HOME    WORLD    U.S.    POLITICS    CRIME    ENTERTAINMENT    HEALTH    TECH    TRAVEL    LIVING
April 16, 2008
Earmark update: Presidential politics saves taxpayers millions
Posted: 12:43 PM ET

Drew Griffin
Special Investigations Unit Correspondent

We’re waiting to find out if the U.S. Senator’s earmark requests this year will jam the Senate Appropriations computer. The deadline for getting those pet project requests in is next Friday, April 25. And if the requests are anything like their counterparts in the House, the computer will experience a “slow down”, as house staffers called it, due to the load of pet projects being requested.

But we’ve learned there is going to be a significant taxpayer savings from at least two U.S. Senators. Which two? Guess?

Senator Barak Obama, who last year requested 112 federal funding projects worth $330 million dollars, will have NO requests this year. He made the announcement while saying he no longer believes in the earmark process. What a difference a year makes.

Not one to fall too far behind the candidate she is chasing, Senator Hillary Clinton’s staff told us the Senator from New York is scaling back her requests, too. While not releasing her requests to CNN, the Senator’s staff sent a message saying the Senator will limit her earmarks to “the most critical needs for New York and America.” Last year Clinton’s requests amounted to $342 million.

So depending on how much Sen. Clinton scales back, and given Sen. Obama is saying no earmarks at all, the race for the democratic nomination may have just saved taxpayers nearly $700 million dollars.

 

20 Comments
Filed under: Earmarks •  Keeping Them Honest
20 Comments
Taj   April 16th, 2008 1:37 pm ET

Drew, $700 million is just the tip of the iceberg. Govt collects trillions of dollors in the form of taxes from people, corporations. We need to hold them responsible for every dollor they waste. Pet projects, ear mark, pork barrel, military, GSA, farm subsidies, welfare, grants to foreign govt etc to name a few. Our SS, medicare, infrastructure, food, city govts, state govts, fed govt etc, etc are all falling part. We need to spend our $$ to people in the US for our social programs, creating a Robust economy.

xtina   April 16th, 2008 2:28 pm ET

great. now why don’t they both show support for an immediate cutting of the fed. gasoline tax? that is such a simple, quick way for washington to show they care.

Melissa   April 16th, 2008 2:54 pm ET

I don’t believe a word from Hillary’s camp. I remember last year’s earmark blogs where she never responded to CNN. Now that she feels pressure from Obama’s camp, she’s trying to sell us she’s scaling back. What does it matter when we the people aren’t given the information as to what she has earmarked.

Doug Pierson Tohatchi, NM   April 16th, 2008 2:55 pm ET

All I can say is AH FOOEY!

Joseph Kowalski, North Huntingdon, PA   April 16th, 2008 3:49 pm ET

I’d be more impressed if either of these candidates had lead the charge to do away with all legislative pet project requests by introducing a bill to do so, and fighting for it’s passage.

Susan   April 16th, 2008 4:17 pm ET

I believe Senator Obama over Senator Clinton any day. Senator McCain already requests no earmarks. What about the rest.?

We the citizens of each state are just as responsible. We keep sending these same politicians back to Washington.

All politics are local. To curb this feasting, it will all have to start at the local level in each state. The president should also be given a line item veto, so that he/she can strike out the pork hiding in any bill passed by the Congress.

Susan
Phoenixville,PA

Joe Q. Public   April 16th, 2008 4:31 pm ET

Earmarks will be a forgotten issue after the election. It is doubtful the members of congress will go along with any attempt to curb earmarks which are allowed by the constitution. This should be filed under pandering.

Paris   April 16th, 2008 4:59 pm ET

CNN why my comments on this are not being posted?
This is my 3rd time.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Wow! I can’t believe that you wrote this on Earmark and you FAILED to mention that John McCain had none 000000.
CNN you need to have more respect for your audience. This is very wrong.
I like to know why you didn’t mention the fact that John McCain hadn’t asked for ANY Earmark for many years?
CNN why?
CNN I dare you to post this.

Mrs. R.   April 16th, 2008 5:14 pm ET

*While not releasing her requests to CNN, the Senator’s staff sent a message saying the Senator will limit her earmarks to “the most critical needs for New York and America.”*

Sad. If Senator Clinton isn’t willing to make public her requests, then perhaps they shouldn’t be made at all. Secrecy doesn’t build trust. I equate secrecy w/sneakiness and that’s not a leadership style I support.

We the public provide the money and I want to know how it’s spent.

I agree that earmarks need to go.

Bryan Price   April 16th, 2008 5:42 pm ET

I’m tired of hearing about earmarks.

The 800 pound gorilla in the room is the war and how much we’re spending on it. It’s truly sad that the talk is about so little of the actual budget, and the budget buster isn’t even put on the books!

I’ll start worrying about earmarks when they actually start to become major parts of the budget.

Bryan
Jacksonville, Florida

AZM   April 16th, 2008 5:59 pm ET

700 million… Wow…
Now if they would just stick to the campaign promise for funding like they said prior… but that’s before the money started rolling in!

We pay before they get there… and for years after… gotta love politicians

Sarah   April 16th, 2008 7:24 pm ET

Drew…thanks for keeping on this story.

Kent, Illinois   April 16th, 2008 7:28 pm ET

If Hillary had any chance at going against McCain in November she would not have any earmarks this time. She knows her bid for the presidency is all over. She may as well get all she can for New York.

Obama will have no earmarks because he knows McCain will not have any this time.

Obama 08

Rob, Arvada, CO   April 16th, 2008 7:58 pm ET

Barack Obama raised “all-in” with no ear-marks. Sorry, Hillary, you lose all your chips!

Annie Kate   April 16th, 2008 9:26 pm ET

I hate to be cynical but for Clinton to cut back her earmarks and Obama eliminate is in an election year where both are running a hotly contested campaign is not impressive - it just seems like one more political trick to gull the voters into thinking they represent real change and savings to the nation. John McCain has not asked for earmarks for YEARS - that is believable and impressive to know that he actually practices what he preaches not only in an election year but in all the other years as well.

Annie Kate
Birmingham AL

Janna   April 16th, 2008 10:31 pm ET

So Obama changed his view completely on this issue? Whatever happened to “Judgement from day one?”
If she lets him get away with this, after the way he exploited her supposed flipped position on the war, she kinda deserves to lose…

lee from Treasure Island Fl   April 17th, 2008 2:43 pm ET

We still have not seen Hillary’s earmarks from last year… yet Obama posted his for all tax payers to see.
This year he followed McCains lead and has ZERO earmarks…which with an economy as our…we can not afford a single one
Yet we still have not heard crap Mrs. Clinton… but spin.
And that debate last night… was not a debate…it was more like 52 minutes of an integration by ABC moderators with Hillary as their key assistant. What sham. A disgrace for anyone who tuned in. Flag pin…Hillary was 5 ft away without a flag pin on, John McCain does not wear one, nor Edwards(he wears out ward bound pin in honor of his dead son), Rev Wright, bitter, and Ayers ….what a joke. Where are the issues… this was tabloids.

Jim   April 22nd, 2008 7:57 pm ET

It is amazing that Obama and Clinton seem to paint themselves as the beacon of hope for tax payers when the two of them, particularly, Obama, seem to keep voicing the need for more government programs and taxation. It would be better if our nation either institutes a flat tax of 10% across the board and send grants to private firms to institute government mandated programs than expand the government. Go McCain!

janie   April 24th, 2008 10:37 am ET

some ear marks are good and much needed, bears dna=no

Jeanette Loos   July 1st, 2008 3:36 pm ET

I am not totally against earmarks,but I think there should be a spending cap in place and these earmarks carefully reviewed.I honestly do not understand why our politicians have to lie about what they can actually do if they become president of the united states.
The most crucial problem we have in this country,(my opinion),is we need to bring our manufactors back to the united states,or tax them heavily so it wont be profitable for them to do business overseas,get rid of nafta,Bring our minimum wage up so people can have a better life.
Get gas prices under control,and admit to the people why it has skyrocked.We the american ,are a residual people and can put our backs to the wall,pull together, and work for a common goal if our goverment officials are doing t he same thing .It is extremely sad to know that people in this once great countrty now have to choose wheather to buy gas ,food or medications.So ,”Big Government”,give us back our pride,give us back our logo,(Made in America).We all would like to go to a store and buy clothes,etc that have the made in american label.

Leave Your Comment


 

Comments are moderated by CNN, in accordance with the CNN Comment Policy, and may not appear on this blog until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting. Also, due to the volume of comments we receive, not all comments will be posted.


subscribe RSS Icon
About this blog

A behind the scenes look at “Anderson Cooper 360°” and the stories it covers, written by Anderson Cooper and the show’s correspondents and producers. Insight you can’t find anywhere else.

For more details, read our tips on how to win 360° approval for comments.

Send your instant feedback to Anderson Cooper 360°.

Featured Contributors
Candy Crowley
Candy Crowley is CNN's senior political correspondent and an AC360° contributor
David Gergen
David Gergen is CNN's senior political analyst and former presidential advisor
Roland S. Martin
Roland S. Martin is a nationally award-winning journalist and AC360° contributor
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNN makes reasonable efforts to review all comments prior to posting and CNN may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Crime  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences  |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2008 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com