<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web Searches May Hint at Late Decider Votes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/23/web-searches-may-hint-at-late-decider-votes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/23/web-searches-may-hint-at-late-decider-votes/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 04:00:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: HMMM</title>
		<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/23/web-searches-may-hint-at-late-decider-votes/comment-page-2/#comment-127456</link>
		<dc:creator>HMMM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 04:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=751#comment-127456</guid>
		<description>this goes out for both Hilary/Obama supporters .. many of you are saying if your candidate doesn’t win the nomination …. you’re jumping ship and voting Republican ……… (You all are the ones who voted for Bush two terms and see what he did to America’s economy etc) ….. and we all know Mc Cain is going continue the same Bush Policy .. both democratic candidates share the same policies so who ever wins the nomination … democrats should be backing the winner …. this shows that many of you are not voting on the issues .. you all are voting out anger/hate/revenge (all things negative)

Many say if MC Cain win the Election .. they are going to purchase a bumper sticker stating “don’t blame me i didn’t vote for Obama/Clinton” … the stickers should say instead “blame me i voted Mc Cain because my democratic candidate didn’t with the nomination”

BEFORE YOU VOTE COME NOV I URGE YOU TO THINK ABOUT HOW YOUR VOTE WILL AFFECT NOT JUST YOU BUT GENERATIONS TO COME ….

see my logic ?

THINK BEFORE YOU VOTE COME NOV &gt;&gt; VOTE WISELY .. NOT OUT OF ANGER/HATE/REVENGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

YOUR VOTE DOESN&#039;T JUST AFFECT YOU BUT YOU CHILDREN &gt;&gt; GRANDCHILDREN AND SO ON &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this goes out for both Hilary/Obama supporters .. many of you are saying if your candidate doesn’t win the nomination …. you’re jumping ship and voting Republican ……… (You all are the ones who voted for Bush two terms and see what he did to America’s economy etc) ….. and we all know Mc Cain is going continue the same Bush Policy .. both democratic candidates share the same policies so who ever wins the nomination … democrats should be backing the winner …. this shows that many of you are not voting on the issues .. you all are voting out anger/hate/revenge (all things negative)</p>
<p>Many say if MC Cain win the Election .. they are going to purchase a bumper sticker stating “don’t blame me i didn’t vote for Obama/Clinton” … the stickers should say instead “blame me i voted Mc Cain because my democratic candidate didn’t with the nomination”</p>
<p>BEFORE YOU VOTE COME NOV I URGE YOU TO THINK ABOUT HOW YOUR VOTE WILL AFFECT NOT JUST YOU BUT GENERATIONS TO COME ….</p>
<p>see my logic ?</p>
<p>THINK BEFORE YOU VOTE COME NOV &gt;&gt; VOTE WISELY .. NOT OUT OF ANGER/HATE/REVENGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
<p>YOUR VOTE DOESN&#039;T JUST AFFECT YOU BUT YOU CHILDREN &gt;&gt; GRANDCHILDREN AND SO ON &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Bor</title>
		<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/23/web-searches-may-hint-at-late-decider-votes/comment-page-2/#comment-126586</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Bor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 02:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=751#comment-126586</guid>
		<description>We speak to the matter that Obama cannot attract the blue collar workers, and we collectively credit Clinton as having the ability to reach out to those very voters.   What amazes me is that the matter of race is not discussed.  Is it not possible that THAT is the matter at hand, the factor that the blue collar folks could not, and would not admit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We speak to the matter that Obama cannot attract the blue collar workers, and we collectively credit Clinton as having the ability to reach out to those very voters.   What amazes me is that the matter of race is not discussed.  Is it not possible that THAT is the matter at hand, the factor that the blue collar folks could not, and would not admit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carla  Ontario Canada</title>
		<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/23/web-searches-may-hint-at-late-decider-votes/comment-page-2/#comment-126458</link>
		<dc:creator>Carla  Ontario Canada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 01:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=751#comment-126458</guid>
		<description>@joanne and Karen, I totally agree with you. Also if the media had done its job and vetted Obama from the beginning then people would know him better. I have learned more about Obama on the internet in the last 3 months and I don&#039;t like what I see. 
I would support Hillary (if I could vote). Here in Canada 3 out 4 people prefer democrats( in case your interested)
Why do people keep saying for her to drop out, you don&#039;t quit a race in the middle of it.
Let people vote and count FL/MI. 
I truly believe that the media networks like to spin all this and add fuel to the fire to keep everyone begging for more. But with the internet, we can go anywhere and do our own research.
Obama doesn&#039;t like to answer questions about his past/associates so how else can we learn about him, but go surfing.
Congratulations to Hillary and I HOPE she goes ALL THE WAY!! 

P.S. CNN please get ride of Jamal he does not make any sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@joanne and Karen, I totally agree with you. Also if the media had done its job and vetted Obama from the beginning then people would know him better. I have learned more about Obama on the internet in the last 3 months and I don&#039;t like what I see.<br />
I would support Hillary (if I could vote). Here in Canada 3 out 4 people prefer democrats( in case your interested)<br />
Why do people keep saying for her to drop out, you don&#039;t quit a race in the middle of it.<br />
Let people vote and count FL/MI.<br />
I truly believe that the media networks like to spin all this and add fuel to the fire to keep everyone begging for more. But with the internet, we can go anywhere and do our own research.<br />
Obama doesn&#039;t like to answer questions about his past/associates so how else can we learn about him, but go surfing.<br />
Congratulations to Hillary and I HOPE she goes ALL THE WAY!! </p>
<p>P.S. CNN please get ride of Jamal he does not make any sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amber</title>
		<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/23/web-searches-may-hint-at-late-decider-votes/comment-page-2/#comment-126452</link>
		<dc:creator>Amber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 01:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=751#comment-126452</guid>
		<description>There is a real reason why Obama has more search hits; we don&#039;t know Obama.  I consistently hear him say &quot;I have a plan&quot; yet rarely hear the plan.  What I do hear about Obama is his &#039;gaffs&#039; .  Hence the reason people search for the info about them.  Makes perfectly logical sense to me.  If Obama supporters spent more time and energy to put his plans and ideas on issues out there they would see better hits.  They need to move beyond just the idea of change if they want to win a general election.  What are they going to change?

I think the old adage about &quot;the devil you know&quot; is holding true for Obama particularly in blue collar workers.  Yes they want change but they want to know exactly what the change is.  Change is not a new concept in politics.  Rallys that raise people up and get them excited only last so long, real life intrudes fast.  

I think the superdelegates need to decide whether they truly want a democrat to win in November or if they want to simply go with the guy they like.  
This blue collar &#039;Reagan Democrat&#039; is more of a risk than Obama supporters want to admit.  Republicans are much more likely to sway this type of voter than the ones Obama has for a base.  It&#039;s the reason they got the nickname!
The new voters that Obama keeps pulling in are great but how many of them will still be excited in November?  For how many will they simple be too busy to vote?  How many of them will simply stay home if Obama is not the candidate versus showing up to vote for McCain?

These are the serious questions.  The popular vote is close, delegates are close, Hillary leads in Superdelegates.  

As for the Yahoo news results; Obama has been campaigning for over a year and the main thing people ask about are his &#039;gaffs&#039;.  Whose fault is it really?  Blame the media all you want but if Obama&#039;s plans and messages were really out for the American people after over a year of campaigning the American people would know it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a real reason why Obama has more search hits; we don&#039;t know Obama.  I consistently hear him say &#034;I have a plan&#034; yet rarely hear the plan.  What I do hear about Obama is his &#039;gaffs&#039; .  Hence the reason people search for the info about them.  Makes perfectly logical sense to me.  If Obama supporters spent more time and energy to put his plans and ideas on issues out there they would see better hits.  They need to move beyond just the idea of change if they want to win a general election.  What are they going to change?</p>
<p>I think the old adage about &#034;the devil you know&#034; is holding true for Obama particularly in blue collar workers.  Yes they want change but they want to know exactly what the change is.  Change is not a new concept in politics.  Rallys that raise people up and get them excited only last so long, real life intrudes fast.  </p>
<p>I think the superdelegates need to decide whether they truly want a democrat to win in November or if they want to simply go with the guy they like.<br />
This blue collar &#039;Reagan Democrat&#039; is more of a risk than Obama supporters want to admit.  Republicans are much more likely to sway this type of voter than the ones Obama has for a base.  It&#039;s the reason they got the nickname!<br />
The new voters that Obama keeps pulling in are great but how many of them will still be excited in November?  For how many will they simple be too busy to vote?  How many of them will simply stay home if Obama is not the candidate versus showing up to vote for McCain?</p>
<p>These are the serious questions.  The popular vote is close, delegates are close, Hillary leads in Superdelegates.  </p>
<p>As for the Yahoo news results; Obama has been campaigning for over a year and the main thing people ask about are his &#039;gaffs&#039;.  Whose fault is it really?  Blame the media all you want but if Obama&#039;s plans and messages were really out for the American people after over a year of campaigning the American people would know it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annie Kate</title>
		<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/23/web-searches-may-hint-at-late-decider-votes/comment-page-2/#comment-126441</link>
		<dc:creator>Annie Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 01:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=751#comment-126441</guid>
		<description>In the weeks prior to Pennsylvania all the pundits and media said was that Hilary needed to win by a healthy margin, preferably a double digit margin to stay a viable candidate.  Last night as I listened to these same pundits and media wonks they reported her win, analyzed it, analyzed some of Obama&#039;s problems, but then downplayed Clinton&#039;s win saying that Obama still was ahead.  I think you would have to be living under a rock not to know that Obama is still ahead - but Hilary is gaining momentum.  Hilary did what the pundits said she needed to do  - so why still negative on her?  Can we at least give her credit for the win she had to have?  

The more I find out about Obama the less I like him.  I also have never cared for how liberal he is; I much prefer Hilary&#039;s conservative approach..  Will I vote for either of them?  I don&#039;t know - I am very impressed with the honor, honesty, and integrity of  McCain. At this point I&#039;m not writing any of them off as choices - wish the press would do the same.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://anniekatec.blogspot.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Annie Kate&lt;/a&gt;
Birmingham AL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the weeks prior to Pennsylvania all the pundits and media said was that Hilary needed to win by a healthy margin, preferably a double digit margin to stay a viable candidate.  Last night as I listened to these same pundits and media wonks they reported her win, analyzed it, analyzed some of Obama&#039;s problems, but then downplayed Clinton&#039;s win saying that Obama still was ahead.  I think you would have to be living under a rock not to know that Obama is still ahead &#8211; but Hilary is gaining momentum.  Hilary did what the pundits said she needed to do  &#8211; so why still negative on her?  Can we at least give her credit for the win she had to have?  </p>
<p>The more I find out about Obama the less I like him.  I also have never cared for how liberal he is; I much prefer Hilary&#039;s conservative approach..  Will I vote for either of them?  I don&#039;t know &#8211; I am very impressed with the honor, honesty, and integrity of  McCain. At this point I&#039;m not writing any of them off as choices &#8211; wish the press would do the same.</p>
<p><a href="http://anniekatec.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">Annie Kate</a><br />
Birmingham AL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/23/web-searches-may-hint-at-late-decider-votes/comment-page-2/#comment-126359</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 00:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=751#comment-126359</guid>
		<description>I live in Indiana.  This evening I saw my first campaign ad sponsored by the Obama camp.   I couldn&#039;t believe the negativity.

This is all so sad.  I am a Clinton supporter but it comes down to this:
Hillary can&#039;t be as hated as CNN would have us believe or she wouldn&#039;t be getting the votes.  It is obvious to anyone with a brain that CNN (with the exception of Lou Dobbs) is campaigning for Obama.
Obama isn&#039;t perfect but I believe he is trying to do the right thing.  He has made some major mistakes but for some reason CNN gives hime a pass on any faux pas.

Good grief--give the woman her due.  She did win Pennsylvania.  Let her at least have 24 hours to enjoy it before you start with the criticism.  But, the primary wasn&#039;t even over before the the panelists were laying out why she can never win.  Nice going.  Do you truly believe we&#039;re so ignorant we can&#039;t see the bias?

I think the bloggers would do well to remember that each of us has an opinion and attacking others for their viewpoint shows your limited understanding of the issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live in Indiana.  This evening I saw my first campaign ad sponsored by the Obama camp.   I couldn&#039;t believe the negativity.</p>
<p>This is all so sad.  I am a Clinton supporter but it comes down to this:<br />
Hillary can&#039;t be as hated as CNN would have us believe or she wouldn&#039;t be getting the votes.  It is obvious to anyone with a brain that CNN (with the exception of Lou Dobbs) is campaigning for Obama.<br />
Obama isn&#039;t perfect but I believe he is trying to do the right thing.  He has made some major mistakes but for some reason CNN gives hime a pass on any faux pas.</p>
<p>Good grief&#8211;give the woman her due.  She did win Pennsylvania.  Let her at least have 24 hours to enjoy it before you start with the criticism.  But, the primary wasn&#039;t even over before the the panelists were laying out why she can never win.  Nice going.  Do you truly believe we&#039;re so ignorant we can&#039;t see the bias?</p>
<p>I think the bloggers would do well to remember that each of us has an opinion and attacking others for their viewpoint shows your limited understanding of the issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffery J. Roth</title>
		<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/23/web-searches-may-hint-at-late-decider-votes/comment-page-2/#comment-126326</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffery J. Roth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 23:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=751#comment-126326</guid>
		<description>First off I have always voted Republican. This year may be different as my vote may go to Obama. What really does a president do? They have to be motivational, dictate a course to their various constituants of varying parties. Even at times those factions can be at odds over a presidents own affiliation. I think Obama has that ability and not polarizing as Ms Clinton.  I think he can reach across the diffence and bridge an agreement of what is best for America. I am of a time when the excuss was a &quot;right wing conspiracy&quot; and now the &quot;media is tough on my poor wife&quot;. Think of all those entitlements yet released or all that money going to the  &quot;library&quot;. I see a comment that Obama is far &quot;left left tax and spend&quot;. OK. Clinton supports health care for everyone and Obama doesn&#039;t. OK. If you do not pay for health care - either your stupid or can&#039;t afford it - the Gov&#039;t will take money away from you as a &quot;penalty&quot;. Isn&#039;t penalty another word for tax? Have not we taxed the people that can least afford it. Isn&#039;t that tax and spend with your good friends benefiting? The first Clinton Health Care Reform missed the Florida &quot;Sunshine Law&quot;. We missed who was involved I 
and don&#039;t see lobbyists piling on. Tax on people that can&#039; least afford it? Good going lets support this! Next, all this money Obama is getting? Must be George Skoris, or whom ever, hand writing on the wall it is &quot;little people&quot; , day to day,  that believe. What is the power of that vote?    Please, I love this country, let&#039;s stop for a second and think this out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off I have always voted Republican. This year may be different as my vote may go to Obama. What really does a president do? They have to be motivational, dictate a course to their various constituants of varying parties. Even at times those factions can be at odds over a presidents own affiliation. I think Obama has that ability and not polarizing as Ms Clinton.  I think he can reach across the diffence and bridge an agreement of what is best for America. I am of a time when the excuss was a &#034;right wing conspiracy&#034; and now the &#034;media is tough on my poor wife&#034;. Think of all those entitlements yet released or all that money going to the  &#034;library&#034;. I see a comment that Obama is far &#034;left left tax and spend&#034;. OK. Clinton supports health care for everyone and Obama doesn&#039;t. OK. If you do not pay for health care &#8211; either your stupid or can&#039;t afford it &#8211; the Gov&#039;t will take money away from you as a &#034;penalty&#034;. Isn&#039;t penalty another word for tax? Have not we taxed the people that can least afford it. Isn&#039;t that tax and spend with your good friends benefiting? The first Clinton Health Care Reform missed the Florida &#034;Sunshine Law&#034;. We missed who was involved I<br />
and don&#039;t see lobbyists piling on. Tax on people that can&#039; least afford it? Good going lets support this! Next, all this money Obama is getting? Must be George Skoris, or whom ever, hand writing on the wall it is &#034;little people&#034; , day to day,  that believe. What is the power of that vote?    Please, I love this country, let&#039;s stop for a second and think this out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: philofficer</title>
		<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/23/web-searches-may-hint-at-late-decider-votes/comment-page-2/#comment-126286</link>
		<dc:creator>philofficer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 22:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=751#comment-126286</guid>
		<description>Sure, Barak, held to the standard of Messiah, falls short. But let&#039;s not forget Hillary&#039;s negatives.  Of the three remaining candidates, she is the most hated, the least trusted.  Can someone with a 55% negative rating really win the presidency?  Her considerable flaws are old news while Barak&#039;s distractors jump on his every foible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, Barak, held to the standard of Messiah, falls short. But let&#039;s not forget Hillary&#039;s negatives.  Of the three remaining candidates, she is the most hated, the least trusted.  Can someone with a 55% negative rating really win the presidency?  Her considerable flaws are old news while Barak&#039;s distractors jump on his every foible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joselito</title>
		<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/23/web-searches-may-hint-at-late-decider-votes/comment-page-2/#comment-126282</link>
		<dc:creator>Joselito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 22:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=751#comment-126282</guid>
		<description>Yahoo is not the only search engine. Not all voters have Internet access or cell phones. Were these reliable sites or blogs? Be more scientific because your effort was...well...What was your point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo is not the only search engine. Not all voters have Internet access or cell phones. Were these reliable sites or blogs? Be more scientific because your effort was...well...What was your point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/23/web-searches-may-hint-at-late-decider-votes/comment-page-1/#comment-126207</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=751#comment-126207</guid>
		<description>I am one of the registered Democrats (in Oregon) that has been doing searches on Senator Obama. The association with Reverend Wright for 20 years, the statement about &quot;bitter&quot; small town people, etc. show insight into Senator Obama&#039;s judgement. Especially with virtually no actual accomplishments or track record. My investigation leaves me cool to accepting Senator Obama as a leader. I do not believe that these are minor incidents as the wrapup to the above article indicate, &quot;Was this by accident or did the Clinton PR machine masterfully play Republican politics and drive interest on silly or episodic wedge issues? Either way, the results bode well for Clinton.&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am one of the registered Democrats (in Oregon) that has been doing searches on Senator Obama. The association with Reverend Wright for 20 years, the statement about &#034;bitter&#034; small town people, etc. show insight into Senator Obama&#039;s judgement. Especially with virtually no actual accomplishments or track record. My investigation leaves me cool to accepting Senator Obama as a leader. I do not believe that these are minor incidents as the wrapup to the above article indicate, &#034;Was this by accident or did the Clinton PR machine masterfully play Republican politics and drive interest on silly or episodic wedge issues? Either way, the results bode well for Clinton.&#034;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay W. (Los Angeles)</title>
		<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/23/web-searches-may-hint-at-late-decider-votes/comment-page-1/#comment-126192</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay W. (Los Angeles)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=751#comment-126192</guid>
		<description>You know what surprises me more then anything? How people are so eager to be placed into a box...

Democrat/Republican/Liberal/Conservative/Left/Right..... the spin machine has Americans right where they want them, divided....

Can all Americans win, when only a few play the game while the rest follow?

Food for thought</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what surprises me more then anything? How people are so eager to be placed into a box...</p>
<p>Democrat/Republican/Liberal/Conservative/Left/Right..... the spin machine has Americans right where they want them, divided....</p>
<p>Can all Americans win, when only a few play the game while the rest follow?</p>
<p>Food for thought</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. Casey Sebastopol, CA.</title>
		<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/23/web-searches-may-hint-at-late-decider-votes/comment-page-1/#comment-126147</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Casey Sebastopol, CA.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 19:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=751#comment-126147</guid>
		<description>It just goes to show you what morons the general public actually are.

These are the same people who believed that Hillary ducked sniper fire in Bosnia because THEY DON&#039;T READ.

There is no way to know who did those searches -- they could have been done BY the clinton campaign. Hey, I know... I&#039;ll go do a day of searching Hillary Clinton and every negative thing I can think of and skew someone&#039;s results. Don&#039;t laugh... it&#039;s not only possible, but easy.. just write a program to do it for you.

10+ years in web development, doh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It just goes to show you what morons the general public actually are.</p>
<p>These are the same people who believed that Hillary ducked sniper fire in Bosnia because THEY DON&#039;T READ.</p>
<p>There is no way to know who did those searches - they could have been done BY the clinton campaign. Hey, I know... I&#039;ll go do a day of searching Hillary Clinton and every negative thing I can think of and skew someone&#039;s results. Don&#039;t laugh... it&#039;s not only possible, but easy.. just write a program to do it for you.</p>
<p>10+ years in web development, doh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wolfsbane</title>
		<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/23/web-searches-may-hint-at-late-decider-votes/comment-page-1/#comment-126111</link>
		<dc:creator>wolfsbane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 19:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=751#comment-126111</guid>
		<description>Clinton has the name recognition and the flak machine - late deciders are more likely to not be as informed about politics, and more easily swayed by distractions, as those who decide earlier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clinton has the name recognition and the flak machine &#8211; late deciders are more likely to not be as informed about politics, and more easily swayed by distractions, as those who decide earlier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RT</title>
		<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/23/web-searches-may-hint-at-late-decider-votes/comment-page-1/#comment-126108</link>
		<dc:creator>RT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=751#comment-126108</guid>
		<description>Go figure.  Folks are searching to find out more about Obama.  Why?  Maybe because he continues to refuse to let Americans know where he stands on any issue outside of &quot;hope&quot; and &quot;change.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go figure.  Folks are searching to find out more about Obama.  Why?  Maybe because he continues to refuse to let Americans know where he stands on any issue outside of &#034;hope&#034; and &#034;change.&#034;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/23/web-searches-may-hint-at-late-decider-votes/comment-page-1/#comment-126105</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=751#comment-126105</guid>
		<description>I am A North Carolina voter and have lived here my whole life. I Am a Hillary Clinton Supporter and will vote for her in the Primary and the General Election. However, I will vote for John McCain if Obama wins the Democratic Nomination. If he is for Change then why is the Entrenched Politicians such and Ted Kennedy and John Kerry supporting Obama, who is a young and impressionable or the better word is &quot;controllable&quot; candidate. I want an President who will not always bend to the will of the party but one who can fight for us against the grain if needed. That is why the Democratic Party will be better off with Hillary Clinton then Obama. 

Vote…..Hillary 08</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am A North Carolina voter and have lived here my whole life. I Am a Hillary Clinton Supporter and will vote for her in the Primary and the General Election. However, I will vote for John McCain if Obama wins the Democratic Nomination. If he is for Change then why is the Entrenched Politicians such and Ted Kennedy and John Kerry supporting Obama, who is a young and impressionable or the better word is &#034;controllable&#034; candidate. I want an President who will not always bend to the will of the party but one who can fight for us against the grain if needed. That is why the Democratic Party will be better off with Hillary Clinton then Obama. </p>
<p>Vote…..Hillary 08</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bruce becker</title>
		<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/23/web-searches-may-hint-at-late-decider-votes/comment-page-1/#comment-126102</link>
		<dc:creator>bruce becker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=751#comment-126102</guid>
		<description>Her win is called 10% because Corzine said she should get out if she couldnt win by double digits in her home state. 
Thanks for the clarification,  Sean. 
Clinton won by 9 and missed her target.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Her win is called 10% because Corzine said she should get out if she couldnt win by double digits in her home state.<br />
Thanks for the clarification,  Sean.<br />
Clinton won by 9 and missed her target.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaliAl</title>
		<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/23/web-searches-may-hint-at-late-decider-votes/comment-page-1/#comment-126093</link>
		<dc:creator>PaliAl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=751#comment-126093</guid>
		<description>No negative for Mr. Barack Obama, we shall support you in all hardships. You speak for all our people. Negatives in campaigning only hurt you who follow a decadent savior.

The internet is filled with deceitful banter  and untruths. Mr. Barack Obama will rise to the mountain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No negative for Mr. Barack Obama, we shall support you in all hardships. You speak for all our people. Negatives in campaigning only hurt you who follow a decadent savior.</p>
<p>The internet is filled with deceitful banter  and untruths. Mr. Barack Obama will rise to the mountain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince</title>
		<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/23/web-searches-may-hint-at-late-decider-votes/comment-page-1/#comment-126088</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=751#comment-126088</guid>
		<description>Sean,

BIG DEAL!!!!!  9% of the vote vs. 10% - Who cares?  She was voted by a lead of OVER 200,000 individual votes!  1/5th of a million more people voted for Hillary than Obama, who cares about percent. 

Also, if you added in Florida, Hillary would be LEADING in the popular vote.  Say what you want about that, but over 1 1/2  million people voted in Florida.  1 1/2  million individual American Voters voted in Florida.

Take a look at the polls today,  McCain would beat Obama in Florida as of today.  And Hillary and dominate McCain in Florida - Do you want to win or not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean,</p>
<p>BIG DEAL!!!!!  9% of the vote vs. 10% &#8211; Who cares?  She was voted by a lead of OVER 200,000 individual votes!  1/5th of a million more people voted for Hillary than Obama, who cares about percent. </p>
<p>Also, if you added in Florida, Hillary would be LEADING in the popular vote.  Say what you want about that, but over 1 1/2  million people voted in Florida.  1 1/2  million individual American Voters voted in Florida.</p>
<p>Take a look at the polls today,  McCain would beat Obama in Florida as of today.  And Hillary and dominate McCain in Florida &#8211; Do you want to win or not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna</title>
		<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/23/web-searches-may-hint-at-late-decider-votes/comment-page-1/#comment-126087</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=751#comment-126087</guid>
		<description>Are you all dizzy with spin now. Good because that is the way the media and Repub/Dems want you to be. Just remember the &quot;Sound Bites&quot; , the selective bits of info.They know that you are numb now and can come in for the kill. Can&#039;t  you see America...Clinton or McCain..The establishment doesn&#039;t care. Either is in &quot;The Pocket&quot;. 
  YOU... The American people ...Are being Swiftboated...
Please wake up please ...please...


Cnn Please post this
Thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you all dizzy with spin now. Good because that is the way the media and Repub/Dems want you to be. Just remember the &#034;Sound Bites&#034; , the selective bits of info.They know that you are numb now and can come in for the kill. Can&#039;t  you see America...Clinton or McCain..The establishment doesn&#039;t care. Either is in &#034;The Pocket&#034;.<br />
  YOU... The American people ...Are being Swiftboated...<br />
Please wake up please ...please...</p>
<p>Cnn Please post this<br />
Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo Ann</title>
		<link>http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/04/23/web-searches-may-hint-at-late-decider-votes/comment-page-1/#comment-126084</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo Ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnac360.wordpress.com/?p=751#comment-126084</guid>
		<description>Leslie, 

I find it rather strange that you don’t fault the media for any of this.  If the media had done its job in the first place and given the voters all of the information on Obama instead of allowing him to hide his negatives, maybe the voters would not have been forced to “follow the rumor mill” and scramble around to find out what else they haven’t been telling them. 

If Obama is the Democratic nominee, I believe that many of the Reagan Democrats, the Independents, and the voters who voted for him in the primaries before all of this negative information came out, will hold it against him and the media and they will vote for McCain in November. 

Jo Ann
North Royalton, Ohio</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leslie, </p>
<p>I find it rather strange that you don’t fault the media for any of this.  If the media had done its job in the first place and given the voters all of the information on Obama instead of allowing him to hide his negatives, maybe the voters would not have been forced to “follow the rumor mill” and scramble around to find out what else they haven’t been telling them. </p>
<p>If Obama is the Democratic nominee, I believe that many of the Reagan Democrats, the Independents, and the voters who voted for him in the primaries before all of this negative information came out, will hold it against him and the media and they will vote for McCain in November. </p>
<p>Jo Ann<br />
North Royalton, Ohio</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
