Hi all… I just want to let you know we’re still tracking the flood of Congressional requests to earmark and spend millions of your tax dollars for pet projects.

The silly spending season in Congress opened with a bang, or maybe the more appropriate word is a crash. So many requests for next year’s spending bills flooded the Appropriations Committee that the computer couldn’t handle it.
Committee staff says the computer “got very slow” when everyone sent in their requests at once. They insist it wasn’t a “crash,” just a big slow down. Um, are we parsing a little bit here?
In any case, the “slow down” prompted House leaders to move the deadline later to let members get in all their zillions of earmark requests for next year.
How many are there and what are they? If you’ve been following this issue, you know Congress doesn’t trust you and me with that information yet. We’ve got our sources working it, though…so stand by.
- Drew Griffin, 360° Correspondent/Special Investigations Unit
| Lorie Ann, Buellton, California |
March 31st, 2008 11:53 am ET Hi Drew, Lorie Ann, Buellton, Calif. |
|
| Richard Sanders |
March 31st, 2008 12:35 pm ET The problem with pet projects is that they do not focus on the nations best interest. While some of these projects my be worthy of consideration, we are not capable of handling them at this time in our nation. We are fixing to pay a hugh bill for all the unregulated greed by banks, brokage firm, insurance companies, etc. in this sub-prime mess. We have a war to pay for, roads & bridges to fix, improved educational systems, & health care to fix. We, also, must slow down the borrowing of money for everything in the world just because we want something now! I truely fear for this country. |
|
| April in Texas |
March 31st, 2008 12:43 pm ET I will be looking forward to see what is found. |
|
| Taj |
March 31st, 2008 12:47 pm ET Drew |
|
| Mac Waddle |
March 31st, 2008 12:48 pm ET Everyone inside the Beltway should be required to watch HBO’s John Adams. Their job is to do the work for the best of the Country. Not to drain every last penny for their own districts in order to get re-elected so they can make retirement off of Lobbyists. We have no true Statesmen anymore. Our founding Fathers would be ashamed of the mockery we have made of the Government they sacrificed so much to build. |
|
| Susan |
March 31st, 2008 12:49 pm ET Drew: It is time once again to ” belly up to the bar ” of tax payer money. Throw I do not mind tax payer money being spent as long as the benefits out-way the waste. This is why the President needs a line item veto, when Susan |
|
| Becca |
March 31st, 2008 1:34 pm ET Just another day in the neighborhood. Until we taxpayers start getting with the program to enforce term limits by simply not re-electing the incumbent, this little exercise of earmarks will be a regular part of our budgeting diet in Washington. There has to be a way to remind these fools that they work for us - not the other way around. |
|
| Melissa |
March 31st, 2008 1:48 pm ET Well at least we know from last year’s experience who will be avoiding releasing their earmark requests public when you ask for them again this year Drew. I’ve yet heard from Congressman Brad Sherman when I emailed him and Hillary Clinton as well. Obama - you’ve got my vote since you released yours upon CNN’s first request. |
|
| independent |
March 31st, 2008 2:25 pm ET Such a simple solution that I pray the next president implements. |
|
| seah |
March 31st, 2008 2:42 pm ET Pet projects that are not for the good of all Americans. More used for pay backs and lining peoples pockets. A backdoor way of ripping off the government and the people. I think any one in office senator, congressman, on up. Should be an open book to the public, with finances and all spending. Personal and government. Hold them all accountable. If they have pet projects, them donate from their own pockets. Better than we the poor people. A vote for America is a vote against Obama |
|
| Charlotte D |
March 31st, 2008 2:43 pm ET This is too depressing. |
|
| Damian |
March 31st, 2008 3:21 pm ET I think there is nothing wrong with most pork barrel projects. Most are important programs and are usually needed to test future national programs. However I do feel that the programs and the amount invested should be made public. We need to have more transparency in Congress. |
|
| Paris |
March 31st, 2008 3:24 pm ET I like to see the Details of who asked for what. |
|
| SUNNY |
March 31st, 2008 3:25 pm ET Who didn’t know this was going to happen? I did. We are a poor country now. We are weak and everybody in the world knows it. What will we do? |
|
| Slater |
March 31st, 2008 4:01 pm ET This is sad. Not that we are asking, that we think that like everything else in our lives, we push a button, click a mouse and BAM! Blow your mind on demand, there is the answer in 3 nanoseconds. We are such an addiction run society it just cracks me up. I really hope in the next decade our society gets some sort of addiction therapy. Mere slow downs due to over loading of systems is not a way in which people skirt issues, it is a real issue that we Americans somehow think is a fantasy. First you have incompetent government workers. Then you have incompetent electronic devices in which they have to use as tools. Then you have the higher ups that have no clue, but their fingers are trained to point away from themselves. By law they have to answer when asked, so eventually we will get the answers we seek. Have patience people. Just because the story is stale doesn’t overshadow the need for the answer, whenever it comes. |
|
| leon |
March 31st, 2008 4:18 pm ET McCain can fix this? lol… Even if he could, he gonna spend all the money in Iraq! what a joke! Talk is cheap, well, I will say I can fix the computer problem, just hire me and I just need half of a single congress man’s salary, only thing is , tax free. |
|
| cary |
March 31st, 2008 4:21 pm ET This is like ” all lines are busy right now— please try your call again later ” !! Right. |
|
| Carol B., Virginia |
March 31st, 2008 4:32 pm ET Hi Drew, There should be more laws or hoops for them to jump through before we hear about any more silly projects. The economy is in trouble and people are less patient about this than ever. Bet you’ll need running shoes to catch up to them for an answer. |
|
| xtina |
March 31st, 2008 5:03 pm ET How about giving some of that ‘earmark’ money back to the taxpayer? I suggest lowering the federal gasoline tax. That’s simple and quick, but God forbid Congress should do it. (If Obama really stands for change , why aren’t we hearing unorthodox ideas such as the lowering of the federal gov’t ’s cut of our gasoline dollar or say, term limits for Congressmen, or increasing the supply of energy by using American resources. Arent’ these ideas REAL change? How come we’re not hearing simple solutions such as these from Obama?) |
|
| Mac Waddle |
March 31st, 2008 5:13 pm ET Reminds me of the fall of USSR. |
|
| deb in az |
March 31st, 2008 5:16 pm ET our economy has so many problems and the pet projects need to stop. bail out banks, bail out home owners…..i think congress can let the pet projects go. .. if that is a problem for them maybe they could put up their own money to finance it….. we have a bad situation with jobs leaving the country and our own government out sourcing jobs as well…..no jobs, people cant pay their mortgage and property taxes…this eliminates schools and more jobs…….which hurts the banks and the lenders……all of this needs to be straightened out….so congress stop spending, stop donating, and stop outsourcing jobs…..because guess what soon there wont be any money to pay your wages either……. |
|
| Jolene |
March 31st, 2008 5:33 pm ET Drew: We can debate on whether we are in a recession or not but spending, whether it be personal or corporate is becoming the focus these days. I never really had to worry about how much money I spend but I have to admit, I’m thinking twice about what and how much I’m spending these days. Even at work, it is getting harder and harder to spend large sums of money on projects without it being scrutinized with a fine tooth comb first. Bottomline, it’s not such a bad thing, we are making better decisions because of it. So, why then doesn’t our government see the importance of the public knowing what they spend the taxpayer’s money on? Perhaps they feel that as long as they are spending money, that’s a good thing for the economy, regardless of whether it’s worthy or not. Thanks for staying on this topic, Drew, I’ll be looking forward to what you uncover! Jolene, St. Joseph, MI |
|
| Olivia |
March 31st, 2008 7:33 pm ET It is unconscionable, given the state of the US economy, that these fat cats just don’t get it. Maybe a tax teaparty is in order. |
|
| Annie Kate |
March 31st, 2008 9:32 pm ET Hi Drew Looking forward to your story Seems like so much waste is hidden in those earmarks and its unfortunate that our legislators do not see anything wrong with this So many they slowed the computer down - that’s not a favorable sign at all. (Yes, there is a difference between a computer slowing down and a computer crashing). What ever happened to the promise that earmarks would become more visible and disclosed to the public? Is that a new year’s resolution that Congress has forgotten/ Annie Kate |
|
| Josh Keck |
April 2nd, 2008 1:17 pm ET All hail the Computer! Computer for President 2008! Maybe not such a bad idea, hrmmmm…? |
|
|
Leave Your Comment
|
||
A behind the scenes look at “Anderson Cooper 360°” and the stories it covers, written by Anderson Cooper and the show’s correspondents and producers. Insight you can’t find anywhere else.
For more details, read our tips on how to win 360° approval for comments.
Send your instant feedback to Anderson Cooper 360°.
- Zimbabwe: Cholera now national emergency
- The economy sent me to the basement
- Who is Bill Richardson?
- Thorny thicket of Bill and Hillary Clinton conflicts?
- Genetic testing
- The Shot: What is it?
- Knut feeling the credit crunch
- Voices of hope in the face of evil
- The straight scoop
- Just in time for the holidays…

