I think people are thinking with their emotions and not their head. Same thing happened when Bush was elected and reelected. Bush made people think that he was for them and them alone. Actually he hoodwinked them twice into voting for him with the same message of inspiration but had another agenda.

How do you believe in someone who says he’ll agree to public campaign financing and now is taking it back?

How do you believe in someone who claimed not to have PACs and now is found to have donated more than 4 times what Clinton did to Super Delegates?

How do you believe in someone who says he’s for gun control in one state and against it in another state?

How do you believe in someone who claims not to be playing the race card and then gets caught circulating a memo detailing how to do just that?

How do you believe in someone who sends Jesse Jackson Jr. to intimidate black candidates who support Clinton?

During the debate last pm Obama pledged to eliminate ear-marks and
pork-barrel spending. One of the CNN moderators asked a great question about how
he was planning to do this when he was already involved in I believe
$91,000,000 requests for his state for projects that he has not disclosed.
He stated he has disclosed this (meaning CNN did not do there research before
they asked this question?), but where was CNN and “keeping them honest” in
researching whether this claim is true?

I thought they both presented themselves very well. One gripe I had was that Obama went on about the “sillyness” of politics with the talking about the whole borrowing lines from a friend’s speech. The minute the debate was over–he accused Clinton of the SAME thing…using parts of Edwards’ speech. I thought it was a bad move if he really wanted to convey the message that that type of politics shouldn’t be used.

Honestly I think the debate was more of the same old same old. It really did nothing for me to persuade me one way or the other.

And the post debate stuff was about the same. Mostly I agree with David Gergen or Jeff Toobin on things. They are the best on the panel and tend to make the most sense to me!

Cynthia, Covington, Ga.

why do we need an audience?? and phone ops?? alot more questions could be asked if we could get rid of all of this.

Some people believe Senator Clinton won the debate because of her concluding comments. I see that Politico noticed that some of those remarks were reminiscent of what John Edwards said in previous debates, but it seems that NO ONE has uncovered the fact that Senator Clinton concluded the debate with the same question that she was asked in New Hampshire right before their Primary. “How do you do it? How do you go on?” she was asked, and after her tearful reply she won the Primary when ALL the polls had her behind by double digits. In the Austin debate she asked herself the same questions, and replied in a similar way, using injured soldiers as the backdrop. While she did not cry, It was obviously contrived to end the debate that way, no matter what she was asked. The only thing missing were violins in the background. Almost everyone seems to be saying how natural her concluding remarks were, and that she found her voice again. If anyone would compare her remarks to the tearful response to the same question in New Hampshire, they may find her response may not have been as “natural” as they are think it was. (Full disclosure: I do not work for the Obama campaign, but I am a supporter.)

I felt like Hillary tried to take charge a bit and was more forceful than she was in the past but i dont feel it got her anywhere. By in large, i agree with all the post debate analysis on AC, that is to say, she scored no more points than ever and obama continues on his high roll. I think he appeared as prepared as ever for the debate and when challenged to get “sleazy”, he deferred and took the high ground! That is most important, because he is right, WE do not want to hear or see it anymore! In the end, she did connect with her closing statement but as AC and Dave Gergen pointed out, she just cant seem to do that on any kind of regular basis, for whatever reason, and that is what’s killing her. I also agreed with Gergen and AC that if she fails to win both TX and OH, she will concede and consolidate the party. In addition, echoing Campbell Brown’s feelings, I strongly feel that the Dems do indeed want to see the “Dream Ticket”, but i doubt one or the other will go for it. As always, the disecting of the debate by AC and team was best of the best.

I feel lucky to be a Democrat, and have these candidates to choose from.

Senator Obama was more polished than he was in past debates, that’s for sure; he has gained some experience from the rallies. He was almost a little too smooth for me.

I still feel Senator Clinton came across more knowledgeable and more experienced, and that, in fact, if these candidates were being interviewed for the job of president, that she would get the job.

With so much riding on this election, future and direction of our country, it seems strange to have this big decision based on these televised interactions, and t.v. commercials. But how else can we get to know the candidates, I guess. It does have a little ‘American Idol’ flavor to it, or Survivor: who’s going to get voted off the island next?

Thanks for the debates, and your continuing coverage. It’s fascinating.

The debate didn’t change my mind; if anything, it confirmed who I thought was the better candidate. Granted she was booed when she made the “xerox” comment, but at the end of the debate, when she said the crises she had in life didn’t compare to the crises of the American people, and when she said she was honored to be sitting with Obama, that should get people excited. I could tell in her voice that she sincerely wants to serve the American people. People criticize her for being unemotional. The important thing is she cares about the people and wants to make a difference in their lives. She’s smart, works hard, persevering, and a visionary. She has what it takes to be a successful President!

Lilibeth
Edmonds, WA

Clinton’s last comments (while trying to mimic Obama’s inspirational kind of words) did resonate with the crowd -and with me at first- I couldn’t shake the feeling that something was off. My husband who is a retired Navy officer said “it’s because the veterans she says she feels sorry for are some of the same ones she sent to war in the first place.” Ahhh-there it is. Furthermore, the other feeling I had -I realized later, too- was one of familiarity -since her words were fittingly and ironically plagarised from not only a Bill Clinton speech but from John Edward’s conceding speech weeks ago. Naturally.

Hello Anderson,

Mrs Hillary Clinton is such a strong woman and motivates me on a personal level. When I heard her last night at the end of the debate, it made me cry…It makes me realize that people always go for the popularity vs substance. NO one should discount her time and effort, she has spent in public office. She could have been a silent first lady, but instead she fought for health care..she fought for children of this country. Chelsey is a good example of her parenting skills, and love despite all the turmoil in their relationship.

When you look at the world, popularity dosn’t get far, but substance does. I think that she would make a good President. Obama, is a good speaker, but I worry that he would lead us into war with Pakistan…and might even into a nuclear war. (especially when he talks about having a stronger army)

I would like to know what he thinks about DRAFT?

Questions should be asked, and we should focus on substance. He seems to say yes to all her ideas. Nothing really new on his side.

However, would like to thank CNN for the debate and giving a platform to both candidates.

I was not impressed with last night’s debate. It was much ado about nothing. Campbell Brown’s moderation was sloppy to say the least. I don’t know why CNN chose her to moderate. Her rudeness to Hillary Clinton was obvious and uncalled for; needless to say I won’t be watching her new show. John King could have handled the moderation easily and with class.

I don’t think the audience adds to the debate, in fact the incessant clapping wasted a lot time.

I guess I am in the minority because although I am an Independent voter, the more I see of Obama the less I trust him. I can understand why he is hesitant to debate Clinton further.

Jo Ann
North Royalton, Ohio

Last night was like most other debates. Unless someone flails and fails miserably, it’s only going to reinforce your confidence in the horse you rode in on. Everyone’s going to be positive that the debate only established and enhanced the same qualities that drew you to your pre-chosen candidate in the first place.

Actually, it all comes down to personality, because it seems to me that implementation of universal health care is the only issue on which they have a noteworthy difference. They are aligned on the war, immigration, cutting the budget, rechanneling the budget to help the poor, etc.

I was dismayed to see that the most meaningless exchange from the whole evening is the most famous: the “change you can xerox” line made all the headlines this morning. Barack plagiarized nothing, but I will say that he has no idea what “plagiarism” means. Try telling your English teacher that you didn’t cheat on your book report, because you had permission to copy from the person who REALLY wrote it. It’s the use of words without attirubtion, not the use of the words without authorization from the original author that makes it wrong. When you pass it off as your own, you have plagiarized, even if you were told you COULD pretend it was your own.

Still, Obama’s statement was not plagiarism so much as it was the use of someone else’s idea — and there is no copyright on ideas. Governor Patrick strung together a a string of someone ELSE’s quotes to make a point. Patrick did not own those words any more than Obama did. Some of the quotes were hundreds of years old. They belong to the world.

Maybe it’s time for a debate with all candidates on one stage (Democrats & Replublicans side by side) before anyone else decides to leave the race! Get them all together in one forum - this may help anyone undecided determine whom they prefer and it may sway others to someone new.

It would be interesting to have them answer the same questions at the same time - might help really define the differences and similarities they have on key issues.

I feel that Obama did really well. I think he was vert calm and collected…very presidential. Hilary was good, too. But I don’t think she should have attacked Obama about “xerox” because ahe did the same thing in her closing statement (which was interestingly like a goodbye speech), the one everyone says was awesome, was almost EXACTLY what Edwards said. She is a good person, but I don’t think she is reaching out to the people like Obama is.
I also would have preferred Anderson or Wolf as the moderator. Or even Jack Cafferty…now that would have been interesting!!!
May the best man or woman win!

Also, for “tina”, I think it only natural that people think with emotions, as well as their brain. You wouldn’t be using your head if you weren’t emotionally engaged with whom ever you support.
“I support so and so, but I can’t stand him/her” that is a little silly.

Hillary cares about Hillary. I think her caring about the veterans NOW is very phony. She after all sent them to war, to die and lose their limbs, so she would not look weak on national security when she ran for President.

All of the previous times she has tried and failed to explain her vote If she REALLY did not understand that a document that was titled “Resolution for using US Military Force in Iraq” was about going to war — she is not as smart as she pretends to be.

Hillary cares about POWER and she’ll do anything to get it . She’ll even pretend to care about real people, at least until she is elected.

Hillary most definitely won the debate last night. She demonstrated her knowledge, experience and ability on all of the key issues. How sad that the media continues to portray her in such a negative light.

Obama merely repeated her ideas and continues to struggle with explaining how he believes he will accomplish his grand ideas.

It was not a debate at all. We had Jorge Ramos implicating Spanish as our second language instead of (maybe) Chinese, French, or Russian. There was no follow up question to Hillary’s suggestion there are 170 languages in NY City and which one she might prefer as the second language. There were NO questions or specifics on HOW to fund health care for all. I prefer Obama, but after seeing the debate I started to seriously wonder about the patriotism of both Obama and Clinton. With John ‘Juan’ McCain the other choice, I’m starting to wonder if voting even matters this election. The “debate” was most disappointing in terms of specific content. CNN needs to cut microphones when a candidate refuses to answer a question or changes to another question. Hillary violated the rules too many times.

I do not think the commentators saw the same debate that I saw last night. I think that Senator Clinton was very good. Senator Obama ( with some exceptions ) seemed to agree with everything that she said. It could have been from the fact that usually she was asked the question first, and then he responded to the same question. He chose to go last, maybe that was part of a strategy.

The commentators seem to have counted her out already and commented that she did not do what she needed to do. Remember that she is a Clinton and Clintons just do not roll over and die.

Susan
Phoenixville,PA

I think Obama won the debate and I think Hillary felt the same way at the end and that’s why she made that comment . It sounded like she was conceding and she wanted us to know that she would be ok. Obama looked “presidential” at times and (to me) stronger than her in character by not letting her comments get to him and end up bickering about it. I think she WILL be o.k. and i think she should leave gracefully like Edwards did, and not wait until she looses Texas and Ohio.

why should Barack be held to his agreement when McCain borrowed money for his campaign from a bank on the agreement that he would pay them back from public financing ? lol I think we’ll hear less of this from Mr. McCain .

Anderson,

I think the debate was excellent and the Democrats have two great candidates to choose from.

I personally support Barack Obama. I genuinly feel that he will do his best to bridge political lines to make positive changes for the American people.

I really appreciated Senator Obama’s comment about the President of the US taking a more active role in Foreign Relations. From my limited travels and from my observations, I think the US government and our President is viewed as arrogant and self serving. If we continue to demand that countries prove to us that they are worthy of a discussion with us, I don’t think we will have much of an opportunity to influence those countries in a positive manner.

I’m not a foreign relations wiz so I could be completely wrong. But if my neighbor told me that he didn’t like the way I was treating my children; and then followed up by demanding that I start treating them better before he will come to visit my home. I’d tell him to kiss where the sun don’t shine.

But, I’m not as mature as most world leaders.

Both of them were lucid and eloquent last night. It doesn’t seem like Hillary would have voted for the war if she had more information then and has said as much. It’s a close call but it seems like the debate was more hers. They each have some valid criticisms of eachother but I don’t like the way Obama juts his chin in the air like he’s above it all. It conveys arrogance. While they’re both good candidates, she is the one with more experience.

As always, the candidate that can speak calm, cool and collected- while still expressing authenticity and passion wins the debate. Once again, this goes to Barack Obama. Obama is the person for the job.

Looking past the rhetoric, I see a person who is well grounded with the issues concerning most Americans, well versed in the history and current state of affairs and fixed by faith in his fine ethics and morals. I believe Obama is adequately experienced in Washington DC to take up the Office of President while maintaining important common sense that many of us lose while being in any position for an extended period of time.

It is my firm belief, that a candidate who draws more attention toward the fundamentals of their decisions, instead of their pre-fixed ideals, will be more appropriately prepared to handle this executive position; knowing well clear that the influence of the president on policy is strong, yet still subject to the will of 500 or so Congressmen and women. While Clinton maintains a fine resume, Obama is presenting himself as the flexible and ideal candidate, prepared to deal with the problems of today and those problems (not yet known) of the future.

The best political team on the news said last night in their comments that Hillary was as always talking about her experience, scoring some points when she talked about difficult issues like health care and Cuba, that she was great but there was an ingredient missing, nothing more. Do they need to hear more? I would like to know if when they applied for working at CNN and now be considered the best political team on the news their resume stated “good at giving political opinions but don’t have any experience about it” and were hired!. Hard to believe.
This is a really hard decision for America to make, do not choose A President, choose THE President and that’s HILLARY!!!.

I think John King and Campbell Brown did a SUPER job on the debate! It was good to see some fresh faces moderating these debates.

Thank You John King for pointing out of these earmarks. So much for change from Obama and Clinton! They are all the same. It is the overall “how great thou art” attitude most American people can live without.

@ JoAnn in North Royalton, OH

I made a comment on this blog a few days ago that I willfully regret. There was a comment about stalking and I joined in on a “water cooler” comment. I didn’t bear witness to the television show about the comment but I would like to commend you for your thoughts because in retrospect they were right on. You took the high road.

While I can not and will not take responsibility for others thoughts or actions, I can for my own whether verbal or in writing. Maybe I am too serious about the matter based on my own experiences but joking about it in my situation didn’t free my soul from my crazy nut (dead now of natural causes). My comments on this blog only made me more mad at myself for making them. My comment was offensive, lacked better judgment and I apologize.

I thought the debate last night was very interesting. Not because either candidate pulled away with a “win” or because either one talked about new ideas or a new plan. I found it interesting because they are so similar. For the first time in a long time, I find the Democratic party is really unified behind a message. It almost is a toss-up with who the ultimate candidate will be, they both have such a similar message. The major differences with immigration, relations with foreign leaders and health care both end up with the same idea, just a different path to get there. Fascinating!

Hillary tried so hard to get the upper hand last night and she failed horribly. Her attack on Obama was like insulting Elvis. Obama was calm and cool which is what people like to see in a leader. At the end of the night I think no one was swayed on anything, which is the exact opposite of what Hillary needed to do. I know I’m bashing Hillary but she was bad. She was staring at Obama like a robot programed to kill him. In the end the best man of the night was John King.

The earmarks are public. Just google them for Obama and Clinton .

Hillary’s are in excess of 300 million. I’ve seen Obama’s so I know they are out easily accessible. I was surprised John King framed that question as though they are secret. They are not .

CNN clearly has some kind of interest in roadrailing Hillary. If it does not come out now it will in the future. I suggest CNN get off there OBAMA soap box and report the news the way it is, not the way they want it to be

Sadly to say, the woman Moderator was(clearly evident nine times) biased against Senator Clinton and favored Senator Obama. She cut responses from Sen. Clinton, disallowed the opportunity on key points for her to counter respond, alloted more time for Sen. Obama’s responses prior to interrupting etc. This is NOT acceptable in Debates and, in MY opinion, showed prejudice.

Anderson
I read these comments and was amazed at two in particularly, Tina and Monika, they apparently have not done any research on the candidates. I suggested that they pickup the book For Love of Politics: Bill and Hillary Clinton: The White House Years. Then maybe they can see what Hillary Clinton is truly like. Also what about the whitewater incident have they forgotten about what her roll was in that situation. Finally Jorge Ramos directed all of his questions to Hillary Clinton and if it wasn’t for the other mediator redirecting the questions to Senator Obma he would not had the opportunity to address the questions. Jorge dose not represent all of us and I do not understand why they says Clinton is big in the Latino community, for those of us who have a good education and understand the value of research they would vote for Hillary if she was the only candidate.

A very balanced debate with candidates holding their own. However I detect a major bias against Sen Clinton by the media which is very disappointing. Why are we not saying that Sen Obama has brought nothing new to the table? At this point the only new thing that either of them could bring to the table is a “hat” of magic tricks. Americans are not open minded in the least if they can’t see that Sen Clinton is being judged more harshly than her opponent. After all these years, women are still not being treated equally.

It’s very insulting to hear comments such as “Sen Obama LOOKS more presendential now than he did before?!”

How superficial are we?

Hillary failed at health care in great part because she did NOT include anyone else’s idea. Yes she is a fighter. But she rams things down people’s throats and if you don’t like it you go on her enemy list. Oh yeah that will work to get health care — NOT .

There is a REASON she had such high negatives coming into this race. She still has them .

I don’t see any difference when they discuss their plans. Hillary does not explain the HOW and neither does OBAMA. Hillary runs through her details but never explains HOW she will get this done .

This comming general election will be my first time voting and I do not vote party, but the man that I believe will better serve the country. I am sickened at what I see in the Demacratic party. All I hear is how these canidates are going to save the world and how they beat around the bush at the real problems. What is this about not making English the official language? I have now lived in Honduras for a year and a half. English is one of those major marks that make me an American and in case these canidates have not been tuned in to the rest of the world- people want to learn English!! How can a canidate say that they care about the country if they will not uphold one of the fundamentals that make us American.

Then there is the subjest of healthcare. I believe that American ought to make the choice to decide if they want healthcare or not. We ought to be able to make decisions for ourselves and our families. I do not want to have healthcare! Could someone please tell the canidates this. I do not want it because my faith is not in the doctors that have the belief that germs cause desease, it is in God Almighty and He most certainly more able to care for me than the government. I can guarantee Dr. Lorraine Day will not want it. Also, seeing what happens in a country with socialized medicine I know that all it will do is make us a bunch of begging spoiled children. In addition, let us take a look at Canada. Some Canadians told my family that 50% of their income goes to taxes.

It also concerned me when Obama made mention of our aid to Central America. I live in the most corrupt government in CA. Don’t send anymore unless we know for sure that it will not go into the pockets of the government officials. Here the rich get richer and the poor get poorer and we help them.

Tina people like you is the problem with america today let the gov’t pay for every thing. McCain can’t raise money so all the money given by vote so that they can have a say in what and where our america will go. Now, you feel because Bush trick you twice that me to kill hope and inspiration for every one else. Hope if you have kids you don’t kill there inspiration and hope to see a better world. What make you think that Obama, Clinton or McCain can fix the mess our america is in without all of us. This is were hope and inspiration in whom ever the next president will be comes in wake up people hope and inspiration is why we get up every day and work hard for us and others. I would hate to know a president is elected out being hopeful and inspirated to hepl this america.

thank you

OK, I’m just going to risk being politically incorrect here. I was extremely INSULTED by the question asked of the candidates regarding what would be the downside of a bilingual country. I have just one question…Besides English, what other language did you have in mind? I grew up in the 1950’s in the Midwest with immigrant grandparents from Europe. There were thousands upon thousands of German, Polish, Italian and Irish immigrants. They may have spoken their native language among themselves at home for ease of conversation, but the children were taught English. And my grandparents got jobs and spoke English. Never did I hear of any of these groups demand to be taught subjects in school in the languages of these groups. America was called the melting pot. They knew before they came here that the language was English. How self-centered for any group of immigrants to come here and want America to become a satellite country of their homeland. Only in America! I don’t think people immigrating to France would be having this conversation. Rule #1: If you come here to be an American, learn English… One used to be able to visit anywhere in the US and feel comfortable. Now, we are treated like foreigners in Miami if we don’t speak Spanish! How arrogant!

I had to laugh at the post debate analysis claiming that Hillary didn’t say anything new. How can any candidate say anything new when they are always asked the same questions. It would be refreshing to hear their views on abortion, housing, free trade, guns, same sex marriage, oil prices, etc.

Americans are so shallow all they really seem to want is a good actor as a President. If that is the only concern then Barack is your man. Then we turn around and complain that we (individuals at the work place) are not being treated fairly. What a bunch of baloney. May the best talker or dresser win the race.

Hillary made no major gains yesterday. The only uptick was her scripted ending remarks that seemed to me to be a tentative acknowlegment that her stock is falling. When it came to particulary controversial topics, such as the role of superdelegates, she said, “it will sort itself out.” She used that on a number of occasions, showing her lack of courage to come out and say what she really thinks. And the “xerox” comment was below the belt. Totally immature. Barack should have turned to her and said, “who did YOu get THAT line from?”

Ljnda i agree with you the only language i know is english. I began to think is there some other language american’s spoke that i didn’t know of asnd what is it? I TO WAS INSULTED BY THAT LINE OF QUESTION.

I’m so tired of hearing/seeing them try and build themselves up. They cherry pick one day and are irratic on another regarding issues. There’s no real elaboration on any of the issues. I can’t help but feel they are winging it. I also can’t help but feel as tho they’ve not sat down and really written any detailed thoughts and solutions.

I attended “Toastmasters” and the object was to get someone to do something for you even if they didnt know you by writing a speech. Get them to give …some sort of donation, project ex. So no i do not think that voting for someone with your emotions is the right way to think. Call me pragmatic. I vote on actual facts and if you lay out his 1.5 years against her 35 years you will see a definite difference in voting. Voting present 150 times is not the person I want in the presidential office. Shows indecisiveness. Make the right choice or make the mistake and own up to it that is what an adult does in life. I expect my president to do the same.

I don’t think last night’s debate made too many people jump ship into another candidate’s side. I’m not sure if it really helped undecideds (maybe CSS’s analytical team can look into that). What I did see is that each person showed themselves clearly for who they are.

I’ve been a long time admirer of Hillary. I have noticed that since she’s become a senator, she’s made some decisions that I was disappointed with (voting for the war and then never admitting she was wrong. Even Edwards admitted he was wrong). Not admitting the NAFTA was a big mistake. Isn’t that the behavior of the current president? Not being mature enough to admit when you’re wrong? There’s nothing wrong in learning from your mistakes. I think she’s overcompensating for the fact that she’s a woman and needs to prove how strong she is. I understand that impulse, but that is what a lot of people are having a hard time reconciling (the early Hillary who was strong but compassionate, and more down to earth versus this Hillary who is having to be so calculating go get what she wants). If she gets the nomination, I will vote for her because she’ll be a much better president than this current one or McCain (he’s appears to be a a war-monger who thinks fighting is our only way to solve problems and he admitted to not understanding finances. I wonder if he understands the law).

Barack was very calm, presidential and proved he does have understand the issues and understands the slight nuances between his policies and Hillary’s. Even when she attached him on copying Gov. Patrick’s words and said he had to use his own words, he didn’t bicker back and forth like she obviously was prepared to do. I wonder who died and gave her the authority to decide what words you can use to give speaches? Like someone said earlier, Gov. Patrick used ideas from someone else also. Big deal. She could have used her time better. He does seem to use good judgement and is ready to mend our international relations personally (not through go-betweens). As for lack of experience, look at all the so-called experience our current president has and look at where it has got us. He owned baseball teams, ran oil companies, was governor for 8 years, and he still managed to get this country into a mess! And what foreign experience did he have before becoming president? If he did have any, it certainly didn’t help his judgement on the Iraq war!!!

In the final analysis, I will vote for whomever is the Democratic candidate so that our country can start to heal!

No one won last night. HiIlary’s last comment about Xeroxing was below the belt and uncalled for.
I first voted in 1976. No matter how much the candidates say they are ready to lead on Day One, they are not. Hillary may have seen from the sidelines what her husband went through, but she was not president. Every president had a major shock when they finally sat in the chair. You could see it on their faces as time went on. They have all said in their campaigns that they would change Washington. None have succeeded. I’m not saying it can’t or won’t happen, but reality is that the juggernaut of DC isn’t going to change overnight, and anyone who believes it can be has their head in the sand or hasn’t been paying attention. I love my country. I love seeing the candidates duke it out. But pettiness has no place in these times.

Why did Hillary Clinton feel it necessary to recite her cv at one point?

She should just post that ish on monster.com!

I can’t believe that Hillary would accuse Obama of stealing or using another’s words and then she truns around and does the same thing last night in her closing statement and what makes it so bad is the fact that she used her husband’s and john Edwards words so tell the truth and shame the Devil

Robert Nerovich,
I don’t think that making english our national language really matters that much. I mean it is a fact that when people come here speaking a different language that by the 2nd generation down they speak english only and can speak none of their grandparents native language. So english isn’t going away anytime soon. We have far more serious problems to worry about than trying to get this passed.

And I agree with Joyce…how can the candidates say anything new when they are asked the same things over and over at every debate? That makes me laugh when the pundits say stuff like she said nothing new. Well if they want something new ask different questions!

Cynthia, Covington, Ga.

Hillary was still showing arrogance last night, when she made the snide, low class and ill advised remark, about “it’s change you can xerox.” That was totally uncalled for, and another cheap shot at Barack. She could never measure up to be the classy person that Senator Barack Obama is, and she almost admitted that at the end of the debate, by saying what an honor and pleasure it was to share the stage with him.

So there’s no doubt whatsoever, that Barack by far, won last nights debate, hands down. He scored on several fronts, without errors of any kind. Clinton leaned more on the side of caution last night, trying very hard to keep her sinking ship afloat, so to speak. And I have to congratulate the Teamsters organization for fully supporting and endorsing Senator Barack Obama for President.

Like most of America, they know a winner and true leader when they see one, and thus the Obama Locomotive is rolling full steam ahead! Go Obama!!

I love how everyone criticizes the Clinton years you know because we had a balanced budget and well we were at peace and heck the economy was in above average condition. Wow so much to cry about. For all the haters stop all this dramatic and negative publicity. Clearly Obama has little accomplishment to fall back on.

<>

I do not believe this comment is what I said Virginia. Where did you get this idea that I said that anywhere in these posts?

<>

Robert Nerovich- hmm…I am Canadian and 50% of my income doesn’t go to taxes….

I also think it is funny that people are insulted by the idea of having to learn more languages. Why not be able to communicate with people of other languages, cultures? Why not learn another language….there is actually a world outside of the United States….
Even if you disagree with making your country officially bilingual, I don’t get why you would be so against learning to speak another language. Obviously people who do not speak english and are new immigrants to the country (or don’t speak it for some other reason) must be encouraged to speak english, but what is so bad about english speaking students or other citizens knowing how to speak a language besides english?

I realize that last night’s debate won’t change the minds of many people, but there are a few things I want to point out.

Clinton’s policy positions have been very clearly defined and she can articulate her position on various subjects without hesitation. Obama’s positions have nearly duplicated those of Clinton’s, with only a few exceptions.

On Healthcare, he has not indicated who or how the hospital/medical care for the 15 million adults would be subsidized. Will those who choose not to buy healthcare become the burden of the taxpayers?

On Earmarks, the figures John King used are those used for National Programs (such as Cancer research programs) and include other members of Congress. Individual or solo earmarks are as follows: Obama $3,334520 Clinton $98,000 (These statistics can be found at http://www.taxpayer.net) It would be more interesting to know what solo programs Obama needs to have earmarks for — since he believes in transparency in government.

Overall, I disagreed with your panel of “experts”, but the one I found most outrageous was the one who brought up “body language”. While Clinton appeared calm and confident, she continually watched Obama while he was speaking. Yet Obama appeared bored, almost arrogant, and spent more time making notes while Clinton spoke.

My question to your “experts”, have they ever heard Obama clearly express a new idea or solution during any one of the debates? I do recall Clinton asking Obama to be her co-sponsor on a bill requiring Bush to get the approval of Congress before making any long-term commitments to the Iraqi governmennt. Clinton intoduced the bill (S 2426 IS) on 12/6/07, and Obama didn’t sign on as a co-sponsor until 1/22/08. I wonder what took him so long, but where’s the media’s responsibility in following up on things like this?

Anderson Cooper 360, “keeping them honest.” Who is keeping him and CNN honest? CNN’s pro Hillary banter is obvious.

Your claims that you are a champion of truth and justice are a bit suspect. After last nights Obama-Clinton debate, Anderson Cooper and guests of CNN, the “C”linton “N”ews “N”etwork, fell all over themselves to highlight Hillary’s closing remarks as the best thing since Shakespeare. It was nothing special.

Sure, she bore her cross, Bill. At face value, why would we want a woman in an abusive, dysfunctional relationship to be our next president. What kind of good judgment could she possess with her toxic mentality. The country should sell the Clinton carbon credits for the levels of toxicity coming from their persona.

Also, CNN always gives Hillary top billing. It is never the Obama-Clinton debate. It is always the other way around. Why do they feature her picture always first. Why did they have Donna Brazil on the post debate panel and describe her as a super delegate but not as a Clinton supporter, which she is. In Donna defense, although she tries to paint a rosy picture on Hillary’s demise, she did speak the truth about Obama.

Hillary Clinton is finished and good riddens. Although I will continue to pray for her conversion of heart.

Mark
Philadelphia, PA

I was disappointed there were no questions regarding climate change and what they would do to reduce GHG emissions.
I missed the first 10 minutes but I am assuming it wasn’t even mentioned (?).

It was refreshing to watch two candidates vying for the same position to act as human beings,instead of the garbage that the GOP has exhibited over the past eight years. If no one has noticed,the American eletorate is fed up with the mudslinging politics,while the prospective candidates dodge questions and continue to talk alot and say nothing. The GOP has met it’s downfall………debating of the issues is all that we will stand.

please give me a break no one is insulted by learning a second language but enlish is america’s first language and nothing will change that.

This is obama’s race to lose. I dont see him getting too far off message. No one can be ready to be pres. besides the job is to be a leader and direct the direction of the country. sen clinton has already screwed up her campaigns money. Thats not a good start. Obama is the best choice to nudge congress in a direction. The republicans dont like sen Clinton at all. This country does NOT need four more years of gridlock.

Hillary’s closing point was not only XEROXED but it was her worst moment in the debate! How can the MSM state otherwise?

DID HILLARY NOT AUTHORIZE THIS WAR? DID HILLARY NOT HELP BUSH WAGE THIS WAR? DID HILLARY NOT ENDORSE THIS WAR?

How then does HRC turn around and get “all pseudo emotional” when she sees the devastating consequences of her poor and bad decisions? Is this the kind of “leadership” we can expect from a Hillary Presidency? Is this the years of “experience” HRC has to offer? When will HRC apologize to the brave men and women in uniform and take responsibility for her actions?

You not only have to be READY on day one, you have to be RIGHT on day one!

Barack Obama won yesterday’s debate, hands down!

The choice is clear - Obama 08.

YES WE CAN!

I STILL THINK HILLARY CLINTON WOULD MAKE THE BEST PRESIDENT. OBAMA IS JUST DANCING AROUND ON ISSUES. HE IS SO FULL OF CRAP. HOW WOULD YOU LIKE TO PAY A FEE FOR NOT HAVING INSURANCE ON YOUR CHILDREN, THAT YOU CAN’T AFFORD IN THE FIRST PLACE. AND HE IS JUST SAYING ,YES ,AND AGREEING WITH ALL THAT HILLARY SAYS. HE NEVER HAS ANY NEW IDEAS OF HIS OWN. HE DOESN’T HAVE EXPERIENCE ,AND WE DON’T HAVE TIME FOR HIM TO LEARN.

Tina,
I agree with you. I think people need to vote for a candidate by looking at the facts. What they have done and said through out the years. Not at how they make you feel or how they look. Anyone can make you feel good but it doesn’t mean that is right for you!

I hope that people are actually using their heads when voting. The last thing we need is a feel good person who can’t make up their minds or do anything with out someone else’s help

On the earmark thing…why aren’t both Hillary and Obama being questioned about how much they have asked for? I hear Hillary has gotten over 290 million and Obama almost 100 million while John McCain has never gotten any!! Why isn’t that being brought out? And why aren’t they asked will they stop getting them?

Cynthia, Covington, Ga.

I thought the debat was exelent. I do wish your commentators would have allowed the health care debate to continue betwen the two of them. I was begining to learn the difference between them and the you guys stoped it. As for your spin after, What did Hillary do to make you folks HATE her so much. I’m sure your aware it shows. My gut say’s that if you want to be asked back as an expert on CNN you better not say anthing bad about BO and spin anthing Hillary says in a negitive fashion. What happen to fair commentary. Anderson I new when it was so. Please stop tring to drive this election. The world is not stupid and they can see the difference..

BS,MS,PHD. 3 degrees of SOSDD. I’m 59 years old. Heard it all enough times to retch my guts out so I couldnt bring myself to watch it. To say I’m disgusted with the process, the canidates and the Republican and Democratic Parties is an vast understatement. I did something exciting, watched reruns and would rather watch grass grow. It will be hard for anyone to follow the current clown in office and I have better things to do with my time.

Mr. Anderson Cooper and CNN, last Thursday’s debates has shown, we require more information about these candidates i.e. Mr. Obama’s 91 million of pork-barrel-spending, infrastructure plans (highway in Texas), real help for military personnel and vision a their plans for the country. Let’s talk about these points and please excuse my writing.

1. America calls it for pork-barrel-spending, Mr. Obama has 91 million on the record and Ms. Clinton has about 300 million, what projects, infrastructure costs and/or programs explained. (in writing)
2. Texas, the highway from Canada to Mexico, this was a yes or no question, candidates talked about infrastructure, please explained.
3. Military, both candidates would mention the military and thanking them for their service/patriotism. Mr. Anderson lets reward service and patriotism, the first $250,000.00 dollars made by a veteran, is all tax-free. Thank you, in America should be done in cash. (Canada as well)
4. Canada and America needs to get on the same page regarding, water, air, pollution, gas, oil, the border, north including Alaska, immigration and the military etc. please don’t take another 10 years.
5. Immigration and border states, cards are a starting point, bank cards, credit cards, Social Security cards, Hospital insurance cards should all show a photograph in some other form/means of security within the cards, please note this should be law.(America, Canada, Mexico)
6. Vision/”I have a dream”, Martin Luther King/I have an idea and I have a goal for the future. They all fall in the place somewhere in these candidates speeches but my question is specific, the 4 year, 8 year, 12 year and 16 year etc. plans or the future. What are your foundation plans in the 4th and 8th years, that allows you to build for the 12th, 16th years and further. Clinton and Obama must now think in terms of the next generations ahead, we must have long term solutions, small steps, small gains is the way, solutions will not come in 4 years time but we move forward, heads in the air, eyes forward, thinking forward seven generations ahead making it work.

Bobby
Canada

At this point in the process, it’s clear both candidates hold the same position on the issues, and a very slight variance on how to go about tackling the issues. Thats said, it comes down to who is going to be able to bring the Democrats and Republicans together to get the work done. Who will truely be able to reach across party lines? Clinton talks about taking the fight to the Republicans, and believe me, the Republicans want the fight! Nothing would get done and both would accuse the other of failing to compromise. Isn’t that the way things are now? Obama is the answer! You have to look no further than campaign support he’s received from all races, genders, rich, poor, democrat, republican, independent. Thats bringing people together! Thats leadership!

Anderson,
In the issue of “LIFTED” passages. I believe that there is a clear DIFFERENCE between taking someone elses concepts and using your own words - (speaking off the cuff as Hillary did Thursday in the Debate) AND a writen, scripted and printed speach USING ENTIRE PASSAGES VERBATUM and even placing emphasis the exact same words as the person you took them from.
Obama knows that his “transgression” is clear and that he will go down in flames just like Joe Biden did a few years ago. That is why he had to deflect the criticism away from him and back on Hillary. She was speaking from the heart Thursday night, unscripted. His speaches (and his speachwriters) clearly used exact passsages. Just becasue she said that “America would be fine” doesn’t mean that she plagerised. Would she be plagerising (from George W. Bush) if she had said “God Bless America”? NO WAY!
His speach however was a writen document, just like any newspiece, article, or anything that anyone would sign their OWN name to.
Journalists should be outraged by this! And Mr. Obama should be ashamed of this attmept to bamboozal the nation. I do not want my children to grow up under the type of “leader” who would think that this was an okay thing to do. IT IS NOT!
And by the way - God bless America!!!

I am voting for Hillary Clinton. She has the experience, knows the job, is a fighter, she has a realistic perspective on handling issues and how to use politically correct negotiations. The world is in a state of CRISIS and I don’t want someone in office with training wheels on. I don’t want someone that is going in with “hands on learning as you go”. I want someone that will come in and do the job immediately. The world cannot take a chance on allowing someone to come in inexperienced and not have a realistic view on handling issues and getting issues resolved. Hillary knows the job, can do the job and will bring the economic, healthcare issue, war issues to the front table. She is a Person of her Word and she goes in with a realistic AGENDA. I have full confidence that she will make a positive difference!!!! I’m not concerned with FEELING GOOD WITH INSPIRATIONAL SPEECHES. If I WANT A FEEL GOOD SERMAN, I’LL GO TO CHURCH AND LISTEN TO MY PASTOR.

John King was the real star moderater of the debate last night. He asked the tough questions of BOTH candidates and did not let them off the hook until they answered it. I have listened to John King for many years. I appreciate his non biased approach in his reporting. As always a job well done by JK

This election is very important and it is up to every individual to listen to the candidates and make an informed decision about who they want for our next President. The press will vote and so will we.

Susan
Phoenixville,PA

I think Senator Clinton proved herself last night. I was a little shocked that CNN commentators heckled her over not bringing anything “new” to the table. What should we expect after close to twenty debates? The “pop psychology” that everyone is infatuated with in Obama is overplayed. One CNN commentator stated that Clinton just looked like a resume last night and could not even look Obama in the face. Aren’t we suppose to review someone’s resume when they are applying for a job? Senator Clinton is essentially interviewing for a job with the American people.” In the end, I enjoyed John King and Anderson Cooper for not wearing their politics on their sleeves and I love Cambell Brown. I think Senator Clinton did an excellent job.

Two things, Obama says he voted “No” for the Iraq war but what I am trying to find out is what he did after his vote? Did he vote “no” and then become silent? I don’t remember any statements being made by him after that vote and before the Presidential bid. Please someone answer this. Second, what did CNN find about the earmark question and the $91,000.00 for Obama. Last nights debate had a question which was answered by Obama but not followed up by CNN.

alys—-

I do not mind people who speak different languages. I am learning Spanish however do not ram it down my throat that I have to put signs up everywhere in Spanish at as an example at the pool when the immigrants should learn English. This is additional expense that I am being caused by paying for the signs. or should I say additional monies included in my assessments for my home.

How many of you actually LISTENED to the debate? People want answers, yet they don’t listen!

that just to show you that mccain will do nothink for the people cindy

I’m not comfortable with how Hillary constantly emphasizes priority on insuring children first and foremost. I’m reminded of the demo on use of the oxygen masks on airplanes. Parents are to secure your masks first, then secure your childs. Without a healty sound parent(s) the integrity of the family infrastructure can begin to deteriorate.

First of all, I would like to point out that I did not leave the earlier comment at 12:29.

Second, I would like to respond to some of the comments that were made re. a second language.

I am from Germany and have lived in the States for 20 years. When I went to school, English was mandatory and French was voluntary from Middle School on up. Back then, there were not many foreigners in Germany, mainly Italians and later Turks. Neither of them demanded that the Germans learn their language.

The reason why English is mandatory in school is basically because it’s an international language spoken in most countries around the world. I think most or all other European countries require English as second language, so it facilitates communications among people of any country.

French was taught because France is a neighbor of Germany. Besides that, French is only spoken in Northern Africa and some tropical islands which either are or were French occupied territories or colonies.

Spanish is also fairly widespread. It is spoken in Spain, Mexico, and several South American countries.

Personally, I don’t see anything wrong with speaking foreign languages. I know when I go on vacation to a foreign country, I want to be able to communicate with the locals, and I don’t expect the whole world to speak German.

I think it’s wrong for people to immigrate to a foreign country (let’s say the U.S.) and refuse to learn the language. I think it’s wrong of the U.S. government to accommodate such people by offering services in their language. However, this does not mean that Americans shouldn’t at least try to learn one foreign language. Which language should be up to the individual. But with Mexico being a neighbor to the south and many Americans going there on vacation, learning Spanish doesn’t seem like such a bad choice.

Anderson- Why do you let CNN go ahead with its obvious pro-Obama reporting. I would like to see the coverage at least be fair!

It was totally obvious that Hillary won the debate. Obama did nothing more than repeat everything she said. The CNN moderators kept trying to get Hillary to say something negative about Obama, and when she did, they slam her.

I thought the Xerox line was funny. Doesnt anyone have a sense of humor?! I debated in highschool on the national circuit, and debates are supposed to be fun. Your supposed to throw a few zingers. It’s the art of the game. When did everyone become so serious?

But I was shocked when the debate ended. CNN pundits came on saying that Barak looked “presidential”?!?! He did nothing more than stutter and follow Hillary’s lead on everything.

And then, when Hillary makes a brillant ending, CNN pundits bill it as a resignation speech!!! What is wrong with your network? I’m a journalist, too, and any level-headed person can see right through this bias.

It’s the masses who can’t, and your taking advantage of them.

Anderson, I think last night we seen the ticket that will beat Mcain….Obama/Clinton 08………..Clinton/Obama 08.I really think after March 4th they need to take their gloves off and shake hands and kick some butt in November……..

Ann Marie-

In response to your first question…funny thing is, Obama wasn’t even IN the senate to vote for the war. So of course he voted no, anyone who wasn’t there could say they voted no. He may have been against the war–but he was never there and had to vote yes or no. So I get really annoyed when he says he’s the only candidate who voted against the war.

Virgina,
No that just shows that McCain is not frivolous with money that is not his. If Hillary and Obama have done such great things with this earmark money then why won’t they talk about it or disclose what it went for? If it helped so many people they’d be proud to tell it. My bet is it was nothing more than helping people who helped them make it to the top. That is what they usually do with it!

Cynthia, Covington, Ga.

While nothing much new was said last night, I’m glad for this and future debates. People need to see both candidates *together* to make a good comparison.

Personally, Sen Obama and all the hype surrounding him scares me. While he may *someday* gain my trust, I don’t feel he’s done enough or experienced enough (in politics) to be the leader of our great country. He’s slick and polished and has that Rock Star image.. but I have to agree when people say he’s “all talk”. I’m afraid… especially given the current administration… to put my trust in anyone who doesn’t have a proven *strong* track record.

Sen Clinton may not appear to be as exciting or enchanting as her opponent but at least she has a concrete political record. I feel the old “don’t judge a book by its cover” is appropriate here.

People need to look beyond Sen Obama’s inspirational delivery and get to the meat of what he says. Sure, we all have hopes and dreams for these United States of America, but unfortunately, I fail to see how he’s more qualified than me to actually put his words into action. On the flip-side, there’s no doubting Sen Clinton’s experience and dedication to public service.

In my opinion, this election is just way too important to vote for mere hope. This election is way too important to vote for appearances. This election is way too important to vote for inexperience. I hope the American public stops being mesmerized by speeches and starts doing their homework before its too late!

For demographic purposes… I’m a 46 year old, divorced mother of 3 teens living in the shadow of NYC.

~Donna Polles
New Milford, NJ

It is most apparent that while Obama is attractive because he appeals to the hopelessness that many are feeling, we must not be lulled into getting caught up in his rhetoric. I support Clinton because there is substance and the ‘how’ behind her ideas and I do not need to be motivated nor inspired—I need to hear and process viable solutions/alternatives/options. I am not getting this from Obama whose optics and speeches smack of privilege, idealism, borrowed concepts and narrowmindedness. I can go to church to hear a stirring ‘Word’ I truly don’t need to hear that from Attorney, Senator, Reverend Obama! Step into the present—-folk are losing homes, jobs, savings etc and the basics of life rigt here at home—what are you going to do? Should Obama win the nomination and the presidency he would be wise to consider another very inspiring, yet ineffective democrat—Jimmy Carter who just could not make the vision become reality. True enough, Clinton chose to vote on Iraq based on what was presented but move on Obama—so did many others based on lies our President and others shared. Please tell us what exactly you are going to do when you can’t use the Iraq and Bill Clinton claim/excuses once you arrive in the Whitehouse. Can you make the tough decisions? Do you know how to play the ‘big P and little p politics—I mean really . Do you know how to stand on your principles and not be the puppet, allowing those who are backing you to advance their agendas through you??? Do you really know what folk are going to throw at you once you get the nomination and possibly win the election? The race to the Whitehouse is not over and those of us who are closely watching this chess game unfold would be wise to use our heads to decide what and who is best for this country. The historical, gender, racial, nor any other implication should NOT impact this most important decision. THINK!

I liked Clinton’s ending, but a lot of the bickering could have been done without…other than that its a lot of “we agree on a lot of stuff” - I’d just like to hear one answer that goes: “Yes, I’d go to Cuba and talk.” THE END!

Why should we care about plagiarism?

First, the issue of plagiarism, one of the first and most important rules a student learns in academia, is the most important rule in academia. A rule of credibility and of honest attribution for any citation in the public’s domain, representing the integrity and moral compass of any student, any person, or written scholarly works, to which is the essence of democracy.

Neglecting and rationalizing this fundamental issue is a very flawed stance to take. The President of the United States is the embodiment of the ideals which represents every document, official statement made, and exists from this point forward, a part of the public record. A public record of historical and moral reflection made against all Americans; a public record, for all to inspect, all to debate, and ultimately, for all to criticize.

The United States of America should expect no less from its president than it does of its students, and above all, we should expect and preserve honesty in “words,” especially when spoken by a future president or nominee for president. Words not only represent ideals of the human condition and how we view ourselves, but also express the integrity or dishonesty of humanity.

The issues must not be overlooked or tread-upon, even the most innocently rationalized impropriety shall beg the question, of a candidate’s integrity, posture, and readiness to lead this country.

I think the issue is a serious one, no matter who is involved. It is the principle of credibility not of concensus.

TC Jones

SantiagoDeChile: I couldn’t agree with your words more.
Let me add that I was also shocked at the pundits analysis. But I have come to expect that and usually turn the channel by that time.

I also hear talk today that she should step down. Can you imagine, on the verge of winning and she should step down? Obama supporters are so scared Hillary is going to win, they are starting to make insane statements…just like the pundits.

Al and Anderson,

I am a medical professional and face insurance issues everyday. Something needs to be done in healthcare. One day, one of us will go to the hospital and find out that medical bills and care are big issues facing America today. Money, should not be the only thing affecting care in our society. (CARING comes first, therefore Healthcare is important)

For instance, if I was to go to a specialist, I would go to the one who is experienced and has come across issues that I face. (not to the one who recently came out of Med school without a residency)

Yes, Obama can raise money, and make speeches….but who can fight million dollar drug and insurance companies. I think Hillary is a strong women, and with the HELP of other republicans and Democrats..she can get this healthcare issue resolved.

Mr. McCain can now question Mr. Obama’s promise to change Washington by working across party lines. Mr. Obama hasn’t worked across party lines since coming to town. Was he a member of the “Gang of 14″ that tried to find common ground between the parties on judicial nominations? Was Mr. Obama part of the bipartisan leadership that tackled other thorny issues like energy, immigration or terrorist surveillance legislation? No. Mr. Obama has been one of the most dependably partisan votes in the Senate.

Mrs. Clinton can do much more to draw attention to Mr. Obama’s lack of achievements. She can agree with Mr. Obama’s statement Tuesday night that change is difficult to achieve on health care, energy, poverty, schools and immigration — and then question his failure to provide any leadership on these or other major issues since his arrival in the Senate. His failure to act, advocate or lead on what he now claims are his priorities may be her last chance to make a winning argument.

It’s in every blogs and in every political conversation, CNN is bias and anti Clinton. You may choose not to show this message but the word it’s getting around!

I believe that Hillary is sincere in her comments and also am wondering why CNN and alot of the media are biased against her. It seems that each time I turn on CNN they always have negative comments about her having nothing new to day.

What new info does Barack have? I too believe he has no substance. If I am wrong and the voters elect him I guess we will all find out if there is anything more there. And Michelle does him more harm than good. Maybe she should take a hint from Bill Clinton and just stick to promoting her spouse. That’s all.

Did anyone aside from me catch one the conservative commentators comment about Hillary, and why on earth did the other commentators let the statement go unchallenged? Essentially she (I did not recognize the commentator) stated that Hillary would nationalize half of our industries. This was in context to health care but the commentator did not qualify her statement. In either case this is a preposterous statement and should not have gone unchallenged. It is nefarious statements like this from the media and lack of challenge that denigrates intelligent consideration and conversation of politics. I expect such commentary go unchallenged on FOX but not on CNN.

In general the political commentators are not worth a cent aside from possibly Gergen. And anyone who believes that Bay Buchanann is a champion of family values is mistaken. The only family value she stands for is the value of money.

Carla Barnes
Bellevue, WA

What did I think?

ZZZZZzzzzzzz. Same old blabber. We have heard it for so long now I feel like I am watching reruns. But since you asked…

She seems like an over-zealous politician desperately vying for the novelty of having the First husband at her side. She is better at making actual points though.

He seems like a fake that is in WAY over his head. If it doesn’t work out for Obama, he would be a great televangelist or cult leader. Really, he’s THAT smooth.

Yet again, you all MISS the point of a Presidential election. Put your “school days banter” aside for JUST a few minutes and ponder this. When was the last time a presidential candidate won, got into office, and put all their campaign promises into effect? NEVER! Why? Because it takes the House and Senate to agree on these “policies” and put them into a bill that can then be signed. FORGET the health care and education give-aways and look to the real job of the President. The person is going to be “responsible” for taking on the global issues; representing our national intrests abroad and here; while at the same time dealing with all the Bush melt downs here and around the world; and restore our economy. You can all roll the dice for Obama if that helps you sleep at night, but I would rather have a president that has already faced all of this, dealt with all of it, and
achieved some of it. Obama has the talent to “inspire”, but on the job training is NOT one of the prerequisites for the President. The media’s “love affair” with Obama is at the peril of this nation’s best interest.

Backing Obama has clearly become the “hip” thing to do. Like SantiagodeChile said….even CNN and all other media outlets seem to be so pro-Obama.

yet again..Iam floored when I hear the so-call “best political team” refer to Obama as a great orator, as “doing well, as “making good points”, etc…YOU GUYS are NUTS!!!!!!!!!!!!
To me he sounds like a bumbling fool….(Much like George Bush when he doesnt have a teleprompter or pre written speech to read).
This man can’t even DEBATE….He cant think on his feet!!!.And you guys have pumped him as PRESIDENTIAL material………What has he promised the folks in the media, especially you CNN folks, to help him become president????

Totally disgusted with the pro Obama anti Hillary attitude on CNN. Campbell was very transparent who she is siding with (Obama), which is very unprofessional. Jeffery Toobin was my hero until he became so bias.

Hillary definitely won the debate. She is the one with the most experience. And it is experience that is going to get the job done, not inspiration speeches and training wheeled bikes that other experts (mostly ex Pres Clinton advisor’s which in a way crack me up for all those Clinton haters out there, because Obama is using all HIS old advisor’s… go figure) are going to advise him on.

At least Hillary KNOWS her stuff, can answer questions easily and readily because her responses are not all coming from memorized lines off of prepared speeches.

Might be a nice CHANGE if America actually voted for someone who CAN think for themselves and make decisions on knowledge from past mistakes rather than have to rely on train and learn as we go kind of person who is taking advice from others who think they know best. Sure Obama got lucky on the Iraq decision, tell THAT to the many people of Ill, whom have suffered because of his lack of decisiveness and inability or willingness to act promptly on key issues. (eh hem the 150+ present votes)

Hopefully the US people can stand up for themselves rather than be steered by the US media, and chose the ONE Candidate that WILL actually do something for your foreign relations as well as be able to get something done on the ground at home. And that certainly will NOT be a man who has to find his way around for the first 4 years.

I am a Hillary supporter but since Obama has been winning a lot of contests lately, I figured this debate might show me what people in all those states must’ve seen. But after this debate, I still remain a Hillary supporter! I find Obama extremely arrogant and not trustworthy. He always has a really hard time explaining what he will do and HOW he will bring about “change”.
People need to realise that this isn’t the SuperBowl. Rooting for the underdog is great and exciting and we loved it when the Giants beat the Patriots. But we cant keep screaming for Obama just bcause his words excite us.
As for the plagiarism issue, I think it is stupid. I dont think the Clinton Campaign should’ve made a big deal about it especially if the words were of his closest friend, though maybe Obama should’ve mentioned his friend and could’ve avoided the whole mess. but he is a passionate speaker and could’ve forgotten. As for people saying that Clinton stole Edwards words, I think thats ridiculous too. Just because she said that I hope Americans will be fine at the end of the day doesnt make her a copycat! I think all the candidates are sincere enough in their purpose and they all want Americans to be okay.
Go Hillary!

I don’t get all the pro-Obama one-sidedness, either, and I think CNN is as guilty as all the networks in this regard. When there is a panel of people talking on the shows (Larry King’s show last week included), everyone is so anti-Hillary. I don’t get it. People are just now starting to question Senator Obama, a little bit, to look beyond the rock-star like persona, and inspiring speeches, and see what he has accomplished. I hope people are starting to think about the importance of this job, and what’s at stake.

I understand that it has been so dark in America for so many Bush years, that we need to be inspired, but we need more than that. All I heard last night was Senator Obama repeating what Hillary was saying. A couple weeks ago when he was speaking about his economic plan, it was pretty much cut-and-paste what Hillary has said for months, and he was reading it off a teleprompter. Hillary knows her stuff, and doesn’t need teleprompters or writers to help her talk about it.

I was surprised that Campbell Brown was assigned this important debate. John King should have done it, in my opinion. I felt Brown was over her head sometimes (and did cut of Senator Clinton a couple times). She’s a good reporter, but John King

It is amazing to me that Senator Obama can continually get by with absolutely no specifics on how to deliver on anything. Change is a great concept, but lets stop the BS and get to reality. Why doesn’t the press, INCLUDING CNN, ever address this? Apparently it is easier to go light on someone without much of a track record on anything of real substance. Shame on you CNN.

If Clinton fails to win the democratic nomination, McCain will certainly get my vote. So much for Obama carrying every independent voter!

i just wish that all the reporters would stop saying that hillary clinton got a standing ovation when in fact the people were just clapping and standing up because the debate was over!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Why not have Candy Crowley moderate last night? She is living and breathing this campaign. She is so smart and sharp, really one of the best on t.v.

I saw the debate last night, I thought both Senator Clinton and Senator Obama where excellent! They are both great democrats! This is why I am asking for help to stop this division with in the democratic party. Please fellow democrats… HELP ME!! Contact the DNC and local Demoractic elected people and demand Senator Clinton and Senator Obama run on the same ticket! United at last! This would be one of the most successful tickets in American History!

People please spread the word. ….
Clinton/Obama 2008!

“Experience change in 2008!”

Each candidate held their ground effectively in terms of style and substance, but more so for O’Bama. The American people, I believe, are beginning to see Senator Clinton’s substance as a heavily diluted, washed-up derivative of former President Clinton’s tenure in the Oval Office. O’Bama promises change and his ability to effect that change was quite evident in his performance last night.

I am constantly surprised by fellow Democrats who say that they will vote for McCain if Hillary doesn’t win the nomination. It is clear that despite how loudly they scream that they are voting for Hillary because of her experience and the issues, that is just a lot of hot air.

McCain and Hillary are on opposite sides of almost any issue. How can any Democrat who cares about health care, Iraq, the economy or the environment vote for McCain???

How about appointing judges or women’s rights are these issues also insignificant??

I would not put much weight on those people who call or write in describing themselves as LIFELONG Democrats who would consider changing parties because Hillary might not win the nomination. Any person who votes according to their beliefs on the issues and not on race or gender has a very easy choice on who to vote for.

erick-duval moore….no, after they all sat down Campbell Brown THEN thanked everyone and then they applauded again…at the end.

Wishing, doesn’t make it so….

I thought Hillary did a fantastic job. I heard many times last night that Obama was “presidential” while Hillary was only so-so. It seems to me that the press has already decided who they want the nominee to be.

I am a Canadian and as my husband and I were watching the debate tonight as well as the debate in California, we truly understand why George W. Bush was elected twice as the President of U.S.–clearly the American voters often do not vote the best candidate. Rather they favour candidates who is most popular or likeable and who is able to give the kind of rhetoric they like to hear. It is most disappointing to us that the American voters seem to vote for a candidate for all the wrong reasons: they vote based on negative ad, be it true or untrue; they vote based on hype, not on facts; they vote based on popularity; regardless if the candidate has the credentials or otherwise; they vote based on media biases, without assessing the candidate for themselves. The American voters are kind of shallow, I must say.

Democracy does not work unless voters are more mature and educated and the media are not biase in their reporting but simply there to present the facts. It is utterly clear to any fair-minded person that Hillary Clinton won both the debates in California and Texas, and that she has the intellect, the passion, the commitment, and most of all, the experience to be a better President for the country. Yet, the commentators all seem to twist the facts to play down her performance.

It is also quite amazing to me how mean-spirited people can be in their comments about her. This is a woman who has devoted a great part of her adult life towards improving the lives of the people of America, particularly the poorer segment of the society. If you were truly a fair-minded person, you can see she is an individual who genuinely loves public life and who genuinely wants the opportunity to fix a country that George W. Bush has done so much damage in the last 8 years. As a woman, I can relate to her moments of emotion. It is clearly not fake. Besides, she is saying and feeling those emotions in response to questions asked of her. She could not have pre-plan those words and could not have anticipated what she will be asked. Yet she is accused of everything under the sun. I find those people and particularly the media who throw those unjust accusations totally irresponsible. You do not have to vote for her but to deride her is truly sad.

The African American community have all but abandon the Clintons. They are obviously voting on racial grounds. Yet there are no reporting to highlight that. I have nothing against Obama. He is a likeable person, but he is definitely not ready for the Presidency. You see moments of his inexperience, particularly when he speaks on policy issues without preparation. If you take out the oratorial skills from Barack Obama, I am not sure how he has proven himself to be qualified for and is deserving of the Presidency. George W. Bush said some of the very thing that makes people crazy about Obama-uniter not divider, working across the ailse, not from the Washington establishment, etc. etc. Everyone knows what happens when he assumes office.

You know, if the Americans cannot appreciate Bill and Hillary Clinton and what they both have done and will do for their country, I am certain the Canadians would love to have them run our country. All that is left to be said is that there are consequences to how you vote. You voted for George W. Bush and see what you, and unfortunately, the rest of the world as well, got. If Obama gets the nomination and win the Presidency, I hope you will not have to live to regret your vote. I hope the rest of the world will not have to bear the pain of your vote.

Clinton made Obama look quite junior during the debate. She has a much stronger command of the issues. When put side by side, it was clear that she is the candidate who is ready to be president, not Obama.

How, then, was the debate not a victory for Clinton? The media should acknowledge the obvious.

If Hillary is so experienced then why can’t she even run her own campaign?? Her inability to use her money wisely and hire competent people should give us a glimpse of how she would run the country. It is easy to talk about experience and ability but both her campaigns in New York were also run incompetently.

If you look at her record up until now, we see that she has consistently hired people because of their loyalty to her instead of their ability to get the job done. Hence we find her in the position she is in now.

Again, it is not enough to have good ideas, you must be able to execute them.

To those who continue to be uninformed as to where the candidates stand on the issues, INFORM YOURSELVES! If you wish to read about their plans- GO TO THEIR WEB SITES!

It is honestly ridiculous to continue saying Obama has no ideas. Inform yourself, please.

Okay let’s try to get this posted AGAIN.

Yet again, you all MISS the point of a Presidential election. Put your “school days banter” aside for JUST a few minutes and ponder this. When was the last time a presidential candidate won, got into office, and put all their campaign promises into effect? NEVER! Why? Because it takes the House and Senate to agree on these “policies” and put them into a bill that can then be signed. FORGET the health care and education give-aways and look to the real job of the President. The person is going to be “responsible” for taking on the global issues; representing our national intrests abroad and here; while at the same time dealing with all the Bush melt downs here and around the world; and restore our economy. You can all roll the dice for Obama if that helps you sleep at night, but I would rather have a president that has already faced all of this, dealt with all of it, and achieved some of it.

Obama has the talent to “inspire”, but on the job training is NOT one of the prerequisites for the President. The media’s “love affair” with Obama is at the peril of this nation’s best interest.

DVW — I agree! Go to their websites and find where Hillary’s policies were express in May 2007 and Barack’s policies (we all agree there is very little difference, right?) were expressed in August 2007.

Oh, wait you may have to go to Hillary’s website for that information, I doubt Barack will own up to it.