One of these two things are true:
- The control room really is a nightly exercise in crisis management but I never realized it until I started putting it into words by blogging.
- The control room has only been a nightly exercise in crisis management since we began doing debate coverage.
I suppose there may be a third combination but it’s late and I’m too tired to come up with what that may be.
Tonight’s issue … AC360 was originally supposed to be on the air from the end of the Democratic debate at 9:32p until 11:00p. Then we got word they were extending the debate (Great call in my opinion. It was really interesting to see Hillary and Barack go one-on-one.) so we’d get it at 9:40p. Then 9:50p. We finally took over at 9:52p. But even though we had lost twenty minutes of air time, we still had the same number of really smart, really interesting guests and how do you just randomly pick one or more of them to cancel at the last minute? We didn’t cancel anyone but it was a mad scramble to figure out how to make it all work timewise.
The good news tonight was that with Anderson back in New York we had no trouble with the prompter!
To answer someone’s question from one of the blogs … yes, on nights like tonight there is some yelling in the control room. But no one takes it personally and we also still made time for a few laughs.
See you tomorrow.
| Linda |
January 31st, 2008 11:42 pm ET I was pleased with both Hillary and Barack this evening. However, I was a little turned off at times with Wolfe’s questioning, especially when he would repeat the same taunting question a number of times. I like some tough grilling when appropriate in a debate, but this seemed needless and perhaps a bit trivial. Sometimes I think the media enjoys a good fight among the candidates more than anyone else. I enjoy CNN very much, but lets not go trying to stir up something that’s not there for the sake of a story. Let’s leave any poor judgement calls up to the candidates. Their mistakes will help the rest of us make a better choice for president. |
|
| Barbara in Culver City, CA |
January 31st, 2008 11:43 pm ET Thanks again for the report, Back Row Blogger. And thanks for answering my question about the yelling that goes on. I’m glad it’s all done in good humor. Laughter is the best way in the world to relieve stress! It’s either that or go get trained in CPR. I have some suggestions for which of your “guests” to cut from the program, not that anyone at 360 cares what I think. I vote first for Carl Bernstein who is far too partisan and second for Bill Bennett who is far too pompous. I’m glad you had no problems with the prompter tonight. Y’all handled the change in air time like the professionals that you are. Good job! |
|
| Cindy |
February 1st, 2008 12:11 am ET Well you all did a great job with the amount of guests that you had and what you put on the air. It was great to me!! Thanks for putting it into words…even though it is hard for ya! LOL I really love hearing what goes on behind the scenes! Hopefully soon you can add a camera and we can see it for ourselves!! Cynthia, Covington, Ga. |
|
| Annie Kate |
February 1st, 2008 12:15 am ET Great show as usual thanks to you all. The show flowed smoothly like it usually does. Glad you didn’t’ have to cut any guests. I kind of agree with Barbara’s description of Bill Bennet but I enjoy him and his pompous air. And I think most of the panelists are partisan in one way or the other. On the Democratic side especially it seems sometimes like a pep rally for Obama. I’d like to see a few people on there for Clinton. I know having James Carville on gave you all some problems with disclosure the last time he was on but he’s still a good analyst and with adequate disclosure he would be a great addition. (For those who don’t like clinton - look at it in a know thy enemy sort of mode). Paul Begala would also make a nice addition. There needs to be better balance on the panels and a lot more objectivity. You all will be pros at crisis management by the time this election series is over. Not a bad thing for the old resume. Just be glad you aren’t having to do it with an auditor looking over your shoulder. Last few I did we had auditors coming out our ears!! Annie Kate |
|
| Lorie Ann |
February 1st, 2008 12:29 am ET One thing is becoming crystal clear about the control room…It’s never in complete control, and that makes an interesting job to go to everyday. Flying by the seat of your pants, might be a good name for your hard working group. Lorie Ann, Buellton, Calif. |
|
| Jolene |
February 1st, 2008 1:55 am ET Well, it’s been a wonderful week for those of us who love politics. Thanks for sharing with us the “control room” perspective. Better be careful though, all that crisis management could give you enough experience to run for the presidency! Jolene, St. Joseph, MI |
|
| Lilibeth |
February 1st, 2008 2:05 am ET A great show again tonight. I’m glad you didn’t have to cancel any guests with the unexpectedly shorter show. I guess you can also tell the guests to be more brief in their commentaries (if that’s possible) so no one has to be cut? I’m glad you all have a sense of humor in your job…sounds like you all get along. I know in my job, if I don’t laugh once in a while, I’d go crazy. Thanks, |
|
| Marjorie |
February 1st, 2008 2:50 am ET I know and believe that Sen. Obama is the best candidate for the democradic party. He is the most eloquent, trust worthy and best qualify to lead America. However, i felt in last night’s debate, Sen. Obama didn’t push enough to make me feel the same passion he felt about these issues as he did in the begining. In my opinion Sen. Obama’s not pushing enough and hoping the American people would feel that he is trust-worthy is not helping him in winning as the democratic candidate. John Kerry was very trust-worthy, however people could not feel it enough and made the wrong decision. John Edwards is also trust-worthy, people don’t make the right decision a lot of the time. With Sen Obama as the democratic candidate, i know the democratic party will succeed in this election. The results are shaky without him as the democratic candidate, |
|
| Lisa |
February 1st, 2008 6:56 am ET The main word that describes last nights democratic presidential debate is civility! Everyone is please that the debate was about issues and not about personal attacks. I would like to thank Obama for making the Clinton’s get out of the dirt with their nasty aggressive campagin attacks and comming back to the issues. What a great leader he was for the Clinton’s. He lead them back to civility and that is exactly why he should be president. |
|
| Jess, Paris, KY |
February 1st, 2008 8:03 am ET I thought the show was great. I don’t do well without a plan, so I can only imagine what you go through every night. I always find David Gergen’s comments really interesting. John King’s as well. One more comment, when will Anderson get a night off? He deserves one after all of this debate/primary work he’s been doing. |
|
| Renee |
February 1st, 2008 9:52 am ET Barbara, I read your comments with much chagrin. It is funny how you may not like someone that I care for and vice versa. It makes us all special. When I hear someone that I particularly do not like on 360 or any other station I listen and then I google them. Sometimes I mute them. When I google them, I look to find their websites. Most of these pundits have their own promotional websites for books etc. There is a website http://www.newsmeat.com where you can track these folks and see what political campaigns they are supporting. When you read their websites you can figure out who their spouses are usually. Then key their spouse’s name in http://www.newsmeat.com. Some of these news commentators are just channeling political donations through their spouses. When you have the facts, everything makes a whole lot of sense. The only pundits that really kill me are the folks that are offering their opinions that are not Americans. Here me out on this. A person decides to come to America from abroad and then takes up a profession as a political commentator bashing our government and our system. And yes, they in the past they have been guests on 360. I guess my never ending about of e-mails have caused these nice folks at 360 to review and discuss these folks. They folks haven’t been back. There are two in particular that just kill me with their own agenda. And, yes, they are on other network and cable television shows doing their Bush bashing for ratings. Do you Barbara have the power to change the media? You bet you do! It is our job as good Americans to hold the media accountable to the jobs they do which is to provide us with full and fair disclosure. We expect it, we deserve it so we in fact can make up our own minds at home based on the facts and not the fiction. |
|
| Maggie C |
February 1st, 2008 8:45 pm ET Last nights debate with Obama and Hillary? Surreal!!! |
|
| Peter Ferguson |
February 2nd, 2008 3:44 am ET I have had it! CNN along with most of the American media, and even my favorite Anderson Cooper are once again crucifying the Clintons and ignoring important observations. Everyone keeps saying that it is beneath a former President to campaign for his wife, meaning Bill Clinton. It baffles me why the media has not asked the simple question of what other former President had a wife running for President. The American media is so caught up in the Obama hype that it has also bought, hook line and sinker, the Republican’s ploy to use Ronald Regan’s name as much as possible to deflect attention away from the mess that Bush has created. Ronald Regan isn’t even alive anymore, yet his name is used more and more in every debate right under our so observant media’s watchful eye. As an African American male, I feel that Barrack is a wonderful candidate and will be a great President but I would personally prefer to have someone not only with experience but with a proven track record of bringing stability and surpluses to the American economy, which is why Hilary will have my vote. I remember the Clinton years very well while living in South Beach and it was a prosperous time had by all. While she wasn’t in office during those years, she was a part of the White House married to the person responsible for bringing together one of the most successful administrations our country has ever seen. And during these debates she has proven to me that her administration would be a continuation of those successful times and better times to come. Peter Ferguson |
|
| chinnu sree |
February 2nd, 2008 12:10 pm ET The debate was good and instructive made me understand difference in their position.and policy. I heard yesterday in CNN that Oprah is coming to address in Ca on behalf of Obama.The people in CA is going to be hearing from Billianair OPRAH and Caroline Kennedy who inherited a lot of money from her mother father and brother,about what Obamh is going to do for poor and middle class people. I think Oprah wants to be the ( black) king maker and want to be in the history book |
|
|
Comments have been closed for this article |
||
A behind the scenes look at “Anderson Cooper 360°” and the stories it covers, written by Anderson Cooper and the show’s correspondents and producers. Insight you can’t find anywhere else.
For more details, read our tips on how to win 360° approval for comments.
Send your instant feedback to Anderson Cooper 360°.
- Thorny thicket of Bill and Hillary Clinton conflicts?
- Genetic testing
- The Shot: What is it?
- Knut feeling the credit crunch
- Voices of hope in the face of evil
- The straight scoop
- Just in time for the holidays…
- Extreme Challenges: The health of the economy, the health of all Americans
- Extreme Challenges: How Obama should fight al Qaeda and its allies
- Where the rubber meets the road - Automakers, welcome back to Congress

