naked why the surprise when someone mentions it.

However, I think that McClellan maybe exhibiting something that all of us are suffering from now – the world is becoming so complex and when we don't have deep expertise on something you tend to trust that those who do. I know it was his job to have peripheral vision, but he was surrounded by credible people (?). Heard a comment recently that deep analytical thinking is becoming the most required survival skill modern man – can't agree more. Mr McClennan could perhaps have had use for it.

He did make me think of the old 80s song, You’re the voice when John Farnam sings We can write what we want to write, we’ve got to make ends meet before we get much older.

]]> By: Pedro http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/05/30/andersons-view-the-360%c2%b0-scott-mcclellan-interview/comment-page-4/#comment-174393 Pedro Mon, 02 Jun 2008 09:32:50 +0000 http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=1076#comment-174393 Anderson, I watched the interview online and I have to say that I admire the way you keep pressing on and when the McClellan tried to give a vague answer you kept pressing on and you kept him honest. I haven't read the book but it seems that if all of it is true, being caught up in the "bubble" is not a valid reason to stay in with the administration. As you said, he's a public servant and he should have put the interests of the American people first. As many politicians, he didn't do that, it seems that it's just a little bit too late for him to start reflecting on the mistakes and a little bit too late for him to start speaking out. Anyways, great interview, you kept him honest, keep up the great work. Anderson,

I watched the interview online and I have to say that I admire the way you keep pressing on and when the McClellan tried to give a vague answer you kept pressing on and you kept him honest. I haven't read the book but it seems that if all of it is true, being caught up in the "bubble" is not a valid reason to stay in with the administration. As you said, he's a public servant and he should have put the interests of the American people first. As many politicians, he didn't do that, it seems that it's just a little bit too late for him to start reflecting on the mistakes and a little bit too late for him to start speaking out. Anyways, great interview, you kept him honest, keep up the great work.

]]> By: Tyler http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/05/30/andersons-view-the-360%c2%b0-scott-mcclellan-interview/comment-page-4/#comment-174371 Tyler Mon, 02 Jun 2008 02:36:53 +0000 http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=1076#comment-174371 Scott McCellan's could easily be branded self-serving. After all, did it tell us anything that any reasonable person didn't already know? Probally not. But to Scott's credit the American people owe him a big Thank You, for his courage to step forward and do the right thing. Now, the big question that remains is what we the people are going to do about what George and Dick did to our country. Are we going to just let it go and move on or are we going to insist on prosecuting these men and their associates for the crimes they have committed against the USA. I hope so because if we don't we have no business ever again pushing our morals on other's because we simply have none. Scott McCellan's could easily be branded self-serving. After all, did it tell us anything that any reasonable person didn't already know? Probally not. But to Scott's credit the American people owe him a big Thank You, for his courage to step forward and do the right thing.

Now, the big question that remains is what we the people are going to do about what George and Dick did to our country. Are we going to just let it go and move on or are we going to insist on prosecuting these men and their associates for the crimes they have committed against the USA. I hope so because if we don't we have no business ever again pushing our morals on other's because we simply have none.

]]> By: Julie San Diego, CA http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/05/30/andersons-view-the-360%c2%b0-scott-mcclellan-interview/comment-page-4/#comment-174273 Julie San Diego, CA Sun, 01 Jun 2008 17:52:27 +0000 http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=1076#comment-174273 Anderson and Company, thanks for attacking the problem at the source - political servants that embrace the "political" but not the "servant". These people work for us. We should be able to expect nothing less than transparency, honor, and honesty. FYI to all you CNN fans - Yahoo added a 20 minute edit of the McClellan interview to their "news ticker" this weekend. Scott sure blinks a lot when he's not sticking to script. I'm usually pretty perceptive, but I just can't put my finger on why he doesn't look the slightest bit upset that all his old friends are attacking him. Something's wrotten in Denmark. And this smells big. Get to the bottom of it, guys. You're officially absolved for every bear video I've had to fast forward through on the Tivo. Thanks for reminding me why I keep watching. Anderson and Company, thanks for attacking the problem at the source – political servants that embrace the "political" but not the "servant". These people work for us. We should be able to expect nothing less than transparency, honor, and honesty.

FYI to all you CNN fans – Yahoo added a 20 minute edit of the McClellan interview to their "news ticker" this weekend.

Scott sure blinks a lot when he's not sticking to script.

I'm usually pretty perceptive, but I just can't put my finger on why he doesn't look the slightest bit upset that all his old friends are attacking him.

Something's wrotten in Denmark. And this smells big.

Get to the bottom of it, guys.

You're officially absolved for every bear video I've had to fast forward through on the Tivo. Thanks for reminding me why I keep watching.

]]> By: pittsburgh http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/05/30/andersons-view-the-360%c2%b0-scott-mcclellan-interview/comment-page-4/#comment-174270 pittsburgh Sun, 01 Jun 2008 17:19:17 +0000 http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=1076#comment-174270 Anderson, I thought he was quite credible. Let's be honest. The American people aren't stupid (well, okay, maybe some). We've known this has been going on for a long time. You could see the guy was uncomfortable when you watched him as Press Secretary. Telling all the lies over and over made him sick and he finally had to talk. I believe him. Anderson,
I thought he was quite credible. Let's be honest. The American people aren't stupid (well, okay, maybe some). We've known this has been going on for a long time. You could see the guy was uncomfortable when you watched him as Press Secretary. Telling all the lies over and over made him sick and he finally had to talk.
I believe him.

]]> By: Chris Pernfuss http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/05/30/andersons-view-the-360%c2%b0-scott-mcclellan-interview/comment-page-4/#comment-174258 Chris Pernfuss Sun, 01 Jun 2008 13:54:20 +0000 http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=1076#comment-174258 Very dissapointed with your approach to interviewing Scott McLellan! Why so confrontational ? He was simply giving his viewpoint based on his experience with the Bush Administration. We all know that the first casualty of war is the truth and the Bush White house is as bad as it's ever been. What Mclellan has to say is not surprising to me at all. If you spent less time attacking Mclellan and more time dealing with what he had to offer your interview would have been more compelling. Very dissapointed with your approach to interviewing Scott McLellan!
Why so confrontational ? He was simply giving his viewpoint based on his experience with the Bush Administration. We all know that the first casualty of war is the truth and the Bush White house is as bad as it's ever been. What Mclellan has to say is not surprising to me at all. If you spent less time attacking Mclellan and more time dealing with what he had to offer your interview would have been more compelling.

]]> By: Pat M http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/05/30/andersons-view-the-360%c2%b0-scott-mcclellan-interview/comment-page-4/#comment-174231 Pat M Sun, 01 Jun 2008 04:06:44 +0000 http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=1076#comment-174231 Anderson great interview, I really enjoyed it. I believe Scott is telling the truth as he feels it, his truth. I feel he is a man that would have regrets if he felt he had unknowningly or unwittingly been part of a cover up for the Iraq war. I can also believe that one can get caught up in the White House game, there were many that did and feared Bush's confirmation on WMD's might put America in great danger. Bush not Scott is the man who has much to answer for. Anderson great interview, I really enjoyed it. I believe Scott is telling the truth as he feels it, his truth. I feel he is a man that would have regrets if he felt he had unknowningly or unwittingly been part of a cover up for the Iraq war. I can also believe that one can get caught up in the White House game, there were many that did and feared Bush's confirmation on WMD's might put America in great danger. Bush not Scott is the man who has much to answer for.

]]> By: JaninaWalker http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/05/30/andersons-view-the-360%c2%b0-scott-mcclellan-interview/comment-page-4/#comment-174209 JaninaWalker Sun, 01 Jun 2008 01:04:37 +0000 http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=1076#comment-174209 Have people present, and have it filmed, when you ask McClellan whether he had a ghost writer or editor who had a significant input to the creation of the book. If people say he was not a complainer prior to the book and that it was out of character, and that it sounded more like that of a leftist blogger, then it likely was mostly written by someone else who had an agenda or strong opinions.. Someone likely had the idea that he should write a book and maybe even offered to do it, for some cut in the profits. You likely won't get a truthful answer, that is why I say have people in the room to watch his expressions carefully, and have it filmed. Even ask him if he is willing to take a lie detector test, at the end, and watch his reaction. If he says he will not speak about the book until a certain time, that indicates that he has to read it himself to find out what he is deemed to have written. I know a person who has really written the book would know what is in it and would not have to bone up before an interview. Being a competent author takes a lot of time, so he should already know the book far better than anyone. Have people present, and have it filmed, when you ask McClellan whether he had a ghost writer or editor who had a significant input to the creation of the book. If people say he was not a complainer prior to the book and that it was out of character, and that it sounded more like that of a leftist blogger, then it likely was mostly written by someone else who had an agenda or strong opinions..

Someone likely had the idea that he should write a book and maybe even offered to do it, for some cut in the profits. You likely won't get a truthful answer, that is why I say have people in the room to watch his expressions carefully, and have it filmed. Even ask him if he is willing to take a lie detector test, at the end, and watch his reaction.

If he says he will not speak about the book until a certain time, that indicates that he has to read it himself to find out what he is deemed to have written. I know a person who has really written the book would know what is in it and would not have to bone up before an interview. Being a competent author takes a lot of time, so he should already know the book far better than anyone.

]]> By: sam http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/05/30/andersons-view-the-360%c2%b0-scott-mcclellan-interview/comment-page-4/#comment-174204 sam Sun, 01 Jun 2008 00:29:25 +0000 http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=1076#comment-174204 your persuit of fact from scott can only be obtained from impeachment / criminal proceeding. scott however provide valuable insight from inner circle which we should encourage rather than muzzling. job for press should be side of scott not administration since they already have ample mussle for coverup without help of press. i totally agree with scott that press abandoned completely thier responsibility to check on bush as obviouosly shown in iraqui wmd case. don,t tell us that everybody bellieved iraqui had one. press consistently ignored cia leake that they do not. i think that commercial news organization sould get out of business and public news organization takes over since you guys only act as mouth piece of administration. afterall, you guys are there for profit and public dont have but bush clan has money. your persuit of fact from scott can only be obtained from impeachment / criminal proceeding. scott however provide valuable insight from inner circle which we should encourage rather than muzzling. job for press should be side of scott not administration since they already have ample mussle for coverup without help of press. i totally agree with scott that press abandoned completely thier responsibility to check on bush as obviouosly shown in iraqui wmd case. don,t tell us that everybody bellieved iraqui had one. press consistently ignored cia leake that they do not. i think that commercial news organization sould get out of business and public news organization takes over since you guys only act as mouth piece of administration. afterall, you guys are there for profit and public dont have but bush clan has money.

]]> By: Suzanne http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/05/30/andersons-view-the-360%c2%b0-scott-mcclellan-interview/comment-page-4/#comment-174198 Suzanne Sat, 31 May 2008 23:45:35 +0000 http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=1076#comment-174198 Thank you Anderson for holding his feet to the fire and asking tough questions. I understand the reason for your interruptions -- you can let people babble on about their talking points, but you had a lot of questions for him and relatively little time to ask them. Continue making sure your guests are properly grilled. I personally am glad McClellan is at least speaking out on this and commend him for his bravery, but it doesn't mean he should be given a soft interview. The questions you asked are common questions the American people have, and it's very refreshing to see a journalist on TV asking the tough questions on behalf of the public. We all want to know why he didn't resign, and I agree with a comment above -- McClellan refuses to admit that it was his job as a press secretary to lie. The softer words are "spin" and "misleading," but guess what? It's all lies to me. Thank you Anderson for holding his feet to the fire and asking tough questions. I understand the reason for your interruptions - you can let people babble on about their talking points, but you had a lot of questions for him and relatively little time to ask them. Continue making sure your guests are properly grilled. I personally am glad McClellan is at least speaking out on this and commend him for his bravery, but it doesn't mean he should be given a soft interview. The questions you asked are common questions the American people have, and it's very refreshing to see a journalist on TV asking the tough questions on behalf of the public.

We all want to know why he didn't resign, and I agree with a comment above - McClellan refuses to admit that it was his job as a press secretary to lie. The softer words are "spin" and "misleading," but guess what? It's all lies to me.

]]> By: Lily, Virginia http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/05/30/andersons-view-the-360%c2%b0-scott-mcclellan-interview/comment-page-4/#comment-174193 Lily, Virginia Sat, 31 May 2008 23:25:16 +0000 http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=1076#comment-174193 I had seen other interviews with Mr. Mclellan, but not to wonderfully butter you up; your questions are the most throrough ones that he has had to anwer so far. What I understood about him stating as being "caught in the Washington game" was that he meant to say "yes, I was as much part of the deceptions and lies as much as those White House officials were, and I did not want to look the other way". I think on occasion he was trying to say that he appologizes for being part of those deceptions, but we have yet to hear a direct apology to the American public from him. That should done if he wants to establish the legitimacy of his message. I had seen other interviews with Mr. Mclellan, but not to wonderfully butter you up; your questions are the most throrough ones that he has had to anwer so far. What I understood about him stating as being "caught in the Washington game" was that he meant to say "yes, I was as much part of the deceptions and lies as much as those White House officials were, and I did not want to look the other way". I think on occasion he was trying to say that he appologizes for being part of those deceptions, but we have yet to hear a direct apology to the American public from him. That should done if he wants to establish the legitimacy of his message.

]]> By: Lois http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/05/30/andersons-view-the-360%c2%b0-scott-mcclellan-interview/comment-page-4/#comment-174192 Lois Sat, 31 May 2008 23:17:00 +0000 http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=1076#comment-174192 For everyone that is so righteous about McClellan. All I can say is, WHO DID YOU VOTE FOR IN 2004? How is it EVERYONE knew he was lying, but he was re-elected. Resoundingly as I recall... It's easy to believe he was duped when the majority of the US was. As far as coming clean sooner, you don't believe him now; why would you have believed him then? For everyone that is so righteous about McClellan. All I can say is, WHO DID YOU VOTE FOR IN 2004? How is it EVERYONE knew he was lying, but he was re-elected. Resoundingly as I recall...

It's easy to believe he was duped when the majority of the US was.

As far as coming clean sooner, you don't believe him now; why would you have believed him then?

]]> By: Fay, CA http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/05/30/andersons-view-the-360%c2%b0-scott-mcclellan-interview/comment-page-4/#comment-174190 Fay, CA Sat, 31 May 2008 23:08:33 +0000 http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=1076#comment-174190 The public is needs journalists to step up and ask tough questions of those in power and hold them accountable just as they did during Hurricane Katrina. McClellan has said that most journalists fell down on the job during the run up to the war--Anderson's interview with him last night is a good example of the kind tough and probing questioning that should be standard practice for all reporters. The public is needs journalists to step up and ask tough questions of those in power and hold them accountable just as they did during Hurricane Katrina. McClellan has said that most journalists fell down on the job during the run up to the war–Anderson's interview with him last night is a good example of the kind tough and probing questioning that should be standard practice for all reporters.

]]> By: Rick- San Francisco http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/05/30/andersons-view-the-360%c2%b0-scott-mcclellan-interview/comment-page-4/#comment-174181 Rick- San Francisco Sat, 31 May 2008 22:17:26 +0000 http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=1076#comment-174181 Anderson, I think a lot of us are curious about the real circumstances which caused McClellan's departure as Press Sec. Is there actual cause for the "disgruntled" defense? Not that it matters- they are clearly all guilty of treason, war cimes and crimes against humanity. To the gallows with the whole administration! Bush, Cheney, Rice, Rove, Rumsfield, etc. They all deserve to hang!!!! Anderson, I think a lot of us are curious about the real circumstances which caused McClellan's departure as Press Sec. Is there actual cause for the "disgruntled" defense? Not that it matters- they are clearly all guilty of treason, war cimes and crimes against humanity. To the gallows with the whole administration! Bush, Cheney, Rice, Rove, Rumsfield, etc. They all deserve to hang!!!!

]]> By: Liz (Chino Hills, CA) http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/05/30/andersons-view-the-360%c2%b0-scott-mcclellan-interview/comment-page-4/#comment-174155 Liz (Chino Hills, CA) Sat, 31 May 2008 19:17:59 +0000 http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=1076#comment-174155 Hi Anderson, I watched your interview .......... YOU WERE TOUGH, but FAIR! I LOVE THAT! All these revelations make me doubt everything about POLITICS! Thanks for keeping them honest! Liz Hi Anderson,

I watched your interview .......... YOU WERE TOUGH, but FAIR!

I LOVE THAT!

All these revelations make me doubt everything about POLITICS!

Thanks for keeping them honest!

Liz

]]> By: Cindy http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/05/30/andersons-view-the-360%c2%b0-scott-mcclellan-interview/comment-page-4/#comment-174150 Cindy Sat, 31 May 2008 19:12:10 +0000 http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=1076#comment-174150 You have opened the door on many issues for all of us so that the amount of information we have on issues is greatly increased, Anderson, but often it seems that the information comes to us jaded so that we see it a certain way. It is time for you and all of news' personnel to just give us information and let us decide how to think about it. Style is important, and you have incredible style; however, your style is not what should guide us to coming to our own conclusions. Our conclusions should be our own, and they should be reached by using having access to information without prejudice. It is obvious to anyone who reads newspapers or watches news programs on television that corporate interests impact the actual news that we get. Your integrity should allow you to step above all that and get you to give us just the facts. Please consider that for future interviews and news casts. Thank you. You have opened the door on many issues for all of us so that the amount of information we have on issues is greatly increased, Anderson, but often it seems that the information comes to us jaded so that we see it a certain way. It is time for you and all of news' personnel to just give us information and let us decide how to think about it. Style is important, and you have incredible style; however, your style is not what should guide us to coming to our own conclusions. Our conclusions should be our own, and they should be reached by using having access to information without prejudice.

It is obvious to anyone who reads newspapers or watches news programs on television that corporate interests impact the actual news that we get. Your integrity should allow you to step above all that and get you to give us just the facts. Please consider that for future interviews and news casts. Thank you.

]]> By: Judy http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/05/30/andersons-view-the-360%c2%b0-scott-mcclellan-interview/comment-page-4/#comment-174149 Judy Sat, 31 May 2008 19:09:46 +0000 http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=1076#comment-174149 Anderson you did a great job of interviewing Scott McClellan. I really liked the way you questioned when he'd say "in the bunker", and the "bubble". You absolutely didn't let him evade your questions. Excellent interview. Anderson you did a great job of interviewing Scott McClellan. I really liked the way you questioned when he'd say "in the bunker", and the "bubble". You absolutely didn't let him evade your questions. Excellent interview.

]]> By: M. Giaquinto. http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/05/30/andersons-view-the-360%c2%b0-scott-mcclellan-interview/comment-page-4/#comment-174118 M. Giaquinto. Sat, 31 May 2008 12:11:49 +0000 http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=1076#comment-174118 The one major question not asked during your interview I believe still needs to be addressed: "When McCellean took the oath of his office, he swore to defend the constitution. Why was that not asked of him? Instead of loyalty to the president being the issue. The constitution states that law is supreme and that we are a country of laws not of people. The one major question not asked during your interview I believe still needs to be addressed: "When McCellean took the oath of his office, he swore to defend the constitution. Why was that not asked of him? Instead of loyalty to the president being the issue. The constitution states that law is supreme and that we are a country of laws not of people.

]]> By: Ron Gebo http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/05/30/andersons-view-the-360%c2%b0-scott-mcclellan-interview/comment-page-4/#comment-174112 Ron Gebo Sat, 31 May 2008 10:04:37 +0000 http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=1076#comment-174112 I am inclined to believe McClellan. If he had spoken up at the beginning or told President Bush he couldn't do what he was expected to do then we would never know what really is going on in the White House. Furthermore we all knew Bush was involving us in the Iraq war for oil and nothing else. Why people voted for this idiot for president is beyond me. It was all money that got him there. I bet in years to come we will find out that Bush was not running the country he was just a spokesman. We can look at Secretary of State Powell when he was trying to convince the UN of the WMD's in Iraq. You could tell on his face he was making up that story. I had a lot of faith in Powell until he spoke at the UN. He knew it was a lie, why didn't he quit? I am inclined to believe McClellan. If he had spoken up at the beginning or told President Bush he couldn't do what he was expected to do then we would never know what really is going on in the White House. Furthermore we all knew Bush was involving us in the Iraq war for oil and nothing else. Why people voted for this idiot for president is beyond me. It was all money that got him there. I bet in years to come we will find out that Bush was not running the country he was just a spokesman.
We can look at Secretary of State Powell when he was trying to convince the UN of the WMD's in Iraq. You could tell on his face he was making up that story. I had a lot of faith in Powell until he spoke at the UN. He knew it was a lie, why didn't he quit?

]]> By: Yolanda McLain http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/05/30/andersons-view-the-360%c2%b0-scott-mcclellan-interview/comment-page-4/#comment-174108 Yolanda McLain Sat, 31 May 2008 09:42:48 +0000 http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=1076#comment-174108 So many are questioning Mr. McClellan regarding his failure to speak up while serving the President. How many times do we have to hear that the President does not like to hear anything that opposes his view and interpretation of facts, events, of reality. This is the "bubble" McClellan refers to, one where no dissent is tolerated, frank discussions on issues with varying facets do not occur in this White House. President Bush, Karl Rove, Vice President Chaney used McClellan to spread their clouded, skewed vision of the world. Only upon leaving has he realized how used and abused he was as well as the American people. I admire his courage. He knew all too well, what type of speaking points the White House would use against him. The Bush family motto is "Loyalty above all else" and woe be to anyone who veers from their concept of loyalty. I believe Mr. McClellan has been loyal ... to the American people. So many are questioning Mr. McClellan regarding his failure to speak up while serving the President. How many times do we have to hear that the President does not like to hear anything that opposes his view and interpretation of facts, events, of reality. This is the "bubble" McClellan refers to, one where no dissent is tolerated, frank discussions on issues with varying facets do not occur in this White House. President Bush, Karl Rove, Vice President Chaney used McClellan to spread their clouded, skewed vision of the world. Only upon leaving has he realized how used and abused he was as well as the American people. I admire his courage. He knew all too well, what type of speaking points the White House would use against him. The Bush family motto is "Loyalty above all else" and woe be to anyone who veers from their concept of loyalty. I believe Mr. McClellan has been loyal ... to the American people.

]]>