HOME    WORLD    U.S.    POLITICS    CRIME    ENTERTAINMENT    HEALTH    TECH    TRAVEL    LIVING
January 28, 2008
Earmarks: Pulling pork can be unappetizing
Posted: 06:25 PM ET

(CNN) — Most members of Congress call them earmarks. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi tried to get them called “legislatively directed spending.” But for almost every American taxpayer I’ve run into over the last year, it’s called “pork” and it’s not very tasty.

Drew Griffin

CNN’s Drew Griffin investigates congressional spending for Anderson Cooper 360°.

Earmarks are those nearly secret pet projects that are added onto the government’s spending bills year after year. On Monday night, President Bush will announce what are being called “unprecedented changes” in the way lawmakers earmark money for special projects that benefit their districts or campaign contributors.

White House spokesman Tony Fratto said, “The president will say that if these spending items are worthy, Congress should debate them in the open and hold a public vote.”

Over the last year, I have traveled from Cape Cod, Massachusetts, to San Francisco, California, to Alaska uncovering the secret pet projects of Congress.

See some of the projects earmarked for 2008 in this Behind-the-Scenes report.

- Drew Griffin, 360° Correspondent

7 Comments
Filed under: Drew Griffin •  Earmarks
7 Comments
Cindy   January 28th, 2008 6:35 pm ET

Drew,
I really don’t care what congress or anyone else calls the earmarks. I just want them gone and soon! I think we as the voters are going to have to make it clear to the people in congress that either they get rid of the pork or we will get rid of them!! That is what is going to have to be done to get anything changed! Until then they will keep wasting our money on nothing!

Cynthia, Covington, Ga.

xtina chicago IL   January 28th, 2008 6:43 pm ET

I think rather than sneaking in little nickel and dime raises in our taxes, we should do away with federal tax withholding; instead, have Congress send us invoices every month for our share of the various earmark expenditures. How would you like to get a bill every month for “your taxpayer share” of projects such as the Woodstock Museum, the Mule Museum and the “Bridge to Nowhere?” Not only would it wake people up to the high taxes we pay but it would open their eyes to the wasteful spending designed to get people re-elected.

xtina chicago IL   January 28th, 2008 7:06 pm ET

p.s. someone with influence and power has to start an effort to install term limits on Congress people. Senators get elected, then begin to do things for people, then the people are beholden to the Senators. More and more people are added to the Senators’ posse as the years go on, so they’re easily re-elected. It’s like one hand washing the other. Term limits might help shake up this system.

Carol B., Maryland   January 28th, 2008 7:20 pm ET

Hi there. That’s a lot of traveling, gumshoes. No matter how we vote, it’s good to know where our taxes are going. Some projects are worthwhile, while others are not and often favors to major campaign contributors. I guess that’s why there’s a Golden Fleece Award.

Sharon from Indy   January 28th, 2008 7:41 pm ET

Drew:
I get confused about what is the difference between statutory earmarks and non-statutory earmarks?

Thank you for all the coverage on Congressional pork and earmarks. It has kept your viewers on track about the obvious inflated Congressional spending.

john n.   January 28th, 2008 7:56 pm ET

everyone complains but nothing is done— its still going on

Annie Kate   January 29th, 2008 1:14 am ET

Drew

The most outrageous earmark you covered was that airstrip out in the middle of no where. I remember they said something if they had known you were coming there would have been more traffic! What a telling statement. I hope you will continue to point out these pork barrel projects; maybe the ludicrous nature of most of these projects will finally get them killed.

If you have a good project to fund one shouldn’t be afraid of it getting debated before funding; if they are reluctant to have it debated then perhaps that in and of itself says its not anything but pork.

AnnieKate
Birmingham, AAL

Comments have been closed for this article

subscribe RSS Icon
About this blog

A behind the scenes look at “Anderson Cooper 360°” and the stories it covers, written by Anderson Cooper and the show’s correspondents and producers. Insight you can’t find anywhere else.

For more details, read our tips on how to win 360° approval for comments.

Send your instant feedback to Anderson Cooper 360°.

Featured Contributors
Candy Crowley
Candy Crowley is CNN's senior political correspondent and an AC360° contributor
David Gergen
David Gergen is CNN's senior political analyst and former presidential advisor
Roland S. Martin
Roland S. Martin is a nationally award-winning journalist and AC360° contributor
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNN makes reasonable efforts to review all comments prior to posting and CNN may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Crime  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences  |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2008 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com