Ismael Estrada
CNN Supervising Producer
Texas state officials confirm that the mother of child born in CPS care last week, is in fact not a minor, but an adult. Which leads to the question everyone has been asking since CPS removed over 400 children from the FLDS ranch in Eldorado, Texas in March. How old are these children, really? The state says they have been stymied by inconsistent birth dates, a lack of official birth records and different stories about their birth parents and ages. Last month, district Judge Barbara Walther ordered DNA testing for all the children and parents.
Texas Child Protective Services spokesperson Marleigh Meisner would not elaborate on the age of the mother, other than to say that she was not a minor. Meisner also would not elaborate on whether the mother was underage when the child was conceived. This could prove to be a hot potato for the state, as many of the ages of the women in state custody come to light. Proving to be a more difficult question, What will the state do with at least one child born to an adult the state believed was a minor?
| Cindy |
May 14th, 2008 11:42 am ET If they can't prove the real ages of these women/girls then how are they going to prove in court that they were sexually abused as minors? I think the lack of real birth records is going to be a thorn in their sides. The people in the FLDS are not crazy. They knew by keeping shoddy records that if they got in trouble with the law it would make it hard to prove any thing. They did that on purpose. |
|
| Gary Chandler in Canada |
May 14th, 2008 12:23 pm ET I ask again; why does it have come down to age or broken bones? |
|
| cj,ca |
May 14th, 2008 1:17 pm ET I KNEW it!! From the first day I heard this story, I knew this would happen. This whole story has been blown out of proportion and all CNN has reported is rumors and speculation. I saw right through that Carolyn person the first time she appeared on TV. Everyone is purchasing her book and writing about how brave she is to come forward ...... please, she is a pissed-off ex-wife who saw an opportunity to cash in on the mass hysteria surrounding the FLDS. First we hear that the phone call was a hoax. Now this story about a teen mother isn't true. What's next? Two things have really bothered me about this whole thing: First, that the Texas authorities would raid the place and traumatize all those kids. Secondly, (and this is the thing that has really shocked and scared me), is the reaction of the public. It's been like a mob mentality. People are willing to believe the worst and condemn others, because they look different and have a different lifestyle, without waiting for any investigations or trials. I'm not stating emphatically that there is nothing strange going on inside the FLDS. I am saying – we don't know – let's wait and find out before we condemn the entire group. Also if there is physical or sexual abuse going on within the FLDS, the statistics are probably no different than the number of kids abused and neglected in any city in the country. |
|
| Ann |
May 14th, 2008 1:29 pm ET Living in a compound like this is not normal anyway...even if some of the children are of age. Their parents have deprived them of maybe never having a normal life because they would not know how to function in real society..and at some point in their lives they may have to. The parents should have to move out of the compound for at least a year and seek professional help and then the state reevaluate each adult before returning the children. |
|
| Kent, Illinois |
May 14th, 2008 2:03 pm ET Yeah, that is quite a mess. But, it isn't the polygamists job to prove anything. They are innocent until proven guilty........remember everyone? USA........USA........USA......lol. They know from the past that keeping records of any kind gets them in trouble. Hell, they don't even know which kids are their own kids. Communal existence. Peace and love.........are we back in the 60's? |
|
| Larry |
May 14th, 2008 2:35 pm ET Wonder if the polygamists in Canada are watching how this plays out? |
|
| Happy Day |
May 14th, 2008 3:42 pm ET pls remember that Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff is up to his armpits in this outrage upon the dignity of the people of the United States. Some might even call him the persecutor in chief, or more formally, Caiaphas Shurtleff. Of course, the real question is why? Why is Shurtleff doing this? Is he acting as a surrogate, and if yes, for whom? Did he work to raise the marriage age in Texas so he could carry his vendetta against the people whose religion he opposes to Texas? |
|
| naknudson |
May 14th, 2008 4:34 pm ET I would very much like to have someone tell me how the mother are able to collect welfare without birth certificates and proof of mothering the children she is claimining benefits for that would be all the proof they need wouldnt it? |
|
| Ruth |
May 14th, 2008 6:21 pm ET I am glad that the abuses by CPS are finally coming to light. They know those "disputed minors" are adults or old enough to be legally married, they just want a legal way to steal the babies. I hope that the FLDS sues the state of Texas until their oil wells dry up and everyone involved in this goes to Federal Prison for unlawful arrest, kidnapping, and violating the constitutionally guaranteed rights of US citizens. Jeremiah Wright needs to change his statement to God D*** Texas – they deserve it for this crusade. |
|
| Mike in NYC |
May 14th, 2008 7:00 pm ET Larry wrote: "pls remember that Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff is up to his armpits in this outrage upon the dignity of the people of the United States." From Shurtleff's wiki entry: "In November 2006, Shurtleff was given Mexico's Aguila Azteca award, for "for foreigners who serve Mexico or humanity" for his support for illegal immigrants." He's far more concerned with the "dignity" of invaders than his own constituents. I'd start questioning the agendas of those who originate such policies. |
|
| Annie Kate |
May 14th, 2008 9:11 pm ET The FLDS learned from the raid in 1953 that they needed to obfuscate any and all records of who was married to whom, how old they were, and who the parents of the children are and their ages. The difficulty of establishing proof does not mean that underage marriage and sexual relations did not go on, it just means its going to be harder to prove it. The fact that none of this is straight forward suggests to me that the state is correct in their charges of underage marriage and underage pregnancy. I hope that Child Protective Services can be given the time to establish what is going on and to ensure what is best for these children Annie Kate |
|
|
Comments have been closed for this article |
||
A behind the scenes look at “Anderson Cooper 360°” and the stories it covers, written by Anderson Cooper, the AC360° staff and a network of contributors. Insight you can’t find anywhere else.
We search the news each day to show you what’s on our radar and what we’re planning for the show each night.
For more details, read our tips on how to win 360° approval for comments.
Send your instant feedback to Anderson Cooper 360°.
- Real-life effects of reform getting lost in the noise
- Evening Buzz: Buying Health Care Reform Votes
- Live Blog from the Anchor Desk 12/21/09
- U.S. soldiers in Iraq could face courts-martial for getting pregnant
- FAQs about health care reform
- Interactive: Brittany Murphy’s acting career
- Senate health care reform bill
- House health care reform bill
- Interactive: The top 10 Health-Care-Reform Players
- Video: Child custody battle continues
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2005

