HOME    WORLD    U.S.    POLITICS    CRIME    ENTERTAINMENT    HEALTH    TECH    TRAVEL    LIVING
February 20, 2008
Backstory on Sen. McCain and The New York Times
Posted: 11:02 PM ET

I’ve talked to several of Senator McCain’s senior advisors on his campaign tonight and they’re angrily denying that the senator had any inappropriate relationship with the lobbyist in that story and they are really criticizing The New York Times for suggesting that somehow senator McCain compromised his integrity in his dealings with the Washington lobbyist described in the story.
The following is a statement his campaign put out:

ALT TEXT

“It is a shame that the New York Times has lowered its standards to engage in a hit and run smear campaign. John McCain has a 24-year record of serving our country with honor and integrity. He has never violated the public trust, never done favors for special interests or lobbyists, and he will not allow a smear campaign to distract from the issues at stake in this election.

“Americans are sick and tired of this kind of gutter politics, and there is nothing in this story to suggest that John McCain has ever violated the principles that have guided his career.”

McCain’s advisers say tonight, that The New York Times started working on this story several months ago, back in the fall. According to Charlie Black, one of the advisers that I spoke to tonight, they say they spent countless hours meeting with The New York Times, giving the paper documentation and statements that they insist disputes a good part of what’s in this story. We’re told that the McCain campaign plans to release some of that documentation tonight, including, for example, a letter that the Times say McCain wrote to the FCC urging them to make rulings to help this lobbyist in question. The McCain campaign insists that the full letter will show that they did no such thing.

As for that suggestion back 2000, when McCain first ran for president, that advisors had been worried about this relationship and confronted both McCain and this female lobbyist, we’re still doing our own reporting on that including trying to find one of the aides quoted on the record there. Senator McCain himself was asked about this, leaving a fundraiser here in Ohio, and he simply said, “I haven’t seen it yet, so I can’t comment.”

McCain’s advisers tell me is they got a call from a reporter who works for the New Republic Magazine doing a story last week about internal turmoil inside The New York Times newsroom. According to the McCain campaign, they were told by this New Republic reporter that there was squabbling inside The New York Times about whether or not to go with this story. In fact Black even said he was told that The New York Times made an editorial decision twice not to run the story and that they “choked” and decided not to run the story.

A CNN producer spoke with the editor of the New Republic article in question and the editor did say they were working on the story that they were working on it for the past week and a half or so. According to the editor The New York Times was extremely nervous about their story.

Why they decided to run it and put it up at 7:00 eastern tonight is definitely curious.

That’s a big part of the puzzle of all this that we’re definitely going to keep working on here.

-Dana Bash, 360° Correspondent

16 Comments
Filed under: John McCain •  Raw Politics
16 Comments
Sharon from Indy   February 21st, 2008 3:45 pm ET

Dana:
This is the part of elections that I dislike. The part that gets ugly.

I understand why the New York Times released the story, but one has to admit it does seem like the story was maneuvered rather than released. Because the Times is considered a “liberal” newspaper, the story would have had more teeth if it would have been released by the Weekly Standard.

Voters are suspicious at anonymous sources during this critical time in the primaries. Or is the other side of the Republican Party behind all this? It is quite a soap opera. But Americans are not actors playing parts in the human condition. We are living it.

I hope the New York Times IS nervous about this story. Their reputation as a professional newspaper is at stake. Tabloid journalism doesn’t belong in politics. Voters need the facts about how a candidate is going to lead America the next four years.

Cindy   February 21st, 2008 3:55 pm ET

This story by the New York Times about John just wreaks of a smear campaign to me! If they had this info in December why hold off on telling it? I think they wanted to release it when it could hurt him the most. Actually I think they wanted to wait longer but others caught on to the story and they had to go to press with it or risk losing it. Besides it is 8 years old and both camps have said nothing happened. I am sure this will be scrutinized by every one now.

Cynthia, Covington, Ga.

Twilight Sky   February 21st, 2008 4:08 pm ET

At least he was having a relationship with a woman. The worst part is that his “advisors” felt the need to interfere. Why didn’t they just let to 2 of them work it out themselves? It’s not like they knew 8 years ago he’d be running and leading in the race to be one of the 2 possible candidates for President. The whole think just stinks.

Besides Guliani was running and everyone knows he wasn’t faithful. Thompson was on his second wife. And don’t even get me started on Bill and Hillary.

David, CA.   February 21st, 2008 4:20 pm ET

Why would the New York Times risk loosing their creditability?

Isabella, California   February 21st, 2008 4:38 pm ET

I understand why this is being reported on but I hope it doesn’t become a media obsession. I really don’t care if McCain or any other politician has an affair. I’m sick of the political debate getting bogged down by scandal about the personal life of a politician. If there is good evidence he did favors for this lobbyist that would matter, although all of these politicians are not innocent about these kinds of things. I say move on and keep the important issues that face this country front and center.

Tammy   February 21st, 2008 5:38 pm ET

I read the NYT online every morning, and they have lost what little credibility they still have with me on this one. The article, the timing, the lack of truth all reek of dirty politics. And what gets me is that they endorsed McCain. I have to wonder who got into their back pockets (was it a desperate move by Hukabee or either of the Dem candidates?). All I hope is that Americans are too smart for this juvenile tactic.

BJ, Bangor, ME   February 21st, 2008 5:40 pm ET

The timing of this is all very suspicious. Is it any wonder people are disillusioned about the whole political process? Is anyone even discussing the issues anymore? Instead, it’s all about who did or said what ,and when. Hopefully once the primaries are over and we move toward the general election, we can get some indepth discussion of what really matters. But I won’t hold my breath.

Justin W.J. in Phoenix   February 21st, 2008 5:48 pm ET

I don’t believe this will hurt McCain in the short run. What this will do will make it harder for McCain to swiftboat his opponent in the future, after complaining that it had been done to him.

Marilee   February 21st, 2008 5:55 pm ET

Did anyone notice an article a month or so ago that Mitt Romney was the only person running for president that had been married just once?

I don’t pay a lot of attention to mud-slinging in political races, but since Romney is a MORAL family man already known for his integrity, proven talent for leadership, spiritual lifestyle AND was willing to spend $40million of his own fortune for the opportunity to serve and preside in our country, WHY did America neglect to support these virtues?

A sad waste, America!

DH   February 21st, 2008 5:58 pm ET

John McCain is a fine politician. I might even vote for him. That said, he is a hypocrite. His puritan stance on ethics is baloney. His facade of being above special interest has NEVER been credible - all the way back to the Keating 5. He can’t be believed when it comes to ethics. But, few politicians can. This story and the Keating story will not die until after the November election - nor should it as long as HE is one the playing the holier than thou role.

Diane N.   February 21st, 2008 6:12 pm ET

I share the same sentiment as most everyone else here. I’m really shocked and surprised by this. From the NYTimes endorseing a candidate, to their retorting to this nonsense. What could they possibly be thinking. Are they changing management or being sold or somethingt?? Disgruntled editors and or reporters??? What?

E. Davis, Fort Myers, FL   February 21st, 2008 6:19 pm ET

I am more concerned with his history with lobbyists. The straight talker himshelf jet setting like he’s J.R. Ewing. The Keating 5 scandel idn’t cast enough of a shadow to him ro restrain from over indulging in the high living offered by lobbyists.

Sabrina in Los Angeles   February 21st, 2008 7:23 pm ET

I think that it is sad if it was knocked down before as not true, yet it is returning to haunt him.

It is “gutter politics” as he said.

America is tired of the mud-slinging politics.

This race should be based on the facts and issues.

If he did it, then it should be called into question for his character but if it is false….it is bad to smear someone this late in the nomination process.

Stephen   February 21st, 2008 7:35 pm ET

We have really become one sad country. Full of hate and gossip and lust of power and money. I not a McCain supporter but this article just sums up what we have become in America. SAD !!!!

Bess   February 22nd, 2008 7:57 am ET

I watched McCain deny the story. I could see he was struggling with it. I’ve seen him blow of false accusations before. He generally laughs. He is not laughing at this one.

What scares me is his temper. He couldn’t look more rigid and inflexible a man if he tried. Even the accusation that he could have an affair or flirtation with a female lobbyist makes one stop and pause and consider his personality. He would look more comfortable in a uniform, I think.

robin rose   February 22nd, 2008 1:03 pm ET

This notion that McCain had an affair is so stupid I find it hard anyone would print it or even suggest it has merit. After all, Bill Clinton had sex IN the White House and his wife is now running for President. Monica had her life destroyed and Bill now collects millions upon millions from rich high rollers. Why doesn’t the NY Times go after the companies that have destroyed our retirements via the subprime mortgage debacle?

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About this blog

A behind the scenes look at “Anderson Cooper 360°” and the stories it covers, written by Anderson Cooper and the show’s correspondents and producers. Insight you can’t find anywhere else.

For more details, read our tips on how to win 360° approval for comments.

Send your instant feedback to Anderson Cooper 360°.

Featured Contributors
Candy Crowley
Candy Crowley is CNN's senior political correspondent and an AC360° contributor
David Gergen
David Gergen is CNN's senior political analyst and former presidential advisor
Roland S. Martin
Roland S. Martin is a nationally award-winning journalist and AC360° contributor
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNN makes reasonable efforts to review all comments prior to posting and CNN may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Crime  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences  |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2008 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com